Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Morphologic and angular planning for cam resection in femoro-acetabular impingement: value of the omega angle

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The alpha angle is used to quantify in a single plane the head–neck junction deformity of cam femoro-acetabular impingement (FAI). When the deformity overlaps the superior retinaculum, femoral head osteoplasty in this area can jeopardise intra-articular vascular structures. This study proposes a new angular measure of the linear radial extension of cam deformity as a planning tool for bone resection and compares the accuracy of femoral head osteoplasty using open and arthroscopic surgery.

Methods

Twenty-five symptomatic patients operated on for FAI were included in this study. Radial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was done before and after surgery. Bi-dimensional coordinates of the vascular foramina and radial extension of the deformity (omega angle) were measured. This extension was correlated with the vascular foramina location and alpha-angle value. Accuracy of resection and hip function were evaluated before and after surgery.

Results

The cam lesion frequently extended posteriorly. No relation between values of alpha and omega angles was found. Cam resection was complete in 88 % of cases; there was a significant improvement in outcome score after surgery.

Conclusions

This study showed that alpha angle, measured in one plane, was not a predictor of the radial extension of cam deformity. To achieve a full resection, it was frequently necessary to extend the femoral head osteoplasty over the retinacular area. Pre-operative determination of the omega angle and location of the vascular foramina helped improve cam resection safety and accuracy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Audenaert EA, Mahieu P, Pattyn C (2011) Three-dimensional assessment of cam engagement in femoroacetabular impingement. Arthroscopy 27(2):167–71. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2010.06.031

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Beaulé PE, Hynes K, Parker G, Kemp KA (2012) Can the alpha angle assessment of cam impingement predict acetabular cartilage delamination? Clin Orthop Relat Res 470(12):3361–7. doi:10.1007/s11999-012-2601-3

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Beutel BG, Collins JA, Garofolo G, Youm T (2015) Hip arthroscopy outcomes, complications, and traction safety in patients with prior lower-extremity arthroplasty. Int Orthop 39(1):13–8. doi:10.1007/s00264-014-2479-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Boraiah S, Dyke JP, Hettrich C, Parker RJ, Miller A, Helfet D, Lorich D (2009) Assessment of vascularity of the femoral head using gadolinium (gd-dtpa)-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: A cadaver study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 91(1):131–7. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.91B1.21275

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Büchler L, Neumann M, Schwab JM, Iselin L, Tannast M, Beck M (2013) Arthroscopic versus open cam resection in the treatment of femoroacetabular impingement. Arthroscopy 29(4):653–60. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2012.12.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Christensen CP, Althausen PL, Mittleman MA, Lee J-A, McCarthy JC (2003) The nonarthritic hip score: reliable and validated. Clin Orthop Relat Res 406:75–83. doi:10.1097/01.blo.0000043047.84315.4b

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Doherty M, Courtney P, Doherty S, Jenkins W, Maciewicz RA, Muir K, Zhang W (2008) Nonspherical femoral head shape (pistol grip deformity), neck shaft angle, and risk of hip osteoarthritis: a case–control study. Arthritis Rheum 58(10):3172–82. doi:10.1002/art.23939

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Espinosa N, Rothenfluh DA, Beck M, Ganz R, Leunig M (2006) Treatment of femoro-acetabular impingement: preliminary results of labral refixation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88(5):925–35. doi:10.2106/JBJS.E.00290

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ganz R, Gill TJ, Gautier E, Ganz K, Krügel N, Berlemann U (2001) Surgical dislocation of the adult hip a technique with full access to the femoral head and acetabulum without the risk of avascular necrosis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 83(8):1119–24

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Jamali AA, Mak W, Wang P, Tai L, Meehan JP, Lamba R (2013) What is normal femoral head/neck anatomy? An analysis of radial CT reconstructions in adolescents. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471(11):3581–7. doi:10.1007/s11999-013-3166-5

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Kalhor M, Beck M, Huff TW, Ganz R (2009) Capsular and pericapsular contributions to acetabular and femoral head perfusion. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91(2):409–18. doi:10.2106/JBJS.G.01679

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kang RW, Yanke AB, Espinoza Orias AA, Orias AE, Inoue N, Nho SJ (2013) Emerging ideas: novel 3-D quantification and classification of cam lesions in patients with femoroacetabular impingement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471(2):358–62. doi:10.1007/s11999-012-2693-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lavigne M, Kalhor M, Beck M, Ganz R, Leunig M (2005) Distribution of vascular foramina around the femoral head and neck junction: relevance for conservative intracapsular procedures of the hip. Orthop Clin N Am 36(2):171–6. doi:10.1016/j.ocl.2005.02.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lazaro LE, Sculco PK, Pardee NC, Klinger CE, Dyke JP, Helfet DL et al (2013) Assessment of femoral head and head–neck junction perfusion following surgical hip dislocation using gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: a cadaveric study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 95(23):e1821–8. doi:10.2106/JBJS.L.01185

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lerch S, Kasperczyk A, Warnecke J, Berndt T, Rühmann O (2013) Evaluation of cam-type femoroacetabular impingement by ultrasound. Int Orthop 37(5):783–8. doi:10.1007/s00264-013-1844-2

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Lerch S, Kasperczyk A, Berndt T, Rühmann O (2015) Ultrasonography can quantify the extent of osteochondroplasty after treatment of cam-type femoroacetabular impingement. Int Orthop 39(5):853–8. doi:10.1007/s00264-014-2588-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Magerkurth O, Jacobson JA, Jax F, Morag Y, Fessell D, Lee SJ et al (2013) Femoroacetabular cam-type impingement: global assessment of the femoral head–neck junction on a single reformatted MR image. Radiology 268(3):822–30. doi:10.1148/radiol.13121961

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Mancini D, Fontana A (2014) Five-year results of arthroscopic techniques for the treatment of acetabular chondral lesions in femoroacetabular impingement. Int Orthop 38(10):2057–64. doi:10.1007/s00264-014-2403-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Neumann M, Cui Q, Siebenrock KA, Beck M (2009) Impingement-free hip motion: the ‘normal” angle alpha after osteochondroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467(3):699–703. doi:10.1007/s11999-008-0616-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Rakhra KS, Sheikh AM, Allen D, Beaulé PE (2009) Comparison of MRI alpha angle measurement planes in femoroacetabular impingement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467(3):660–5. doi:10.1007/s11999-008-0627-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Spencer S, Millis MB, Kim Y-J (2006) Early results of treatment of hip impingement syndrome in slipped capital femoral epiphysis and pistol grip deformity of the femoral head–neck junction using the surgical dislocation technique. J Pediatr Orthop 26(3):281–5. doi:10.1097/01.bpo.0000217726.16417.74

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Stähelin L, Stähelin T, Jolles BM, Herzog RF (2008) Arthroscopic offset restoration in femoroacetabular cam impingement: accuracy and early clinical outcome. Arthroscopy 24(1):51–57.e1. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2007.08.010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Sussmann PS, Ranawat AS, Shehaan M, Lorich D, Padgett DE, Kelly BT (2007) Vascular preservation during arthroscopic osteoplasty of the femoral head–neck junction: a cadaveric investigation. Arthroscopy 23(7):738–43. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2007.01.025

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Sutter R, Dietrich TJ, Zingg PO, Pfirrmann CWA (2012) How useful is the alpha angle for discriminating between symptomatic patients with cam-type femoroacetabular impingement and asymptomatic volunteers? Radiology 264(2):514–21. doi:10.1148/radiol.12112479

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Tanzer M, Noiseux N (2004) Osseous abnormalities and early osteoarthritis: the role of hip impingement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 429:170–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Tönnis D (1976) Normal values of the hip joint for the evaluation of x-rays in children and adults. Clin Orthop Relat Res 119:39–47

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Vendittoli PA, Young DA, Stitson DJ, Wolfe R, Del Buono A, Maffulli N (2012) Acetabular rim lesions: arthroscopic assessment and clinical relevance. Int Orthop 36(11):2235–41. doi:10.1007/s00264-012-1595-5

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the Hospital da Luz Radiology department for providing MRI equipment and all the processing software necessary for geometrical analysis

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paulo Renato Amaral Rego.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest and there was no founding involved in the preparation of this manuscript

Ethical approval

This article does not include results of experimental investigations on humans, and as a retrospective study, formal consent was not required. Informed consent from all patients was obtained on a routine basis for surgical procedures. We obtained formal consent from our institutional review board to perform geometric analysis on imaging files.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rego, P.R.A., Mascarenhas, V., Oliveira, F.S. et al. Morphologic and angular planning for cam resection in femoro-acetabular impingement: value of the omega angle. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 40, 2011–2017 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-015-3053-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-015-3053-7

Keywords

Navigation