Skip to main content
Log in

Cholangiokarzinome – Übersicht zur aktuellen anatomischen, histomorphologischen und morphomolekularen Klassifikation

Cholangiocarcinoma—diagnosis, classification, and molecular alterations

  • Schwerpunkt: Leberpathologie
  • Published:
Der Pathologe Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Hintergrund

Unter dem Begriff Cholangiokarzinom werden diverse maligne epitheliale Neoplasien unterschiedlicher Differenzierung, Ätiologie und Pathogenese zusammengefasst.

Ziel der Arbeit

In dieser Arbeit sollen die Ätiologie, Pathogenese, Diagnostik, Klassifikation und molekulare Alterationen intra- und extrahepatischer Cholangiokarzinome dargestellt werden.

Material und Methoden

Grundlage hierfür sind die derzeit verfügbare Fachliteratur sowie eigene Erkenntnisse.

Ergebnisse und Diskussion

Cholangiokarzinome sind morphologisch und molekular vielgestaltige maligne epitheliale Neoplasien, die ubiquitär im Gallengangsystem entstehen können. Da histologisch und immunhistochemisch breite Überlappungen zu den häufigen metastatischen Absiedelungen in der Leber bestehen, sollte die definitive Diagnose nur im klinischen Kontext gestellt werden. Nach makroanatomischen Kriterien werden Cholangiokarzinome in intrahepatische (iCCA), perihiläre (pCCA) und distale (dCCA) Tumore subklassifiziert. Wie sich durch neuere Untersuchungen abzeichnet, bestehen insbesondere zwischen den iCCA und den extrahepatischen CCA (eCCA, diese umfassen pCCA und dCCA) deutliche molekulare Unterschiede. Zudem konnten mittlerweile morphologisch gut charakterisierte Vorläuferläsionen identifiziert werden, die sich in verschiedenen Häufigkeiten nicht nur der anatomischen Klassifikation, sondern auch distinkten Ätiologien zuordnen lassen. Eine exakte Klassifikation der CCA ist somit essenziell, vor allem im Hinblick auf die Entwicklung innovativer, zielgerichteter Therapieansätze.

Abstract

Background

The entity cholangiocarcinoma comprises various malignant epithelial neoplasms of different morphology, etiology, and pathogenesis.

Aim

In this review, the etiology, pathogenesis, diagnostic criteria, classification, and molecular alterations of intra- and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas are summarized.

Material and Methods

This review is based on the currently available literature and personal knowledge.

Results and Discussion

Cholangiocarcinomas are morphologically and molecularly diverse neoplasms that can develop ubiquitously in the biliary tract. Since there is a significant histological and immunohistochemical overlap with frequent liver metastases, a definite diagnosis can often only be rendered in the clinical context. Cholangiocarcinomas are subclassified into intrahepatic (iCCA), perihilar (pCCA), and distal (dCCA) tumors according to macro-anatomical criteria. Recent studies show that there are distinctive molecular differences in particular between iCCA and extrahepatic CCA (eCCA, including pCCA and dCCA). In addition, morphologically well-characterized precursor lesions have been identified, which in various frequencies can be assigned not only to the anatomical classification, but also to certain etiologies. An exact classification is therefore essential, especially with regard to the development of innovative, targeted therapeutic approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2

Literatur

  1. Adeva J, Sangro B, Salati M et al (2019) Medical treatment for cholangiocarcinoma. Liver Int 39(Suppl 1):123–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Albores-Saavedra J, Henson DE, Klimstra DS (2000) Armed Forces Institute of Pathology (AFIP) Atlas; tumors of the gallbladder, extrahepatic bile ducts, and ampulla of vater

    Google Scholar 

  3. Andersen JB, Spee B, Blechacz BR et al (2012) Genomic and genetic characterization of cholangiocarcinoma identifies therapeutic targets for tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Gastroenterology 142:1021–1031

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Arends MJ, Fukayama M, Klimstra DS et al (2019) WHO classification of tumours, digestive system tumours, 5. Aufl.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Banales JM, Cardinale V, Carpino G et al (2016) Expert consensus document: cholangiocarcinoma: current knowledge and future perspectives consensus statement from the European network for the study of Cholangiocarcinoma (ENS-CCA). Nature reviews. Gastroenterol Hepatol 13:261–280

    Google Scholar 

  6. Borger DR, Tanabe KK, Fan KC et al (2012) Frequent mutation of isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)1 and IDH2 in cholangiocarcinoma identified through broad-based tumor genotyping. Oncologist 17:72–79

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Bosman FT, Carneiro F, Hruban RH et al (2010) WHO classification of tumours of the digestive system. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), Lyon, France

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bridgewater J, Galle PR, Khan SA et al (2014) Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. J Hepatol 60:1268–1289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cardinale V, Carpino G, Reid LM et al (2012) Cholangiocarcinoma: a cancer in search of the right classification. Hepatology 56:1585–1586 (author reply 1586)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cardinale V, Wang Y, Carpino G et al (2012) Mucin-producing cholangiocarcinoma might derive from biliary tree stem/progenitor cells located in peribiliary glands. Hepatology 55:2041–2042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Chaisaingmongkol J, Budhu A, Dang H et al (2017) Common molecular subtypes among asian hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma. Cancer Cell 32:57–70 e53

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Chan-On W, Nairismagi ML, Ong CK et al (2013) Exome sequencing identifies distinct mutational patterns in liver fluke-related and non-infection-related bile duct cancers. Nat Genet 45:1474–1478

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Drilon A, Laetsch TW, Kummar S et al (2018) Efficacy of larotrectinib in TRK fusion-positive cancers in adults and children. N Engl J Med 378:731–739

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Edge SB, Byrd DR (2010) AJCC cancer staging manual, 7. Aufl.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Fan B, Malato Y, Calvisi DF et al (2012) Cholangiocarcinomas can originate from hepatocytes in mice. J Clin Invest 122:2911–2915

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Goeppert B, Folseraas T, Roessler S et al (2020) Genomic characterization of cholangiocarcinoma in primary sclerosing cholangitis reveals novel therapeutic opportunities. Hepatology. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.31110

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Goeppert B, Frauenschuh L, Renner M et al (2014) BRAF V600E-specific immunohistochemistry reveals low mutation rates in biliary tract cancer and restriction to intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Mod Pathol 27:1028–1034

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Goeppert B, Konermann C, Schmidt CR et al (2014) Global alterations of DNA methylation in cholangiocarcinoma target the Wnt signaling pathway. Hepatology 59:544–554

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Goeppert B, Roessler S, Renner M et al (2019) Mismatch repair deficiency is a rare but putative therapeutically relevant finding in non-liver fluke associated cholangiocarcinoma. Br J Cancer 120:109–114

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Goeppert B, Toth R, Singer S et al (2019) Integrative analysis defines distinct prognostic subgroups of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Hepatology 69:2091–2106

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Jiao Y, Pawlik TM, Anders RA et al (2013) Exome sequencing identifies frequent inactivating mutations in BAP1, ARID1A and PBRM1 in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas. Nat Genet 45:1470–1473

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Jusakul A, Cutcutache I, Yong CH et al (2017) Whole-genome and epigenomic landscapes of etiologically distinct subtypes of cholangiocarcinoma. Cancer Discov 7:1116–1135

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Kendall T, Verheij J, Gaudio E et al (2019) Anatomical, histomorphological and molecular classification of cholangiocarcinoma. Liver Int 39(Suppl 1):7–18

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Lowery MA, Ptashkin R, Jordan E et al (2018) Comprehensive molecular profiling of intrahepatic and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas: potential targets for intervention. Clin Cancer Res 24:4154–4161

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Nakamura H, Arai Y, Totoki Y et al (2015) Genomic spectra of biliary tract cancer. Nat Genet 47:1003–1010

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Raggi C, Invernizzi P, Andersen JB (2015) Impact of microenvironment and stem-like plasticity in cholangiocarcinoma: molecular networks and biological concepts. J Hepatol 62:198–207

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Rizvi S, Gores GJ (2013) Pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management of cholangiocarcinoma. Gastroenterology 145:1215–1229

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Schlitter AM, Born D, Bettstetter M et al (2014) Intraductal papillary neoplasms of the bile duct: stepwise progression to carcinoma involves common molecular pathways. Mod Pathol 27:73–86

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Schlitter AM, Jang KT, Kloppel G et al (2015) Intraductal tubulopapillary neoplasms of the bile ducts: clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular analysis of 20 cases. Mod Pathol 28:1249–1264

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Shaib Y, El-Serag HB (2004) The epidemiology of cholangiocarcinoma. Semin Liver Dis 24:115–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Shaib YH, El-Serag HB, Davila JA et al (2005) Risk factors of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in the United States: a case-control study. Gastroenterology 128:620–626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Sia D, Hoshida Y, Villanueva A et al (2013) Integrative molecular analysis of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma reveals 2 classes that have different outcomes. Gastroenterology 144:829–840

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Sipos B, Henopp T (2011) Precursor lesions of pancreatobiliary cancer. Pathologe 32(Suppl 2):224–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Tyson GL, El-Serag HB (2011) Risk factors for cholangiocarcinoma. Hepatology 54:173–184

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Tyson GL, Ilyas JA, Duan Z et al (2014) Secular trends in the incidence of cholangiocarcinoma in the USA and the impact of misclassification. Dig Dis Sci 59:3103–3110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Walter D, Ferstl P, Waidmann O et al (2019) Cholangiocarcinoma in Germany: epidemiologic trends and impact of misclassification. Liver Int 39:316–323

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Wardell CP, Fujita M, Yamada T et al (2018) Genomic characterization of biliary tract cancers identifies driver genes and predisposing mutations. J Hepatol 68:959–969

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Zen Y, Adsay NV, Bardadin K et al (2007) Biliary intraepithelial neoplasia: an international interobserver agreement study and proposal for diagnostic criteria. Mod Pathol 20:701–709

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Zen Y, Fujii T, Itatsu K et al (2006) Biliary papillary tumors share pathological features with intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas. Hepatology 44:1333–1343

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Benjamin Goeppert.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

B. Goeppert gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Für diesen Beitrag wurden vom Autor keine Studien an Menschen oder Tieren durchgeführt. Für die aufgeführten Studien gelten die jeweils dort angegebenen ethischen Richtlinien.

Additional information

Schwerpunktherausgeber

H. Baba, Essen

T. Longerich, Heidelberg

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Goeppert, B. Cholangiokarzinome – Übersicht zur aktuellen anatomischen, histomorphologischen und morphomolekularen Klassifikation. Pathologe 41, 488–494 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00292-020-00808-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00292-020-00808-6

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation