Abstract
Over one-fourth of the world’s land area is dedicated to agriculture, and these lands provide important ecosystem services (ES). Trees are a key component of agricultural ecosystems’ ability to provide ES, especially in tropical regions. Agricultural landowners’ evaluation of the ES provided by trees influences management decisions, impacting tree cover at large scales. Using a case study approach, we conducted semi-structured interviews with four types of agricultural landowners in southern Costa Rica to better understand how they value ES provided by trees. We used a socio-cultural valuation method, which revealed that landowners highly valued regulating and provisioning ES provided by trees and that the number and type of ES identified was influenced by the principle economic activity. Those farmers with larger amounts of forests on their properties more often identified cultural ES. The socio-cultural valuation methods revealed that respondents valued trees as wildlife habitat, coupling supporting and cultural services with both material (e.g., tourism) and non-material benefits (e.g., beauty). Few farmers in the study benefited from payment for ecosystem services programs, but the high value farmers placed on trees indicates there are other opportunities to increase tree cover on farms, such as promotion of live fencing and expanded riparian corridors. Results from this work can help improve conservation outcomes by shifting the focus of ecosystem service valuation to the needs and concerns of small-scale farmers in the development of outreach programs, management plans, and policies aimed at increasing tree cover on private lands in agricultural landscapes.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arriagada RA, Ferraro PJ, Sills EO, Pattanayak SK, Cordero-Sancho S (2012) Do payments for environmental services affect forest cover? A farm-level evaluation from Costa Rica. Land Econ 88(2):382–399. https://doi.org/10.3368/le.88.2.382
Asah ST, Blahna DJ, Ryan CM (2012) Involving forest communities in identifying and constructing ecosystem services: Millennium assessment and place specificity. J Forestry 3:149–156. https://doi.org/10.5849/jof.11-054
Asah ST, Guerry AD, Blahna DJ, Lawler JJ (2014) Perception, acquisition and use of ecosystem services: human behavior, and ecosystem management and policy implications. Ecosyst Serv 10(2014):180–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.08.003
Babbie E (2013) The practice of social research., 13th edn. Wadsworth, Cengage Learning, Belmont, CA
Babin N (2015) The coffee crisis, fair trade, and agroecological transformation: impacts on land-use change in Costa Rica. Agroecology Sustain Food Syst 39:99–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/21683565.2014.960549
Barton DN, Benjamin T, Cerdan CR, DeClerck F, Madsen AS, Rusch GM, Salazar AG, Sanchez D, Villanueva C (2016) Assessing ecosystem services from multifunctional trees in pastures using Bayesian belief networks. Ecosyst Serv 18:165–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.03.002
Bath-Rosenfeld R (2019) The importance of fruiting trees for seed-dispersing frugivores on agricultural and pastoral landscapes in southern Costa Rica. Masters thesis, Northern Arizona University
Bernard HR (2006) Research methods in anthropology., 4th edn. Altamira Press, Oxford, UK
Bernues A, Tello-Garcia E, Rodriguez-Ortega R, Ripoll-Bosch R, Casasus I (2016) Agricultural practices, ecosystem services and sustainability in High Nature Value farmland: Unraveling the perceptions of farmers and nonfarmers. Land Use Policy 59:130–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.08.033
Borgella RJ, Snow AA, Gavin TA (2001) Species richness and pollen loads of hummingbirds using forest fragments in southern Costa Rica. Biotropica 33:90–109. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7429.2001.tb00160.x
Brinkhoff T (2017) Coto Brus: Canton in Costa Rica. https://www.citypopulation.de/php/costarica-admin.php?adm1id=608
Caceres DM, Tapella E, Quetier F, Diaz S (2015) The social value of biodiversity and ecosystem services from the perspectives of different social actors. Ecol Soc 20:62. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26269749
Cadavid-Florez L, Laborde J, Mclean DJ (2020) Isolated trees and small woody patches greatly contribute to connectivity in highly fragmented tropical landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning 196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103745
Campbell LM (2002) Conservation narratives in Costa Rica: conflict and co-existence. Dev Change 33:29–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7660.00239
Chan KMA, Satterfield T, Goldstein J (2012) Rethinking ecosystem services to better address and navigate cultural values. Ecol Econ 74:8–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.11.011
Cole RJ (2010) Social and environmental impacts of payments for environmental services for agroforestry on small-scale farms in southern Costa Rica. Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol 17(3):208–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504501003729085
Costanza R, de Groot R, Braat L, Kubiszewsk I, Fioramonti L, Sutton P, Farber S, Grasso M (2017) Twenty years of ecosystem services: how far have we come and how far do we still need to go? Ecosyst Serv 28:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.09.008
Daily GC, Ehrlich PR, Sanchez-Azofeifa GA (2001) Countryside biogeography: use of human-dominated habitats by the avifauna of southern Costa Rica. Ecol Appl 11:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(2001)011[0001:CBUOHD]2.0.CO;2
De Groot RS, Wilson MA, Boumans RMJ (2002) A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods, and services. Ecol Econ 1:393–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00089-7
Estrada-Carmona N, Martinez-Salas A, DeClerck FAJ, Vilchez-Mendoza S, Garbach K (2019) Managing the farmscape for connectivity increases conservation value for tropical bird species with different forest-dependencies. J Environ Manage. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109504
Gillies CS, Cassady St. Clair C (2008) Riparian corridors enhance movement of a forest specialist bird in fragmented tropical forest. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105(50):19774–19779. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0803530105
Garbach K, Martinez-Salinas A, DeClerck F (2010) The importance of management: contributions of live fences to maintaining bird diversity in agricultural landscapes. Mesoamericana 3(14):53–66
Harvey CA, Haber WA (1999) Remnant trees and the conservation of biodiversity in Costa Rican pastures. Agrofor Syst 44:37–67
Harvey CA, Komar O, Chazdon R, Ferguson BG, Finegan B, Griffith DM, Martinez-Ramos M, Morales H, Nigh R, Soto-Pinto L, Van Breugel M, Wishnie M (2008) Integrating agricultural landscapes with biodiversity conservation in the Mesoamerican hotspot. Conserv Biol 22(1):8–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00863.x
Henderson KA, Anand M, Bauch CT (2013) Carrot or stick? Modelling how landowner behavioural responses can cause incentive-based forest governance to backfire. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0077735
Iniesta-Arandia I, Garcia-Llorente M, Aguilera PA, Montes C, Martin-Lopez B (2014) Socio-cultural valuations of ecosystem services: uncovering the links between values, drivers of change, and human well-being. Ecol Econ 10:36–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.09.028
[IPBES] Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (2019) Cultural and social valuation methods. https://ipbes.net/cultural-social-valuation-methods. Accessed 15 Apr 2020
Jacobs S, Martín-López B, Barton DN, Dunford R, Harrison PA, Kelemen E, Saarikoski H, Termansen M, Garcia-Llorente M, Gomez-Baggethun E, Kopperoinen L, Luque S, Palomo I, Priess JA, Rusch GM, Tenerelli P, Turkelboom F, Demeyer R, Hauck J, Keune H, Smith R (2018) The means determine the end: pursuing integrated valuation in practice. Ecosyst Serv 29:515–528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.07.011
Jantzi T, Schelhas J, Lassoie JP (1999) Environmental values and forest patch conservation in a rural Costa Rican community. Agriculture Hum Values 16:29–39. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007524321057
Lansing DM (2014) Unequal access to payments for ecosystem services: the case of Costa Rica. Dev Change 45(6):1310–1331. https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12134
Lansing DM (2017) Understanding smallholder participation in payments for ecosystem services: the case of Costa Rica. Hum Ecol 45(1):77–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-016-9886-x
Lapointe M, Cumming GS, Gurney GG (2019) Comparing ecosystem service preferences between urban and rural dwellers. BioScience 151:108–116. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biy151
Lautenbach S, Mupepele AC et al. (2019) Blind spots in ecosystem services research and challenges for implementation. Reg Environ Change. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-018-1457-9
Leon MC, Harvey CA (2006) Live fences and landscape connectivity in a neotropical agricultural landscape. Agrofor Syst 68:15–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-005-5831-5
Logsdon RA, Kalcic MM, Trybula EM, Chaubey I, Frankenberger JR (2015) Ecosystem services and Indiana agriculture: farmers’ and conservationists’ perceptions. Int J Biodivers Sci, Ecosyst Serv Manag 11(3):264–282
[MA] Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Ecosystems and their services. In: ecosystems and human well-being: a framework for assessment, Sarukhan J and Whyte A (eds) Island Press, Washington, pp 49–70
Matias DMS, Leventon J, Rau AL, Borgemeister C, von Wehrden H (2017) A review of ecosystem service benefits from wild bees across social contexts. Ambio 46:456–467. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-016-0844-z
Mendenhall CD, Shields-Estrada A, Krishnaswami AJ, Daily GC (2016) Quantifying and sustaining biodiversity in tropical agricultural landscapes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 113:14544–14551. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1604981113
Morse WC, Schedlbauer JL, Sesnie SE, Finegan B, Harvey CA, Hollenhorst SJ, Kavanagh KL, Stoian D, Wulfhorst JD (2009) Consequences of environmental service payments for forest retention and recruitment in a Costa Rican biological corridor. Ecol Soc 14(1):23, http://www.jstor.org/stable/26268023
Muhamad D, Okubo S, Harashina K, Parikesit, Gunawan B, Takeuchi K (2014) Living close to forests enhances people’s perception of ecosystem services in a forest-agricultural landscape of West Java, Indonesia. Ecosyst Serv 8:197–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.04.003
Newing H, Eagle CM, Puri RK, Watson CN (2011) Conducting research in conservation: Social Science in Methods and Practice New York. Routledge, NY
Page G, Bellotti B (2015) Farmers value on-farm ecosystem services as important, but what are the impediments to participation in PES schemes? Sci Total Environ 515-516:12–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.02.029
Petchers S, Harris S (2008) The roots of the coffee crisis. In: Bacon CM (ed) Confronting the coffee crisis. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 43–66
Power AG (2010) Ecosystem services and agriculture: tradeoffs and synergies. Philos Trans R Soc 365:2959–2971. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0143
Quesada Román A (2013) Condición de uso de la tierra del distrito San Vito, Coto Brus, Puntarenas. Reflexiones. http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=72927050003. Accessed 20 Sep 2019
Quinn CE, Quinn JE, Halfacre AC (2015) Digging deeper: a case study of farmer conceptualization of ecosystem services in the American south. Environ Manag 56:802–813. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-015-0534-9
QSR International (2018) NVivo Qualitative Data Analysis Software Version 12 [software]
Reid JL (2016) Knowledge and experience predict indiscriminate bat-killing intentions among Costa Rican men. Biotropica 48(3):394–404. https://doi.org/10.1111/btp.12279
Reid JL, Fagan ME, Lucas J, Slaughter J, Zahawi RA (2018) The ephemerality of secondary forests in southern Costa Rica. Conservation Lett. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12607
Reyes SA, Rosado IA (2000) Plantas utilizadas como cercas vivas en el estado de Veracruz. Madera y Bosques 1(6):55–71. https://doi.org/10.21829/myb.2000.611342
Ricketts TH, Daily CD, Ehrlich PR, Michener CD (2004) Economic value of tropical forest to coffee production. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101(34):12579–12582. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0405147101
Saarikoski H, Primmer E et al. (2018) Institutional challenges in putting ecosystem service knowledge in practice. Ecosyst Serv 29:579–598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.07.019
Sandhu HS, Wratten SD, Cullen R (2007) From poachers to gamekeepers: perceptions of farmers toward ecosystem services on arable farmland. Int J Agric Sustainability 5:39–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/14735903.2007.9684812
Schenk A, Hunziker M, Kienast F (2007) Factors influencing the acceptance of nature conservation measures-A qualitative study in Switzerland. J Environ Manag 83:66–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.01.010
Scholte SSK, van Teffelen AJA, Verburg PH (2015) Integrating socio-cultural perspectives into ecosystem service valuation: a review of concepts and methods. Ecol Econ 114:67–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.03.007
Sibelet N, Chamayou L, Newing H, Gutierrez Montes I (2017) Perceptions of trees outside forests in cattle pastures: Land sharing within the Central Volcanic Talamanca Biological Corridor, Costa Rica. Hum Ecol 45:499–511. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-017-9924-3
Smith HF, Sullivan CA (2014) Ecosystem services within agricultural landscapes-Farmers’ perceptions. Ecol Econ 98:72–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.12.008
Smith J (2016) Contested understandings of sustainability and climate issues in southern Costa Rica. Econ Ecol, Exch, Adapt: Anthropological Explorations: Res Economic Anthropol 36:33–56. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0190-128120160000036002
Swinton SM, Lupi F, Robertson GP, Hamilton SK (2007) Ecosystem services and agriculture: cultivating agricultural ecosystems for diverse benefits. Ecol Econ 64:245–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.09.020
Teixeira HM, Vermue AJ, Cardoso IM, Claros MP, Bianchi FJJA (2018) Farmers show complex and contrasting perceptions on ecosystem services and their management. Ecosyst Serv 33a:44–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.08.006
Thomas DR (2006) A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. Am J Evaluation 27:237–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214005283748
TV Sur Canal 14 (2016) Estudio revela que el canton de Coto Brus es uno de los mas pobres del pais. TV Sur Canal 14. http://www.tvsur.co.cr/noticias/estudio-revela-que-el-canton-de-coto-brus-es-uno-de-los-mas-pobres-del-pais/. Accessed 15 Apr 2018
Vignola R, Gonzelz-Rodrigo B, Lane O, Marchamalo M, McDaniels T (2017) A scenario approach to assess stakeholder preferences for ecosystem services in agricultural landscapes of Costa Rica. Regional Environ Change 2(17):605–618. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-016-1051-y
Walze A, Schmidt K et al. (2019) Sociocultural valuation of ecosystem services for operational ecosystem management: mapping applications by decision contexts in Europe. Regional Environ Change 19:2245–2259
Wolfe JD, Elizondo P (2020) Integrating wildlife conservation into ecosystem service payments and carbon offsets: a case study from Costa Rica. Conserv Sci Pract (2)4. https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.173
Young JC, Rose DC, Mumby HS, Benitez-Capistros F, Derrick CJ, Finch T, Mukherjee N (2018) A methodological guide to using and reporting on interviews in conservation science research. Methods Ecol Evol 9:10–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12828
Zahawi RA (2005) Establishment and growth of living fence species: an overlooked tool for the restoration of degraded areas in the tropics. Restor Ecol 1(13):92–201. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-100X.2005.00011.x
Zahawi RA, Duran G, Kormann U (2015) Sixty-seven years of land-use change in southern Costa Rica. PLoS ONE 10:1–17. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143554
Zbinden S, Lee DR (2005) Paying for environmental services: an analysis of participation in Costa Rica’s PSA program. World Dev 33(2):255–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2004.07.012
Acknowledgements
This study was funded by Earthwatch Institute. The authors would like to Mau Paniagua for providing his local knowledge and assistance throughout the project and Bob Lenegan for his encouragement during this process. The authors also thank the Las Cruces Biological Station staff, the residents of Coto Brus, and the Organization for Tropical Studies.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Leary, J., Grimm, K., Aslan, C. et al. Landowners’ Socio-Cultural Valuation of Ecosystem Services Provided by Trees in Costa Rican Agricultural Landscapes. Environmental Management 67, 974–987 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-021-01442-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-021-01442-5