Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Computer-aided designed, three dimensional-printed hemipelvic prosthesis for peri-acetabular malignant bone tumour

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Prosthetic reconstruction may be a promising treatment for peri-acetabular malignant bone tumour; however, it is associated with a high complication rate. Therefore, prosthetic design and approach of prosthetic reconstruction after tumour resection warrant study.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 11 patients with peri-acetabular malignant bone tumours treated by personalized 3D-printed hemipelvic prostheses after en bloc resection between 2015 and 2016. Pre-operative and post-operative pain at rest was assessed according to a 10-cm VAS score. The results of functional improvement were evaluated using the MSTS-93 score at the final follow-up. We also analyzed tumour recurrence, metastases, and complications associated with the reconstruction procedure.

Results

All patients were observed for six to 24 months with an average follow-up of 15.5 months. One patient had occasional pain of the involved hip at the final follow-up (VAS, pre vs. post 8 months: 3 vs. 2). The mean MSTS-93 score was 19.2 (range, 13–25). Hip dislocation was detected in two patients, while delayed wound healing occurred in one patient. One patient with mesenchymal chondrosarcoma had a left iliac bone metastasis. Local tumour recurrence was not observed.

Conclusions

Reconstruction of bony defect after tumour resection using personalized 3D-printed hemipelvic prostheses can obtain acceptable functional results without severe complications. Based on previous reports and our results, we believe that reconstruction arthroplasty using 3D-printed hemipelvic prostheses will provide a promising alternative for those patients with peri-acetabular malignant bone tumours.

Level of Evidence: Level IV, therapeutic study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Carter SR, Eastwood DM, Grimer RJ, Sneath RS (1990) Hindquarter amputation for tumours of the musculoskeletal system. J Bone Joint Surg Br 72:490–493

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Puri A, Gulia A, Pruthi M (2014) Outcome of surgical resection of pelvic osteosarcoma. Indian J Orthop 48:273–278

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Schwartz AJ, Kiatisevi P, Eilber FC, Eilber FR, Eckardt JJ (2009) The Friedman-Eilber resection arthroplasty of the pelvis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467:2825–2830

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Kusuzaki K, Shinjo H, Kim W, Nakamura S, Murata H, Hirasawa Y (1998) Resection hip arthroplasty for malignant pelvic tumor. Outcome in 5 patients followed more than 2 years. Acta Orthop Scand 69:617–621

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ozaki T, Hillmann A, Winkelmann W (1998) Treatment outcome of pelvic sarcomas in young children: orthopaedic and oncologic analysis. J Pediatr Orthop 18:350–355

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ayvaz M, Bekmez S, Mermerkaya MU, Caglar O, Acaroglu E, Tokgozoglu AM (2014) Long-term results of reconstruction with pelvic allografts after wide resection of pelvic sarcomas. Scientific World Journal 2014:605019

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Zang J, Guo W, Yang Y, Xie L (2014) Reconstruction of the hemipelvis with a modular prosthesis after resection of a primary malignant peri-acetabular tumour involving the sacroiliac joint. Bone Joint J 96-B:399–405

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sun W, Li J, Li Q, Li G, Cai Z (2011) Clinical effectiveness of hemipelvic reconstruction using computer-aided custom-made prostheses after resection of malignant pelvic tumors. J Arthroplast 26:1508–1513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Menendez LR, Ahlmann ER, Falkinstein Y, Allison DC (2009) Periacetabular reconstruction with a new endoprosthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467:2831–2837

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Enneking WF, Dunham WK (1978) Resection and reconstruction for primary neoplasms involving the innominate bone. J Bone Joint Surg Am 60:731–746

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Jansen JA, Sande MAJV, Dijkstra PDS (2013) Poor long-term clinical results of saddle prosthesis after resection of periacetabular tumors. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471:324

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ji T, Guo W, Yang RL, Tang XD, Wang YF (2013) Modular hemipelvic endoprosthesis reconstruction--experience in 100 patients with mid-term follow-up results. Eur J Surg Oncol 39:53–60

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Dai KR, Yan MN, Zhu ZA, Sun YH (2007) Computer-aided custom-made hemipelvic prosthesis used in extensive pelvic lesions. J Arthroplast 22:981–986

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Delloye C, Banse X, Brichard B, Docquier PL, Cornu O (2007) Pelvic reconstruction with a structural pelvic allograft after resection of a malignant bone tumor. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89:579–587

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Guo W, Li D, Tang X, Yang Y, Ji T (2007) Reconstruction with modular hemipelvic prostheses for periacetabular tumor. Clin Orthop Relat Res 461:180–188

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ozaki T, Hoffmann C, Hillmann A, Gosheger G, Lindner N, Winkelmann W (2002) Implantation of hemipelvic prosthesis after resection of sarcoma. Clin Orthop Relat Res 396:197–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Aboulafia AJ, Buch R, Mathews J, Li W, Malawer MM (1995) Reconstruction using the saddle prosthesis following excision of primary and metastatic periacetabular tumors. Clin Orthop Relat Res 314:203–213

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ozaki T, Hillmann A, Bettin D, Wuisman P, Winkelmann W (1996) High complication rates with pelvic allografts. Experience of 22 sarcoma resections. Acta Orthop Scand 67:333–338

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. O'Connor MI, Sim FH (1989) Salvage of the limb in the treatment of malignant pelvic tumors. J Bone Joint Surg Am 71:481–494

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Stephenson RB, Kaufer H, Hankin FM (1989) Partial pelvic resection as an alternative to hindquarter amputation for skeletal neoplasms. Clin Orthop Relat Res 242:201–211

    Google Scholar 

  21. Campanacci M, Capanna R (1991) Pelvic resections: the Rizzoli institute experience. Orthop Clin N Am 22:65–86

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Abudu A, Grimer RJ, Cannon SR, Carter SR, Sneath RS (1997) Reconstruction of the hemipelvis after the excision of malignant tumours. Complications and functional outcome of prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Br 79:773–779

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Fuchs B, O'Connor MI, Kaufman KR, Padgett DJ, Sim FH (2002) Iliofemoral arthrodesis and pseudarthrosis: a long-term functional outcome evaluation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 397:29–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Harrington KD, Johnston JO, Kaufer HN, Luck JJ, Moore TM (1986) Limb salvage and prosthetic joint reconstruction for low-grade and selected high-grade sarcomas of bone after wide resection and replacement by autoclaved [corrected] autogeneic grafts. Clin Orthop Relat Res 211:180–214

    Google Scholar 

  25. Li G, Wang L, Pan W, Yang F, Jiang W, Wu X, Kong X, Dai K, Hao Y (2016) In vitro and in vivo study of additive manufactured porous Ti6Al4V scaffolds for repairing bone defects. Sci Rep 6:34072

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Shah FA, Snis A, Matic A, Thomsen P, Palmquist A (2016) 3D printed Ti6Al4V implant surface promotes bone maturation and retains a higher density of less aged osteocytes at the bone-implant interface. Acta Biomater 30:357–367

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Sing SL, An J, Yeong WY, Wiria FE (2016) Laser and electron-beam powder-bed additive manufacturing of metallic implants: a review on processes, materials and designs. J Orthop Res 34:369–385

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Xu N, Wei F, Liu X, Jiang L, Cai H, Li Z, Yu M, Wu F, Liu Z (2016) Reconstruction of the upper cervical spine using a personalized 3D-printed vertebral body in an adolescent with Ewing sarcoma. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 41:E50–E54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Liang H, Ji T, Zhang Y, Wang Y, Guo W (2017) Reconstruction with 3D-printed pelvic endoprostheses after resection of a pelvic tumour. Bone Joint J 99-B:267–275

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Chen X, Xu L, Wang Y, Hao Y, Wang L (2016) Image-guided installation of 3D-printed patient-specific implant and its application in pelvic tumor resection and reconstruction surgery. Comput Methods Prog Biomed 125:66–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Wong KC, Kumta SM, Geel NV, Demol J (2015) One-step reconstruction with a 3D-printed, biomechanically evaluated custom implant after complex pelvic tumor resection. Comput Aided Surg 20:14–23

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Enneking WF, Spanier SS, Goodman MA (1980) A system for the surgical staging of musculoskeletal sarcoma. Clin Orthop Relat Res 153:106–120

    Google Scholar 

  33. Mavrogenis AF, Rossi G, Altimari G, Calabro T, Angelini A, Palmerini E, Rimondi E, Ruggieri P (2013) Palliative embolisation for advanced bone sarcomas. Radiol Med 118:1344–1359

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Enneking WF, Dunham W, Gebhardt MC, Malawar M, Pritchard DJ (1993) A system for the functional evaluation of reconstructive procedures after surgical treatment of tumors of the musculoskeletal system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 286:241–246

    Google Scholar 

  35. Winkelmann WW (1986) Hip rotationplasty for malignant tumors of the proximal part of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Am 68:362–369

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Ruggieri P, Mavrogenis AF, Angelini A, Mercuri M (2011) Metastases of the pelvis: does resection improve survival? Orthopedics 34:e236–e244

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Finn HA (1998) Pelvis and acetabulum. In: Simon MA, Springfield D (eds) Surgery for bone and soft-tissue tumors. Lippincott-Raven Publishers, Philadelphia, pp 671–682

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Baichuan Wang or Zengwu Shao.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, B., Hao, Y., Pu, F. et al. Computer-aided designed, three dimensional-printed hemipelvic prosthesis for peri-acetabular malignant bone tumour. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 42, 687–694 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-017-3645-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-017-3645-5

Keywords

Navigation