Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Age- and Gender-Related Variability in Nasal Tip Support

  • Original Article
  • Rhinoplasty
  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The age at which nasal tip support changes start to occur is unknown. Evaluation of nasal tip support is difficult, especially as the ideal nasal tip support pressure remains elusive. The aim of this study is to determine the nasal tip support pressure alterations relative to age and sex.

Objectives

The aim of this study is to determine the changers in resistance of the nasal tip support in relation to age and sex.

Methods

This prospective clinical study was conducted between January and April 2019 at a tertiary health facility. Nasal tip resistances were measured in four different age-groups (20–29, 30–39, 40–64, and > 65 years) with a digital Newton meter. A total of 159 patients with a minimum of 36 patients per group were included in the study. Nasal tip resistance measurements were compared among nasal tip displacement distances of 2, 3, and 4 mm, focusing on age and sex.

Results

The nasal tip resistance of the 20–29 age-group was significantly higher at 2, 3, and 4 mm nasal tip displacement distances, when compared with the 30–39 and 40–64 age-groups, whereas compared to the > 65 years group, it was significantly higher at 3 and 4 mm nasal tip displacement distances (p < 0.005). Nasal tip resistance of males was found to be significantly higher than that of females, at 3 and 4 mm nasal tip displacement distances (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Nasal tip resistance is higher in males and universally decreases significantly after 30 years of age while remaining constant at later ages. Therefore, surgeons should prefer nasal tip resistance increasing techniques in the rhinoplasty operations that are performed on patients even from early years of age, in order to maintain and strengthen the nasal tip resistance.

Level of Evidence IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tardy ME (1997) Rhinoplasty: the art and the science. WB Saunders Company, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  2. Rotter N, Tobias G, Lebl M et al (2002) Age-related changes in the composition and mechanical properties of human nasal cartilage. Arch Biochem Biophys 403:132–140

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Riedler KL, Shokrani A, Markarian A, Fisher LM, Pepper JP (2017) Age-related histologic and biochemical changes in auricular and septal cartilage. Laryngoscope. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.26807

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Helal HA, Ghanem MAM, Al-Badawy AM, Abdel Haleem MM, Mousa MH (2018) Histological and anthropometric changes in the aging nose. Aesthet Surg J. https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjy245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lee JW, McHugh J, Kim JC, Baker SR, Moyer JS (2013) Age-related histologic changes in human nasal cartilage. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 15:256–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gray E, Maducdoc M, Manuel C, Wong JF (2016) Estimation of nasal tip support using computer-aided design and 3-dimensional printed models. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 18:285–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Karaiskakis P, Bromba M, Dietz A, Sand M, Dacho A (2016) Reconstruction of nasal tip support in primary, open approach septorhinoplasty. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 273:2555–2560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Beaty MM, Dyer WK II, Shawl MW (2002) The quantification of surgical changes in nasal tip support. Arch Facial Plast Surg 4:82–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dobratz EJ, Tran V, Hilger PA (2010) Comparison of techniques used to support the nasal tip and their long-term effects on tip position. Arch Facial Plast Surg 12:172–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Manuel CT, Leary R, Protsenko DE, Wong BJ (2014) Nasal tip support: a finite element analysis of the role of the caudal septum during tip depression. Laryngoscope 124:649–654

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Shamouelian D, Leary RP, Manuel CT, Harb R, Protsenko DE, Wong BJ (2015) Rethinking nasal tip support: a finite element analysis. Laryngoscope 125:326–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Fanous N, Cote V, Fanous A (2011) The new Genetico-Racial Skin Classification: how to maximize the safety of any peel or laser treatment on any Asian, Caucasian or black patient. Can J Plast Surg 19:9–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Erol O, Buyuklu F, Koycu A, Bas C, Erbek SS (2019) Evaluation of nasal tip support in septorhinoplasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-019-01352-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Rohrich RJ, Hollier LH, Janis JE, Kim J (2004) Rhinoplasty with advancing age. Plast Reconstr Surg 114:1936–1944

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Krmpotic-Nemanic J, Kostovic I, Rudan P, Nemanic G (1971) Morphological and histological changes responsible for the droop of the nasal tip in advanced age. Acta Otolaryngol 71:278

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Yaar M, Gilchrest BA (2001) Skin aging: postulated mechanisms and consequent changes in structure and function. Clin Geriatr Med 17:617

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Gilchrest BA (1982) Age-associated changes in the skin. J Am Geriatr Soc 30:139

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to extend our sincere thanks to Hatice Gökcen Tasdogan, Irfan Efe Boztepe, Yigit Alp Sahin, Asyanur Coruhlu, Aylin Caygur, who are second-year students of the school of medicine for their time and effort. We would like to thank Editage (www.editage.com) for English language editing.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alper Koycu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

The study protocol was approved by the Baskent University Medical and Health Sciences Research Council and Ethics Committee (Project No. KA18/431) and supported by Baskent University Research Fund.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all patients.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Koycu, A., Erol, O., Buyuklu, F.A. et al. Age- and Gender-Related Variability in Nasal Tip Support. Aesth Plast Surg 44, 910–916 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-019-01578-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-019-01578-0

Keywords

Navigation