Skip to main content
Log in

Different vascular response to concurrent implantation of sirolimus- and zotarolimus-eluting stents in the same vessel

  • Case Report
  • Published:
Heart and Vessels Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Drug-eluting stents (DES) have become routine therapy in clinical practice because restenosis is significantly reduced in patients treated with these devices. New generations of DES bearing newer antiproliferative drugs have been developed. Sirolimus was the first antiproliferative drug eluted by a DES (SES) while Zotarolimus represents a sirolimus-derived, newer antiproliferative drug borne by a different kind of DES (ZES). This report describes two cases of different vascular response to concurrent side by side implantation of SES and ZES in the same vessel and highlights significant early restenosis of ZES as compared with SES.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Serruys PW, De Jaegere P, Kiemeneij F, Macaya C, Rutsch W, Heyndrickx G, Emanuelsson H, Marco J, Legrand V, Materne P (1994) A comparison of balloon-expandable-stent implantation with balloon angioplasty in patients with coronary artery disease. Benestent Study Group. N Engl J Med 331:489–495

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kasaoka S, Tobis JM, Akiyama T, Reimers B, Di Mario C, Wong ND, Colombo A (1998) Angiographic and intravascular ultrasound predictors of in-stent restenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 32:1630–1635

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Tanaka S, Watanabe S, Matsuo H, Segawa T, Iwama M, Hirose T, Takahashi H, Ono K, Warita S, Kojima T, Minatoguchi S, Fujiwara H (2008) Prospective randomized trial comparing a nitinol self-expanding coronary stent with low-pressure dilatation and a high-pressure balloon expandable bare metal stent. Heart Vessels 23:1–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kaul S, Shah PK, Diamond GA (2007) As time goes by: current status and future directions in the controversy over stenting. J Am Coll Cardiol 50:128–137

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Serruys PW, Kutryk MJB, Ong ATL (2006) Coronary-artery stents. N Engl J Med 354:483–495

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Schampaert E, Moses JW, Schofer J, Schluter M, Gershlick AH, Cohen EA, Palisaitis DA, Breithardt G, Donohoe DJ, Wang H, Popma JJ, Kuntz RE, Leon MB (2006) Sirolimus-eluting stents at two years: a pooled analysis of SIRIUS, E-SIRIUS, and C-SIRIUS with emphasis on late revascularizations and stent thromboses. Am J Cardiol 98:36–41

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kandzari DE, Leon MB, Popma JJ, Fitzgerald PJ, O’shaughnessy C, Ball MW, Turco M, Applegate RJ, Gurbel PA, Midei MG, Badre SS, Mauri L, Thompson KP, LeNarz LA, Kuntz RE (2006) Comparison of zotarolimus-eluting and sirolimus-eluting stents in patients with native coronary artery disease: a randomized controlled trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 48:2440–2447

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kandzari DE, Leon MB (2006) Overview of pharmacology and clinical trials program with the zotarolimus-eluting Endeavor stent. J Intervent Cardiol 19:405–413

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Chen Y, Smith M, Sheets M, Ballaron S, Trevillyan J, Burke S, Rosenberg T, Henry C, Wagner R, Bauch R, Marsh K, Fey T, Hsieh G, Gauvin D, Mollison K, Carter G, Djuric S (2007) Zotarolimus, a novel sirolimus analogue with potent anti-proliferative activity on coronary smooth muscle cells and reduced potential for systemic immunosuppression. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 49: 228–235

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Burzotta F, Siviglia M, Altamura L, Trani C, Leone AM, Romagnoli E, Mazzari MA, Mongiardo R, Niccoli G, Brancati M, Biondi-Zoccai G, Rebuzzi AG, Schiavoni G, Crea F (2007) Outcome of overlapping heterogenous drug-eluting stents and of overlapping drug-eluting and bare metal stent. Am J Cardiol 99:364–368

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Corbett SJ, Cosgrave J, Colombo A (2007) Concurrent implantation of sirolimus- and paclitaxel- eluting stents in the same vessel. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 69:109–114

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sakurai R, Bonneau HN, Honda Y, Fitzgerald PJ (2007) Intravascular ultrasound findings in ENDEAVOR II and ENDEAVOR III. Am J Cardiol 100:S71–S76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ozer N, Tangurek B, Firat F, Ozer S, Tartan Z, Ozturk R, Ozay B, Ciloglu F, Yilmaz H, Cam N (2008) Effects of drug-eluting stents on systemic inflammatory response in patients with unstable angina pectoris undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Heart Vessels 23:75–82

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Federico Piscione.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cirillo, P., De Rosa, S., Di Palma, V. et al. Different vascular response to concurrent implantation of sirolimus- and zotarolimus-eluting stents in the same vessel. Heart Vessels 24, 313–316 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00380-008-1134-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00380-008-1134-x

Key words

Navigation