Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Measuring Recreation Benefit Loss under Climate Change with Revealed and Stated Behavior Data: The Case of Lac Saint-Pierre World Biosphere Reserve (Québec, Canada)

  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Based on a case study carried out on the Lac Saint-Pierre (LSP) World Biosphere Reserve (Québec, Canada), this paper estimates ecosystem service loss, more precisely the loss related to cultural and recreational activities of the LSP due to the fall of its water level under the pressure of climate change. We measure two dimensions of this loss. As a first step, the extrapolation of our representative survey reports $100 million annual loss in terms of recreation revenue due to the trip reduction to LSP, which is about 60% of current level. Subsequently, the travel-cost data and the contingent behavior data are combined in a revealed and stated behavior panel random-effect estimation, which reports an additional loss measured by consumer surplus that visitors can obtain from their trips up to $232 million, signifying 42% of reduction in their current value.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. http://www.ec.gc.ca/stl/default.asp?lang=Fr&n=09C5A944-1

  2. The related questions for both methods used in the paper are reported in Annex.

  3. Although the absolute level of the tourism revenue may present bias and imprecision, we still believe the relative number about the percentage of reduction in the tourism revenue to be relevant.

  4. The negative binomial distribution is a generalized Poisson distribution including a gamma noise variable that has a mean of 1 and a scale parameter of v.

  5. Although some interesting literatures have developed around the credibility of both the auto-reported travel cost and the standardized transport cost proxied by distance (see Randall 1994; Ovaskainen et al. 2012, among others), using the fuel cost and car wear as proxy of travel cost is a common way in the related literature, since very often the transport cost consists of the biggest expenditure of a trip. By using this proxy, we depart from the tourism revenue context since in both the travel cost and the contingent behavior data, we were more interested to measure visitors’ preference captured in consumer surplus, equal to the difference between total satisfaction and the actual payment. So here, a more precise measurement of the real cost payed for a trip comes to be very important, we therefore adopted the distance-based measurement in aims of gaining in measurement precision. We acknowledge certainly the potential problem with this standardized measurement of the travel cost, since people may consider the length of the travel in very heterogeneous way. We hope our combined methods based on random-effect estimation model for panel data to capture at least some part of this heterogeneity between people. We did the same estimation with the auto-reported expenditure data, but the results were statistically insignificant and very difficult to interpret. We also believe these unsatisfactory results can be explained by the potential omissions in the auto-reported trip related expenditure data that we observed in the previous section.

References

  • Abson DJ, von Wehrden H, Baumgärtner S, Fischer J, Hanspach J, Härdtle W, Heinrichs H, Klein AM, Lang DJ, Martens P, Walmsley D (2014) Ecosystem services as a boundary object for sustainability. Ecol Econ 103:p29–p37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.04.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azevedo CD, Herriges JA, Kling CL (2003) Combining revealed and stated preferences: consistency tests and their interpretations. Am J Agric Econ 85(3):525–537 https://www.jstor.org/stable/1244980

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BCDM Conseil Inc. (2005a) Rapport III: La pêche sportive au lac Saint-Pierre en 2003. Pêche sur la glace: évaluation des retombées économiques. Pour leministère des Ressources naturelles et de la Faune, Direction de la recherche sur la faune, Québec. p 67

  • BCDM Conseil Inc. (2005b) Rapport IV: La pêche sportive au lac Saint-Pierre en 2003. Pêche en eau libre: évaluation des retombées économiques. Pour leministère des Ressources naturelles et de la Faune, Direction de la recherche sur la faune, Québec. p 89

  • Bouchard A, Morin J (2000) Reconstitution des débits du fleuve Saint-Laurent entre 1932 et 1998. Environnement Canada, Service météorologique du Canada, Section Hydrologie. Rapport technique RT–101

  • Boulding KE (1945) The concept of economic surplus. Am Economic Rev 35(5):851–869

    Google Scholar 

  • Bridgewater P, Babin D (2017) UNESCO–MAB Biosphere Reserves already deal with ecosystem services and sustainable development. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 114(22):E4318. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1702761114

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • CAA (2013) Coûts d’utilisation d’une automobile. Au-delà de l’étiquette de prix: comprendre les dépenses liées au véhicule. Édition 2013. Association Canadienne des Automobilistes

  • Carson RT, Groves T (2007) Incentive and informational properties of preference questions. Environ Resour Econ 37(1):181–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CBD (2010) Decision UNEP/CBD/COP/DEC/X/2 adopted by the conference of the parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity at its tenth meeting. Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD). https://www.cbd.int/decision/cop/?id=12268

  • Chae D-R, Wattage P, Pascoe S (2012) Recreational benefits from a marine protected area: a travel cost analysis of Lundy. Tour Manag 33(2012):971–977

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collard A, Villeneuve F, Dombrowski P, Couture R (2010) Portrait faunique du Centre-du-Québec, Rapport préparé par la Fédération québécoise des Chasseurset pêcheurs, Région 17, pour la Commission Régionale sur les Ressources Naturelles et le Territoire du Centre-du-Québec

  • Costanza R, d’Arge R, de-Groot R, Farber S, Grasso M, Hannon B, Limburg K, Naeem S, O’Neil R, Paruelo J, Raskin R, Sutton P, van den Belt J (1997) The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Ecol Econ 25(1):3–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(98)00020-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daily G (1997) Nature’s services: societal dependence on natural ecosystems. Island Press, Washington, DC

  • Díaz S, Demissew S, Carabias J, Joly C, Lonsdale M, Ash N, Larigauderie A, Adhikari JR, Arico S, Báldi A, Bartuska A, Baste IA, Bilgin A, Brondizio E, Chan KMA, Figueroa VE, Duraiappah A, Fischer M, Hill R, Koetz T, Leadley P, Lyver P, Mace GM, Martin-Lopez B, Okumura M, Pacheco D, Pascual U, Pérez ES, Reyers B, Roth E, Saito O, Scholes RJ, Sharma N, Tallis H, Thaman R, Watson R, Yahara T, Hamid ZA, Akosim C, Al-Hafedh Y, Allahverdiyev R, Amankwah E, Asah ST, Asfaw Z, Bartus G, Brooks LA, Caillaux J, Dalle G, Darnaedi D, Driver A, Erpul G, Escobar-Eyzaguirre P, Failler P, Moustafa A, Fouda M, Fu B, Gundimeda H, Hashimoto S, Homer F, Lavorel S, Lichtenstein G, Mala WA, Mandivenyi W, Matczak P, Mbizvo C, Mehrdadi M, Metzger JP, Mikissa JB, Moller H, Mooney HA, Mumby P, Nagendra H, Nesshover C, Oteng-Yeboah AA, Pataki G, Roué M, Rubis J, Schultz M, Smith P, Sumaila R, Takeuchi K, Thomas S, Verma M, Yeo-Chang Y, Zlatanova D (2015) The IPBES Conceptual Framework-connecting nature and people. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 14:1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • du Preez M, Hosking SG (2011) The value of the trout fishery at Rhodes, North Eastern Cape, South Africa: a travel cost analysis using count data models. J Environ Plan Manag 54(2):267–282. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2010.505837

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich P, Mooney H (1983) Extinction, substitution, and ecosystem services. BioScience 33(4):248–254. https://doi.org/10.2307/1309037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) (2009) Valuing the protection of ecological systems and services. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of the Administrator, Science Advisory Board. Washingtin, DC, p 139

  • Grilli G, Landgraf G, Curtis J, Hynes S (2018) A travel cost evaluation of the benefits of two destination salmon rivers in Ireland. J Outdoor Recreat Tour 3292018:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Groupe Conseil Genivar Inc. (2005) Étude des impacts socioéconomiques: La sauvagine en migration dans le Québec méridional, particulièrement la Grande Oie desneiges et la Bernache du Canada. Environnement Canada, Ottawa, Canada. 63 pages and appendix

  • Huard D (2016) Étude économique régionale des impacts et de l’adaptation liés aux changements climatiques sur le fleuve Saint-Laurent: Description des scénarios climatiques. Rapport présenté à la Division des impacts et de l’adaptation liés aux changements climatiques, Ressources naturelles Canada et au gouvernement du Québec. Montréal: Ouranos

  • Hausman J, Hall B, Griliches Z (1984) Econometric Models for Count Data with an Application to the Patents-R & D Relationship. Econometrica 52(4):909–938. https://doi.org/10.2307/1911191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ishwaran N (2012) Science in intergovernmental environmental relations: 40 years of UNESCO’s Man and the Biosphere (MAB) Programme and its future. Environ Dev 1:91–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2011.11.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • List JA, Gallet CA (2001) What experimental protocol influence disparities between actual and hypothetical stated values? Evidence from a meta-analysis. Environ Resour Econ 20(3):241–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Little J, Berrens R (2004) Explaining disparities between actual and hypothetical stated values: further investigation using meta-analysis. Econ Bull 3(6):1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • MA (Millenium Ecosystem Assessment) (2005) Ecosystems and Human Well-being. Vol 2: Current states and trends. Island Press, Washington DC, p 917

  • MDDEFP (2013) Retombées économiques des activités de chasse, de pêche et de piégeage au Québec en 2012 : Synthèse. Ministère du Développement durable, de l’Environnement, de la Faune et des Parcs, p 26. https://www.mffp.gouv.qc.ca/publications/faune/statistiques/retombees-economique-ccp.pdf

  • Mingelbier M, Trencia G, Dumas R, Dumas B, Mailhot Y, Bouchard C, Manolesco DC, Brodeur P, Hudon C, Ouellette G (2001) Avis scientifique concernant la mortalité massive des carpes dans le Saint-Laurent durant l'été 2001. Société de la faune et des parcs du Québec, Ministère de l’environnement, Biodôme de Montréal, Environnement Canada. p 25

  • Murphy JJ, Allen PG, Stevens TH, Weatherhead D (2005) A meta-analysis of hypothetical bias in stated preference valuation. Environ Resour Econ 30(3):313–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olaussen J (2016) Catch-and-release and angler utility: evidence from an Atlantic salmon recreational fishery. Fish Manag Ecol 23(3–4):253–263. https://doi.org/10.1111/fme.12167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ovaskainen V, Neuvonen M, Pouta E (2012) Modeling recreation demand with respondent-reported driving cost and stated cost of travel time. J For Econ 18(4):303–317

    Google Scholar 

  • Poe GL, Lauber B, Connelly NA, Creamer S, Ready RC, Stedman RC (2013) Net benefits of recreational fishing in the Great Lakes Basin: a review of the literature. Department of Natural Resources, N.Y.S. College of Agricultural and Life Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, p 79. HURU Series no. 13–10. http://dnr.cornell.edu/hdru/pubs/HDRUReport13-10.pdf

  • Pokki H, Artell J, Mikkola J, Orell P, Ovaskainen V (2018) Valuing recreational salmon fishing at a remote site in Finland: a travel cost analysis. Fish Res 208(2018):145–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Randall A (1994) A difficulty with the travel cost method. Land Econ 70(1):88–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz L, Duit A, Folke C (2011) Participation, adaptive co-management, and management performance in the world network of biosphere reserves. World Dev 39(4):662–671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2010.09.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • TEEB (2010) Kumar P (ed) The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity ecological and economic foundations. Earthscan, London

  • UNESCO (2008) Madrid action plan for biosphere reserves (2008–2013). UNESCO, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO (2016) Lima Action Plan for UNESCO’s Man and the Biosphere (MAB) Programme and Its World Network of Biosphere Reserves (2016–2025)

  • von Haefen RH, Phaneuf DJ (2008) Identifying demand parameters in the presence of unobservables: A combined revealed and stated preference approach. J Environ Econ Manage 56(1):19–32

  • Vossler CA, Doyon M, Rondeau D (2012) Truth in consequentiality: theory and field evidence on discrete choice experiments. Am Economic J 4(4):145–171

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead JC, Haab TC, Huang J (2000) Measuring recreation benefits of quality improvements with revealed and stated behavior data. Resour Energy Econ 22:339–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0928-7655(00)00023-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead JC, Pattanayak SK, Van Houtven GL, Gelso BR (2008) Combining Revealed and stated preference data to estimate the nonmarket value of ecological services: an assessment of the state of the science. J Economic Surv 22(5):872–908. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6419.2008.00552.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jie He.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

He, J., Enomana, H., Dupras, J. et al. Measuring Recreation Benefit Loss under Climate Change with Revealed and Stated Behavior Data: The Case of Lac Saint-Pierre World Biosphere Reserve (Québec, Canada). Environmental Management 64, 746–756 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-019-01219-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-019-01219-x

Keywords

Navigation