Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Shrub Encroachment Following Wetland Creation in Mixedgrass Prairie Alters Grassland Vegetation and Soil

  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Wetland decline under post-European settlement and land use change across western Canada has led to mitigation strategies, including wetland creation. Created wetlands can trigger environmental change, including woody species encroachment, in turn altering vegetation and soil. We quantify changes in shrub abundance from prior to wetland creation (1949) until 60 years later (2012) within a Mixedgrass ecosystem of the Verger watershed in Alberta, Canada. In addition, we compare remaining grassland with areas colonized by shrubland on similar ecosites for differences in (1) plant composition, including native and introduced flora, (2) herbage yield and forage accessibility for livestock, and (3) soil properties (surface organic depth, bulk density, mineral nitrogen (N), and carbon (C) concentration). Repeat photos show Shepherdia argentea shrublands increased from 0 to 88 ha (to 1.15% of study area) following wetland creation, with the greatest increase in the last 20 years. Relative to grasslands, shrublands had lower total plant diversity but greater presence of introduced plant species. Shrub patches were 94% lower in herbaceous production, with 77% of shrublands non-utilized by cattle, collectively leading to reduced grazing capacity. Relative to grasslands, shrublands had a thicker soil surface mulch layer, and where cattle were present, had increased mineral soil N and C. Overall, shrub encroachment following wetland creation has markedly altered vegetation and soils in this once grassland landscape, with negative impacts on native plant diversity, herbage production and forage accessibility, and has implications for the management of shrub encroachment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams BW, Richman J, Poulin-Klein L, France K, Moisey D, McNeil RL (2013) Rangeland plant communities for the dry mixedgrass natural subregion of Alberta. Second approximation. Pub. No. T/040. Rangeland Management Branch, Policy Division, Alberta Environment and Sustainable Resource Development, Lethbridge. p 135

  • Alberta Environment (2007) Provincial wetland restoration/compensation guide. Pub. No. T/040. Environemental Partnerships and Education Branch, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. ISBN: 978-0-7785-5479-0

  • Allington GRH, Valone TJ (2014) Islands of fertility: a byproduct of grazing? Ecosystems 17:127–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Allred BW, Smith WK, Twidwell D, Haggerty JH, Running SW, Naugle DE, Fuhlendorf SD (2015) Ecosystem services lost to oil and gas in North America. Science 348:401–402

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson EM, Steidl RJ (2019) Woody plant encroachment restructures bird communities in semiarid grasslands. Biological Conservation 108276

  • Archer S (1995) Tree-grass dynamics in a Prosopis-thornscrub savanna parkland: reconstructing the past and prediction the future. Ecoscience 2:83–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Archer S, Schimel DS, Holland EA (1995) Mechanisms of shrubland expansion - land-use, climate or CO2. Climatic Change 29:91–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Asamoah SA (2008) Vegetation, livestock and waterfowl responses to hydrologic gradients in created wetlands of the Dry Mixedgrass Prairie. PhD Dissertation, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta. p 333

  • Asamoah SA, Bork EW, Thompson JE (2011) Effects of flood seasonality and frequency on northern pintails and other breeding ducks in management prairie wetlands. West North Am Naturalist 71:349–360

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayer WA, Browne LM (1970) Alkaloids of Shepherdia argentea and Shepherdia canadensis. Can J Chem 48:1980–1984

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Badiou P, McDougal R, Pennock D, Clark B (2011) Greenhouse gas emissions and carbon sequestration potential in restored wetlands of the Canadian prairie pothole region. Wetl Ecol Manag 19:237–256

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bai Y, Colberg T, Romo JT, McConkey B, Pennock D, Farrell R (2009) Does expansion of western snowberry enhance ecosystem carbon sequestration and storage in Canadian Prairies? Agric Ecosyst Environ 134:269–276

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bélanger G, Rochette P, Chantigny M, Ziadi N, Angers D, Charbonneau E, Pellerin D, Liang C (2015) Nitrogen availability from dairy cow dung and urine applied to forage grasses in eastern Canada. Can J Plant Sci 95:55–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Bengtsson J, Bullock JM, Egoh B, Everson C, Everson T, O’Connor T, O’Farrell PJ, Smith HG, Lindborg R (2019) Grasslands—more important for ecosystem services than you might think. Ecosphere 10(2):e02582

  • Bestelmeyer BT, Kalil NI, Peters DPC (2007) Does shrub invasion indirectly limit grass establishment via seedling herbivory? A test at grassland-shrubland ecotones. J Vegetation Sci 18:363–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bork EW, Burkinshaw AM (2009) Cool-season floodplain meadow responses to shrub encroachment in Alberta. Rangel Ecol Manag 62:44–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Burkinshaw AM, Bork EW (2009) Shrub encroachment impacts the potential for multiple use conflicts on public land. Environ Manag 44:493–504

    Google Scholar 

  • Carbutt C, Henwood WD, Gilfedder LA (2017) Global plight of native temperate grasslands: Going, going, gone? Biodivers Conserv 26:2911–2932

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapin FS (1980) The mineral nutrition of wild plants. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 11:233–260

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Collette LKD, Pither J (2015) Russian olive (Elaeagnus angustifolia) biology and ecology and its potential to invade northern North American riparian ecosystems. Invasive Plant Sci Manag 8:1–14

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Collins SL, Knapp AK, Briggs JM, Blair JM, Steinauer EM (1998) Modulation of diversity by grazing and mowing in native tallgrass prairie. Science 280:745–747

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Connell JH, Slayter RO (1977) Mechanisms of succession in natural communities and their role in community stability and organization. Am Midl Naturalist 111:1119–1144

    Google Scholar 

  • Darrouzet-Nardi A, D’Antonio CM, Dawson TE (2006) Depth of water acquisition by invading shrubs and resident herbs in a Sierra Nevada meadow. Plant Soil 285:31–43

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dittberner PL, Olson MR (1983) The plant information network (PIN) database: Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, Utah and Wyoming. FWS/OBS-83/86, USDI, Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, D.C., p 786

  • D’Odorico P, Okin GS, Bestelmeyer BT (2012) A synthetic review of feedbacks and drivers of shrub encroachment in arid grasslands. Ecohydrology 5:520–530

    Google Scholar 

  • Donkor NT, Gedir JV, Hudson RJ, Bork EW, Chanasyk DS, Naeth MA (2002) Impacts of grazing systems on soil compaction and pasture production in Alberta. Can J Soil Sci 82:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Dye II KL, Ueckert DN, Whisenant SG (1995) Redberry juniper-herbaceous understory interactions. J Range Manag 48:100–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Erickson DO, Barker WT, Wanapat S, Williamson RL (1981) Nutritional composition of common shrubs in North Dakota, USA. Proceedings of the North Dakota Academy of Science Meeting, North Dakota Academy of Science, Grand Forks, ND, p 4

  • ESRI (2014) ArcGIS Desktop Help 10.0. Mosaic to New Raster. ESRI, Redlands, CA, USA. http://help.arcgis.com/en/arcgisdesktop/10.0/help/index.html#//001700000098000000

  • Fredrickson EL, Estell RE, Laliberte A, Anderson DM (2006) Mesquite recruitment in the Chihuahuan desert: historic and prehistoric patterns with long-term impacts. J Arid Environ 65:285–295

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant TA, Madden E, Berkey GB (2004) Tree and shrub invasion in northern mixed-grass prairie: Implications for breeding grassland birds. Wildl Soc Bull 32:807–818

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant TA, Shaffer TL, Flanders B (2020) Resiliency of native prairies by Kentucky bluegrass, smooth brome, and woody vegetation. Rangel Ecol Manag 73:321–328

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuhlendorf SD, Limb RF, Engle DM, Miller RF (2011) Assessment of prescribed fire as a conservation practice. In: Briske DD (ed) Conservation benefits of rangeland practices: assessment, recommendations and knowledge gaps. USDA, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Washington, D.C., USA, p 75–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen PL, Hoffman GR (1988) The vegetation of the Grand River/Cedar River, Sioux, and Ashland Districts of the Custer National Forest: a habitat classification. GTR RM-157, Fort Collins, Colorado, USDA, p 28

  • Henwood WD (2010) Toward a strategy for the conservation and protection of the world’s temperate grasslands. Gt Plains Res 20:121–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Hladek KL (1971) Growth character and utilization of buffaloberry (Shepherdia argentea Nutt.) in the Little Missouri River badlands of southwestern Dakota. Thesis, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND, USA, p 106

  • Hoekstra JM, Boucher TM, Ricketts TH, Roberts C (2005) Confronting a biome crisis: global disparities of habitat loss and protection. Ecol Lett 8:23–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Janke AK, Anteau MJ, Stafford JD (2019) Prairie wetlands confer consistent migrant refueling conditions across a gradient of land use intensities. Biol Conserv 229:99–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Kent M, Coker P (1992) Vegetation description and analysis: a practical approach. CRC Press, Belhaven Press, London, p 97

    Google Scholar 

  • Klebenow DA, Oakleaf RJ (1984) Historical avifaunal changes in the riparian zone of the Truckee River, Nevada. In: Warner RE, Hendrix KM (eds) California riparian systems: ecology, conservation, and productive management. Proceedings of the 1981 California Riparian Systems Conference, University of California, Davis, Sept. 17-19, University of California Press, Los Angeles, CA, USA, p 203–209

  • Köchy M, Wilson SD (2000) Competitive effects of shrubs and grasses in Prairie. Oikos 91:385–395

    Google Scholar 

  • Köchy M, Wilson SD (2001) Nitrogen deposition and forest expansion in the northern Great Plains. J Ecol 89:807–817

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramp BA, Ansley RJ, Tunnell TR (1998) Survival of mesquite seedlings emerging from cattle and wildlife feces in a semi-arid grassland. Southwest Naturalist 43:300–312

    Google Scholar 

  • Lett MS, Knapp AK, Briggs JM, Blair JM (2004) Influence of shrub encroachment on aboveground net primary productivity and carbon and nitrogen pools in a mesic grassland. Can J Bot 82:1363–1370

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Looman J (1984) The biological flora of Canada: 4. Shepherdia argentea. Can Field Naturalist 98:231–244

    Google Scholar 

  • Maron JL, Connors PG (1996) A native nitrogen-fixing shrub facilitates weed invasion. Oecologia 105:302–312

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarron JK, Knapp AK, Blair JM (2003) Soil C and N responses to woody plant expansion in a mesic grassland. Plant Soil 257:183–192

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McCune B, Grace JB (2002) Analysis of ecological communities. MjM Software Design, Gleneden Beach, Oregon, USA, p 300

  • MacDonald GM (1989) Postglacial palaeoecology of the subalpine forest-grassland ecotone of southwestern Alberta: New insights on vegetation andclimate change in the Canadian Rocky Mountains and adjacent foothills. Palaeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 73:155–173

  • Prather CM, Huynh A, Pennings SC (2017) Woody structure facilitates invasion of woody plants by providing perches for birds. Ecol Evolution 7:8032–8039

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratajczak ZR, Nippert JB, Hartman JC, Ocheltree TW (2011) Positive feedbacks amplify rates of woody encroaching in mesic tallgrass prairie. Ecosphere 2:121

  • Ratajczak Z, Nippert JB, Collins SL (2012) Woody encroachment decreases diversity across North American grasslands and savannas. Ecology 93(4):697–703

    Google Scholar 

  • Riginos C, Grace JB (2008) Savanna tree density, herbivores and the herbaceous community: Bottom-up vs. top-down effects. Ecology 89:2228–2239.

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS 9.3 Users Guide (2012) Statistical Procedures, 2nd ed. Statistical Analysis Software Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA, p 547

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheoran V, Sheoran AS, Poonia P (2010) Soil reclamation of abandoned mine land by revegetation: a review. Intern J Soil Sed Water 1: 13

  • Springsteen A, Loya W, Hebig M, Hendrickson J (2010) Soil carbon and nitrogen across a chronosequence of woody plant expansion in North Dakota. Plant Soil 328:369–379

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tjetjen B, Jeltsch F, Zehe E, Classen N, Groengroeft A, Schiffers K, Oldeland J (2010) Effects of climate change on the coupled dynamics of water and vegetation in drylands. Ecohydrology 3:226–237

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Auken OW (2000) Shrub invasions of North American semiarid grasslands. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 31:197–215

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Koppel J, Rietkerk M, van Langevelde F, Kumar L, Klausmeister CA, Fryxell JM, Hearne JW, van Andel J, de Ridder N, Skidmore A, Stroosnijder L, Prins HHT (2002) Spatial heterogeneity and irreversible vegetation change in semiarid grazing systems. Am Naturalist 159:209–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Vlassak K, Paul EA, Harris RE (1973) Assessment of biological nitrogen fixation in grassland and associated sites. Plant Soil 38:637–649

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Williams CE, Krock SL (2012) Patchy invasion of riparian savannas by Rhamnus frangula (Rhamnaceae) in Northwestern Pennsylvania: is soil drainage a factor? Castanea 77(4):318–326

    Google Scholar 

  • Willms WD, Jefferson PG (1993) Production characteristics of the mixed prairie: Constraints and potential. Can J Anim Sci 73:765–778

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright HA, Bailey AW (1982) Fire ecology: United States and Southern Canada. John Wiley and Sons Inc, New York, Toronto, p 528

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Funding for this work was provided by the Rangeland Research Institute at the University of Alberta. The authors thank Adrienne Tastad, Jamie Kalla, and Lysandra Pyle for assistance with field sampling, and Daniel Hewins and Kelvin Lien for assistance with soil lab work. GIS support was provided by Charlene Nielsen, Peter Blenis provided advice with statistical analysis, and Peder K. Bøcher co-supervised RD while at Aarhus University. Special thanks to Edwin and Ruth Mattheis for making this work possible through their donation of the Mattheis Ranch to the University of Alberta, and to Don and Sandra Armitage for their support throughout the project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Edward W. Bork.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dahl, R., Dalgaard, T. & Bork, E.W. Shrub Encroachment Following Wetland Creation in Mixedgrass Prairie Alters Grassland Vegetation and Soil. Environmental Management 66, 1120–1132 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-020-01386-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-020-01386-2

Keywords

Navigation