Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Mathematical model of the primary CD8 T cell immune response: stability analysis of a nonlinear age-structured system

  • Published:
Journal of Mathematical Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The primary CD8 T cell immune response, due to a first encounter with a pathogen, happens in two phases: an expansion phase, with a fast increase of T cell count, followed by a contraction phase. This contraction phase is followed by the generation of memory cells. These latter are specific of the antigen and will allow a faster and stronger response when encountering the antigen for the second time. We propose a nonlinear mathematical model describing the T CD8 immune response to a primary infection, based on three nonlinear ordinary differential equations and one nonlinear age-structured partial differential equation, describing the evolution of CD8 T cell count and pathogen amount. We discuss in particular the roles and relevance of feedback controls that regulate the response. First we reduce our system to a system with a nonlinear differential equation with a distributed delay. We study the existence of two steady states, and we analyze the asymptotic stability of these steady states. Second we study the system with a discrete delay, and analyze global asymptotic stability of steady states. Finally, we show some simulations that we can obtain from the model and confront them to experimental data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams B, Banks H, Davidian M, Kwon HD, Tran H, Wynne S, Rosenberg E (2005) HIV dynamics: modeling, data analysis, and optimal treatment protocols. J Comput Appl Math 184: 10–49

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Althaus C, Ganusov V, De Boer R (2007) Dynamics of CD8 T cell responses during acute and chronic lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus infection. J Immunol 179: 2944–2951

    Google Scholar 

  • Antia R, Bergstrom C, Pilyugin S, Kaech S, Ahmed R (2003) Models of {CD8+ Responses: 1. What is the antigen-independent proliferation program. J Theor Biol 221: 585–598

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Antia R, Ganusov V, Ahmed R (2005) The role of models in understanding CD8+ T-cell memory. Nat Rev 5: 101–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Appay V, Rowland-Jones S (2004) Lessons from the study of T-cell differentiation in persistent human virus infection. Seminars Immunol 16: 205–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arpin C, Angelov G, Walzer T, Tomkowiak M, Beloeil L, Marvel J (2002) Hyperproliferative response of a monoclonal memory CD8 T cell population is characterized by an increased frequency of clonogenic precursors. J Immunol 168: 2147–2153

    Google Scholar 

  • Baccam P, Beauchemin C, Macken C, Hayden F, Perelson A (2006) Kinetics of influenza A virus infection in humans. J Virol 80: 7590–7599

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bannard O, Kraman M, Fearon D (2009) Secondary replicative function of CD8+ T cells that had developed an effector function. Science 323: 505–509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beauchemin C, McSharry J, Drusano G, Nguyen J, Went G, Ribeiro R, Perelson A (2008) Modeling amantadine treatment of influenza A virus in vitro. J Theor Biol 254: 439–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bidot C, Gruy F, Haudin CS, Hentati FE, Guy B, Lambert C (2008) Mathematical modeling of T-cell activation kinetic. J Comput Biol 15: 105–128

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • De Boer R, Oprea M, Antia R, Murali-Krishna K, Ahmed R, Perelson A (2001) Recruitment times, proliferation, and apoptosis rates during the CD8 T-cell response to lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus. J Virol 75(22): 10663–10669

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ennis F, Yi-Hua Q, Riley D, Rook A, Schild G, Pratt R, Potter C (1981) HLA-restricted virus-specific cytotoxic T-lymphocyte responses to live and inactivated influenza vaccines. The Lancet ii: 887–891

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guarda G, Hons M, Soriano S, Huang A, Polley R, Martin-Fontecha A, Stein J, Germain R, Lanzavecchia A, Sallusto F (2007) L-selectin-negative CCR7 effector and memory CD8+ T cells enter reactive lymph nodes and kill dendritic cells. Nat Immunol 8: 743–752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hale J, Verduyn Lunel S (1993) Introduction to functional differential equations, Applied Mathematical Sciences, vol 99. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hermans I, Ritchie D, Yang J, Roberts J, Ronchese F (2000) CD8+ T cell-dependent elimination of DC in vivo limits the induction of antitumor immunity. J Immunol 164: 3095–3101

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins M, Mintern J, LaGruta N, Kedzierska K, Doherty P, Turner S (2008) Cell cycle-related acquisition of cytotoxic mediators defines the progressive differentiation to effector status for virus-specific CD8 T cells. J Immunol 181: 3818–3822

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaech S, Ahmed R (2001) Memory CD8+ T cell differentiation : initial antigen encounter triggers a developmental program in nave cells. Nat Immunol 2: 415–422

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemp R, Powell T, Dwyer D, Dutton R (2004) Cutting edge: regulation of CD8+ T cell effector population size. J Immunol 179: 2923–2927

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim P, Lee P, Levy D (2007) Modeling regulation mechanisms in the immune system. J Theor Biol 246: 33–69

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Lee H, Topham D, Park S, Hollenbaugh J, Treanor J, Mosmann T, Jin X, Ward B, Miao H, Holden-Wiltse J, Perelson A, Zand M, Wu H (2009) Simulation and prediction of the adaptative immune response to influenza A virus infection. J Virol 83: 7151–7165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murali-Krishna K, Altman J, MSuresh , Sourdive D, Zajax A, Miller J, Slansky J, Ahmed R (1998) Counting antigen-specific CD8 T cells: a reevaluation of bystander activation during viral infection. Immunity 8: 177–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perelson A (2001) Modelling viral and immune system dynamics. Nat Rev Immunol 2: 28–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rouzine I, Murali-Krishna K, Ahmed R (2005) Generals die in friendly fire, or modeling immune response to HIV. J Comput Appl Math 184: 258–274

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Saenz R, Quinlivan M, Elton D, MacRae S, Blunden A, Mumford J, Daly J, Digard P, Cullinane A, Grenfell B, McCauley J, Wood J, Gog J (2010) Dynamics of influenza virus infection and pathology. J Virol 84: 3974–3983

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sprent J, Surh C (2001) Generation and maintenance of memory T cells. Curr Opin Immunol 13: 248–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stipdonk MV, Lemmens E, Schoenberger S (2001) Naive CTLs require a single brief period of antigenic stimulation for clonal expansion and differentiation. Nat Immunol 2: 423–429

    Google Scholar 

  • Su M, Wladen P, Golan D, Eisen H (1993) Cognate peptide-induced destruction of CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocytes is due to fratricide. J Immunol 151: 658–667

    Google Scholar 

  • Veiga-Fernandes H, Walter U, Bourgeois C, McLean A, Rocha B (2000) Response of naive and memory CD8+ T Cells to antigen stimulation in vivo. Nat Immunol 1: 47–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webb G (1985) Theory of nonlinear age-dependent population dynamics, Monographs and textbooks. In: Pure and Applied Mathematics, vol 89. Marcel Dekker, New York

  • Wodarz D, May R, Nowak M (2000) The role of antigen-independent persistence of memory cytotoxic T lymphocytes. Int Immunol 12: 467–477

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fabien Crauste.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Terry, E., Marvel, J., Arpin, C. et al. Mathematical model of the primary CD8 T cell immune response: stability analysis of a nonlinear age-structured system. J. Math. Biol. 65, 263–291 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00285-011-0459-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00285-011-0459-8

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification (2000)

Navigation