Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of 2c- and 3cLIF droplet temperature imaging

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experiments in Fluids Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This work presents “pulsed 2D-3cLIF-EET” as a measurement setup for micro-droplet internal temperature imaging. The setup relies on a third color channel that allows correcting spatially changing energy transfer rates between the two applied fluorescent dyes. First measurement results are compared with results of two slightly different versions of the recent “pulsed 2D-2cLIF-EET” method. Results reveal a higher temperature measurement accuracy of the recent 2cLIF setup. Average droplet temperature is determined by the 2cLIF setup with an uncertainty of less than 1 K and a spatial deviation of about 3.7 K. The new 3cLIF approach would become competitive, if the existing droplet size dependency is anticipated by an additional calibration and if the processing algorithm includes spatial measurement errors more appropriately.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Assuming a pulse duration of 4 ns and a droplet velocity of 20 m/s cause a negligible motion blur of 0.08 \(\upmu\)m, far less than the typically available optical resolution.

  2. Fluorescence saturation describes the loss of linearity between the fluorescence signal and its excitation intensity (Chaze et al. 2016).

  3. Self-absorption needs to be differentiated from re-absorption. While the latter case concerns interaction of two dyes, the first case considers the overlap of the emission and absorption spectrum of a single dye.

  4. The droplet velocity is the product of the measured droplet distance and the known droplet-generation frequency.

  5. Using dry air allows prevention of water condensation on the droplet surface.

  6. For a 100 mum droplet, a dye concentration of 5 μM and a molar attenuation coefficient of 2 × 104 L/mol/cm (at 550 nm, compare Fig. 1c), self-absorption is estimated using the Beer–Lambert law to approximately 0.001 %.

  7. The unit μM is an abbreviation for μmol/L. Details to the selection of the dye concentrations can be found in Palmer et al. (2016, 2018).

  8. The repetition rate is limited by the fluorescence detector.

  9. This values is an average value. For high temperature, average received fluorescence signal intensity reduced and the noise increases slightly.

  10. This value cannot be read from Fig. 3c), but is calculated applying Eq. 4 (Palmer et al. 2016).

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was performed as part of the Cluster of Excellence “Tailor-Made Fuels from Biomass”, which is funded by the Excellence Initiative of the German federal and state governments to promote science and research at German universities.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Johannes Palmer.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Publisher's Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Palmer, J., Reddemann, M.A., Kirsch, V. et al. Comparison of 2c- and 3cLIF droplet temperature imaging. Exp Fluids 59, 102 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-018-2545-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-018-2545-9

Navigation