Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of erlotinib (OSI-774) in combination with docetaxel in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SSCHN)

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

This phase I study determined the maximal-tolerated dose, dose-limiting toxicities, pharmacokinetics, and recommended dose of erlotinib with docetaxel.

Patients and methods

Twenty-eight patients with head and neck cancer were enrolled. Patients were orally given erlotinib (50 mg) daily plus 35 mg/m2 of docetaxel intravenously weekly × 3 every 4 weeks. Dose escalation of erlotinib was in 50-mg increments until toxicity. Pharmacokinetics were studied with LC–MS/MS, standard, and population pharmacokinetic methods.

Results

Ninety-five courses were successfully given (median 3, range 1–6). The most frequent side effects were diarrhea, fatigue, skin rash, anemia, and hypoalbuminemia. Dose de-escalation for both erlotinib and docetaxel was due to skin rash, neutropenia and/or severe infection with docetaxel to 25 mg/m2 and erlotinib to starting dose of 50 mg and re-escalation of docetaxel to 35 mg/m2. Responses were observed in 4/26 evaluable patients (100 mg erlotinib). In 24 patients, the mean Cmax and AUC erlotinib values increased with dose and following cumulative dosing (days 7 and 8 vs. day1, p < 0.05). The CL/F (~7 L/h), V/F (~140 L), and t1/2 (~20 h) for erlotinib were similar to the reported. The mean AUC ratio of metabolite OSI-420 to erlotinib following repetitive dosing at 100 mg (+ or – docetaxel) showed a ~50% increase (p < 0.02), possibly suggesting self-enzyme induction. Population pharmacokinetic studies showed no significant covariate affecting erlotinib pharmacokinetics.

Conclusions

The combination of erlotinib and docetaxel was associated with significant toxicity, which limited the amount of administered erlotinib. Dosing for phase II trials was docetaxel 35 mg/m2 and erlotinib 50 mg. The reason for excessive toxicity is not clear, but not due to change in pharmacokinetics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Woodburn JR (1999) The epidermal growth factor receptor and its inhibition in cancer therapy. Pharmacol Ther 82:241–250

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Salomon DS, Brandt R, Ciardiello F et al (1995) Epidermal growth factor-related peptides and their receptors in human malignancies. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 19:183–232

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Herbst RS, Langer CJ (2002) Epidermal growth factor receptors as a target for cancer treatment: the emerging role of IMC-225 in the treatment of lung and head and neck cancers. Semin Oncol 29(Suppl 4):27–36

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kalyankrishna S, Grandis J (2006) Epidermal growth factor receptor biology in head and neck cancer. J Clin Oncol 24:2666–2672

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Grandis JR, Melhem MF, Gooding WE et al (1998) Levels of TGF-alpha and EGFR protein in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma and patient survival. J Natl Cancer Inst 90:824–832

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Fry DW (1999) Inhibition of the epidermal growth factor receptor family of tyrosine kinases as an approach to cancer chemotherapy: progression from reversible to irreversible inhibitors. Pharmacol Ther 82:207–218

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Maurizi M, Almadori G, Ferrandina G et al (1996) Prognostic significance of epidermal growth factor receptor in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Br J Cancer 74:1253–1257

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Huang SM, Bock JM, Harari PM (1999) Epidermal growth factor receptor blockade with C225 modulates proliferation, apoptosis, and radiosensitivity in squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck. Cancer Res 59:1935–1940

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Vermorken JB, Trigo J, Hitt R, Koralewski P, Diaz-Rubio E, Rolland F, Knecht R, Amellai N, Schueler A, Baselga J (2007) Open-label, uncontrolled, multicenter phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of cetuximab as a single agent in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck who failed to respond to platinum-based therapy. J Clin Oncol 25:2171–2177

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ciardiello F, Tortora G (2001) A novel approach in the treatment of cancer: targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor. Clin Cancer Res 7:2958–2970

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sirotnak FM, Zakowski MF, Miller VA, Scher HI, Kris MG (2000) Efficacy of cytotoxic agents against human tumor xenografts is markedly enhanced by coadministration of ZD1839 (Iressa), an inhibitor of EGFR tyrosine kinase. Clin Cancer Res 6(12):4885–4892

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hidalgo M, Siu LL, Nemunaitis J et al (2001) Phase I and pharmacologic study of OSI-774, an epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in patients with advanced solid malignancies. J Clin Oncol 19:3267–3279

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Soulieres D, Senzer NN, Vokes EE, Hidalgo M, Agarwala SS, Siu LL (2004) A multicenter phase II study of erlotinib, an oral epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell cancer of the head and neck. J Clin Oncol 1:77–85

    Google Scholar 

  14. Burtness B, Goldwasser MA, Flood W et al (2005) Phase III randomized trial of cisplatin plus placebo compared with cisplatin plus cetuximab in metastatic/recurrent head and neck cancer: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol 23:5568–5577

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Couteau C, Chouaki N, Leyvraz S et al (1999) A phase II study of docetaxel in patients with metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Br J Cancer 81:457–462

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Catimel G, Verweij J, Mattijssen V et al (1994) Docetaxel (Taxotere): an active drug for the treatment of patients with advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Ann Oncol 5:533–537

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Dreyfuss A, Clark J, Norris C et al (1996) Docetaxel: an active drug for squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. J Clin Oncol 4:1672–1678

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kouroussis C, Agelaki S, Mavroudis D, Souglakos J, Kakolyris S, Kalbakis K, Vardakis N, Reppa D, Hatzidaki D, Samonis G, Georgoulias V (2000) A dose escalation study of weekly docetaxel in patients with advanced solid tumors. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 46:488–492

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Takabantake D, Fujita T, Shien T et al (2006) Tumor inhibitory effect of gefitininib(ZD1839) and taxane combination therapy in EGFR-overexpressing breast cancer cell lines(MCF7/ADR, MDA-MB-231). Int J Cancer 120:181–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Therase P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA et al (2000) New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. J Natl Cancer Inst 92:205–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhang Y, Rhoades C, Kraut E, Grever M, Schuller DE, Eng C, Lang J, Chan KK (2004) Pharmacokinetics of OSI-774, a selective epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase (TK) inhibitor, in combination with docetaxel in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck. J Clin Oncol 22:5541 (abstr)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Forouzesh B,Hidalgo M, Takimoto C et al. (2002) Phase I, pharmacokinetic (PK), and biological studies of the epidermal growth factor-tyrosine kinase (EGFR-TK) inhibitor OSI-774 in combination with docetaxel. J Clin Oncol 21:81 (abstr)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Davies AM, Lara PN, Hau DH et al (2005) Intermittent erlotinib in combination with docetaxel (DOC): phase I schedules designed to achieve pharmacodynamic separation [abstract 7038]. J Clin Oncol 23:7038

    Google Scholar 

  24. Chiorean E, Porter J, Foster A et al (2008) A phase I and pharmacokinetic trial of erlotinib in combination with weekly docetaxel in patients with taxane negative malignancies. Clin Cancer Res 14:1131–1137

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The project described was supported by Grant Number U01-CA76576 from the National Cancer Institute. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Cancer institute or the National Institutes of Health.

Conflict of interest

The authors have no significant conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eric H. Kraut.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kraut, E.H., Rhoades, C., Zhang, Y. et al. Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of erlotinib (OSI-774) in combination with docetaxel in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SSCHN). Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 67, 579–586 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-010-1332-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-010-1332-y

Keywords

Navigation