Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effects of the topographical extent of coronary artery ectasia on coronary blood flow in patients with aortic aneurysms

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Heart and Vessels Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aortic aneurysms are associated with coronary artery ectasia (CAE). However, the relation between the extent of CAE and coronary blood flow in patients with aortic aneurysms is not fully understood. This study was undertaken to assess the angiographic characteristics and effects of the topographical extent of CAE on coronary blood flow in patients with aortic aneurysms. This study consisted of 93 consecutive patients with aortic aneurysms (AA group) and 79 patients without aortic aneurysms who had angiographically normal coronary arteries as the control group (Control group). Coronary flow velocity was determined using the thrombolysis in myocardial infarction frame count (TFC) and the topographical extent of CAE was assessed. In the AA group, 43 patients (46.2 %) had significant coronary artery stenosis and 37 patients (40.2 %) had diffuse CAE. TFC was significantly higher in the AA group than in the control group in all 3 coronary arteries. Furthermore, mean corrected TFC (CTFC) was significantly higher in the AA group than in the control group (40.1 ± 10.7 vs. 25.8 ± 6.5, p < 0.001). In the AA group, mean CTFC in patients with diffuse CAE was significantly higher than that in patients with segmental CAE (50.2 ± 8.7 vs. 33.6 ± 5.2, p < 0.001). The mean CTFC correlated positively with the topographical extent of CAE. Many patients with aortic aneurysms were accompanied with angiographic coronary artery stenosis and CAE. Furthermore, patients with aortic aneurysms had higher CTFC than those without aortic aneurysms and it was primarily driven by more frequent prevalence of diffuse CAE.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. United Kingdom Small Aneurysm Trial Participants (2002) Long-term outcomes of immediate repair compared with surveillance of small abdominal aortic aneurysms. N Engl J Med 346:1445–1452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lederle FA, Wilson SE, Johnson GR, Reinke DB, Littooy FN, Acher CW, Ballard DJ, Messina LM, Gordon IL, Chute EP, Krupski WC, Busuttil SJ, Barone GW, Sparks S, Graham LM, Rapp JH, Makaroun MS, Moneta GL, Cambria RA, Makhoul RG, Eton D, Ansel HJ, Freischlag JA, Bandyk D (2002) Immediate repair compared with surveillance of small abdominal aortic aneurysms. N Engl J Med 346:1437–1444

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cao P, De Rango P, Verzini F, Parlani G, Romano L, Cieri E (2011) Comparison of surveillance versus aortic endografting for small aneurysm repair (CAESAR): results from a randomized trial. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 41:13–25

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ouriel K, Clair DG, Kent KC, Zarins CK (2010) Endovascular repair compared with surveillance for patients with small abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg 51:1081–1087

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Nakayama A, Morita H, Miyata T, Hoshina K, Nagayama M, Takanashi S, Sumiyoshi T, Komuro I, Nagai R (2014) Predictors of mortality after emergency or elective repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm in a Japanese population. Heart Vessels 29:65–70

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Scott RA, Wilson NM, Ashton HA, Kay DN (1995) Influence of screening on the incidence of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: 5-year results of a randomized controlled study. Br J Surg 82:1066–1070

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bub GL, Greenberg RK, Mastracci TM, Eagleton MJ, Panuccio G, Hernandez AV, Cerqueira MD (2011) Perioperative cardiac events in endovascular repair of complex aortic aneurysms and association with preoperative studies. J Vasc Surg 53:21–27

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Nakayama A, Morita H, Hamamatsu A, Miyata T, Hoshina K, Nagayama M, Takanashi S, Sumiyoshi T, Komuro I (2014) Coronary atherosclerotic lesions in patients with a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm. Heart Vessels. doi:10.1007/s00380-014-0488-5

    PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Shin S, Kwon TW, Cho YP, Lee JY, Park H, Han Y (2013) Preoperative cardiac evaluation by dipyridamole thallium-201 myocardial perfusion scan provides no benefit in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm. World J Surg 37:2965–2971

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Stajduhar KC, Laired JR, Rogan KM, Wortham DC (1993) Coronary arterial ectasia: increased prevalence in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm as compared to occlusive atherosclerotic peripheral vascular disease. Am Heart J 125:86–92

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Papadakis MC, Leontiadis E, Manginas A, Voudris V, Pavlides G, Karatasakis G, Foussas SG, Mihalis AS, Cokkinos DV (2004) Frequency of coronary artery ectasia in patients undergoing surgery for ascending aortic aneurysms. Am J Cardiol 94:1433–1435

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Papadakis MC, Manginas A, Cotileas P, Demopoulos V, Voudris V, Pavlides G, Foussas SG, Cokkinos DV (2001) Documentation of slow coronary flow by the TIMI frame count in patients with coronary ectasia. Am J Cardiol 88:1030–1032

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Johnston KW, Rutherford RB, Tilson MD, Shah DM, Hollier L, Stanley JC (1991) Suggested standards for reporting on arterial aneurysms: Subcommittee on Reporting Standards for Arterial Aneurysms, AdHoc Committee on Reporting Standards, Society for Vascular Surgery and North American Chapter, International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery. J Vasc Surg 13:452–458

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Thompson RW, Geraghty PJ, Lee JK (2002) Abdominal aortic aneurysms: basic mechanisms and clinical implications. Curr Probl Surg 39:110–230

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hirose Y, Hamada S, Takamiya M, Imakita S, Naito H, Nishimura T (1992) Aortic aneurysms: growth rates measured with CT. Radiology 185:249–252

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Swaye PS, Fisher LD, Litwin P, Vignola PA, Judkins MP, Kemp HG, Mudd GJ, Gosselin AJ (1983) Aneurysmal coronary artery disease. Circulation 67:134–138

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Demopoulos V, Olympios C, Fakiolas C, Pissimissis E, Economides N, Adamopoulou E, Foussas S, Cokkinos DV (1997) The natural history of aneurysmal coronary artery disease. Heart 78:136–141

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Markis JE, Joffe CD, Cohn PF, Feen DJ, Herman MV, Gorlin R (1976) Clinical significance of coronary arterial ectasia. Am J Cardiol 37:217–222

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Gibson CM, Cannon CP, Daley WL, Dodge JT Jr, Alexander B Jr, Marble SJ, McCabe CH, Raymond L, Fortin T, Poole WK, Braunwald E (1996) TIMI frame count: a quantitative method of assessing coronary artery flow. Circulation 93:879–888

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Beckman JA (2006) Aortic aneurysms: pathophysiology, epidemiology, and prognosis. In: Creager MA, Dzau VJ, Loscalzo J (eds) Vascular Medicine. Saunders Elsevier Inc, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  21. Elefteriades JA, Pomianowski P (2013) Practical genetics of thoracic aortic aneurysm. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 56:57–67

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Thompson RW (2002) Reflections on the pathogenesis of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Cardiovasc Surg 10:389–394

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Dollery CM, McEwan JR, Henney AM (1995) Matrix metalloproteinases and cardiovascular disease. Circ Res 77:863–868

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Virmani R, Robinowitz M, Atkinson JB, Forman MB, Silver MD, McAllister HA (1986) Acquired coronary arterial aneurysms: an autopsy study of 52 patients. Hum Pathol 17:575–583

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Lamblin N, Bauters C, Hermant X, Lablanche JM, Helbecque N, Amouyel P (2002) Polymorphisms in the promoter regions of MMP-2, MMP-3, MMP-9 and MMP-12 genes as determinants of aneurysmal coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 40:43–48

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Tanedo JS, Kelly RF, Marquez M, Burns DE, Klein LW, Costanzo MR, Parrillo JE, Hollenberg SM (2001) Assessing coronary blood flow dynamics with the TIMI frame count method: comparison with simultaneous intracoronary Doppler and ultrasound. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 53:459–463

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Zografos TA, Korovesis S, Giazitzoglou E, Kokladi M, Venetsanakos I, Paxinos G, Fragakis N, Katritsis DG (2013) Clinical and angiographic characteristics of patients with coronary artery ectasia. Int J Cardiol 167:1536–1541

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kosar F, Acikgoz N, Sahin I, Topal E, Aksoy Y, Cehreli S (2005) Effect of ectasia size or the ectasia ratio on the thrombosis in myocardial infarction frame count in patients with isolated coronary artery ectasia. Heart Vessels 20:199–202

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None declared.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Satoshi Kurisu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ikenaga, H., Kurisu, S., Watanabe, N. et al. Effects of the topographical extent of coronary artery ectasia on coronary blood flow in patients with aortic aneurysms. Heart Vessels 30, 712–718 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00380-014-0540-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00380-014-0540-5

Keywords

Navigation