Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Prevalence of anatomical variants in the clivus: fossa navicularis magna, canalis basilaris medianus, and craniopharyngeal canal

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

This study determined the prevalence of fossa navicularis magna (FNM), canalis basilaris medianus (CBM), and craniopharyngeal canal (CPC), the size of FNMs, and types of CBM using 3D computed tomography (CT) images.

Methods

A total of 1059 3D images [649 cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and 410 CT] were evaluated in this study. The prevalence of FNM, CBM, and CPC, length, width, and depth of FNM, and type of CBM were assessed.

Results

Overall, FNM was identified in 7.6%, CPC in 0.3%, and CBM in 2.5% of the study group. Type 2 (0.1%) and Type 6 (0.1%) are the least common CBM types. There was no significant difference between genders for depth and width measurements (p > 0.05), however, the length of FNM was significantly higher in males than females in CBCT images (p = 0.02).

Conclusion

FNM, CBM, and CPC are rare anatomical variants of clivus. However, they can facilitate spread of infection to the skull base or vice-versa. These types of anatomical variations should be known by radiologists to avoid unnecessary diagnosis and treatment procedures and to distinguish anatomic variations from pathological conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abele TA, Salzman KL, Harnsberger HR, Glastonbury CM (2014) Craniopharyngeal canal and its spectrum of pathology. Am J Neuroradiol 35:772–777

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ahmad M, Jenny J, Downie M (2012) Application of cone beam computed tomography in oral and maxillofacial surgery. Aust Dent J 57(Suppl 1):82–94

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Akyel NG, Alimli AG, Demirkan TH, Sivri M (2018) Persistent craniopharyngeal canal, bilateral microphthalmia with colobomatous cysts, ectopic adenohypophysis with Rathke cleft cyst, and ectopic neurohypophysis: case report and review of the literature. Childs Nerv Syst 34:1407–1410

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Arey LB (1950) The craniopharyngeal canal reviewed and reinterpreted. Anat Rec 106:1–16

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Beltramello A, Puppini G, El-Dalati G, Girelli M, Cerini R, Sbarbati A et al (1998) fossa navicularis magna. Am J Neuroradiol 19:1796–1798

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cankal F, Ugur HC, Tekdemir I, Elhan A, Karahan T, Sevim A (2004) Fossa navicularis: anatomic variation at the skull base. Clin Anat 17:118–122

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cho KH, Chang H, Yamamoto M, Abe H, Rodriguez-Vazquez JF, Murakami G et al (2013) Rathke’s pouch remnant and its regression process in the prenatal period. Childs Nerv Syst 29:761–769

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Currarino G (1988) Canalis basilaris medianus and related defects of the basiocciput. Am J Neuroradiol 9:208–211

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ersan N (2017) Prevalence and morphometric features of fossa navicularis on cone beam computed tomography in Turkish population. Folia Morphol (Warsz) 76:715–719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hemphill M, Freeman JM, Martinez CR, Nager GT, Long DM, Crumrine P (1982) A new, treatable source of recurrent meningitis: basioccipital meningocele. Pediatrics 70:941–943

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Jacquemin C, Bosley TM, al Saleh M, Mullaney P (2000) Canalis basilaris medianus: MRI. Neuroradiology 42:121–123

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kasim N, Choudhri A, Alemzadeh R (2018) Craniopharyngeal canal, morning glory disc anomaly and hypopituitarism: what do they have in common? Oxf Med Case Rep 2018:018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kaushik C, Ramakrishnaiah R, Angtuaco EJ (2010) Ectopic pituitary adenoma in persistent craniopharyngeal canal: case report and literature review. J Comput Assist Tomogr 34:612–614

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Khairy S, Almubarak AO, Aloraidi A, Alahmadi KOA (2017) Canalis basalis medianus with cerebrospinal fluid leak: rare presentation and literature review. Br J Neurosurg. https://doi.org/10.1080/02688697.2017.1346173

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kizilkilic O, Yalcin O, Yildirim T, Sener L, Parmaksiz G, Erdogan B (2005) Hypothalamic hamartoma associated with a craniopharyngeal canal. Am J Neuroradiol 26:65–67

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lohman BD, Sarikaya B, McKinney AM, Hadi M (2011) Not the typical Tornwaldt’s cyst this time? A nasopharyngeal cyst associated with canalis basilaris medianus. Br J Radiol 84:169–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Martinez CR, Hemphill JM, Hodges FJ III, Gayler BW, Nager GT, Long DM et al (1981) Basioccipital meningocele. Am J Neuroradiol 2:100–102

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Morabito R, Longo M, Rossi A, Nozza P, Granata F (2013) Pharyngeal enterogenous cyst associated with canalis basilaris medianus in a newborn. Pediatr Radiol 43:512–515

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Neelakantan A, Rana AK (2014) Benign and malignant diseases of the clivus. Clin Radiol 69:1295–1303

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Pinilla-Arias D, Hinojosa J, Esparza J, Munoz A (2009) Recurrent meningitis and persistence of craniopharyngeal canal: case report. Neurocirugia (Astur) 20:50–53

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Prabhu SP, Zinkus T, Cheng AG, Rahbar R (2009) Clival osteomyelitis resulting from spread of infection through the fossa navicularis magna in a child. Pediatr Radiol 39:995–998

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ray B, Kalthur S, Kumar B, Bhat M, D’souza A, Gulati H et al (2014) Morphological variations in the basioccipital region of the South Indian skull. Nepal J Med Sci 3:124–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Rizzo A (1901) Canale cranio faringeo, fossetta faringea, interparietali e pre-interparietali nel cranio umano. Mon Zool Ital 12:241–252

    Google Scholar 

  24. Romiti G (1890) La fossetta faringea nell’osso occipitale dell’uomo. Atti Soc Toscana Sci Nat 1:11

    Google Scholar 

  25. Rossi U (1891) Il canale cranio-faringeo e la fossetta faringea. Monitore Zoologico Italiano 2:117

    Google Scholar 

  26. Segal N, Atamne E, Shelef I, Zamir S, Landau D (2013) Intracranial infection caused by spreading through the fossa naviclaris magna—a case report and review of the literature. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 77:1919–1921

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Syed AZ, Mupparapu M (2016) Fossa navicularis magna detection on cone-beam computed tomography. Imaging Sci Dent 46:47–51

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Syed AZ, Zahedpasha S, Rathore SA, Mupparapu M (2016) Evaluation of canalis basilaris medianus using cone-beam computed tomography. Imaging Sci Dent 46:141–144

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Protocol Development: KO. Data Collection-Analysis: SB, KO. Manuscript Writing: DGB, SB. Manuscript Editing: KO.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seval Bayrak.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bayrak, S., Göller Bulut, D. & Orhan, K. Prevalence of anatomical variants in the clivus: fossa navicularis magna, canalis basilaris medianus, and craniopharyngeal canal. Surg Radiol Anat 41, 477–483 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-019-02200-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-019-02200-3

Keywords

Navigation