Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Development of a new equation to estimate creatinine clearance in cancer patients

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Determining renal function is important for chemotherapy eligibility and dosing. Measured creatinine clearance (mCrCl) is the gold standard but is cumbersome. Equations estimating CrCl (eCrCl) based on serum creatinine (SCr) produce widely varying estimates. Considering that SCr is derived from skeletal muscle, this study prospectively developed a new eCrCl equation in cancer patients using CT-defined muscle surface area (MSA) and evaluated its utility in a separate, retrospective series.

Methods

In a prospective, observational cohort study of cancer patients, mCrCl by 24-h urine collection was correlated with CT-determined MSA to create an equation for eCrCl [muscle surface area (cm2) × 42/SCr]. eCrCl by Wright, Cockcroft–Gault (CG), CKD-EPI, MDRD, and MSA was compared to mCrCl to determine fit. MSA-eCrCl was used to simulate carboplatin dosing in a retrospective series of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Results

Prospectively, 22 patients were accrued and evaluable (12 males; median age 69). MSA-eCrCl correlated stronger (r 2 0.80) than current equations (r 2 0.47–0.69) with mCrCl. In calculating carboplatin doses for 89 NSCLC patients with MSA and CG-eCrCl, median error of CG-determined carboplatin dose was 5.5 % (range −19.0 to 44.2 %), assuming that MSA was better at estimating CrCl. Forty-two patients (47 %) received doses that varied ≥10 % of what was calculated by MSA.

Conclusions

We propose a new formula for eCrCl in patients that appears more accurate than current formulae and may have implications for chemotherapy efficacy and toxicity. Studies to validate this formula are under way.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Stevens LA et al (2006) Assessing kidney function–measured and estimated glomerular filtration rate. N Engl J Med 354(23):2473–2483

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Delanaye P et al (2011) Are the creatinine-based equations accurate to estimate glomerular filtration rate in African American populations? Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 6(4):906–912

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hudson JQ et al (2013) Performance of methods to assess kidney function in a predominantly overweight sample of patients with liver disease. Ren Fail 35(2):249–256

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Finkel KW, Howard SC (2014) Onco-nephrology: an invitation to a new field. J Clin Oncol 32(22):2389–2390

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Holweger K et al (2008) Novel algorithm for more accurate calculation of renal function in adults with cancer. Ann Pharmacother 42(12):1749–1757

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Calvert AH et al (1989) Carboplatin dosage: prospective evaluation of a simple formula based on renal function. J Clin Oncol 7(11):1748–1756

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wright JD et al (2008) Carboplatin dosing in obese women with ovarian cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol 109(3):353–358

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Barrett SV et al (2008) Does body mass index affect progression-free or overall survival in patients with ovarian cancer? Results from SCOTROC I trial. Ann Oncol 19(5):898–902

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wright JG et al (2001) Estimation of glomerular filtration rate in cancer patients. Br J Cancer 84(4):452–459

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bouillanne O et al (2005) Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index: a new index for evaluating at-risk elderly medical patients. Am J Clin Nutr 82(4):777–783

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Martin L et al (2013) Cancer cachexia in the age of obesity: skeletal muscle depletion is a powerful prognostic factor, independent of body mass index. J Clin Oncol 31(12):1539–1547

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Shen W et al (2004) Total body skeletal muscle and adipose tissue volumes: estimation from a single abdominal cross-sectional image. J Appl Physiol 97(6):2333–2338

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Mourtzakis M et al (2008) A practical and precise approach to quantification of body composition in cancer patients using computed tomography images acquired during routine care. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 33(5):997–1006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Morgen CS, Sorensen TI (2014) Obesity: global trends in the prevalence of overweight and obesity. Nat Rev Endocrinol 10(9):513–514

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. US Food and Drug Administration (2000) Capecitabine (Xeloda)—highlights of prescribing information

  16. Hunter RJ et al (2009) Dosing chemotherapy in obese patients: actual versus assigned body surface area (BSA). Cancer Treat Rev 35(1):69–78

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Griggs JJ et al (2012) Appropriate chemotherapy dosing for obese adult patients with cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline. J Clin Oncol 30(13):1553–1561

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. McIntosh JF, Moller E, Van Slyke DD (1928) Studies of urea excretion. III: The influence of body size on urea output. J Clin Invest 6(3):467–483

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Wuerzner G et al (2010) Marked association between obesity and glomerular hyperfiltration: a cross-sectional study in an African population. Am J Kidney Dis 56(2):303–312

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kasiske BL, Napier J (1985) Glomerular sclerosis in patients with massive obesity. Am J Nephrol 5(1):45–50

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Investigator-initiated grant funding was provided by the Alberta Cancer Foundation and Canadian Institutes of Health Research.

Conflict of interest

All authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Ethical standard

All procedures performed in the prospective component of this study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The retrospective model did not require consent.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael B. Sawyer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chu, M.P., McCaw, L., Stretch, C. et al. Development of a new equation to estimate creatinine clearance in cancer patients. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 76, 117–124 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-015-2777-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-015-2777-9

Keywords

Navigation