Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Can Forest Managers Plan for Resilient Landscapes? Lessons from the United States National Forest Plan Revision Process

Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The United States Forest Service, a federal agency entrusted with managing 78 M hectares of national forestlands under a broad multiple-use mandate, has seen recent shifts in policy direction emphasizing ecological restoration, consideration of climate change impacts, and a focus on managing for resilient landscapes. The process of revising the comprehensive plans guiding national forest management presents opportunities to reorient objectives, activities, and commitments toward these goals. Here we analyze case studies of three national forests that have completed the forest plan revision process since 2014: the Francis Marion National Forest in coastal South Carolina, the Kaibab National Forest in northern Arizona, and the Rio Grande National Forest in southern Colorado. We analyze plan revision participants’ perspectives on the opportunities and barriers to reorienting national forest management toward resilient landscapes and the broader political, social, and institutional factors that influence these dynamics. Key opportunities included better promoting resilient landscape objectives by revising fire management guidelines, incorporating scientific data and modeling from multiple agency and non-agency partners, and building opportunities for adaptive management via long-term trust networks. Major barriers included inconsistent higher-level support for resilience objectives, an emphasis on meeting narrow quantitative performance targets, and under-investments in monitoring.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abrams J (2019) The emergence of network governance in US National Forest administration: causal factors and propositions for future research. Policy Econ 106:101977

    Google Scholar 

  • Abrams J, Huber-Stearns H, Bone C et al. (2017) Adaptation to a landscape-scale mountain pine beetle epidemic in the era of networked governance: the enduring importance of bureaucratic institutions. Ecol Soc 22:22

    Google Scholar 

  • Abrams J, Knapp M, Paveglio TB et al. (2015) Re-envisioning community-wildfire relations in the US West as adaptive governance. Ecol Soc 20:34

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen CD (2002) Lots of lightning and plenty of people: an ecological history of fire in the upland Southwest. In: Vale T (ed) Fire, native peoples, and the natural landscape. Island Press, Washington, D.C, pp 173–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Archie KM, Dilling L, Milford JB, Pampel FC (2012) Climate change and western public lands: a survey of US federal land managers on the status of adaptation efforts. Ecol Soc 17:20

  • Baron JS, Gunderson L, Allen CD et al. (2009) Options for national parks and reserves for adapting to climate change. Environ Manag 44:1033–1042

    Google Scholar 

  • Benson MH, Garmestani AS (2011a) Can we manage for resilience? the integration of resilience thinking into natural resource management in the United States. Environ Manag 48:392–399

    Google Scholar 

  • Benson MH, Garmestani AS (2011b) Embracing panarchy, building resilience and integrating adaptive management through a rebirth of the National Environmental Policy Act. J Environ Manag 92:1420–1427

    Google Scholar 

  • Biber E (2009) Too many things to do: how to deal with the dysfunctions of multiple-goal agencies. Harv Environ Law Rev 33:1–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Bone C, Moseley C, Vinyeta K, Bixler RP (2016) Employing resilience in the United States Forest Service. Land Use Policy 52:430–438

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown SJM, Nie M (2019) Making forest planning great again? early implementation of the Forest Service’s 2012 National Forest Planning Rule. Nat Resour Environ 33:1–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Busenberg G (2004) Wildfire management in the United States: the evolution of a policy failure. Rev Policy Res 21:145–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler KF, Koontz TM (2005) Theory into practice: implementing ecosystem management objectives in the USDA Forest Service. Environ Manag 35:138–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler WH, Goldstein BE (2010) The US fire learning network: springing a rigidity trap through multi-scalar collaborative networks. Ecol Soc 15:21

    Google Scholar 

  • Calkin DE, Thompson MP, Finney MA (2015) Negative consequences of positive feedbacks in US wildfire management. Ecosyst 2:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnley S, Poe MR, Ager AA et al. (2015) A burning problem: social dynamics of disaster risk reduction through wildfire mitigation. Hum Organ 74:329–340

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng AS, Gerlak AK, Dale L, Mattor K (2015) Examining the adaptability of collaborative governance associated with publicly managed ecosystems over time: insights from the Front Range Roundtable, Colorado, USA. Ecol Soc 20:35. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-07187-200135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Church SP, Dunn M, Prokopy LS (2019) Benefits to qualitative data quality with multiple coders: two case studies in multi-coder data analysis. J Rural Soc Sci 34:2

    Google Scholar 

  • Colavito MM (2017) Utilising scientific information to support resilient forest and fire management. Int J Wildland Fire 26:375–383

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman K, Stern MJ, Widmer J (2018) Facilitation, coordination, and trust in landscape-level forest restoration. J 116:41–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Cortner HJ, Moote MA (1999) The politics of ecosystem management. Island Press, Washington, D.C

    Google Scholar 

  • Cosens BA (2013) Legitimacy, Adaptation, and Resilience in Ecosystem Management. Ecol Soc 18:3. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-05093-180103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dale L (2006) Wildfire Policy and Fire Use on Public Lands in the United States. Soc Nat Resour 19:275–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920500460898

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dale L, Gerlak AK (2007) It’s all in the numbers: acreage tallies and environmental program evaluation. Environ Manag 39:246–260

    Google Scholar 

  • Davenport MA, Leahy JE, Anderson DH, Jakes PJ (2007) Building trust in natural resource management within local communities: a case study of the Midewin National Tallgrass Prairie. Environ Manag 39:353–368. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-006-0016-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson DJ (2010) The applicability of the concept of resilience to social systems: some sources of optimism and nagging doubts. Soc Nat Resour 23:1135–1149

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis EJ, Cerveny LK, Ulrich DR, Nuss ML (2018) Making and breaking trust in forest collaborative groups. Humboldt J Soc Relat 40:211–231

    Google Scholar 

  • DeLuca TH, Aplet GH, Wilmer B, Burchfield J (2010) The unknown trajectory of forest restoration: a call for ecosystem monitoring. J 108:288–295

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennison PE, Brewer SC, Arnold JD, Moritz MA (2014) Large wildfire trends in the western United States, 1984–2011. Geophys Res Lett 41:2928–2933. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL059576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellenwood MS, Dilling L, Milford JB (2012) Managing United States public lands in response to climate change: a view from the ground up. Environ Manag 49:954–967

    Google Scholar 

  • Falk DA (2017) Restoration ecology, resilience, and the axes of change. Ann Mo Bot Gard 102:201–216. https://doi.org/10.3417/2017006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez S, Rainey HG (2006) Managing successful organizational change in the public sector. Public Adm Rev 66:168–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer AP, Spies TA, Steelman TA et al. (2016) Wildfire risk as a socioecological pathology. Front Ecol Environ 14:276–284

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisichelli NA, Schuurman GW, Hoffman CH (2016) Is ‘resilience’ maladaptive? towards an accurate lexicon for climate change adaptation. Environ Manag 57:753–758. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-015-0650-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleischman F, Struthers C, Arnold G et al. (2020) US Forest Service implementation of the National Environmental Policy Act: fast, variable, rarely litigated, and declining. J 118:403–418. https://doi.org/10.1093/jofore/fvaa016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garmestani AS, Benson MH (2013) A Framework for Resilience-based Governance of Social-Ecological Systems. Ecol Soc 18:9. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-05180-180109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greiner SM, Grimm KE, Waltz AE (2020) Managing for resilience? examining management implications of resilience in southwestern national forests. J For. https://doi.org/10.1093/jofore/fvaa006

  • Gunderson LH, Holling CS (eds) (2002) Panarchy: understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Island Press, Washington, D.C

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanberry BB, Bragg DC, Alexander HD (2020) Open forest ecosystems: an excluded state. Ecol Manag 472:118256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hessburg PF, Agee JK (2003) An environmental narrative of inland northwest United States forests. 1800–2000 Ecol Manag 178:23–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirt PW (1994) A conspiracy of optimism: management of the national forests since World War Two. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, NE

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoberg G (1992) Pluralism by design: environmental policy and the American regulatory state. Praeger Publishers, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Holling CS (1973) Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 4:1–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Holling CS (1996) Engineering resilience versus ecological resilience. In: Schulze P (ed) Engineering within ecological constraints. National Academies Press, Washington, D.C, p 31–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Holling CS, Meffe GK (1996) Command and control and the pathology of natural resource management. Conserv Biol 10:328–337

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingalls ML, Stedman RC (2016) The power problematic: exploring the uncertain terrains of political ecology and the resilience framework. Ecol Soc 21:6

    Google Scholar 

  • Jantarasami LC, Lawler JJ, Thomas CW (2010) Institutional barriers to climate change adaptation in US national parks and forests. Ecol Soc 15:33

  • Johnson KN (1987) Reflections on the development of FORPLAN. In: Hoekstra TW, Dyer AA, LeMaster DC (eds) FORPLAN: An Evaluation of a Forest Planning Tool. USDA Forest Service Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO, pp 45–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson KN (1992) Consideration of watersheds in long-term forest planning models: the case of FORPLAN and Its use on the national forests. In: Naiman RJ (ed) Watershed Management: Balancing Sustainability and Environmental Change. Springer, New York, NY, p 347–360

    Google Scholar 

  • Joyce LA, Blate GM, McNulty SG et al. (2009) Managing for multiple resources under climate change: national forests. Environ Manag 44:1022–1032

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemp KB, Blades JJ, Klos PZ et al. (2015) Managing for climate change on federal lands of the western United States: perceived usefulness of climate science, effectiveness of adaptation strategies, and barriers to implementation. Ecol Soc 20:17

    Google Scholar 

  • Kent B, Bare BB, Field RC, Bradley GA (1991) Natural resource land management planning using large-scale linear programs: the USDA Forest Service experience with FORPLAN. Oper Res 39:13–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein RJT, Nicholls RJ, Thomalla F (2003) Resilience to natural hazards: how useful is this concept? Glob Environ Change Part B Environ Hazards 5:35–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Koontz TM, Bodine J (2008) Implementing ecosystem management in public agencies: lessons from the U.S. Bureau of Land Management and the Forest Service. Conserv Biol 22:60–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Koontz TM, Gupta D, Mudliar P, Ranjan P (2015) Adaptive institutions in social-ecological systems governance: A synthesis framework. Environ Sci Policy 53:139–151

    Google Scholar 

  • Littell JS, Peterson DL, Millar CI, O’Halloran KA (2012) US National Forests adapt to climate change through science–management partnerships. Clim Change 110:269–296

    Google Scholar 

  • McWethy DB, Schoennagel T, Higuera PE et al. (2019) Rethinking resilience to wildfire. Nat Sustain 2:797–804

    Google Scholar 

  • Moseley C, Charnley S (2014) Understanding micro-processes of institutionalization: stewardship contracting and national forest management. Policy Sci 47:69–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton AC (2016) Biodiversity risks of adopting resilience as a policy goal. Conserv Lett 9:369–376

    Google Scholar 

  • Nie MA, Schultz CA (2012) Decision-making triggers in adaptive management. Conserv Biol 26:1137–1144

    Google Scholar 

  • North MP, Stephens SL, Collins BM et al. (2015) Reform forest fire management. Science 349:1280–1281

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Olsson L, Jerneck A, Thoren H et al. (2015) Why resilience is unappealing to social science: theoretical and empirical investigations of the scientific use of resilience. Sci Adv 1:e1400217

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom E (2009) A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science 325:419–422

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom E (2007) A diagnostic approach for going beyond panaceas. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:15181–15187

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pyne SJ (1982) Fire in America: a cultural history of wildland and rural fire. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Raish C (2000) Environmentalism, the Forest Service, and the Hispano communities of northern New Mexico. Soc Nat Resour 13:489–508

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasch R, McCaffrey S (2019) Exploring wildfire-prone community trust in wildfire management agencies. Sci 65:652–663

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiners D (2012) Institutional effects on decision making on public lands: an interagency examination of wildfire management. Public Adm Rev 72:177–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricco G, Schultz CA (2019) Organizational learning during policy implementation: lessons from U.S. forest planning. J Environ Policy Plan 21:275–287. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2019.1623659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rigg CM (2001) Orchestrating ecosystem management: challenges and lessons from Sequoia National Forest. Conserv Biol 15:78–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2001.99339.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoennagel T, Balch JK, Brenkert-Smith H et al. (2017) Adapt to more wildfire in western North American forests as climate changes. Proc Natl Acad Sci 114:4582–4590. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1617464114

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz C (2008) Responding to scientific uncertainty in US forest policy. Environ Sci Policy 11:253–271

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz CA, Moseley C, Mattor K (2015) Striking the balance between budgetary discretion and performance accountability: the case of the US Forest Service’s approach to integrated restoration. J Nat Resour Policy Res 7:109–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz CA, Thompson MP, McCaffrey SM (2019) Forest Service fire management and the elusiveness of change. Fire Ecol 15:13

    Google Scholar 

  • Selles OA, Rissman AR (2020) Content analysis of resilience in forest fire science and management. Land Use Policy 94:104483

    Google Scholar 

  • Shindler BA, Toman E, McCaffrey SM (2009) Public perspectives of fire, fuels and the Forest Service in the Great Lakes Region: a survey of citizen–agency communication and trust. Int J Wildland Fire 18:157–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Spies TA, White EM, Kline JD et al. (2014) Examining fire-prone forest landscapes as coupled human and natural systems. Ecol Soc 19:9

    Google Scholar 

  • Steelman T (2016) US wildfire governance as social-ecological problem. Ecol Soc 21:3. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-08681-210403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steelman TA, Burke CA (2007) Is wildfire policy in the United States sustainable? J 105:67–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Steelman TA, McCaffrey SM (2011) What is limiting more flexible fire management—public or agency pressure? J 109:454–461

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephens SL, Collins BM, Biber E, Fulé PZ (2016) US federal fire and forest policy: emphasizing resilience in dry forests. Ecosphere 7:e01584

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephens SL, Ruth LW (2005) Federal forest-fire policy in the United States. Ecol Appl 15:532–542

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern MJ, Coleman KJ (2015) The multidimensionality of trust: applications in collaborative natural resource management. Soc Nat Resour 28:117–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern MJ, Martin CA, Predmore SA, Morse WC (2014) Risk tradeoffs in adaptive ecosystem management: the case of the US Forest Service. Environ Manag 53:1095–1108

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern MJ, Predmore SA (2012) The importance of team functioning to natural resource planning outcomes. J Environ Manag 106:30–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.03.049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern MJ, Predmore SA, Mortimer MJ, Seesholtz DN (2010) The meaning of the National Environmental Policy Act within the U.S. Forest Service. J Environ Manag 91:1371–1379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.02.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens‐Rumann CS, Kemp KB, Higuera PE et al. (2018) Evidence for declining forest resilience to wildfires under climate change. Ecol Lett 21:243–252. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12889

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tierney K (2015) Resilience and the neoliberal project: Discourses, critiques, practices—and Katrina. Am Behav Sci 59:1327–1342

    Google Scholar 

  • Timberlake T, Schultz C, Abrams J (2017) Resilience in land management planning: policy mandates, approaches, and resources. Ecosystem Workforce Program, Institute for a Sustainable Environment, Eugene, OR

    Google Scholar 

  • Timberlake TJ, Schultz CA, Evans A, Abrams JB (2020) Working on institutions while planning for forest resilience: a case study of public land management in the United States. J Environ Plan Manag. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2020.1817730

  • Wenger C (2017) The oak or the reed: how resilience theories are translated into disaster management policies. Ecol Soc 22:18

    Google Scholar 

  • Westerling AL, Hidalgo HG, Cayan DR, Swetnam TW (2006) Warming and earlier spring increase western US forest wildfire activity. Science 313:940–943

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wurtzebach Z, Schultz C (2016) Measuring ecological integrity: history, practical applications, and research opportunities. BioScience 66:446–457

    Google Scholar 

  • Wurtzebach Z, Schultz C, Waltz AEM et al. (2019) Adaptive governance and the administrative state: knowledge management for forest planning in the western United States. Reg Environ Change 19:2651–2666. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-019-01569-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young OR (2002) Institutional interplay: the environmental consequences of cross-scale interactions. In: Ostrom E, Dietz T, Dolsak N, et al., (eds) The drama of the commons. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C, pp 263–291

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors sincerely appreciate the time and contributions of our case-study interviewees. This study was funded by the Joint Fire Science Program, Grant #16-3-01-10).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jesse Abrams.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abrams, J., Greiner, M., Schultz, C. et al. Can Forest Managers Plan for Resilient Landscapes? Lessons from the United States National Forest Plan Revision Process. Environmental Management 67, 574–588 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-021-01451-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-021-01451-4

Keywords

Navigation