Skip to main content
Log in

Oncologic Outcome of Intersphincteric Resection for Very Low Rectal Cancer

  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

In 2000 we launched a prospective program of intersphincteric resection (ISR) for very low rectal cancer. In this study we compared the oncologic outcome of patients who underwent ISR with the outcome of patients who underwent abdominoperineal resection (APR).

Methods

The data of 202 patients with very low rectal cancer who underwent curative ISR (n = 132) or curative APR (n = 70) between 1995 and 2006 were analyzed. Patients were divided into ISR and APR groups. Survival and local recurrence were investigated in both groups.

Results

The median follow-up was 40 months in the ISR group and 57 months in the APR group. The 5-year local relapse-free survival rate was 83% in the ISR group and 80% in the APR group (p = 0.364), and the 5-year disease-free survival rate was 69% in the ISR group and 63% in the APR group (p = 0.714).

Conclusions

For very low rectal cancers, ISR appears to be oncologically acceptable and can reduce the number of APRs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kapiteijn E, Marijnen CA, Nagtegaal ID et al (2001) Preoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision for resectable rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 345:638–646

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Heald RJ, Ryall RD (1986) Recurrence and survival after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Lancet 28:1479–1482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Pollett WG, Nicholls RJ (1983) The relationship between the extent of distal clearance and survival and local recurrence rates after curative anterior resection for carcinoma of the rectum. Ann Surg 198:159–163

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland (1996) Guidelines for the management of colorectal cancer. The Royal College of Surgeons of England, London

    Google Scholar 

  5. Quirke P, Durdey P, Dixon MF et al (1986) Local recurrence of rectal adenocarcinoma due to inadequate surgical resection; histopathological study of lateral tumour spread and surgical excision. Lancet 38:996–999

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Nicholls RJ, Hall C (1996) Treatment of non-disseminated cancer of the lower rectum. Br J Surg 83:15–18

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Rullier E, Laurent C, Bretagnol F et al (2005) Sphincter-saving resection for all rectal carcinomas: the end of the 2-cm distal rule. Ann Surg 241:465–469

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Schiessel R, Karner-Hanusch J, Herbst F et al (1994) Intersphincteric resection for low rectal tumours. Br J Surg 81:1376–1378

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Braun J, Treutner KH, Winkeltau G et al (1992) Results of intersphincteric resection of the rectum with direct coloanal anastomosis for rectal carcinoma. Am J Surg 163:407–412

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Teramoto T, Watanabe M, Kitajima M (1997) Per anum intersphincteric rectal dissection with direct coloanal anastomosis for lower rectal cancer: the ultimate sphincter-preserving operation. Dis Colon Rectum 40:S43–S47

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Rullier E, Zerbib F, Laurent C et al (1999) Intersphincteric resection with excision of internal anal sphincter for conservative treatment of very low rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 42:1168–1175

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Köhler A, Athanasiadis S, Ommer A et al (2000) Long-term results of low anterior resection with intersphincteric anastomosis in carcinoma of the lower one-third of the rectum: analysis of 31 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 43:843–850

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Rullier E, Goffre B, Bonnel C et al (2001) Preoperative radiochemotherapy and sphincter-saving resection for T3 carcinomas of the lower third of the rectum. Ann Surg 234:633–640

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Tiret E, Poupardin B, McNamara D et al (2003) Ultralow anterior resection with intersphincteric dissection—what is the limit of safe sphincter preservation? Colorectal Dis 5:454–457

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Saito N, Ono M, Sugito M et al (2004) Early results of intersphincteric resection for patients with very low rectal cancer: an active approach to avoid a permanent colostomy. Dis Colon Rectum 47:459–466

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bretagnol F, Rullier E, Laurent C et al (2004) Comparison of functional results and quality of life between intersphincteric resection and conventional coloanal anastomosis for low rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 47:832–838

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Schiessel R, Novi G, Holzer B et al (2005) Technique and long-term results of intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 48:1858–1867

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Saito N, Moriya Y, Shirouzu K et al (2006) Intersphincteric resection in patients with very low rectal cancer: a review of the Japanese experience. Dis Colon Rectum 49:S13–S22

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hohenberger W, Merkel S, Matzel K et al (2006) The influence of abdomino-peranal (intersphincteric) resection of lower third rectal carcinoma on the rates of sphincter preservation and locoregional recurrence. Colorectal Dis 8:23–33

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Portier G, Ghouti L, Kirzin S et al (2007) Oncological outcome of ultra-low coloanal anastomosis with and without intersphincteric resection for low rectal adenocarcinoma. Br J Surg 94:341–345

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Chamlou R, Parc Y, Simon T et al (2007) Long-term results of intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer. Ann Surg 246:916–921

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Sobin LH, Wittekind C (2002) International union against cancer TMN classification of malignant tumours, 6th edn. Wiley-Liss, New York

    Google Scholar 

  23. Sugihara K, Moriya Y, Akasu T et al (1996) Pelvic autonomic nerve preservation for patients with rectal carcinoma. Oncologic and functional outcome. Cancer 78:1871–1880

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Mori T, Takahashi K, Yasuno M (1998) Radical resection with autonomic nerve preservation and lymph node dissection techniques in lower rectal cancer surgery and its results: the impact of lateral lymph node dissection. Langenbecks Arch Surg 383:409–415

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Saito N, Koda K, Takiguchi K et al (1999) Nerve-sparing surgery for advanced rectal cancer patients: special reference to Dukes C patients. World J Surg 23:1062–1068

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Parks AG, Percy JP (1982) Resection and sutured colo-anal anastomosis for rectal carcinoma. Br J Surg 69:301–304

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Parks AG (1972) Transanal technique in low rectal anastomosis. Proc R Soc Med 65:975–976

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Shafik A (1986) A new concept of the anatomy of the anal sphincter mechanism and the physiology of defecation. Reversion to normal defecation after combined excision operation and end colostomy for rectal cancer. Am J Surg 151:278–284

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Law WL, Chu KW (2001) Impact of total mesorectal excision on the results of surgery of distal rectal cancer. Br J Surg 88:1607–1612

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Enker WE, Havenga K, Polyak T et al (1997) Abdominoperineal resection via total mesorectal excision and autonomic nerve preservation for low rectal cancer. World J Surg 21:715–720

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Akasu T, Takawa M, Yamamoto S et al (2007) Incidence and patterns of recurrence after intersphincteric resection for very low rectal adenocarcinoma. J Am Coll Surg 205:642–647

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Paty PB, Enker WE, Cohen AM et al (1994) Treatment of rectal cancer by low anterior resection with coloanal anastomosis. Ann Surg 219:365–373

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Bonadeo FA, Vaccaro CA, Benati ML et al (2001) Rectal cancer: local recurrence after surgery without radiotherapy. Dis Colon Rectum 44:374–379

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Gamagami RA, Liagre A, Chiotasso P et al (1999) Coloanal anastomosis for distal third rectal cancer: prospective study of oncologic results. Dis Colon Rectum 42:1272–1275

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Yamada K, Ogata S, Saiki Y et al (2007) Functional results of intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer. Br J Surg 94:1272–1277

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported in part by a Grant-in-Aid (18-7) for Cancer Research from the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan. We thank the staff of the Department of Pathology at our institute for the pathologic investigations performed for the present study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Norio Saito.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Saito, N., Sugito, M., Ito, M. et al. Oncologic Outcome of Intersphincteric Resection for Very Low Rectal Cancer. World J Surg 33, 1750–1756 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-009-0079-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-009-0079-2

Keywords

Navigation