Skip to main content
Log in

Quantitative Appraisal Through MRI of Breast Tissue Thickness and Implant Projection After Breast Augmentation with High- and Extra-High-Profile Round Implants

  • Original Article
  • Breast Surgery
  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Changes in breast tissue thickness and in implant projection 5 years after augmentation with high- and extra-high-profile round implants were measured through MRI with a DICOM standard viewer.

Methods

Twenty-four females with small-volume breast asymmetry without hypertrophy or ptosis underwent subfascial breast augmentation for cosmetic purposes, by using micro-textured soft cohesive silicone gel-filled round implants, from a single manufacturer. MRI measured the linear antero-posterior dimension of breast tissue thickness and projection of the implants. Statistical analysis of data was performed by Pearson correlation coefficient, line graph, and scatter diagram.

Results

The “r” of Pearson for right and left breasts indicated a significant correlation between the breast tissue thickness before and 5 years after augmentation. Closeness of the lines displayed in the line graph indicated strong linear positive correlation between the breast tissue thicknesses. The “r” values for projection of right and left implants indicated a significant correlation between the projection standardized by the manufacturer and that encountered 5 years after augmentation with high- and extra-high-profile round implants. A scatter diagram of data indicated a strong positive correlation between implant projection standardized by the manufacturer and that encountered 5 years after augmentation, on both breasts.

Conclusion

Soft cohesive silicone gel-filled high- and extra-high-profile round implants supported breast tissue compressing without significant loss of the implant projection. Despite the consistency of the soft cohesive silicone gel, the implant softness and flexibility were preserved, resulting in low-pressure gradient over the mammary parenchyma without significant changes of the breast tissue thickness.

EBM Level IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tebbets JB, Teitelbaum S (2010) High- and extra-high-projection breast implants: potential consequences for patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 126(6):2150–2159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Largent JA, Reisman NR, Kaplan HM, Oefelein MG, Jewell ML (2013) Clinical trial outcomes of high- and extra-high-profile breast implants. Aesth Surg J 33(4):529–539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Nahabedian MY (2010) Discussion: high- and extra-high-projection breast implants: potential consequences for patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 126(6):2165–2167

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Maxwell GP, Gabriel A (2014) The evolution of breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 134(1 Suppl):12S–17S

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Panettiere P, Marchetti L, Accorsi D (2007) Soft cohesive silicone gel breast prosthesis: a comparative prospective study of aesthetic results versus lower cohesivity silicone gel prosthesis. J Plast Reconstr Surg 60:482–489

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Calobrace MB, Capizzi PJ (2014) The biology and evolution of cohesive gel and shaped implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 134(1 Suppl):6S–11S

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Abramo AC, Scartozzoni M, Lucena TW, Sgarbi R (2019) High- and extra-high-profile round implants in breast augmentation: guidelines to prevent rippling and implant edge visibility. Aesth Plast Surg 43:305–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Giess CS, Yeh ED, Raza S, Birdwell RL (2014) Background parenchymal enhancement at breast MR imaging: normal patterns, diagnostic challenges, and potential for false-positive and false-negative interpretation. RadioGraphics 34(1):234–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Haak D, Page C-E, Deserno TM (2016) A survey of DICOM viewer software to integrate clinical research and medical imaging. J Digit Imaging 29(2):206–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cai Y, See S (2014) Medixant: RadiAnt DICOM viewer. Technology and engineering. University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hollander M, Wolfe DA, Chicken E (2013) Nonparametric statistical methods, 3rd edn. Wiley, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  12. Evans TS, Lambiotte R (2010) Line graphs of weighted networks for overlapping communities. Eur Phys J 77:265–272

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Friendly M, Denis D (2005) The early origins and development of the scatterplot. J Hist Behav Sci 41(2):103–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Somogyi RB, Stavrou D, Southwick G (2015) Correction of small volume breast asymmetry using deep parenchymal resection and identical silicone implants: an early experience. Aesthet Surg J 35(4):394–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wan D, Rohrich RJ (2017) Making sense of implant “profile” in breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 5(5):e1343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Jewell ML, Bengtson BP, Smither K, Nuti G, Perry TA (2019) Physical properties of silicone gel breast implants. Aesthet Surg J 39(3):264–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Brown MH, Shenker R, Samuel A, Silver SA (2005) Cohesive silicone gel breast implants in aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 116(3):768–779

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antonio Carlos Abramo.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

No financial support or benefits have been received by the author or any co-author to accomplish this manuscript.

Ethical Standards

All procedures performed in this study involving humans participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the ACA - Institute of Assistance in Plastic Surgery of São Paulo research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and Medical Research Involving Human Subjects and its latter amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

All patients provided informed consent.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abramo, A.C., Lucena, T.W. & Scartozzoni, M. Quantitative Appraisal Through MRI of Breast Tissue Thickness and Implant Projection After Breast Augmentation with High- and Extra-High-Profile Round Implants. Aesth Plast Surg 44, 52–59 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-019-01533-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-019-01533-z

Keywords

Navigation