Abstract
Forest dieback due to climate change poses a risk to mountain forests throughout the world, and has severe consequences in terms of lost ecosystem services for forest stakeholders. This contribution aims to analyze how forest stakeholders perceive forest dieback, and the way in which they adapt to it. We conducted qualitative in-depth interviews in three mid-mountain case study areas in France, Germany, and China, enabling a cross-comparison of different settings affected by forest dieback. Results show that forest dieback is not a new phenomenon for stakeholders who consider that it has increased over the last few decades, due to rising temperatures and extreme weather events. In all survey areas, respondents consider forest dieback as tangible proof of climate change, identifying context-specific impacts with varying levels of severity. Cause-effect relationships are not easy to establish. Forest stakeholders are unable to determine whether climate change is a triggering or aggravating factor. For adaptive strategies, respondents can be grouped into three main profiles: proactive, reactive, and wait-and-see forest owners. These types of stakeholders differ in terms of their investment capacities, economic dependency, emotional attachment to forests, knowledge level, and capacity to obtain actionable information through participation in institutional networks.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adger W-N (2003) Social aspects of adaptive capacity. In: Smith JB, Klein RJT, Huq S (eds) Climate change, adaptive capacity and development. Imperial College Press, London, p 29–49. https://doi.org/10.1142/9781860945816_0003
Adger W, Lorenzoni I, O’Brien KL (2009) Adapting to climate change: thresholds, values, governance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511596667
Allen CD et al. (2010) A global overview of drought and heat-induced tree mortality reveals emerging climate change risks for forests. For Ecol Manag 259:660–684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2009.09.001
André K, Baird J, Gerger Swartling Å, Vulturius G, Plummer R (2017) Analysis of Swedish forest owners’ information and knowledge-sharing networks for decision-making: insights for climate change communication and adaptation. Environ Manag 59:885–897. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-017-0844-1
Blennow K (2012) Adaptation of forest management to climate change among private individual forest owners in Sweden. For Policy Econ 24:41–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2011.04.005
Blennow K, Persson J, Tomé M, Hanewinkel M (2012) Climate change: believing and seeing implies adapting. PLoS ONE 7:e50182. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0050182
Bouriaud L et al. (2015) Institutional factors and opportunities for adapting European forest management to climate change. Reg Environ Change 15:1595–1609. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-015-0852-8
Broomell SB, Budescu DV, Por H-H (2015) Personal experience with climate change predicts intentions to act. Glob Environ Change 32:67–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.03.001
Bulkeley H (2000) Common knowledge? Public understanding of climate change in Newcastle, Australia. Public Underst Sci 9:313–333. https://doi.org/10.1177/096366250000900301
Cailleret M, Nourtier M, Amm A, Durand-Gillmann M, Davi H (2014) Drought-induced decline and mortality of silver fir differ among three sites in Southern France. Ann For Sci 71:643–657. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-013-0265-0
Chang W-Y, Lantz VA, MacLean DA (2009) Public attitudes about forest pest outbreaks and control: case studies in two Canadian provinces. For Ecol Manag 257:1333–1343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2008.11.031
Ciesla WM, Donaubauer E (1994) Decline and dieback of trees and forests: a global overview. FAO, Rome
Der Spiegel (1981) Säureregen: “Da liegt was in der Luft”. Der Spieg 47:96–110
Deuffic P, Arts BJM, Sotirov M (2018) “Your policy, my rationale”. How individual and structural drivers influence European forest owners’ decisions. Land Use Policy 79:1024–1038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.09.021
Deuffic P, Lyser S (2012) Biodiversity or bioenergy: is deadwood conservation an environmental issue for French forest owners? Can J For Res 42:1491–1502. https://doi.org/10.1139/x2012-073
Deuffic P, Ní Dhubháin Á (2020) Invisible losses. What a catastrophe does to forest owners’ identity and trust in afforestation programmes. Sociol Rural 60:104–128. https://doi.org/10.1111/soru.12272
Dullinger S, Dirnböck T, Köck R, Hochbichler E, Englisch T, Sauberer N, Grabherr G (2005) Interactions among tree-line conifers: differential effects of pine on spruce and larch. J Ecol 93:948–957. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2005.01036.x
Dunn RR (2005) Modern insect extinctions, the neglected majority. Conserv Biol 19:1030–1036. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00078.x
EAA (European Environment Agency) (2017) Climate change, impacts and vulnerability in Europe 2016. an indicator-based report vol n°1/2017. European Environment Agency, Copenhagen
Fellenor J, Barnett J, Potter C, Urquhart J, Mumford JD, Quine CP (2018) The social amplification of risk on Twitter: the case of ash dieback disease in the United Kingdom. J Risk Res 21:1163–1183. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2017.1281339
Ficko A, Lidestav G, Ní Dhubháin Á, Karppinen H, Zivojinovic I, Westin K (2019) European private forest owner typologies: a review of methods and use. For Policy Econ 99:21–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2017.09.010
Grothmann T, Patt A (2005) Adaptive capacity and human cognition: the process of individual adaptation to climate change. Glob Environ Change 15:199–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2005.01.002
Gundersen VS, Frivold LH (2011) Naturally dead and downed deadwood in Norwegian boreal forests: public preferences and the effect of information. Scand J For Res 26:110–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/02827581.2010.536567
Gupta J et al. (2010) The adaptive capacity wheel: a method to assess the inherent characteristics of institutions to enable the adaptive capacity of society. Environ Sci Policy 13:459–471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2010.05.006
Hagerman SM, Pelai R (2018) Responding to climate change in forest management: two decades of recommendations. Front Ecol Environ 16:579–587. https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.1974
Hanewinkel M, Cullmann DA, Schelhaas M-J, Nabuurs G-J, Zimmermann NE (2013) Climate change may cause severe loss in the economic value of European forest land. Nat Clim Change 3:203–207. http://www.nature.com/nclimate/journal/v3/n3/abs/nclimate1687.html#supplementary-information http://www.nature.com/nclimate/journal/v3/n3/abs/nclimate1687.html#supplementary-information
Hansen AJ et al. (2001) Global change in forests: responses of species, communities, and biomes: interactions between climate change and land use are projected to cause large shifts in biodiversity. BioScience 51:765–779. https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0765:GCIFRO]2.0.CO;2
He J (2017) Looking beyond tenure in China’s collective forest tenure reform: insights from Yunnan Province, Southwest China. Int Forestry Rev 19:29–41. https://doi.org/10.1505/146554817820888609
He J, Zhou Z, Weyerhaeuser H, Xu J (2009) Participatory technology development for incorporating non-timber forest products into forest restoration in Yunnan, Southwest China. For Ecol Manag 257:2010–2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2009.01.041
He J, Zhou Z, Yang H, Xu J (2011) Integrative management of commercialized wild mushroom: a case study of Thelephora ganbajun in Yunnan, Southwest China 48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-011-9691-7
IPCC (2014) Climate Change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part A: global and sectoral aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Kellomäki S, Karjalainen T, Väisänen H (1997) More timber from boreal forests under changing climate? For Ecol Manag 94:195–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(96)03975-8
Lausch A, Heurich M, Fahse L (2013) Spatio-temporal infestation patterns of Ips typographus (L.) in the Bavarian Forest National Park, Germany. Ecol Indic 31:73–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.07.026
Lawrence A (2017) Adapting through practice: Silviculture, innovation and forest governance for the age of extreme uncertainty. For Policy Econ 79:50–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2016.07.011
Lawrence A et al. (2020) Extension, advice and knowledge systems for private forestry: understanding diversity and change across Europe. Land Use Policy 94:104522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104522
Lidskog R, Sjödin D (2014) Why do forest owners fail to heed warnings? Conflicting risk evaluations made by the Swedish forest agency and forest owners. Scand J For Res 29:275–282. https://doi.org/10.1080/02827581.2014.910268
Lidskog R, Sjödin D (2015) Risk governance through professional expertise. Forestry consultants’ handling of uncertainties after a storm disaster. J Risk Res:1–17 https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2015.1043570
Lindner M et al. (2010) Climate change impacts, adaptive capacity, and vulnerability of European forest ecosystems. For Ecol Manag 259:698–709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2009.09.023
Lindner M et al. (2014) Climate change and European forests: what do we know, what are the uncertainties, and what are the implications for forest management? J Environ Manag 146:69–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.07.030
Lodin I, Eriksson LO, Forsell N, Korosuo A, 11, 346. (2020) Combining climate change mitigation scenarios with current forest owner behavior: a scenario study from a region in Southern Sweden Forests 11:346 https://doi.org/10.3390/f11030346
Marzano M, Woodcock P, Quine CP (2019) Dealing with dieback: forest manager attitudes towards developing resistant ash trees in the United Kingdom. Forestry 92:554–567. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/cpz022
Mason M (2010) Sample size and saturation in PhD studies using qualitative interviews forum qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative. Soc Res 11:1–19
McFarlane BL, Witson DOT (2008) Perceptions of ecological risk associated with mountain pine beetle (Dendroctonus ponderosae) infestations in Banff and Kootenay National Parks of Canada. Risk Anal 28:203–212. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01013.x
Miles MB, Huberman MA, Saldaña J (2013) Qualitative data analysis: a methods sourcebook. SAGE Publications, Los Angeles
Millar CI, Stephenson NL, Stephens SL (2007) Climate change and forests of the future: managing in the face of uncertainty. Ecol Appl 17:2145–2151. https://doi.org/10.1890/06-1715.1
Müller J, Bütler R (2010) A review of habitat thresholds for dead wood: a baseline for management recommendations in European forests. Eur J For Res 129:981–992. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-010-0400-5
Nelson H (2007) Does a crisis matter? Forest policy responses to the mountain pine beetle epidemic in British Columbia. Can J Agric Econ 55:459–470. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7976.2007.00102.x
Palinkas LA, Horwitz SM, Green CA, Wisdom JP, Duan N, Hoagwood K (2015) Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Adm Policy Ment Health 42:533–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y
Petucco C, Andrés-Domenech P, Duband L (2020) Cut or keep: what should a forest owner do after a windthrow? For Ecol Manag 461:117866. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2020.117866
Radke N, Yousefpour R, von Detten R, Reifenberg S, Hanewinkel M (2017) Adopting robust decision-making to forest management under climate change. Ann For Sci 74:43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-017-0641-2
Risbey J, Kandlikar M, Dowlatabadi H, Graetz D (1999) Scale, context, and decision making in agricultural adaptation to climate variability and change. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change 4:137–165. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009636607038
Roberge J-M et al. (2016) Socio-ecological implications of modifying rotation lengths in forestry. Ambio 45:109–123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-015-0747-4
Rubel F, Brugger K, Haslinger K, Auer I (2017) The climate of the European Alps: shift of very high resolution Köppen-Geiger climate zones 1800-2100. Meteorologische Z 26:115–125. https://doi.org/10.1127/metz/2016/0816
Sacher P, Mayer M (2019) Szenarien der Waldentwicklung in Bayern bis 2045 und 2075 – Ergebnisse einer Delphi-Studie mit ausgewählten Waldexperten. Institut für Geographie und Geologie der Universität Greifswald, Greifswald. https://doi.org/10.23689/fidgeo-3258
Sarewitz D (2011) Does climate change knowledge really matter? Wiley Interdiscip Rev: Clim Change 2:475–481. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.126
Seibold S et al. (2016) Microclimate and habitat heterogeneity as the major drivers of beetle diversity in dead wood. J Appl Ecol 53:934–943. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12607
Slovic P (1987) Perception of risk Science 236:280–285
Sousa-Silva R et al. (2018) Adapting forest management to climate change in Europe: linking perceptions to adaptive responses. For Policy Econ 90:22–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2018.01.004
Staupe-Delgado R (2019) Progress, traditions and future directions in research on disasters involving slow-onset hazards. Disaster Prev Manag 28:623–635. https://doi.org/10.1108/DPM-11-2018-0358
Strauss A, Corbin J (1994) Grounded theory methodology. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS (eds) Handbook of qualitative research. SAGE Publications Ltd, Thousand Oaks, p 273–285
Takala T, Hujala T, Tanskanen M, Tikkanen J (2019) Competing discourses of the forest shape forest owners’ ideas about nature and biodiversity conservation. Biodivers Conserv 28:3445–3464. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-019-01831-7
Van Gameren V, Zaccai E (2015) Private forest owners facing climate change in Wallonia: Adaptive capacity and practices. Environ Sci Policy 52:51–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2015.05.004
Van Herzele A, Van Gossum P (2008) Typology building for owner-specific policies and communications to advance forest conversion in small pine plantations. Landsc Urban Plan 87:201–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.06.003
Weber EU (2010) What shapes perceptions of climate change? Wiley Interdiscip Rev: Clim Change 1:332–342. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.41
Weiss G et al. (2019) Forest ownership changes in Europe: state of knowledge and conceptual foundations. For Policy Econ 99:9–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2018.03.003
Wilson RS, Zwickle A, Walpole H (2019) Developing a broadly applicable measure of risk perception. Risk Anal 39:777–791. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13207
Yousefpour R, Augustynczik ALD, Hanewinkel M (2017) Pertinence of reactive, active, and robust adaptation strategies in forest management under climate change. Ann For Sci 74:40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-017-0640-3
Acknowledgements
This research is part of the international project CLIMTREE “Ecological and Socio-economic Impacts of Climate-Induced Tree Diebacks in Highland Forests” funded by Belmont Forum Call: “Mountains as Sentinels of Change”. The French section of this research was funded by the French National Research Agency (ANR) under the grant number ANR-15-MASC-002-01. We thank Laurent Larrieu (INRA), Dominique Micaux (ONF), Alexandre Laizé (Communauté de Communes Pyrénées audoises) and Johnatan de Larminat for their help with interviewees’ contacts. The German part of this research has been funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) under the grant number MA 7249/1-1. The German project team would like to thank Lea Prüß and Michael Sobek for their invaluable help with transcribing the interviews. The Chinese part of this research has been funded by the Ministry of Education of PR China (Project No. 16JJD850015) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (Project No. 41661144002).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Deuffic, P., Garms, M., He, J. et al. Forest Dieback, a Tangible Proof of Climate Change? A Cross-Comparison of Forest Stakeholders’ Perceptions and Strategies in the Mountain Forests of Europe and China. Environmental Management 66, 858–872 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-020-01363-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-020-01363-9