Abstract
The Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU) neural network has great potential in estimating and predicting a variable. In addition to radar reflectivity (Z), radar echo-top height (ET) is also a good indicator of rainfall rate (R). In this study, we propose a new method, GRU_Z-ET, by introducing Z and ET as two independent variables into the GRU neural network to conduct the quantitative single-polarization radar precipitation estimation. The performance of GRU_Z-ET is compared with that of the other three methods in three heavy rainfall cases in China during 2018, namely, the traditional Z-R relationship (Z=300R1.4), the optimal Z-R relationship (Z=79R1.68) and the GRU neural network with only Z as the independent input variable (GRU_Z). The results indicate that the GRU_Z-ET performs the best, while the traditional Z-R relationship performs the worst. The performances of the rest two methods are similar.
To further evaluate the performance of the GRU_Z-ET, 200 rainfall events with 21882 total samples during May–July of 2018 are used for statistical analysis. Results demonstrate that the spatial correlation coefficients, threat scores and probability of detection between the observed and estimated precipitation are the largest for the GRU_Z-ET and the smallest for the traditional Z-R relationship, and the root mean square error is just the opposite. In addition, these statistics of GRU_Z are similar to those of optimal Z-R relationship. Thus, it can be concluded that the performance of the GRU_Z-ET is the best in the four methods for the quantitative precipitation estimation.
摘要
门控循环神经网络在估测和预测变量方面具有巨大潜能. 除了雷达反射率外, 雷达回波顶高也能很好地反映降水. 利用门控循环神经网络, 本文发展了一种新的单偏振雷达的定量降水估测方法 GRU_Z-ET, 该方法是将雷达反射率和雷达回波顶高同时作为自变量引入门控循环神经网络来估测降水. 随后, 基于 2018 年江西省北部的三次强降雨过程, 对比分析了新方法 GRU_Z-ET 与其他三种方法的表现. 其他三种方法分别是传统的 Z-R 关系 (Z=300R1.4)、 最优法拟合的 Z-R 关系 (Z=79R1.68) 和仅有雷达反射率一个自变量的门控循环神经网络(GRU_Z). 结果表明, 在这四种方法中, GRU_Z-ET方法估测的降水精度最高, 而传统的Z-R关系精度最低, 最优法拟合的Z-R关系和GRU_Z方法的精度相当. 为了进一步评估GRU_Z-ET方法对降水的估测性能, 利用这四种方法对2018年5-7月江西北部的200个降水过程(21882个样本)的降水量进行了定量估测和统计分析. 结果表明, 在这四种方法中, GRU_Z-ET方法估测的降水与观测降水的空间相关系数、 威胁分数和探测概率最高, 均方根误差最低; 传统Z-R关系的空间相关系数、 威胁分数和探测概率最低, 均方根误差最高; GRU_Z 方法和最优法拟合Z-R关系的空间相关系数、 威胁分数和探测概率和均方根误差相似. 这进一步验证了在这些雷达降水估测的方法中, 本文发展的 GRU_Z-ET 方法的精度最高, 传统的 Z-R 关系精度最低, GRU_Z 方法和最优法拟合的 Z-R 关系的精度相当.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adler, R. F., and R. A. Mack, 1984: Thunderstorm cloud height-rainfall rate relations for use with satellite rainfall estimation techniques. J. Climate Appl. Meteorol., 23, 280–296, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1984)023<0280:TCHRRF>2.0.CO;2.
Alfieri, L., P. Claps, and F. Laio, 2010: Time-dependent Z-R relationships for estimating rainfall fields from radar measurements. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 10, 149–158, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-10-149-2010.
Atlas, D., D. Rosenfeld, and D. A. Short, 1990: The estimation of convective rainfall by area integrals. 1. The theoretical and empirical basis. J. Geophys. Res.: Atmos., 95, 2153–2160, https://doi.org/10.1029/JD095iD03p02153.
Bracci, A., and Coauthors, 2022: Quantitative precipitation estimation over Antarctica using different Ze-SR relationships based on snowfall classification combining ground observations. Remote Sensing, 14, 82, https://doi.org/10.3900/RS14010082.
Bringi, V. N., M. A. Rico-Ramirez, and M. Thurai, 2011: Rainfall estimation with an operational polarimetric C-band radar in the United Kingdom: Comparison with a gauge network and error analysis. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 12, 935–954, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-10-05013.1.
Chen, H. N., V. Chandrasekar, and R. Bechini, 2017: An improved dual-polarization radar rainfall algorithm (DROPS2.0): Application in NASA IFloodS field campaign. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 18, 917–937, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-16-0124.1.
Diederich, M., A. Ryzhkov, C. Simmer, P. F. Zhang, and S. Trömel, 2015: Use of specific attenuation for rainfall measurement at X-band radar wavelengths. Part II: Rainfall estimates and comparison with rain gauges. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 16, 503–516, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-14-0067.1.
Duan, S. B., Z. L. Li, B. H. Tang, H. Wu, L. L. Ma, E. Y. Zhao, and C. R. Li, 2013: Land surface reflectance retrieval from hyperspectral data collected by an unmanned aerial vehicle over the Baotou test site. PLoS One, 8, e66972, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0066972.
Eldardiry, H., E. Habib, and Y. Zhang, 2015: On the use of radar-based quantitative precipitation estimates for precipitation frequency analysis. J. Hydrol., 531, 441–453, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.05.016.
Fujiwara, M., 1965: Raindrop-size distribution from individual storms. J. Atmos. Sci., 22, 585–591, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1965)022<0585:RSDFIS>2.0.CO;2.
Fulton, R. A., J. P. Breidenbach, D. J. Seo, D. A. Miller, and T. O’Bannon, 1998: The WSR-88D rainfall algorithm. Wea. Forecasting, 13, 377–395, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0434(1998)013<0377:TWRA>2.0.CO;2.
Greff, K., R. K. Srivastava, J. Koutník, B. R. Steunebrink, and J. Schmidhuber, 2017: LSTM: A search space Odyssey. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 28, 2222–2232, https://doi.org/10.1109/TNNLS.2016.2582924.
He, K. K., Q. P. Fan, K. Q. Li, S. Q. Chen, and Y. Gong, 2007: Z-R relation with its application to Typhoon precipitation in Zhoushan. Journal of Applied Meteorological Science, 18, 573–576, https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-7313.2007.04.020. (in Chinese with English abstract)
Huang, H., K. Zhao, H. N. Chen, D. M. Hu, P. L. Fu, Q. Lin, and Z. W. Yang, 2020: Improved attenuation-based radar precipitation estimation considering the azimuthal variabilities of microphysical properties. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 21, 1605–1620, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-19-0265.1.
Jorgensen, D. P., and P. T. Willis, 1982: A Z-R relationship for hurricanes. J. Appl. Meteorol., 21, 356–366, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1982)021<0356:AZRRFH>2.0.CO;2.
Joyce, R. J., J. E. Janowiak, P. A. Arkin, and P. P. Xie, 2004: CMORPH: A method that produces global precipitation estimates from passive microwave and infrared data at high spatial and temporal resolution. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 5(3), 487–503, https://doi.org/10.1175/1525-7541(2004)005<0487:CAMTPG>2.0.CO;2.
Jung, J. Y., S. H. Jin, and M. S. Park, 2008: Precipitation analysis based on spatial linear regression model. The Korean Journal of Applied Statistics, 21, 1093–1107, https://doi.org/10.5351/KJAS.2008.21.6.1093.
Kou, L. L., Z. H. Wang, and F. Xu, 2018: Three-dimensional fusion of spaceborne and ground radar reflectivity data using a neural network-based approach. Adv. Atmos. Sci., 35, 346–359, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-017-6334-9.
Kuang, Q. M., X. B. Yang, W. S. Zhang, and G. P. Zhang, 2016: Spatiotemporal modeling and implementation for radar-based rainfall estimation. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 13, 1601–1605, https://doi.org/10.1109/LGRS.2016.2597170.
Kusiak, A., X. P. Wei, A. P. Verma, and E. Roz, 2013: Modeling and prediction of rainfall using radar reflectivity data: A data-mining approach. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 51, 2337–2342, https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2012.2210429.
Lakshmanan, V., K. Hondl, C. K. Potvin, and D. Preignitz, 2013: An improved method for estimating radar echo-top height. Wea. Forecasting, 28, 481–488, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-12-00084.1.
Lee, G. W., 2006: Sources of errors in rainfall measurements by Polarimetric radar: Variability of drop size distributions, observational noise, and variation of relationships between R and Polarimetric parameters. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 23, 1005–1028, https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH1899.1.
Li, D., P. Zhang, J. M. Zhao, J. B. Cheng, and H. Y. Zhao, 2019: MP mitigation in GNSS positioning by GRU NNs and adaptive wavelet filtering. IET Communications, 13, 2756–2766, https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-com.2018.5792.
Liao, F., Y. C. Hong, and G. G. Zhang, 2007: Review of orographic influences on surface precipitation. Meteorological Science and Technology, 15, 309–316, https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1671-6345.2007.03.001. (in Chinese with English abstract)
Liu, J., Z. Z. Song, D. F. Liu, and C. M. Jia, 1999: Classified Z-I relationship and its application to the measurement of rainfall by weather radar over the Huaihe River Basin. Scientia Meteorologica Sinica, 19, 213–220. (in Chinese with English abstract)
Martinaitis, S. M., and Coauthors, 2020: A physically based multi-sensor quantitative precipitation estimation approach for gap-filling radar coverage. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 21, 1485–1511, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-19-0264.1.
Mirzaei, S., J. L. Kang, and K. Y. Chu, 2022: A comparative study on long short-term memory and gated recurrent unit neural networks in fault diagnosis for chemical processes using visualization. Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers, 130, 104028, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtice.2021.08.016.
Ramli, S., S. H. A. Bakar, and W. Tahir, 2011: Radar hydrology: New Z/R relationships for Klang River Basin, Malaysia based on rainfall classification. Preprints, 2011 IEEE Colloquium on Humanities, Science and Engineering, Penang, Malaysia, IEEE, 537–541, https://doi.org/10.1109/CHUSER.2011.6163790.
Rosenfeld, D., D. Atlas, and D. A. Short, 1990: The estimation of convective rainfall by area integrals: 2. The height-area rainfall threshold (HART) method. J. Geophys. Res.: Atmos., 95, 2161–2176, https://doi.org/10.1029/JD095iD03p02161.
Ryzhkov, A. V., T. J. Schuur, D. W. Burgess, P. L. Heinselman, S. E. Giangrande, and D. S. Zrnic, 2005: The joint polarization experiment: Polarimetric rainfall measurements and hydrometeor classification. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 86, 809–824, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-86-6-809.
Sehad, M., M. Lazri, and S. Ameur, 2017: Novel SVM-based technique to improve rainfall estimation over the Mediterranean region (north of Algeria) using the multispectral MSG SEVIRI imagery. Advances in Space Research, 59, 1381–1394, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2016.11.042.
Seo, B. C., W. F. Krajewski, and A. Ryzhkov, 2020: Evaluation of the specific attenuation method for radar-based quantitative precipitation estimation: Improvements and practical challenges. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 21, 1333–1347, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-20-0030.1.
Wang, Y., Y. R. Feng, J. H. Cai, and S. Hu, 2011: An approach for radar quantitative precipitation estimate based on categorical Z-I relations. Journal of Tropical Meteorology, 27, 601–608, https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1004-4965.2011.04.018. (in Chinese with English abstract)
Wang, Y. D., P. F. Zhang, A. V. Ryzhkov, J. Zhang, and P. L. Chang, 2014: Utilization of specific attenuation for tropical rainfall estimation in complex terrain. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 15, 2250–2266, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-14-0003.1.
Wang, Y. T., and V. Chandrasekar, 2010: Quantitative precipitation estimation in the CASA X-band dual-polarization radar network. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 27, 1665–1676, https://doi.org/10.1175/2010JTECHA1419.1.
Wolfensberger, D., M. Gabella, M. Boscacci, U. Germann, and A. Berne, 2021: RainForest: A random forest algorithm for quantitative precipitation estimation over Switzerland. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 14, 3169–3193, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-3169-2021.
Wu, W. X., H. B. Zou, J. S. Shan, and S. S. Wu, 2018: A dynamical Z-R relationship for precipitation estimation based on radar echo-top height classification. Advances in Meteorology, 2018, 8202031, https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/8202031.
Yang, C., M. S. Sun, W. X. Zhao, Z. Y. Liu, and E. Y. Chang, 2017: A neural network approach to jointly modeling social networks and mobile trajectories. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 35, 36, https://doi.org/10.1145/3041658.
Yang, J., L. P. Liu, C. C. Zhao, and Y. H. Wu, 2015: Spatial distribution of error from the convective precipitation estimation of radar and optimization of Z-R relationship. Plateau Meteorology, 34, 1785–1796, https://doi.org/10.7522/j.issn.1000-0534.2014.00074. (in Chinese with English abstract)
Zhang, C. J., H. Y. Wang, J. Zeng, L. M. Ma, and L. Guan, 2020c: Short-term dynamic radar quantitative precipitation estimation based on wavelet transform and support vector machine. J. Meteor. Res., 34, 413–426, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13351-020-9036-7.
Zhang, J., S. X. Wang, and B. Clarke, 2004: WSR-88D reflectivity quality control using horizontal and vertical reflectivity structure. Preprints, 11th Conference on Aviation, Range and Aerospace Meteorology, Hyannis, MA, American Meteorological Society.
Zhang, J., K. Howard, and J. J. Gourley, 2005: Constructing three-dimensional multiple-radar reflectivity mosaics: Examples of convective storms and stratiform rain echoes. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 22, 30–42, https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-1689.1.
Zhang, J., L. Tang, S. Cocks, P. F. Zhang, A. Ryzhkov, K. Howard, C. Langston, and B. Kaney, 2020a: A dual-polarization radar synthetic QPE for operations. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 21, 2507–2521, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-19-0194.1.
Zhang, J., and Coauthors, 2016: Multi-Radar Multi-Sensor (MRMS) quantitative precipitation estimation: Initial operating capabilities. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 97, 621–638, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00174.1.
Zhang, Y., L. P. Liu, and H. Wen, 2020b: Performance of a radar mosaic quantitative precipitation estimation algorithm based on a new data quality index for the Chinese Polarimetric Radars. Remote Sensing, 12, 3557, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12213557.
Zhang, Y. H., S. W. Chen, W. Tian, G. Y. Ma, and S. Chen, 2021a: Offline single-polarization radar quantitative precipitation estimation based on a spatiotemporal deep fusion model. Advances in Meteorology, 2021, 9659167, https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/9659167.
Zhang, Y., S. Bi, L. Liu, H. Chen, Y. Zhang, P. Shen, F. Yang, Y. Wang, Y. Zhang and S. Yao, 2021b: Deep learning for polarimetric radar quantitative precipitation estimation during land-falling typhoons in south China. Remote Sensing, 13, 3157, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13163157.
Zhang, Y. Z., Q. Wu, J. F. Hu, G. N. Zhao, and Y. Cao, 2018: Characteristics of hourly precipitation in Jiangxi. Torrential Rain and Disasters, 37(3), 274–280, https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1004-9045.2018.03.010. (in Chinese with English abstract)
Zou, H. B., S. S. Wu, and J. S. Shan, 2022: Sensitivity of lake-effect convection to the lake surface temperature over Poyang Lake in China. J. Meteor. Res., 36, 342–359, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13351-022-1142-2.
Zou, H. B., J. S. Shan, S. S. Wu, and H. Yin, 2013: Climatic characteristics of persistent heavy rains over Jiangxi and their large scale circulation backgrounds. Journal of the Meteorological Sciences, 33, 449–456. (in Chinese with English abstract)
Zou, H. B., S. W. Zhang, X. D. Liang, and X. T. Yi, 2018: Improved algorithms for removing isolated non-meteorological echoes and ground clutters in CINRAD. J. Meteor. Res., 32, 584–597, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13351-018-7176-9.
Zou, H. B., S. S. Wu, J. S. Shan, and X. T. Yi, 2019: A method of radar echo extrapolation based on TREC and Barnes filter. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 36, 1713–1727, https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-18-0194.1.
Zou, H. B., S. W. Zhang, Y. N. Liu, W. D. Zhang, and X. X. Yang, 2020: Analysis of a convective storm crossing Poyang Lake in China. J. Meteor. Res., 33, 529–545, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13351-020-9143-5.
Acknowledgements
We thank two anonymous reviewers for insightful comments that guided the revision of the manuscript, Meteorological Information Center of Jiangxi Meteorological Bureau for collecting and providing the single-polarization radar and automatic weather station data, and Nanjing Hurricane Translation for reviewing the English language quality of this paper. This work was jointly supported by the National Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 42275007 and 41865003) and Jiangxi Provincial Department of science and technology project (Grant No. 20171BBG70004).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Article Highlights
• A new method, the GRU_Z-ET, is proposed based on the GRU neural network and two radar variables of radar reflectivity and echo-top height to conduct radar Quantitative precipitation estimation (QPE).
• The GRU_Z-ET increases the estimation of heavy precipitation and improves the spatial distribution of the radar QPE, compared with the traditional Z-R relationship, the optimal Z-R relationship and the GRU_Z.
• The GRU neural network is demonstrated to improve the radar QPE by introducing radar echo-top height.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zou, H., Wu, S. & Tian, M. Radar Quantitative Precipitation Estimation Based on the Gated Recurrent Unit Neural Network and Echo-Top Data. Adv. Atmos. Sci. 40, 1043–1057 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-022-2127-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-022-2127-x
Key words
- quantitative precipitation estimation
- Gated Recurrent Unit neural network
- Z-R relationship
- echo-top height