Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Soil microbial activity and litter turnover in native grazed and ungrazed rangelands in a semiarid ecosystem

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biology and Fertility of Soils Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Long-term overgrazing is known to influence soil microbiological properties and C sequestration in soil organic matter. However, much remains to be known concerning overgrazing impacts on soil microbial activity and litter turnover in heavily grazed rangelands of Central Iran. Aboveground litter decomposition of three dominant species (Agropyron intermedium, Hordeum bulbosum, and Juncus sp.) were studied using a litter bag experiment under field conditions in three range sites of Central Iran, a site with continuous grazing, a site ungrazed for 17 years with dominant woody species (80% cover), and a site ungrazed for 17 years with dominant pasture species (70% cover). Soil samples were taken from 0 to 30 cm depth and analyzed for their chemical and microbiological properties. Results demonstrate that soil organic C and total N contents and C/N ratios were similar for both ungrazed and grazed sites, while available P and K concentrations significantly decreased under grazed conditions. It was also evident that range grazing decreases soil respiration and microbial biomass C, suggesting a lower recent annual input of decomposable organic C. Nevertheless, grazing conditions had no significant effect on litter decomposition indicating soil microclimate is not affected by grazing animals in this ecosystem. It is concluded that overgrazing may presumably depress microbial activity through either reduced input of fresh plant residue into the surface soil or lack of living roots and exudates for stimulating microbial activity. This study also suggests that 17 years of livestock exclusion might be insufficient time for expected C accumulation in soil.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aweto AO, Adejumobi DO (1991) Impact of grazing on soil in the southern guinea savanna zone of Nigeria. Environmentalist 11:27–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee MR, Burton DL, McCaughey WP, Grant CA (2000) Influence of pasture management on soil biological quality. J Range Manage 53:127–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bardgett RD, Jones AC, Jones DL, Kemmitt SJ, Cook R, Hobbs PJ (2001) Soil microbial community patterns related to the history and intensity of grazing in sub-montane ecosystems. Soil Biol Biochem 33:1653–1664

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Baron VS, Mapfumo E, Dick AC, Naeth MA, Okine EK, Chanasyk DS (2002) Grazing intensity impacts on pasture carbon and nitrogen flow. J Range Manage 55:535–541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer A, Cole CV, Black AL (1987) Soil property comparisons in virgin grasslands between grazed and nongrazed management systems. Soil Sci Soc Am J 51:176–182

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Berg WA, Bradford JA, Sims PL (1997) Long-term soil nitrogen and vegetation change on sandhill rangeland. J Range Manage 50:482–486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biondini ME, Patton BD, Nyren PE (1998) Grazing intensity and ecosystem processes in a Northern Mixed-grass Prairie, USA. Ecol Appl 8:469–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaneton EJ, Lavado RS (1996) Soil nutrients and salinity after long-term grazing exclusion in a Flooding Pampa grassland. J Range Manage 49:182–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahlgren RA, Singer MJ, Huang X (1997) Oak tree and grazing impacts on soil properties and nutrients in a California oak woodland. Biogeochemistry 39:45–64

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dormaar JF, Willms WD (1998) Effects of forty-four years of grazing on fescue grassland soils. J Range Manage 51:122–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dormaar JF, Willms WD (2000) Rangeland management impacts on soil biological indicators in Southern Alberta. J Range Manage 53:233–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haferkamp MR, Macneil MD (2004) Grazing effects on carbon dynamics in the Northern Mixed-grass Prairie. Environ Manage 33:462–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holt JA (1997) Grazing pressure and soil carbon, microbial biomass and enzyme activities in semi-arid northeastern Australia. Appl Soil Ecol 5:143–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkinson DS, Ladd JN (1981) Microbial biomass in soil: measurement and turnover. In: Paul EA, Ladd JN (eds) Soil Biochemistry, vol 5. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 415–471

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkinson DS, Powlson DS (1976) The effects of biocidal treatments on metabolism in soil. I. Fumigation with chloroform. Soil Biol Biochem 8:167–177

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Karlen DL, Mausbach MJ, Doran JW, Cline RG, Harris RF, Schuman GE (1997) Soil quality: a concept, definition, and framework for evaluation. Soil Sci Soc Am J 61:4–10

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kieft TL (1994) Grazing and plant canopy effects on semi-arid soil microbial biomass and respiration. Biol Fertil Soils 18:155–182

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lavado RS, Sierra JO, Hashimoto PN (1996) Impact of grazing on soil nutrients in a Pampa grassland. J Range Manage 49:452–457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LeCain DR, Morgan JA, Schuman GE, Reeder JD, Hart RH (2000) Carbon exchange rate in grazed and ungrazed pastures of Wyoming. J Range Manage 53:199–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li X, Chen Z (2004) Soil microbial biomass C and N along a climatic transect in the Mongolian steppe. Biol Fertil Soils 39:344–351

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Menezes SC, Elliott ET, Valentine DW, Williams SA (2001) Carbon and nitrogen dynamics in elk winter ranges. J Range Manage 54:400–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nael M, Khademi H, Hajabbasi MA (2004) Response of soil quality indicators and their spatial variability to land degradation in Central Iran. Appl Soil Ecol 27:221–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Page AL, Miller RH, Keeney DR (1982) Methods of soil analyses. Part 2. Chemical and microbiological properties. Am Soc Agro (Madison, USA)

  • Paul EA, Clark FE (1996) Soil microbiology and biochemistry, 2nd edn. Academic, California

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeder JD, Schuman GE (2002) Influence of livestock grazing on C sequestration in semi-arid mixed-grass and short-grass rangelands. Environ Pollut 116:457–463

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reeder JD, Schuman GDE, Morgan JA, LeCain DR (2004) Response of organic and inorganic carbon and nitrogen to long-term grazing of the shortgrass steppe. Environ Manage 33:485–495

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shariff AR, Biondini ME, Grygiel CE (1994) Grazing intensity effects on litter decomposition and soil nitrogen mineralization. J Range Manage 47:444–449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smit A, Kooijman AM (2001) Impact of grazing on the input organic matter and nutrients to the soil in a grass-encroached Scots pine forest. Forest Ecol Manage 142:99–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snyman HA, Du Preez CC (2005) Rangeland degradation in a semi-arid South Africa—II. Influence on soil quality. J Arid Environs 60:483–507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Southorn N, Cattle S (2000) Monitoring soil quality for Central Tablelands grazing systems. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 31:2211–2229

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sparling GP (1992) Ratio of microbial biomass carbon to soil organic carbon is sensitive indicator of changes in soil organic matter. Aust J Soil Res 30:195–207

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stark S, Wardle DA, Ohtonen R, Helle T, Yeates GW (2000) The effect of reindeer grazing on decomposition, mineralization and soil biota in a dry oligotrophic Scots pine forest. Oikos 90:301–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taddese G, Mohamed Saleem MA, Abyie A, Wagnew A (2002) Impact of grazing on plant species richness, plant biomass, plant attribute, and soil physical and hydrological properties of Vertisol in East African highlands. Environ Manage 29:279–289

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor BR, Parkinson D (1988) Respiration and mass loss rates of aspen and pine leaf litter decomposing in laboratory microcosms. Can J Bot 66:1948–1959

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vallentine JF (2001) Grazing management, 2nd edn. Academic, San Diego, CA, pp 411–444

    Google Scholar 

  • Vesk PA, Westoby M (2001) Predicting plant species’ responses to grazing. J Appl Ecol 38:897–909

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watkinson AR, Ormerod SJ (2001) Grasslands, grazing and biodiversity: editors’ introduction. J Appl Ecol 28:233–237

    Google Scholar 

  • Wieder RK, Lang GE (1982) A critique of the analytical methods used in examining decomposition data obtained from litterbags. Ecology 63:1636–1642

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willms WD, Dormaar JF, Adams BW, Douwes HE (2002) Response of the mixed prairie to protection from grazing. J Range Manage 55:210–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood CW, Edward JH (1992) Agroecosystem management effects on soil carbon and nitrogen. Agric Ecosys Environ 39:123–138

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yates CJ, Norton DA, Hobbs RJ (2000) Grazing effects on plant cover, soil and microclimate in fragmented woodlands in south-western Australia: implications for restoration. Austral Ecology 25:36–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported and made possible by a grant from the Department of Research, Shahrekord University, Iran. Authors wish to thank the two anonymous reviewers for their critical review and comments on the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Soil Science Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Shahrekord University, P.O. Box 115, Shahrekord, Iran

    Fayez Raiesi

  2. Natural Resources Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Shahrekord University, P.O. Box 115, Shahrekord, Iran

    Esmael Asadi

Authors
  1. Fayez Raiesi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Esmael Asadi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fayez Raiesi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Raiesi, F., Asadi, E. Soil microbial activity and litter turnover in native grazed and ungrazed rangelands in a semiarid ecosystem. Biol Fertil Soils 43, 76–82 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-005-0066-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-005-0066-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation