Skip to main content
Log in

Early response-based intensification of primary therapy in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients who are eligible for autologous stem cell transplantation: phase II study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Annals of Hematology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This phase II study prospectively evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of an early change in induction therapy before autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in multiple myeloma (MM) patients who failed to achieve more than a partial response (PR) after two cycles of a cyclophosphamide, thalidomide, and dexamethasone (CTD) regimen. Patients aged 18–65 years received two cycles of CTD therapy, and then the patients who achieved more than a PR received two additional cycles of CTD therapy, while those who failed to achieve more than a PR were given intensified therapy with four cycles of a Vel-CD regimen (bortezomib, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone). After completing primary chemotherapy, the patients underwent ASCT. This study initially enrolled 64 patients, although four were excluded. Of the patients, 60 were treated with CTD regimen and 8 patients also had the intensified Vel-CD regimen, of whom five showing improved responses. The overall response rate before ASCT in 59 patients was 94.9 %, including 27.1 % with a stringent complete response/complete response, 23.7 % with a very good partial response (VGPR), and 44.1 % with a PR. The median time to progression (TTP) was 33.2 months (95 % CI, 26.6–34.8). Patients who attained a VGPR or better after ASCT tended to have a longer TTP than the patients who did not (not reached vs. 24.2 months, P = 0.04). In conclusion, early response-adapted intensification with a Vel-CD regimen was a well-tolerated, effective strategy for improving the response before ASCT in patients with newly diagnosed MM.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Child JA, Morgan GJ, Davies FE et al (2003) High-dose chemotherapy with hematopoietic stem-cell rescue for multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med 348:1875–1883

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Koreth J, Cutler CS, Djulbegovic B et al (2007) High-dose therapy with single autologous transplantation versus chemotherapy for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 13:183–196

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Attal M, Harousseau JL, Stoppa AM et al (1996) A prospective, randomized trial of autologous bone marrow transplantation and chemotherapy in multiple myeloma. Intergroupe Francais du Myelome. N Engl J Med 335:91–97

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kristinsson SY, Landgren O, Dickman PW et al (2007) Patterns of survival in multiple myeloma: a population-based study of patients diagnosed in Sweden from 1973 to 2003. J Clin Oncol 25:1993–1999

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Brenner H, Gondos A, Pulte D (2008) Recent major improvement in long-term survival of younger patients with multiple myeloma. Blood 111:2521–2526

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kumar SK, Rajkumar SV, Dispenzieri A et al (2008) Improved survival in multiple myeloma and the impact of novel therapies. Blood 111:2516–2520

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Morgan GJ, Davies FE, Gregory WM et al (2012) Cyclophosphamide, thalidomide, and dexamethasone as induction therapy for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients destined for autologous stem-cell transplantation: MRC Myeloma IX randomized trial results. Haematologica 97:442–450

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Yang DH, Kim YK, Sohn SK et al (2010) Induction treatment with cyclophosphamide, thalidomide, and dexamethasone in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: a phase II study. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk 10:62–67

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Jung SH, Park H, Ahn JS et al (2013) Efficacy of stem cell mobilization in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma after a CTD (cyclophosphamide, thalidomide, and dexamethasone) regimen. Int J Hematol 97:92–97

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cavo M, Tacchetti P, Patriarca F et al (2010) Bortezomib with thalidomide plus dexamethasone compared with thalidomide plus dexamethasone as induction therapy before, and consolidation therapy after, double autologous stem-cell transplantation in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: a randomised phase 3 study. Lancet 376:2075–2085

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Buda G, Orciuolo E, Carulli G et al (2013) Bortezomib with thalidomide plus dexamethasone compared with thalidomide plus doxorubicin and dexamethasone as induction therapy in previously untreated multiple myeloma patients. Acta Haematol 129:35–39

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Richardson PG, Xie W, Mitsiades C et al (2009) Single-agent bortezomib in previously untreated multiple myeloma: efficacy, characterization of peripheral neuropathy, and molecular correlations with response and neuropathy. J Clin Oncol 27:3518–3525

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Rajkumar SV, Rosinol L, Hussein M et al (2008) Multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of thalidomide plus dexamethasone compared with dexamethasone as initial therapy for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol 26:2171–2177

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lokhorst HM, Schmidt-Wolf I, Sonneveld P et al (2008) Thalidomide in induction treatment increases the very good partial response rate before and after high-dose therapy in previously untreated multiple myeloma. Haematologica 93:124–127

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Harousseau JL, Attal M, Avet-Loiseau H et al (2010) Bortezomib plus dexamethasone is superior to vincristine plus doxorubicin plus dexamethasone as induction treatment prior to autologous stem-cell transplantation in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: results of the IFM 2005-01 phase III trial. J Clin Oncol 28:4621–4629

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Nooka AK, Kaufman JL, Behera M et al (2013) Bortezomib-containing induction regimens in transplant-eligible myeloma patients: a meta-analysis of phase 3 randomized clinical trials. Cancer 119:4119–4128

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kobayashi T, Kuroda J, Fuchida S et al (2013) The response to second-line induction with bortezomib and dexamethasone is predictive of long-term outcomes prior to high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplantation for multiple myeloma. Intern Med 52:961–968

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lahuerta JJ, Mateos MV, Martinez-Lopez J et al (2008) Influence of pre- and post-transplantation responses on outcome of patients with multiple myeloma: sequential improvement of response and achievement of complete response are associated with longer survival. J Clin Oncol 26:5775–5782

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Harousseau JL, Avet-Loiseau H, Attal M et al (2009) Achievement of at least very good partial response is a simple and robust prognostic factor in patients with multiple myeloma treated with high-dose therapy: long-term analysis of the IFM 99-02 and 99-04 Trials. J Clin Oncol 27:5720–5726

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Chanan-Khan AA, Giralt S (2010) Importance of achieving a complete response in multiple myeloma, and the impact of novel agents. J Clin Oncol 28:2612–2624

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. O'Shea D, Giles C, Terpos E et al (2006) Predictive factors for survival in myeloma patients who undergo autologous stem cell transplantation: a single-centre experience in 211 patients. Bone Marrow Transplant 37:731–737

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Alegre A, Diaz-Mediavilla J, San-Miguel J et al (1998) Autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation for multiple myeloma: a report of 259 cases from the Spanish Registry. Spanish Registry for Transplant in MM (Grupo Espanol de Trasplante Hematopoyetico-GETH) and PETHEMA. Bone Marrow Transplant 21:133–140

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Alvares CL, Davies FE, Horton C et al (2005) Long-term outcomes of previously untreated myeloma patients: responses to induction chemotherapy and high-dose melphalan incorporated within a risk stratification model can help to direct the use of novel treatments. Br J Haematol 129:607–614

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. van de Velde HJ, Liu X, Chen G et al (2007) Complete response correlates with long-term survival and progression-free survival in high-dose therapy in multiple myeloma. Haematologica 92:1399–1406

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Je-Jung Lee.

Additional information

Seo-Yeon Ahn and Sung-Hoon Jung contributed equally to this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ahn, SY., Jung, SH., Joo, Y.D. et al. Early response-based intensification of primary therapy in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients who are eligible for autologous stem cell transplantation: phase II study. Ann Hematol 93, 1571–1577 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-014-2067-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-014-2067-3

Keywords

Navigation