Abstract
The variable anatomy of Ebstein’s anomaly leads to its various surgical procedures. The long-term outcomes of different operations were not well established. Thirty-five patients with Ebstein’s anomaly who underwent operations from 2006 to 2018 in our department were retrospectively reviewed. Individualized surgical plans were performed according to the preoperative echocardiography and surgeons’ preference. Tricuspid repair, either Danielson’s or Carpentier’s technique, was the primary choice in patients who had sufficient tricuspid leaflets and adequate right ventricle, while tricuspid replacement was used when a reliable repair is not achievable. Additional bidirectional cavopulmonary shunt was performed in those who had unstable hemodynamics despite of high central venous pressure after separation from cardiopulmonary bypass. The perioperative and follow-up data were collected. The age was 26.9 (0.6–54) years [16 children (age < 14, and 19 adults (age ≥ 14)]. Preoperative tricuspid regurgitation was severe in 30, moderate in 4, and mild in the remaining 1 patient. Preoperative cardiac-associated malformations include 20 atrial septal defects, 2 ventricular septal defects, 2 pulmonary stenosis, and 1 sub aortic ridge, and these were operated simultaneously. Among all the surgical patients, 2 needed additional reoperation during the same admission, and ultimately, 29 patients had biventricular repair, including 21 tricuspid repair and 8 replacements. The other 6 patients had cavopulmonary connection and achieved 1.5 ventricular repair (3 tricuspid repair and 3 replacements). In all the 24 tricuspid repair patients, Danielson’s procedure was used in 17, while Carpentier’s technique was used in the other 7 patients. The average cardiopulmonary bypass time was 90 ± 28 min and cross-clamp time was 48 ± 24min. There were 2 perioperative deaths (5.7%) and no third-degree atrioventricular block. The postoperative in hospital stay was 13.7 ± 9.6 days. In the 33 survivors who were followed up at a median of 29.2 months, 6 patients had severe tricuspid regurgitation, and 2 of them underwent tricuspid replacement. The 5-year freedom from severe tricuspid dysfunction or reoperation was 78.5%, and no difference was found between children and adults, neither between different surgical choices. The surgeries of Ebstein’s anomaly were variable, and individualized operation achieved reasonable short- and mid-term results. However, severe tricuspid regurgitation during the follow-up was not neglectable, and reoperation in such cases also achieved good outcomes. New repair strategy such as cone repair may be considered.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Danielson GK, Maloney JD, Devloo RA (1979) Surgical repair of Ebstein's anomaly. Mayo Clin Proc 54:185–192
Danielson GK, Driscoll DJ, Mair DD, Warnes CA, Oliver WC Jr (1992) Operative treatment of Ebstein's anomaly. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 104:1195–1202
Dearani JA, Danielson GK (2005) Surgical management of Ebstein's anomaly in the adult. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 17:148–154
Carpentier A, Chauvaud S, Mace L, Relland J, Mihaileanu S, Marino JP, Abry B, Guibourt P (1988) A new reconstructive operation for Ebstein's anomaly of the tricuspid valve. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 96:92–101
Chauvaud S, Berrebi A, d'Attellis N, Mousseaux E, Hernigou A, Carpentier A (2003) Ebstein's anomaly: repair based on functional analysis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 23:525–531
Silva JP, Baumgratz JF, Fonseca L, Afiune JY, Franchi SM, Lopes LM, Magalhaes DM, Vila JH (2004) Ebstein's anomaly: results of the conic reconstruction of the tricuspid valve. Arq Bras Cardiol 82:212–216
da Silva JP, Baumgratz JF, da Fonseca L, Franchi SM, Lopes LM, Tavares GM, Soares AM, Moreira LF, Barbero-Marcial M (2007) The cone reconstruction of the tricuspid valve in Ebstein's anomaly. The operation: early and midterm results. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 133:215–223
da Silva JP, da Silva Lda F (2012) Ebstein's anomaly of the tricuspid valve: the cone repair. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Pediatr Card Surg Annu 15:38–45
Celermajer DS, Cullen S, Sullivan ID, Spiegelhalter DJ, Wyse RK, Deanfield JE (1992) Outcome in neonates with Ebstein's anomaly. J Am Coll Cardiol 19:1041–1046
Watson H (1974) Natural history of Ebstein's anomaly of tricuspid valve in childhood and adolescence. An international co-operative study of 505 cases. Br Heart J 36:417–427
Kim HY, Jang SY, Moon JR, Kim EK, Chang SA, Song J, Huh J, Kang IS, Yang JH, Jun TG, Park SW (2016) Natural Course of Adult Ebstein Anomaly When Treated according to Current Recommendation. J Korean Med Sci 31:1749–1754
Sarris GE, Giannopoulos NM, Tsoutsinos AJ, Chatzis AK, Kirvassilis G, Brawn WJ, Comas JV, Corno AF, Di Carlo D, Fragata J, Hraska V, Jacobs JP, Krupianko S, Sairanen H, Stellin G, Urban A, Ziemer G (2006) Results of surgery for Ebstein anomaly: a multicenter study from the European Congenital Heart Surgeons Association. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 132:50–57
Davies RR, Pasquali SK, Jacobs ML, Jacobs JJ, Wallace AS, Pizarro C (2013) Current spectrum of surgical procedures performed for Ebstein's malformation: an analysis of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Congenital Heart Surgery Database. Ann Thorac Surg 96:1703–1709. (discussion 1709–1710)
Quaegebeur JM, Sreeram N, Fraser AG, Bogers AJ, Stumper OF, Hess J, Bos E, Sutherland GR (1991) Surgery for Ebstein's anomaly: the clinical and echocardiographic evaluation of a new technique. J Am Coll Cardiol 17:722–728
Chen JM, Mosca RS, Altmann K, Printz BF, Targoff K, Mazzeo PA, Quaegebeur JM (2004) Early and medium-term results for repair of Ebstein anomaly. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 127:990–998. (discussion 998–999)
Brown ML, Dearani JA, Danielson GK, Cetta F, Connolly HM, Warnes CA, Li Z, Hodge DO, Driscoll DJ, Center Mayo Clinic Congenital Heart (2008) The outcomes of operations for 539 patients with Ebstein anomaly. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 135:1120–1136. (1136 e1-e7)
Wu Q, Huang Z (2001) Anatomic correction of Ebstein anomaly. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 122:1237–1238
Wu Q, Huang Z (2004) A new procedure for Ebstein's anomaly. Ann Thorac Surg 77:470–476. (discussion 476)
Wu Q, Huang Z, Pan G, Wang L, Li L, Xue H (2007) Early and midterm results in anatomic repair of Ebstein anomaly. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 134:1438–1440. (discussion 1440–1432)
Liu J, Qiu L, Zhu Z, Chen H, Hong H (2011) Cone reconstruction of the tricuspid valve in Ebstein anomaly with or without one and a half ventricle repair. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 141:1178–1183
Pizarro C, Bhat MA, Temple J (2012) Cone reconstruction and ventricular septal defect closure for neonatal Ebstein's anomaly. Multimed Man Cardiothorac Surg 2012:mms014
Vogel M, Marx GR, Tworetzky W, Cecchin F, Graham D, Mayer JE, Pigula FA, Bacha EA, Del Nido PJ (2012) Ebstein's malformation of the tricuspid valve: short-term outcomes of the "cone procedure" versus conventional surgery. Congenit Heart Dis 7:50–58
Dearani JA, Said SM, Burkhart HM, Pike RB, O'Leary PW, Cetta F (2013) Strategies for tricuspid re-repair in Ebstein malformation using the cone technique. Ann Thorac Surg 96:202–208. (discussion 208–210)
Ibrahim M, Tsang VT, Caruana M, Hughes ML, Jenkyns S, Perdreau E, Giardini A, Marek J (2015) Cone reconstruction for Ebstein's anomaly: Patient outcomes, biventricular function, and cardiopulmonary exercise capacity. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 149:1144–1150
Holst KA, Dearani JA, Said S, Pike RB, Connolly HM, Cannon BC, Sessions KL, O'Byrne MM, O'Leary PW (2018) Improving Results of Surgery for Ebstein Anomaly: Where Are We After 235 Cone Repairs? Ann Thorac Surg 105:160–168
Hetzer R, Hacke P, Javier M, Miera O, Schmitt K, Weng Y, Delmo Walter EM (2015) The long-term impact of various techniques for tricuspid repair in Ebstein's anomaly. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 150:1212–1219
Jinghao Z, Kai L, Yanhui H, Zhongqun Z, Botao G, Xinwei D, Zhiwei X, Jinfen L (2017) Individualized Surgical Treatments for Children with Ebstein Anomaly. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 65:649–655
Anderson HN, Dearani JA, Said SM, Norris MD, Pundi KN, Miller AR, Cetta ML, Eidem BW, O'Leary PW, Cetta F (2014) Cone reconstruction in children with Ebstein anomaly: the Mayo Clinic experience. Congenit Heart Dis 9:266–271
Dearani JA, Said SM, O'Leary PW, Burkhart HM, Barnes RD, Cetta F (2013) Anatomic repair of Ebstein's malformation: lessons learned with cone reconstruction. Ann Thorac Surg 95:220–226. (discussion 226–228)
Silva JP, Silva Lda F, Moreira LF, Lopez LM, Franchi SM, Lianza AC, Baumgratz JF, Tavares GM (2011) Cone reconstruction in Ebstein's anomaly repair: early and long-term results. Arq Bras Cardiol 97:199–208
Brown ML, Dearani JA, Danielson GK, Cetta F, Connolly HM, Warnes CA, Li Z, Hodge DO, Driscoll DJ (2009) Comparison of the outcome of porcine bioprosthetic versus mechanical prosthetic replacement of the tricuspid valve in the Ebstein anomaly. Am J Cardiol 103:555–561
Attenhofer Jost CH, Connolly HM, Scott CG, Burkhart HM, Warnes CA, Dearani JA (2012) Outcome of cardiac surgery in patients 50 years of age or older with Ebstein anomaly: survival and functional improvement. J Am Coll Cardiol 59:2101–2106
Al-Najashi KS, Balint OH, Oechslin E, Williams WG, Silversides CK (2009) Mid-term outcomes in adults with ebstein anomaly and cavopulmonary shunts. Ann Thorac Surg 88:131–136
Brown ML, Dearani JA, Danielson GK, Cetta F, Connolly HM, Warnes CA, Li Z, Hodge DO, Driscoll DJ (2008) Functional status after operation for Ebstein anomaly: the Mayo Clinic experience. J Am Coll Cardiol 52:460–466
Lange R, Burri M, Eschenbach LK, Badiu CC, da Silva JP, Nagdyman N, Fratz S, Horer J, Kuhn A, Schreiber C, Vogt MO (2015) Da Silva's cone repair for Ebstein's anomaly: effect on right ventricular size and function. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 48:316–320. (discussion 320–311)
Beroukhim RS, Jing L, Harrild DM, Fornwalt BK, Mejia-Spiegeler A, Rhodes J, Emani S, Powell AJ (2018) Impact of the cone operation on left ventricular size, function, and dyssynchrony in Ebstein anomaly: a cardiovascular magnetic resonance study. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 20:32
Holst KA, Dearani JA, Said SM, Davies RR, Pizarro C, Knott-Craig C, Kumar TKS, Starnes VA, Kumar SR, Pasquali SK, Thibault DP, Meza JM, Hill KD, Chiswell K, Jacobs JP, Jacobs ML (2018) Surgical Management and Outcomes of Ebstein Anomaly in Neonates and Infants: A Society of Thoracic Surgeons Congenital Heart Surgery Database Analysis. Ann Thorac Surg 106:785–791
Knott-Craig CJ, Overholt ED, Ward KE, Razook JD (2000) Neonatal repair of Ebstein's anomaly: indications, surgical technique, and medium-term follow-up. Ann Thorac Surg 69:1505–1510
Kumar TKS, Boston US, Knott-Craig CJ (2017) Neonatal Ebstein Anomaly. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 29:331–337
Dong L, Shi YK, Xu JP, Zhang EY, Liu JC, Li YX, Ni YM, Yang Q, Han T, Fu B, Chen J, Ren L, Wei SL, Chen H, Liu KX, Yu FX, Liu JS, Xiao MD, Wu SM, Zhang KL, Huang HL, Jiang SL, Qiao CH, Wang CS, Xu ZY, Zhou XM, Wang DJ, Ni LX, Xiao YB, Jiang SL, Zhang GM, Liang GY, Yang SY, Bo P, Zhong QJ, Zhang JB, Zhang X, Zhu YB, Teng X, Zhu P, Huang F, Xiao YM, Cao GQ, Tian H, Xia LM, Lu FL, Liu YQ, Liu DX, Xu H, Yuan Y, Li M, Chang C, Wu XC, Xu Z, Guo P, Bai YJ, Xue WB, Jiang XY, Na ZH, Zeng QY, Cai H, Wang YL, Xiong R, Jin S, Zheng XM, Wu D (2016) The multicenter study on the registration and follow-up of low anticoagulation therapy for the heart valve operation in China. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi 96:1489–1494
Zhu X, Luo Y, Zhang E, An Q, Xiao X, Dong L, Guo Y, Dian K, Wu Z (2018) Ten-year experience of tricuspid valve replacement with the St. Jude medical valve. Sci Rep 8:16654
Acknowledgements
This study is supported by Clinical Research Foundation of Xinhua Hospital (15LC03) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (81600219).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
None for all authors.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhu, J., Zhang, L., Bao, C. et al. Mid-term outcomes of individualized surgeries in patients with Ebstein’s anomaly. Heart Vessels 34, 1332–1339 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00380-019-01358-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00380-019-01358-5