Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The Contribution of Project Environmental Assessment to Assessing and Managing Cumulative Effects: Individually and Collectively Insignificant?

  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper explores the opportunities and constraints to project-based environmental assessment as a means to support the assessment and management of cumulative environmental effects. A case study of the hydroelectric sector is used to determine whether sufficient information is available over time through project-by-project assessments to support an adequate understanding of cumulative change. Results show inconsistency from one project to the next in terms of the components and indicators assessed, limited transfer of baseline information between project assessments over time, and the same issues and concerns being raised by review panels–even though the projects reviewed are operating in the same watershed and operated by the same proponent. Project environmental assessments must be managed, and coordinated, as part of a larger system of impact assessment, if project-by-project assessments are to provide a meaningful forum for learning and understanding cumulative change. The paper concludes with recommendations for improved project-based assessment practice in support of cumulative effects assessment and management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Atkinson SF, Bhatia S, Schoolmaster FA (2000) Treatment of biodiversity impacts in a sample of US environmental impact statements. Impact Assess Proj Apprais 18:271–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball M, Noble BF, Dube MG (2013a) Valued ecosystem components for watershed cumulative effects: an analysis of environmental impact assessments in the South Saskatchewan River watershed, Canada. Integr Environ Assess Manag 9(3):469–479

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ball M, Somers G, Wilson J, Tanna R, Chung C, Duro D, Seitz N (2013b) Scale, assessment components, and reference conditions: issues for cumulative effects assessment in Canadian watersheds. Integr Environ Assess Manag 9(3):370–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banks G (2013) Little by little, inch by inch: project expansion assessments in the Papua New Guinea mining industry. Resour Policy 38:688–695

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beanlands G, Duinker P (1983) An ecological framework for environmental impact assessment. J Environ Manag 18:267–277

    Google Scholar 

  • Birley M (2002) A review of trends in health-impact assessment and the nature of the evidence used. J Environ Manag Health 13(1):21–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blueberry River First Nations vs Her Majesty the Queen in in Right of the Province of British Columbia (2015) Notice of Civil Claim. Supreme Court of British Columbia, registry no. S-151727

  • Bowen GA (2009) Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qual Res J 9(2):27–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boutilier R, Black L (2013) Legitimizing industry and multi-sectoral regulation of cumulative impacts: a comparison of mining and energy development in Athabasca, Canada and the Hunter Valley, Australia. Resour Policy 38:696–703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canter LW, Atkinson SF (2011) Multiple uses of indicators and indices in cumulative effects assessment and management. Environ Impact Assess Rev 31(5):491–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canter L, Ross B (2010) State of practice of cumulative effects assessment and management: the good, the bad and the ugly. Impact Assess Proj Apprais 28(4):261–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CCME, Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (2014) Canada-wide definitions and principles for cumulative effects. Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment, Winnipeg. http://www.ccme.ca/en/resources/ea.html

  • CCME, Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (2009) Regional strategic environmental assessment in Canada: principles and guidance. Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment, Winnipeg http://www.ccme.ca/en/resources/ea.html

  • CEAA, Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency (2015). Operational policy statement: assessing cumulative effects under the Canadian environmental assessment Act, 2012. Minister of the Environment, Ottawa ON

  • CEC, Manitoba Clean Environment Commission (2014) Report on public hearing: Keeyask generation project. CEC, Winnipeg http://www.cecmanitoba.ca/

  • CEC, Manitoba Clean Environment Commission (2013) Report on public hearing: Bipole III transmission project. CEC, Winnipeg MB. Available at http://www.cecmanitoba.ca/

  • CEC, Manitoba Clean Environment Commission (2004) Report on public hearings: Wuskwatim generation and transmission projects. CEC, Winnipeg http://www.cecmanitoba.ca/

  • CESD, Commissioner of the Environment and Sustainable Development (2011) 2011 October Report of the Commissioner of the Environment and Sustainable Development. Office of the Auditor General of Canada, Ottawa ON

  • Chetkiewicz A, Lintner A (2014) Getting it right in Ontario’s far North: the need for a regional strategic assessment in the ring of fire. Wildlife Conservation Society and EcoJustice Canada, Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  • Creasey R, Ross WA (2009) The Cheviot mine project: cumulative effects assessment lessons for professional practice. In: Hann K (Ed) Environmental assessment: practice and participation. Oxford University Press, Toronto, pp 158–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubé M, Duinker P, Grieg L, Carver M, Servos M, McMaster M, Noble B, Schreier H, Jackson L, Munkittrick KR (2013) A framework for assessing cumulative effects in watersheds: an introduction to Canadian case studies. Integr Environ Assess Manag 9(3):363–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duinker P, Greig L (2006) The impotence of cumulative effects assessment in Canada: ailments and ideas for redeployment. Environ Manag 37(2):153–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duinker P, Burbidge EL, Boardley SR, Greig LA (2013) Scientific dimensions of cumulative effects assessment: toward improvements in guidance for practice. Environ Rev 21:40–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich A (2010) Cumulative cultural effects and reasonably foreseeable future developments in the Upper Thelon Basin, Canada. Impact Assess Proj Apprais 28(4):279–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fearnside PM (2013) Carbon credit for hydroelectric dams as a source of greenhouse-gas emissions: the example of Brazil’s Teles Pires Dam. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 18(5):691–699

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freylejer L (2012) The social and economic (under)development of northern Manitoba communities over the past two and a half decades. Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives, Winnipeg https://www.policyalternatives.ca

  • Gunn J, Noble BF (2012) Critical review of the cumulative effects assessment undertaken by Manitoba Hydro for the Bipole III project. Aura Environmental Research and Consulting Ltd, Saskatoon, Public Interest Law Centre

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunn J, Noble BF (2015) Sustainability considerations in regional environmental assessment. In: Morrison-Saunders A, Pope J, Bond A (Eds) Sustainability assessment handbook. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 79–102

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Harriman J, Noble BF (2008) Characterizing project and strategic approaches to regional cumulative effects assessment in Canada. J Environ Assess Pol Manag 10:1–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hegmann G, Yarranton TA (2011) Alchemy to reason: effective use of cumulative effects assessment in resource management. Environ Impact Assess Rev 31:484–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • JBACE, James Bay Advisory Committee on the Environment (2016) James Bay Advisory Committee on the Environment Annual Report 2015–2016. JBACE, Montreal QC

  • Johnson D, Lalonde K, McEachern M, Kenney J, Mendoza G, Buffin A, Rich K (2011) Improving cumulative effects assessment in Alberta: regional strategic assessment. Environ Impact Assess Rev 31(5):481–483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones FC (2016) Cumulative effects assessment: theoretical underpinnings and big problems. Environ Rev 24:187–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamal AG, Linklater R, Tompson S, Dipple J, Ithinto Mechisowin Committee (2015) A recipe for change: reclamation of Indigenous food sovereignty in O-Pipon-Na-Piwin Cree Nation for decolonization, resource sharing, and cultural restoration. Globalizations 12(4):559–575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karkkainen BC (2002) Toward a smarter NEPA: monitoring and managing government’s environmental performance. Columbia Law Rev 102(4):903–972

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kemess North Joint Review Panel (2007) Panel report: Kemess north copper-gold mine project. Kemess North Joint Review Panel, Ottawa, CEAA Registry Doc 04-07-3394

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy AJ (Ed) (1995) Cumulative effects assessment in Canada: from concept to practice. Alberta Society of Professional Biologists, Calgary.

  • Kennett S (2002) Lessons from Cheviot: redefining government’s role in cumulative effects assessment. In: Kennedy A (Ed) Cumulative effects management tools and approaches. Alberta Society of Professional Biologists, Edmonton

    Google Scholar 

  • KHLP, Keeyask Hydropower Limited Partnership (2012) Keeyak generation project, environmental impact statement. KHLP, Winnipeg. http://keeyask.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/Keeyask-SV-EIS.pdf

  • Krippendorff K. (2004) Content analysis: an introduction to its methodology. Sage, Thousand Oaks, California

  • Kulchyski P, Nechoway R (2006) The town that lost its name: the impact of hydroelectric development on Grand Rapids, Manitoba. Canada Centre for Policy Alternatives, Winnipeg https://www.policyalternatives.ca/

  • Lees J, Jaeger J, Gunn J, Noble BF (2016) Analysis of uncertainty consideration in environmental assessment: an empirical study of Canadian EA practice. J Environ Plan Manag 59(11):2024–2044. doi:10.1080/09640568.2015.1116980

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lienafa K, Martin T (2010) Beyond the conflict: the reconstruction of the O-Pipon-Na-Piwin first nation community in Manitoba. Geog Research Forum 30:50–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Loney M (1995) Social problems, community trauma and hydro project impacts. Canadian Journal of Native Studies 15(2):231–254

  • Manitoba Hydro (2003) Environmental impact statement, Wuskwatim transmission project. Manitoba Hydro, Winnipeg

    Google Scholar 

  • Manitoba Wildlands (2005) The hydro province: Manitoba’s hydroelectric complex. Manitoba Wildlands, Winnipeg, http://manitobawildlands.org/pdfs/HydroProvince.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Manitoba Hydro (2011) Environmental impact statement, Bipole III project. Manitoba Hydro, Winnipeg https://www.hydro.mb.ca/projects/bipoleIII/regulatory_filings.shtml#eis

  • Mitchell RE, Parkins JR (2011) The challenge of developing social indicators for cumulative effects assessment and land use planning. Ecol Society 16(2):29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan G (2013) An inside look at the bitter legal battle over cumulative impacts of oil sands activity. Alberta Oil: The Business of Energy 16 (9), np http://www.albertaoilmagazine.com/2013/09/impacts-of-oil-sands-activity-first-nations/

  • Natural Resources Canada (2016) Renewable energy. http://www.nrcan.gc.ca/energy/renewable-electricity/7295#hydro

  • Noble BF (2015) Cumulative effects research: achievements, status, directions and challenges in the Canadian context. J Environ Assess Policy Manag 17(1). doi:10.1142/S1464333215500015

  • Noble BF, Basnet P (2015) Capacity for watershed cumulative effects assessment and management in the South Saskatchewan Watershed, Canada. Canadian Water Res J 40(2):187–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noble BF, Gunn J (2013) Review of KHLP’s approach to the Keeyask generation project cumulative effects assessment. Aura Environmental Research and Consulting Ltd, Saskatoon, Commissioned report by the Public Interest Law Centre

    Google Scholar 

  • Parkins JR (2011) Deliberative democracy, institution building, and the pragmatics of cumulative effects assessment. Ecol Society 16(3):20. doi:10.5751/ES-04236-160320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Retief F (2007) A performance evaluation of strategic environmental assessment (SEA) processes within the South African context. Environ Impact Assess Rev 27:84–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg DM, Berkes F, Bodaly RA, Hecky RE, Kelly CA, Rudd JWM (1997) Large-scale impacts of hydroelectric development. Environ Rev 5:27–54

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ross W (1998) Cumulative effects assessment: learning from Canadian case studies. Impact Assess Proj Apprais 16(4):267–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheelanere P, Noble BF, Patrick R (2013) Institutional requirements for watershed cumulative effects assessment and management: lessons from a Canadian transboundary watershed. Land Use Policy 30:67–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Therivel R, Ross B (2007) Cumulative effects assessment: does scale matter? Environ Impact Assess Rev 27:365–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waldram JB (1988) Native people and hydroelectric development in northern Manitoba, 1957–1987: the promise and the reality. Manitoba History. Retrieved September 30, 2015, from http://www.mhs.mb.ca/docs/mb_history/15/hydroelectricdevelopment.shtml

  • Weber M, Krogman N, Antoniuk T (2012) Cumulative effects assessment: linking social, ecological, and governance dimensions. Ecol Society 17(2):22

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Geography and Planning, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 5C8, Canada

    Bram Noble, Jialang Liu & Paul Hackett

Authors
  1. Bram Noble
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jialang Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Paul Hackett
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bram Noble.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Noble, B., Liu, J. & Hackett, P. The Contribution of Project Environmental Assessment to Assessing and Managing Cumulative Effects: Individually and Collectively Insignificant?. Environmental Management 59, 531–545 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-016-0799-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-016-0799-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation