Skip to main content
Log in

Settlement patterns of female barn swallows Hirundo rustica across different group sizes: access to colorful males or favored nests?

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In most avian species, individuals are faced with two critical decisions at the start of a breeding season: choosing a breeding site and a mate. An analysis of these decisions in light of population-level patterns, such as group size variation in social breeders, can illuminate the causes and patterns of habitat selection behavior. Group sizes are variable in barn swallows; however, no clear and consistent benefits of group breeding have been found in this species, and it is puzzling as to why individuals breed socially. Previous analyses demonstrated that individuals aggregate to gain access to nests that were constructed during previous seasons; however extra-pair matings are also prevalent in this species, raising questions about the mate-selection strategies of females across different group sizes. In this paper, I address the question of how females make their first site-selection decisions in terms of two features known to be causally related to seasonal reproductive success: (1) colorful males or (2) old nests. Using experimental and observational data, I tested, but found no support for, the hypotheses that propose female settlement decisions are a function of (1) the prevalence of colorful males or (2) the increased opportunity for extra-pair matings at group sites. Instead, it is apparent that female settlement patterns are strongly tied to the availability of old nests at a site. Extra-pair fertilizations are equally common across all group sizes in this population, suggesting that females do not face a trade-off between old nests and the possibility of extra-pair mating decisions when making settlement decisions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander RD (1974) The evolution of social behavior. Ann Rev Ecolog Syst 5:325–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ardia DR (2005) Individual quality mediates tradeoffs between reproductive effort and immune function in tree swallows. J Anim Ecol 74:517–524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barclay RMR (1988) Variation in the costs, benefits, and frequency of nest reuse by barn swallows. Auk 105:53–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulinier T, Danchin E (1997) The use of conspecific reproductive success for breeding patch selection in terrestrial migratory species. Evol Ecol 11:505–517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briceno AT (2002) Tail length and sexual selection in the North American barn swallow Hirundo rustica erythrogaster. MS Thesis. University of Tulsa, Tulsa

  • Brohede J, Primmer CR, Møller A, Ellegren H (2002) Heterogeneity in the rate and pattern of germline mutation at individual microsatellite loci. Nucleic Acids Res 30:1997–2003

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brown CR, Brown MB (1999) Barn swallow (Hirundo rustica). No. 42. In: Poole A, Gill F (eds) The birds of North America. The Birds of North America, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown CR, Brown MB (2001) Avian coloniality: progress and problems. In: Nolan V, Thompson CF (eds) Current ornithology, vol 16. Plenum, New York, pp 1–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Cadiou B, Monnat JY, Danchin E (1994) Prospecting in the kittiwake, Rissa tridactyla: different behavioural patterns and the role of squatting in recruitment. Anim Behav 47:847–856

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coulson JC (1966) The influence of pair-bond and age on breeding biology of kittiwake gulls Rissa tridactyla. J Anim Ecol 35:269–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cramp S (ed) (1988) The birds of the Western Palearctic, vol 5: tyrant flycatchers to thrushes. Oxford University Press, Oxford

  • Danchin E, Wagner RH (1997) The evolution of coloniality: the emergence of new perspectives. Trends Ecol Evol Biol 12:842–847

    Google Scholar 

  • Danchin E, Boulinier T, Massot M (1998) Conspecific reproductive success and breeding habitat selection: implications for the study of coloniality. Ecology 79:2415–2428

    Google Scholar 

  • Doerr VAJ, Doerr ED, Jenkins SH (2006) Habitat selection in two Australasian treecreepers: what cues should they use? Emu 106:93–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drent RH, Daan S (1980) The prudent parent: energetic adjustment in avian breeding. Ardea 68:225–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffith SC, Owens IPF, Thuman KA (2002) Extra-pair paternity in birds: a review of interspecific variation and adaptive function. Mol Ecol 11:2195–2212

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hill JR III (1982) Reproductive success in the barn swallow: effects of nest reuse and age. MS Thesis. Pennsylvania State University

  • Hill GE (1998) An easy, inexpensive means to quantify plumage coloration. J Field Ornithol 69:353–363

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoi H, Hoi-Leitner M (1997) An alternative route to coloniality in the bearded tit: females pursue extra-pair fertilizations. Behav Ecol 8:113–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollander M, Wolfe DA (1999) Nonparametric statistical methods, Second edition. Wiley, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleven O, Jacobsen F, Izadnegahdar R, Robertson RJ, Lifjeld JT (2006) Male tail streamer length predicts fertilization success in the North American barn swallow Hirundo rustica erythrogaster. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 59:412–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Littell R, Milliken G, Stroup W, Wolfinger R (1996) System for mixed models. SAS Institute, Cary, NC

    Google Scholar 

  • Møller AP (1987) The advantages and disadvantages of coloniality in the swallow Hirundo rustica. Anim Behav 35:819–832

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Møller AP (1994) Sexual selection and the barn swallow. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Møller AP, Birkhead TR (1993) Cuckholdy and sociality: a comparative study of birds. Am Nat 139:644–656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morton ES, Forman L, Braun M (1990) Extrapair fertilizations and the evolution of colonial breeding in purple martins. Auk 107:275–283

    Google Scholar 

  • Neter J, Kutner MH, Nachtsheim CJ, Wasserman W (1996) Applied linear statistical models, 4th edn. Irwin, Chicago, IL

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuman CR, Safran RJ, Lovette IJ (2007) Male tail streamer length does not predict apparent or genetic reproductive success in North American barn swallows Hirundo rustica erythrogaster. J Avian Biol 38:28–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Price T (1998) Maternal and paternal effects in birds: effects on offspring fitness. In: Mousseau TA, Fox CW (eds) Maternal effects as adaptations. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 202–226

    Google Scholar 

  • Primmer CR, Møller AP, Ellegren H (1995) Resolving genetic relationships with microsatellite markers: a parentage testing system for the swallow Hirundo rustica. Mol Ecol 4:493–498

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Primmer CR, Møller AP, Ellegren H (1996) New microsatellites from the pied flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca and the swallow Hirundo rustica. Hereditas 124:281–283

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reed JM, Oring LW (1992) Reconnaissance for future breeding sites by spotted sandpipers. Behav Ecol 3:310–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowe L, Ludwig D, Schluter D (1994) Time, condition and the seasonal decline of avian clutch size. Am Nat 143:698–722

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Safran RJ (2004) Adaptive site selection rules and variation in group size of barn swallows: individual decisions predict population patterns. Am Nat 164: 121–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Safran RJ (2006) Nest-site selection decisions in barn swallows: What predicts reproductive performance? Can J Zool 84:1533–1539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Safran RJ, McGraw KJ (2004) Plumage coloration, not length or symmetry of tail-streamers, is a sexually selected trait in North American barn swallows. Behav Ecol 15:455–461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Safran RJ, Neuman CR, McGraw KJ, IJ Lovette (2005) Dynamic paternity allocation as a function of male plumage color in barn swallows. Science 309:2210–2212

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Saino N, Primmer CR, Ellegren H, Møller AP (1997) An experimental study of paternity and tail ornamentation in the barn swallow (Hirundo rustica). Evolution 51:562–570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saino N, Romano M, Sacchi R, Ninni P, Møller AP (2003) Do male barn swallows experience a trade-off between the expression of multiple signals? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 54:465–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute (1990) SAS/STAT User’s guide, Version 6, 4th edn, vol 2. SAS Institute, Cary

    Google Scholar 

  • Shields WM (1984) Factors affecting nest and site fidelity in Adirondack barn swallows. Auk 101:780–789

    Google Scholar 

  • Shields WM, Crook JR (1987) Barn swallow coloniality: a net cost for group breeding in the Adirondacks? Ecology 68:1373–1386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shields WM, Crook JR, Hebblethwaite ML, Wiles-Ehmann SS (1988) Ideal free coloniality in the swallows. In: Slobodchikoff CN (ed) The ecology of social behavior. Academic, San Diego, pp 189–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Slagsvold T (1986) Nest site settlement by the pied flycatcher: does the female choose her mate for the quality of his house or himself? Ornis Scand 17:210–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith HG, Montgomerie R, Poldmaa T, White BN, Boag PT (1991) DNA fingerprinting reveals relation between tail ornaments and cuckoldry in barn swallows Hirundo rustica. Behav Ecol 2:90–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snapp BD (1976) Colonial breeding in the barn swallow and its adaptive significance. Condor 78:471–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Streif M, Rasa A (2001) Divorce and its consequences in the common blackbird Turdus merula. Ibis 143:554–560

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarof SA, Ratcliffe LM, Kasumovic MM, Boag PT (2005) Are least flycatcher (Empidonax minimus) clusters hidden leks? Behav Ecol 16:207–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner RH (1993) The pursuit of extra pair copulations by female birds: a new hypothesis of colony formation. J Theor Biol 163:333–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner RH, Schug MD, Morton ES (1996) Condition-dependent control of paternity by female purple martins: implications for coloniality. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 38:379–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westneat DF, Sherman PW (1997) Density and extra-pair fertilizations in birds: a comparative analysis. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 41:205–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winkler DW, Allen PE (1995) Effects of handicapping on female condition and reproduction in tree swallows (Tachycineta bicolor). Auk 112:737–747

    Google Scholar 

  • Winkler DW, Allen PE (1996) The seasonal decline in tree swallow clutch size: physiological constraint or strategic adjustment. Ecology 77:922–932

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolinksi RA (1981) Pair formation, nest-site selection and territory in the Barn Swallow. MS Thesis. Michigan State University

Download references

Acknowledgement

I thank many individuals for the assistance with data collection, especially J. Anderson, K. Belinsky, T. Bruce, M. Byrne, J. DaCosta, S. Flaxman, M. Hauber, D. Hawley, M. Griesser, J. Hill, I. Lovette, J. Martin, K. McGraw, S. McRae, S. Mendler, C. Neuman, A. Romero, and K. Roux, J. Schuetz, L. Stenzler, and B. Taft. Many landowners across Tompkins County, including Cornell University, graciously provided access to their populations of barn swallows. Stimulating discussion with and the advice of C. Brown, D. Hawley, M. Hauber and S. Flaxman, R. Vallender, H. Greene, A. Lotem, P. Sherman, M. Wells, D. Winkler, and all the members of the Winkler lab (D. Ardia, T. Bruce, C. Burney, V. Ferretti, P. Lambias, G. Langham, J. Schuetz, L. Stenzler, and M. Wasson) were invaluable throughout this project. This manuscript benefited from comments by D. Ardia, D. Hawley, S. Flaxman, K. McGraw, D. Rubenstein, P. Sherman, and D. Winkler. Funding was provided by the American Ornithologists’ Union, the Animal Behavior Society, the Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology at Cornell, the National Science Foundation (Doctoral Dissertation Improvement Grant # 0308392 to R.J. Safran and D.W. Winkler), the Purple Martin Conservation Association, Sigma Xi, and the Wilson Ornithological Society. Support during data collection was provided by a training grant in Computational Biology from the National Science Foundation and the Department of Biometrics at Cornell (1998–2000) and the American Association of University Women’s American Fellowship (2003–2004). Support during final manuscript preparation was provided by the Council on Science and Technology Postdoctoral Fellowship and the Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology at Princeton University. All of the sampling and experimental methods were approved by The Cornell University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (Number 01–51) and eggs were collected under permits from the US Fish & Wildlife Service and the New York Department of Environmental Conservation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rebecca J. Safran.

Additional information

Communicated by C. Brown

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Safran, R.J. Settlement patterns of female barn swallows Hirundo rustica across different group sizes: access to colorful males or favored nests?. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 61, 1359–1368 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-007-0366-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-007-0366-6

Keywords

Navigation