Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Gemcitabine and metabolite pharmacokinetics in advanced NSCLC patients after bronchial artery infusion and intravenous infusion

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

We investigated the safety, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of gemcitabine administered via bronchial artery infusion (BAI) and IV infusion in advanced NSCLC patients.

Methods

Patients were eligible if they had received at least two prior cytotoxic chemotherapy regimens. Gemcitabine was administered via BAI as 600 mg/m2 on day one of cycle one, followed by IV as 1000 mg/m2 on day eight of cycle one, and IV on days one and eight of all subsequent cycles. Pharmacokinetics for gemcitabine and dFdU metabolite in plasma, and dFdCTP active metabolite in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) were evaluated. Intensive pharmacokinetic sampling was performed after BAI and IV infusions during cycle one.

Results

Three male patients (age range 59–68 years) were evaluated. All patients responded with stable disease or better. One PR was observed after cycle three, and the remaining had SD. Cmax (mean ± SD) following BAI for gemcitabine, dFdCTP, and dFdU were 7.71 ± 0.13, 66.5 ± 40.6, and 38 ± 6.27 µM and following IV infusion, 17 ± 2.36, 50.8 ± 3.61, and 83.2 ± 12.3 µM, respectively. The AUCinf (mean ± SD) following BAI for gemcitabine, dFdCTP, and dFdU were 6.89 ± 1.2, 791.1 ± 551.2, and 829.9 ± 217.8 µM h and following IV infusion, 12.5 ± 3.13, 584 ± 86.6, and 1394.64 ± 682.2 µM h, respectively. The AUC and Cmax of dFdCTP after BAI were higher than IV. The median OS was 6.27 months. No grade 3 or 4 toxicity was observed. The most common side effects were all grade ≤ 2 involving nausea, vomiting, rigor, thrombocytopenia, and anemia.

Conclusions

Systemic exposure to dFdCTP was higher after BAI than IV in two out of three patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

References

  1. de Sousa Cavalcante L, Monteiro G (2014) Gemcitabine: metabolism and molecular mechanisms of action, sensitivity and chemo resistance in pancreatic cancer. Eur J Pharmacol 741:8–16

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Zhu J, Zhang H, Jiang S, Ni J (2017) Neoadjuvant chemotherapy by bronchial arterial infusion in patients with unresectable stage III squamous cell lung cancer. Ther Adv Respir Dis 11(8):301–309

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Khatri A, Williams B, Fisher J, Brundage R, Gurvich V, Lis L et al (2014) SLC28A3 genotype and gemcitabine rate of infusion affect dFdCTP metabolite disposition in patients with solid tumours. Br J Cancer 110(2):304–312

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. R Core Team (2018) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/

  5. Ciccolini J, Serdjebi C, Peters G, Giovannetti E (2016) Pharmacokinetics and pharmacogenetics of gemcitabine as a mainstay in adult and pediatric oncology: an EORTC-PAMM perspective. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 78(1):1–12

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Derissen E, Huitema A, Rosing H, Schellens J, Beijnen J (2018) Intracellular pharmacokinetics of gemcitabine, its deaminated metabolite 2′,2′-difluorodeoxyuridine and their nucleotides. Br J Clin Pharmacol 84(6):1279–1289

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Tempero M, Plunkett W, Ruiz van Haperen V, Hainsworth J, Hochster H, Lenzi R et al (2003) Randomized phase II comparison of dose-intense gemcitabine: thirty-minute infusion and fixed dose rate infusion in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J Clin Oncol 21(18):3402–3408

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Alvarellos M, Lamba J, Sangkuhl K, Thorn C, Wang L, Klein D et al (2014) PharmGKB summary pharmacogenetics. Genomics 24(11):564–574

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Mitra A, Kirstein M, Khatri A, Skubitz K, Dudek A, Greeno E et al (2012) Pathway-based pharmacogenomics of gemcitabine pharmacokinetics in patients with solid tumors. Pharmacogenomics 13(9):1009–1021

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank all the patients for their participation in this study. We would like to acknowledge the assistance of the Clinical Pharmacology Shared Resource of the Masonic Cancer Center, a comprehensive cancer center designated by the National Cancer Institute, supported in part by P30 CA77598.

Funding

This study was funded by Eli Lilly.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark N. Kirstein.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest to report.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alharbi, A.F., Kratzke, R.A., D’Cunha, J. et al. Gemcitabine and metabolite pharmacokinetics in advanced NSCLC patients after bronchial artery infusion and intravenous infusion. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 83, 387–391 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-018-3757-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-018-3757-7

Keywords

Navigation