Abstract
Environmental conservation activities such as biodiversity and natural resource management are supported by many eager volunteers in many countries. Because it takes a great deal of time and effort to train new members, volunteer programs are important for preventing the burnout of volunteers and maintaining their motivations to participate. This study explored whether motivations that inspire the future frequency of participation, which volunteers prefer, differ depending on the previous frequency of participation in conservation activities. Online surveys were chosen as the primary social research method to collect the relevant data, and 1500 responses were obtained from Japanese citizens who had participated in conservation activities. The findings suggest that improvement of personal physical well-being can have an influence on the variation in frequency of participation in the episodic group that participates only about once a year. The results also indicate that improvement of personal mental well-being and well-being for a local community can have an influence on the variation in frequency of participation in the irregular group that participates about every 2 months. Additionally, this study shows that interaction with other people and enjoyment of cultural services from ecosystems can have an influence on the variation in frequency of participation in many groups including the regular group that participates every month. These results represent valuable information that can be used as a reference for conducting conservation programs aimed at encouraging people to learn about nature conservation and interact with others to improve their local community.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ajzen I (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 50:179–211
Asah ST, Blahna DJ (2012) Motivational functionalism and urban conservation stewardship: implications for volunteer involvement. Conserv Lett 5:470–477. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-263X.2012.00263.x
Asah ST, Blahna DJ (2013) Practical implications of understanding the influence of motivations on commitment to voluntary urban conservation stewardship. Conserv Biol 27:866–875. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12058
Asah ST, Lenentine MM, Blahna DJ (2014) Benefits of urban landscape eco-volunteerism: mixed methods segmentation analysis and implications for volunteer retention. Landsc Urban Plan 123:108–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.12.011
Bethlehem J (2010) Selection bias in web surveys. Int Stat Rev. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-5823.2010.00112.x
Bramston P, Pretty G, Zammit C (2010) Assessing environmental stewardship motivation. Environ Behav 43:776–788. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916510382875
Bruyere B, Rappe S (2007) Identifying the motivations of environmental volunteers. J Environ Plan Manag 50:503–516. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640560701402034
Byron I, Curtis A (2002) Maintaining volunteer commitment to local watershed initiatives. Environ Manag 30:59–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-002-2552-7
Caissie LT, Halpenny EA (2011) Volunteering for nature: motivations for participating in a biodiversity conservation volunteer program. World Leis J 45:38–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/04419057.2003.9674315
Carrus G, Scopelliti M, Lafortezza R et al. (2015) Go greener, feel better? The positive effects of biodiversity on the well-being of individuals visiting urban and peri-urban green areas. Landsc Urban Plan 134:221–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.10.022
Clary EG, Snyder M, Ridge RD et al. (1998) Understanding and assessing the motivations of volunteers: a functional approach. J Pers Soc Psychol 74:1516–1530. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1516
Clary EG, Snyder M, Stukas AA (1996) Volunteers’ motivations: findings from a national survey. Nonprofit Volunt Sect Q 25:485–505. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764096254006
Dennis M, James P (2016) User participation in urban green commons: exploring the links between access, voluntarism, biodiversity and well being. Urban Urban Green 15:22–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2015.11.009
DiEnno CM, Thompson JL (2013) For the love of the land: how emotions motivate volunteerism in ecological restoration. Emot Sp Soc 6:63–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emospa.2012.02.002
Donald BJ (1997) Fostering volunteerism in an environmental stewardship group: a report on the task force to bring back the Don, Toronto, Canada. J Environ Plan Manag 40:483–505. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640569712056
Dresner M, Handelman C, Braun S, Rollwagen-Bollens G (2014) Environmental identity, pro-environmental behaviors, and civic engagement of volunteer stewards in Portland area parks. Environ Educ Res 21:991–1010. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2014.964188
Ford ME (1992) Motivating humans: goals, emotions, and personal agency beliefs. p 302. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483325361
Grese RE, Kaplan R, Ryan RL, Buxton J (2000) Psychological benefits of volunteering in stewarship programs. In: Gobster PH, Hull RB (eds) Restoring nature: perspectives from the social sciences and humanities. Island Press, Washington, D.C., pp 265–280
Grönlund H, Holmes K, Kang C et al. (2011) Cultural values and volunteering: a cross-cultural comparison of students’ motivation to volunteer in 13 countries. J Acad Ethics 9:87–106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-011-9131-6
Higgins O, Shackleton CM (2015) The benefits from and barriers to participation in civic environmental organisations in South Africa. Biodivers Conserv 24:2031–2046. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-015-0924-6
Hofstede G (2001) Culture’s consequences: comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA
Husk K, Lovell R, Cooper C, et al. (2016) Participation in environmental enhancement and conservation activities for health and well-being in adults: a review of quantitative and qualitative evidence. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010351.pub2
Kottke JL, Mellor S (1986) Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Pers Psychol 39:672–675. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7
Kurita K, Kaoru U (1998) Nature conservation volunteer activities of NPO in Kanto Region, Japan. J Jpn Inst Landsc Archit 62:400–404. https://doi.org/10.5632/jila.62.400
Maslow AH (1943) A theory of human motivation. Psychol Rev 50:370–396. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0054346
Matloch J (2018) Willingness to pay or willingness to volunteer: who gets involved in regional landscape protection in what way? The assessment of German cultural landscapes. Springer VS, Wiesbaden, p 135–177
McDougle L, Handy F, Katz-Gerro T et al. (2014) Factors predicting proclivity and intensity to volunteer for the environment in the US and South Korea. J Environ Plan Manag 58:837–854. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2014.899204
McDougle LM, Greenspan I, Handy F (2011) Generation green: understanding the motivations and mechanisms influencing young adults’ environmental volunteering. Int J Nonprofit Volunt Sect Mark 16:325–341. https://doi.org/10.1002/nvsm.431
Measham TG, Barnett GB (2008) Environmental volunteering: motivations, modes and outcomes. Aust Geogr 39:537–552. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049180802419237
Miles I, Sullivan WC, Kuo FE (1998) Ecological restoration volunteers: the benefits of participation. Urban Ecosyst 2:27–41. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009501515335
Ministry of Agriculture Forestry and Fisheries in Japan (2013) Actual condition survey report 2013 on forest conservation activity in Japan. http://www.e-stat.go.jp/SG1/estat/List.do?bid=000001051452&cycode=0
Molsher R, Townsend M (2015) Improving wellbeing and environmental stewardship through volunteering in nature. Ecohealth 13:151–155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10393-015-1089-1
Moore M, Townsend M, Oldroyd J (2006) Linking human and ecosystem health: the benefits of community involvement in conservation groups. Ecohealth 3:255–261. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10393-006-0070-4
Nakajima T, Furuya K (2004) A study on the Satoyama image toward survived open-spaces expected by participants for civic Satoyama management activity in Northern part of Chiba Prefecture. J Jpn Inst Landsc Archit 67:653–658. https://doi.org/10.5632/jila.67.653
Nakano LY (2000) Volunteering as a lifestyle choice: negotiating self-identities in Japan. Ethnology 39:93–107. https://doi.org/10.2307/3773837
O’Brien L, Burls A, Townsend M, Ebden M (2011) Volunteering in nature as a way of enabling people to reintegrate into society. Perspect Public Health 131:71–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/1757913910384048
O’Brien L, Townsend M, Ebden M (2010) ‘Doing something positive’: volunteers’ experiences of the well-being benefits derived from practical conservation activities in nature. Volunt Int J Volunt Nonprofit Organ 21:525–545. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-010-9149-1
Oku H, Tahara K (2012) Structure of forest volunteer organizations’ and participants’ motives for volunteer activities in Minoh National Forest. J Jpn Inst Landsc Archit 75:525–528. https://doi.org/10.5632/jila.75.525
Ryan RL, Kaplan R, Grese RE (2001) Predicting volunteer commitment in environmental stewardship programmes. J Environ Plan Manag 44:629–648. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640560120079948
Sakurai R, Kobori H, Nakamura M, Kikuchi T (2015) Factors influencing public participation in conservation activities in urban areas: a case study in Yokohama, Japan. Biol Conserv 184:424–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2015.02.012
Schwartz SH (1992) Universals in the content and structure of values: theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Adv Exp Soc Psychol 25:1–65
Silverberg KE, Marshall EK, Ellis GD (2001) Measuring job satisfaction of volunteers in public parks and recreation. J Park Recreat Admi 19:79–92
Takase Y, Furuya K, Sakuraba S (2015) The relationship between citizens’ willingness to work for participation in green space conservation activities and attributes, citizens’ willingness to work and attitude toward participation. J Jpn Inst Landsc Archit 78:619–624. https://doi.org/10.5632/jila.78.619
Takase Y, Furuya K, Sakuraba S (2014) Promotion process for green space conservation activity participation from residents’ perspectives. J Archit Plan (Trans AIJ) 79:2241–2249. https://doi.org/10.3130/aija.79.2241
Taniguchi H (2010) Who are volunteers in Japan? Nonprofit Volunt Sect Q 39:161–179. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764008326480
Terry B, Harder A, Pracht D (2010) Understanding the value of volunteer involvement. J Agric Educ 52:118–127
United Nations (2015) World Urbanization Prospects The 2014 Revision. https://esa.un.org/unpd/wup/Publications/Files/WUP2014-Report.pdf. Accessed 29 Jun 2017
Weaver D (2015) Volunteer tourism and beyond: motivations and barriers to participation in protected area enhancement. J Sustain Tour 23:683–705. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2014.992901
Worrell R, Appleby MC (2000) Stewardship of natural resources: definition, ethical and practical aspects. J Agric Environ Ethics 12:263–277
Zuo A, Wheeler SA, Edwards J (2016) Understanding and encouraging greater nature engagement in Australia: results from a national survey. J Environ Plan Manag 59:1107–1125. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2015.1054926
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Dr. Takase reports grants from JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number 17K08179, during the conduct of the study.
Appendix 1
Appendix 1
Comparison of the proportion of respondents and the proportion of the population in regard to the place of residence. The population data were collected on October 1, 2014 (http://www.stat.go.jp/data/jinsui/2.htm#annuals)
Regions’ name | (A) Proportion of respondents | (B) Proportion of population | (A)−(B) |
---|---|---|---|
Hokkaido | 5.1% | 4.2% | 0.9% |
Tohoku | 7.1% | 6.5% | 0.6% |
Kanto | 37.3% | 33.7% | 3.6% |
Chubu | 16.1% | 16.9% | −0.8% |
Kinki (Kansai) | 18.6% | 17.8% | 0.8% |
Chugoku | 5.4% | 5.9% | −0.5% |
Shikoku | 2.5% | 3.1% | −0.6% |
Kyusyu | 8.5% | 11.4% | −2.9% |
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Takase, Y., Hadi, A.A. & Furuya, K. The Relationship Between Volunteer Motivations and Variation in Frequency of Participation in Conservation Activities. Environmental Management 63, 32–45 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-018-1106-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-018-1106-6