Skip to main content
Log in

Successful use of the Cardiva Boomerang™ vascular closure device to close a brachial artery puncture site after emergency PTCA

  • Case Report
  • Published:
Heart and Vessels Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Brachial artery access is a good alternative for performing percutaneous transluminal angioplasty when femoral access is contraindicated or not feasible. Although several closure devices are available for femoral access, haemostasis for brachial artery access is still achieved by manual compression with several potential complications, such as bleeding, pseudo-aneurysm formation, especially in patients in which heparin is administered, or thrombotic vessel occlusion. This first-in-human report describes the off-label brachial use of the Cardiva Boomerang™, a novel vascular closure device, which provides haemostasis using a temporary intravascular tampon, thus permitting the easier physiological closure of the puncture site without any important complications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. De Luca G, Suryapranata H, Marino P (2008) Reperfusion strategies in acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction: an overview of current status. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 50(5):352–382

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Serruys PW, De Jaegere P, Kiemeneij F, Macaya C, Rutsch W, Heyndrickx G, Emanuelsson H, Marco J, Legrand V, Materne P (1994) A comparison of balloon-expandable-stent implantation with balloon angioplasty in patients with coronary artery disease. Benestent Study Group. N Engl J Med 331:489–495

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kaul S, Shah PK, Diamond GA (2007) As time goes by: current status and future directions in the controversy over stenting. J Am Coll Cardiol 50:128–137

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cirillo P, De Rosa S, Di Palma V, De Rosa R, Maietta P, Piscione F, Chiariello M (2009) Different vascular response to concurrent implantation of sirolimus- and zotarolimus-eluting stents in the same vessel. Heart Vessels 24:313–316

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kaukanen ET, Manninen HI, Matsi PJ, Soder HK (1997) Brachial artery access for percutaneous renal artery interventions. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 20(5):353–358

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Semler HJ (1985) Transfemoral catheterization: mechanical versus manual control of bleeding. Radiology 154:234–235

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Grollman JH Jr, Marcus R (1988) Transbrachial arteriography: techniques and complications. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 11:32–35

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Inglese L, Lupattelli T, Carbone GL, Palmisano D, Musto C, Mollichelli N, Medda M (2004) Axillary artery access for interventional procedures. J Endovasc Ther 11:414–418

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Heenan SD, Grubnic S, Buckenham TM, Belli AM (1996) Transbrachial arteriography: indications and complications. Clin Radiol 51:205–209

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Jolly SS, Amlani S, Hamon M, Yusuf S, Metha SR (2009) Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography or intervention and the impact on major bleeding and ischemic events: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Am Heart J 157(1):132–140

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Puggioni A, Boesmans E, Deloose K, Peeters P, Bosiers M (2008) Use of StarClose for brachial artery closure after percutaneous endovascular interventions. Vascular 16(2):85–90

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kahn ZM, Kumar M, Hollander G, Frankel R (2002) Safety and efficacy of the Perclose suture mediated closure device after diagnostic and interventional catheterizations in a large consecutive population. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 55:14–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Belenky A, Aranovich D, Greif F, Bachar G, Bartal G, Atar E (2007) Use of a collagen-based device for closure of low brachial artery punctures. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 30:273–275

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hon LQ, Ganeshan A, Thomas SM, Warakaulle D, Jagdish J, Uberoi R (2008) An overview of vascular closure devices: what every radiologist should know. Eur J Radiol 73:181–190

    Google Scholar 

  15. Doyle BJ, Godfrey MJ, Lennon RJ, Ryan JL, Bresnahan JF, Rihal CS, Ting HH (2007) Initial experience with the Cardiva Boomerang vascular closure device in diagnostic catheterization. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 69(2):203–208

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Seltzer S, Alejos JC, Levi DS (2009) Experience with the Cardiva Boomerang Catalyst system in pediatric cardiac catheterization. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 74:476-481

    Google Scholar 

  17. Allie DE, Smalling R, Hebert CJ, Walker CM (2006) The costs of VAM complications. Endovasc Today 5:2–6

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sasaki Y, Hwang MW, Shirasawa K, Takeda S, Ayukawa H, Inenaga-Kitaura K, Rei T, Kitaura Y, Kawai C (2008) Stenting for superficial femoral artery atherosclerotic occlusion: long-term follow-up results. Heart Vessels 23:264–270

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Plinio Cirillo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cirillo, P., Petrillo, G., D’Ascoli, G.L. et al. Successful use of the Cardiva Boomerang™ vascular closure device to close a brachial artery puncture site after emergency PTCA. Heart Vessels 25, 565–568 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00380-010-0003-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00380-010-0003-6

Keywords

Navigation