Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Prenatal diagnosis of diastematomyelia

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Child's Nervous System Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Diastematomyelia, also termed split cord malformation, is a form of occult spinal dysraphism characterized by a cleft in the spinal cord. Prenatal diagnosis of this anomaly is possible by ultrasonography (US), and fetal MRI can be used to diagnose the type of diastematomyelia precisely. Diastematomyelia can be isolated or associated with other dysraphisms, segmental anomalies of the vertebral bodies, or visceral malformations (horseshoe or ectopic kidney, utero-ovarian malformation, and anorectal malformation). We present three cases of fetal diastematomyelia investigated using a multimodal prenatal work-up (US, MRI, 3D-CT).

Cases

The first case, detected at 20 weeks' gestation, had a lumbar meningocele. At 30 weeks' gestation, direct US visualization revealed the division of the spinal cord into two hemicords. This patient illustrates an isolated type II diastematomyelia with a favorable prognosis. The second case, detected at 22 weeks' gestation, presented with disorganization of bony process of the vertebral column with a midline echogenic bony spur, asymmetrical hemicords, and a foot malposition. Fetal MRI at 26 weeks' gestation and CT/3D reconstructed at 32 weeks' gestation confirmed a type I diastematomyelia with orthopedic malposition. The third case, detected at 22 weeks' gestation, presented with widening of the lumbar canal and scoliosis. Prenatal work-up (US, MRI) disclosed other visceral malformations (pelvic kidney), which led to the assumption of a complex polymalformative syndrome. The pregnancy was terminated. Fetopathologic examination disclosed even more visceral malformations (anal atresia and unicorn uterus).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2a, b.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 7a, b.
Figs. 8a–c.
Fig. 9.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Allen LM, Silverman RK (2000) Prenatal ultrasound evaluation of fetal diastematomyelia: two cases of type I split cord malformation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 15:78–82

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Anderson NG, Jordan S, MacFarlane MR, Lovell-Smith M (1994) Diastematomyelia: diagnosis by prenatal sonography. Am J Roentgenol 163:911–914

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Barkovich AJ (1997) Congenital anomalies of the spine. In: Barkovich AJ (ed) Pediatric neuroimaging. Raven Press, New York, pp 621–683

  4. Boulot P, Ferran JL, Charlier C, Pages A, Bachelard B, Hedon B, Viala JL (1993) Prenatal diagnosis of diastematomyelia. Pediatr Radiol 23:67–68

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Caspi B, Gorbacz S, Appelman Z, Elchalal U (1990) Antenatal diagnosis of diastematomyelia. J Clin Ultrasound 18:721–725

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gubbels JL, Gold WR, Bauserman S (1991) Prenatal diagnosis of fetal diastematomyelia in a pregnancy exposed to acyclovir. Reprod Toxicol 5:517–520

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Pachi A, Maggi E, Giancotti A, Forleo S, Torregrossa G, Roggini M, Bosman C (1992) Prenatal sonographic diagnosis of diastematomyelia in a diabetic woman. Prenat Diagn 12:535–539

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Pang D (1992) Split cord malformation. II. Clinical syndrome. Neurosurgery 31:481–500

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Pang D (1995) Disorders of the pediatric spine. Raven Press, New York

  10. Pang D, Dias MS, Ahab-Barmada M (1992) Split cord malformation. I. A unified theory of embryogenesis for double spinal cord malformations. Neurosurgery 31:451–80

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Santiago Medina L, al-Orfali M, Zurakowski D, Poussaint TY, DiCanzio J, Barnes PD (1999) Occult lumbosacral dysraphism in children and young adults: diagnostic performance of fast screening and conventional MR imaging. Radiology 211:767–771

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sepulveda W, Kyle PM, Hassan J, Weiner E (1997) Prenatal diagnosis of diastematomyelia: case reports and review of the literature. Prenat Diagn 17:161–165

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Skalej M, Duffner F, Stefanou A, Petersen D (1999) 3D spiral CT imaging of bone anomalies in a case of diastematomyelia. Eur J Radiol 29:262–265

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Soonawala N, Overweg-Plandsoen WC, Brouwer OF (1999) Early clinical signs and symptoms in occult spinal dysraphism: a retrospective case study of 47 patients. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 101:11–14

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Williams RA, Barth RA (1985) In utero sonographic recognition of diastematomyelia. Am J Roentgenol 144:87–88

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Winter RK, McKnight L, Byrne RA, Wright CH (1989) Diastematomyelia: prenatal ultrasonic appearances. Clin Radiol 40:291–294

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pascale Sonigo-Cohen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sonigo-Cohen, P., Schmit, P., Zerah, M. et al. Prenatal diagnosis of diastematomyelia. Childs Nerv Syst 19, 555–560 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-003-0771-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-003-0771-8

Keywords

Navigation