Skip to main content
Log in

How did intraoperative neuromonitorization prevent tetraplegia?

  • Case Report
  • Published:
Child's Nervous System Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Patients with mucopolysaccharidosis type IVA (MPS IVA) have many risk factors for myelopathy and paresis. These are spinal cord compression, bone stenosis, and soft tissue thickening with ligament laxity, deformity, odontoid hypoplasia, and atlantoaxial instability. Although most patients with MPS IVA appear generally healthy at birth, patients often show skeletal deformities within a few years. Surgical indications are difficult to determine. Historically, many physicians have used prophylactic decompression and fusion in young, asymptomatic MPS IVA patients to prevent cord compression. Although spinal cord decompression is usually required at the craniocervical junction in patients with MPS IVA, decompression may be required at other spinal cord levels as well. There is a risk of developing neurological damage during surgery. The most common causes are ischemia secondary to cardiac output deteriorated in the prone position or due to artery damage, and local trauma due to neck movements or traction while bringing the patient to the prone position. Neurophysiological monitoring is very important during surgery to reduce the risk of neurological damage in spinal cord surgery. In this case report, a case with loss of lower extremity neuromonitorization motor evoked potential (MEP) responses in the early period of surgery without any intervention to the craniocervical junction after prone positioning will be presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ransford AO, Crockard HA, Stevens JM, Modaghegh S (1996) Occipito-atlanto-axial fusion in Morquio-Brailsford syndrome. A ten-year experience. J Bone Joint Surg Br 78:307–313

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Stevens JM, Kendall BE, Crockard HA, Ransford A (1991) The odontoid process in Morquio-Brailsford’s disease. The effects of occipitocervical fusion. J Bone Joint Surg Br 73:851–858. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.73B5.1910048

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Charrow J, Alden TD, Breathnach CAR et al (2015) Diagnostic evaluation, monitoring, and perioperative management of spinal cord compression in patients with Morquio syndrome. Mol Genet Metab 114:11–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymgme.2014.10.010

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ofiram E, Lonstein JE, Skinner S, Perra JH (2006) The disappearing evoked potentials: a special problem of positioning patients with skeletal dysplasia: case report. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31:E464–470. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000222122.37415.4d

  5. Tong CKW, Chen JCH, Cochrane DD (2012) Spinal cord infarction remote from maximal compression in a patient with Morquio syndrome. J Neurosurg Pediatr 9:608–612. https://doi.org/10.3171/2012.2.PEDS11522

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Borlot F, Arantes PR, Capel Cardoso AC, Kim CA (2014) Remote spinal cord injury in mucopolysaccharidosis type IVA after cervical decompression. Neurology 82:1382–1383. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000000341

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mustafa Caglar Sahin.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Additional informed consent was obtained from all individual participants for whom identifying information is included in this article.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sahin, M.C., Ipek, E.M., Zinnuroglu, M. et al. How did intraoperative neuromonitorization prevent tetraplegia?. Childs Nerv Syst 39, 1323–1328 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-022-05748-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-022-05748-5

Keywords

Navigation