Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Case History of the Science and Management Collaboration in Understanding Hypoxia Events in Long Bay, South Carolina, USA

  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Communication of knowledge between the scientific and management communities is a difficult process complicated by the distinctive nature of professional career goals of scientists and decision-makers. This article provides a case history highlighting a collaboration between the science and management communities that resulted from a response to a 2004 hypoxia, or low dissolved oxygen, event in Long Bay, off Myrtle Beach, South Carolina. A working group of scientists and decision-makers was established at the time of the event and has continued to interact to develop a firm understanding of the drivers responsible for hypoxia formation in Long Bay. Several factors were found to be important to ensure that these collaborative efforts were productive: (1) genuine interest in collaboratively working across disciplines to examine a problem; (2) commitment by agency leadership, decision-makers, and researchers to create successful communication mechanisms; (3) respect for each others’ perspectives and an understanding how science and management are performed and that they are not mutually exclusive; (4) networking among researchers and decision-makers to ensure appropriate team members are involved in the process; (5) use of decision-maker input in the formulation of research and monitoring projects; and (6) commitment of resources for facilitation to ensure that researchers and decision-makers are communicating effectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Boesch DF, Rabalais NN (1991) Effects of hypoxia on continental shelf benthos: comparisons between the New York Bight and the northern Gulf of Mexico. In: Tyson RV, Pearson TH (eds) Modern and ancient continental shelf anoxia. Geological Society Special Publications 58. The Geological Society, London, pp 27–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi BCK, McQueen DV, Rootman I (2003) Bridging the gap between scientists and decision makers. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 57(12):918

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conley DJ, Carstensen J, Vaquer-Sunyer R, Duarte CM (2009) Ecosystem thresholds with hypoxia. Hydrobiologia 629:21–29

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dale VH, Kling C, Meyer JL, Sanders J, Stallworth H, Armitage T, Wangsness D, Bianchi TS, Blumberg A, Boynton W, Conley DJ, Crumpton W, David MB, Gilbert D, Howarth RW, Lowrance R, Mankin K, Opaluch J, Paerl H, Reckhow K, Sharpley AN, Simpson TW, Snyder C, Wright D (2010) Hypoxia in the Northern Gulf of Mexico. Springer, New York, 213 pp

  • Diaz RJ, Rosenberg R (1995) Marine benthic hypoxia: a review of its ecological effects and the behavioral responses of benthic macrofauna. Oceanography and Marine Biology, an Annual Review 33:245–303

    Google Scholar 

  • Diaz RJ, Rosenberg R (2008) Spreading dead zones and consequences for marine ecosystems. Science 321:926–928

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Diaz RJ, Solow A (1999) Ecological and economic consequences of hypoxia. Topic 2. Gulf of Mexico Hypoxia Assessment. NOAA Coastal Ocean Program Decision Analysis Series. NOAA, COP, Silver Spring, MD, 86 pp

  • Dreelin EA, Rose JB (2008) Creating a dialogue for effective collaborative decision-making: a case study with Michigan stakeholders. Journal of Great Lakes Research 34:12–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grantham BA, Chan F, Nielson KJ, Fox DS, Barth JA, Huyer A, Lubchenko J, Menge BA (2004) Upwelling-driven nearshore hypoxia signals ecosystem and oceanographic changes in the northeast Pacific. Nature 429:749–754

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gray RH (1990) Fish behaviour and environmental assessment. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 9(1):53–67

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gutierrez BT, Voulgaris G, Work PA (2006) Cross-shore variation of wind-driven flows on the inner shelf in Long Bay, South Carolina, USA. Journal of Geophysical Research 111:1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs KL (2002) Connecting Science, policy and decision-making: a handbook for researchers and science agencies. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Office of Global Programs, Silver Spring, Maryland, 25 pp

  • Jacobs K, Garfin G, Lenart M (2005) More than just talk: connecting science and decisionmaking. Environment 47(9):6–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Karl HA, Susskind LE, Wallace KH (2007) A dialogue, not a diatribe: effective integration of science and policy through joint fact finding. Environment 49(1):20–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Korfmacher KS (2002) Science and ecosystem management in the Albemarle-Pamlico Estuarine Study. Ocean and Coastal Management 45:277–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myrtle Beach Chamber of Commerce (MBCC) (2006) 17th edition of the statistical abstract for the Myrtle Beach Area Chamber of Commerce, Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, 28 pp

  • Research to Applications Task Force (RATF) (2007) Best practices for increasing the impact of research investments. A report by the research to applications task force of the ocean research and resources advisory panel. Washington, DC, 19 pp

  • Saliba GS, Jacobs KL (2008) Saving the San Pedro River: science, collaboration, and sustainability in Arizona. Environment 50(6):30–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Travel Industry Association of America (TIAA) (2003) The economic impact of travel on South Carolina 2002, Washington, DC, 42 pp

  • Turner RE, Rabalais NN, Justic D (2005) Predicting summer hypoxia in the northern Gulf of Mexico: Riverine N, P, and Si loading. Marine Pollution Bulletin 52(2):139–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voulgaris G, Haus BK, Work P, Shay LK, Seim HE, Weisberg RH, Nelson JR (2008) Waves initiative within SEACOOS. Marine Technology Society Journal 42(3):68–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiseman WJ Jr, Rabalais NN, Turner RE, Dinnel SP, MacNaughton A (1997) Seasonal and interannual variability within the Louisiana coastal current: stratification and hypoxia. Journal of Marine Systems 12:237–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu RSS (2002) Hypoxia: from molecular responses to ecological responses. Marine Pollution Bulletin 45:35–45

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The research conducted for this case history has been a true collaboration among numerous agencies, universities, and local businesses. The authors would like to thank the following agencies and universities for providing resources such as staff time, graduate students, facilities, and equipment: S.C. Department of Natural Resources, S.C. Sea Grant Consortium, S.C. Department of Health and Environmental Control, University of South Carolina, and Coastal Carolina University. In addition, the authors would like to thank the Grand Strand pier owners for allowing access to their facilities for this research. The authors also thank three anonymous reviewers and Rick DeVoe for their valuable suggestions in revising the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. South Carolina Sea Grant Consortium, 287 Meeting Street, Charleston, SC, 29401, USA

    Denise Sanger

  2. Southeast Coastal Ocean Observing Regional Association, Charleston, SC, USA

    Debra Hernandez

  3. Marine Science Department, Coastal Carolina University, Conway, SC, USA

    Susan Libes, Eric Koepfler & Joseph Bennett

  4. Earth and Ocean Sciences Department, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA

    George Voulgaris

  5. South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control, Charleston, SC, USA

    Braxton Davis

  6. North Inlet-Winyah Bay National Estuarine Research Reserve, Georgetown, SC, USA

    Erik Smith

  7. Fisheries Office of Science and Technology, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA

    Rebecca Shuford

  8. School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA

    Dwayne Porter

Authors
  1. Denise Sanger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Debra Hernandez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Susan Libes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. George Voulgaris
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Braxton Davis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Erik Smith
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Rebecca Shuford
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Dwayne Porter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Eric Koepfler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Joseph Bennett
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Denise Sanger.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sanger, D., Hernandez, D., Libes, S. et al. A Case History of the Science and Management Collaboration in Understanding Hypoxia Events in Long Bay, South Carolina, USA. Environmental Management 46, 340–350 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-010-9529-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-010-9529-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation