Abstract
Purpose
To assess subspecialty mix and case volumes of general and abdominal subspecialty radiologists interpreting abdominal MRI.
Methods
The 2016 CMS Physician/Supplier Procedure Summary Master File was used to obtain billed counts of radiologist-interpreted abdominal fluoroscopy, US, CT, and MRI examinations. The CMS Physician and Other Supplier Public Use File was used to assess the subspecialty mix and case volume of the radiologists interpreting those examinations.
Results
The fraction of all abdominal imaging examinations interpreted by generalists and abdominal subspecialty radiologists was 70.7% and 16.5% for fluoroscopy; 68.7% and 21.0% for US; 71.4% and 19.2% for CT; and 41.9% and 52.5% for MRI. In 2016, the fraction of general and abdominal radiologists interpreting > 50 fluoroscopy examinations on Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries was 15.1% and 16.2%. For > 50 US examinations, the fraction was 61.5% and 60.5%; for > 50 CT examinations, 91.2% and 79.6%; and for > 50 MRI examinations, 4.0% and 28.5%. The fraction of abdominal imaging examinations interpreted overall by low-volume providers (those interpreting ≤ 50 examinations in 2016) was 59.5% for fluoroscopy, 17.5% for US, 6.3% for CT, and 50.6% for MRI.
Conclusion
Nationally, most abdominal fluoroscopy, US, and CT examinations are interpreted by general radiologists, who have similar annual volumes of these examinations as abdominal subspecialty radiologists. In contrast, most abdominal MRI examinations are interpreted by abdominal subspecialty radiologists, who attain considerably higher volumes. These findings have implications for workforce planning and abdominal imaging fellowship design to ensure their graduates are optimally prepared to contribute to their future practices.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Rosman DA, Duszak R, Jr., Wang W, Hughes DR, Rosenkrantz AB. Changing Utilization of Noninvasive Diagnostic Imaging Over 2 Decades: An Examination Family-Focused Analysis of Medicare Claims Using the Neiman Imaging Types of Service Categorization System. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018;210(2):364-8.
Qayyum A. Diffusion-weighted imaging in the abdomen and pelvis: concepts and applications. Radiographics. 2009;29(6):1797-810.
Madhuranthakam AJ, Yuan Q, Pedrosa I. Quantitative Methods in Abdominal MRI: Perfusion Imaging. Top Magn Reson Imaging. 2017;26(6):251-8.
Srinivasa Babu A, Wells ML, Teytelboym OM, et al. Elastography in Chronic Liver Disease: Modalities, Techniques, Limitations, and Future Directions. Radiographics. 2016;36(7):1987-2006.
Kloeckner R, Otto G, Biesterfeld S, Oberholzer K, Dueber C, Pitton MB. MDCT versus MRI assessment of tumor response after transarterial chemoembolization for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2010;33(3):532-40.
Pedrosa I, Sun MR, Spencer M, et al. MR imaging of renal masses: correlation with findings at surgery and pathologic analysis. Radiographics. 2008;28(4):985-1003.
Rahman WT, Hussain HK, Parikh ND, Davenport MS. Reinterpretation of Outside Hospital MRI Abdomen Examinations in Patients With Cirrhosis: Is the OPTN Mandate Necessary? AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016;207(4):782-8.
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Physician/Supplier Procedure Summary File. https://www.cms.gov/Research-Statistics-Data-and-Systems/Statistics-Trends-and-Reports/Physician-Supplier-Procedure-Summary/index.html. Accessed on: December 28, 2018.
Gyftopoulos S, Harkey P, Hemingway J, Hughes DR, Rosenkrantz AB, Duszak R, Jr. Changing Musculoskeletal Extremity Imaging Utilization From 1994 Through 2013: A Medicare Beneficiary Perspective. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017;209(5):1103-9.
Morris E, Duszak R, Jr., Sista AK, Hemingway J, Hughes DR, Rosenkrantz AB. National Trends in Inferior Vena Cava Filter Placement and Retrieval Procedures in the Medicare Population Over Two Decades. J Am Coll Radiol. 2018;15(8):1080-6.s
Rosenkrantz AB, Bilal NH, Hughes DR, Duszak R, Jr. National specialty trends in billable diagnostic ultrasound in the ED: analysis of Medicare claims data. Am J Emerg Med. 2014;32(12):1470-5.
Chokshi FH, Hughes DR, Wang JM, Mullins ME, Hawkins CM, Duszak R, Jr. Diagnostic Radiology Resident and Fellow Workloads: A 12-Year Longitudinal Trend Analysis Using National Medicare Aggregate Claims Data. J Am Coll Radiol. 2015;12(7):664-9.
Rosenkrantz AB, Hawkins CM, Deitte LA, Hemingway J, Hughes DR, Duszak R, Jr. Invasive Procedural Versus Diagnostic Imaging and Clinical Services Rendered by Radiology Trainees Over Two Decades. J Am Coll Radiol. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2018.11.029.
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Medicare Provider Utililzation and Payment Data: Physician and Other Supplier. https://www.cms.gov/research-statistics-data-and-systems/statisti cs-trends-and-reports/medicare-provider-charge-data/physician-and-other-supplier.html. Accessed on: December 28, 2018.
Rosenkrantz AB, Hoque K, Hemingway J, Hughes DR, Duszak R, Jr. Unique Medicare Beneficiaries Served: A Radiologist-Focused Specialty-Level Analysis. J Am Coll Radiol. 2018;15(5):734-9 e2.
Rosenkrantz AB, Nicola GN, Duszak R, Jr. Characteristics of High-Performing Radiologists Within Medicare Quality Programs. J Am Coll Radiol. 2018;15(6):842-9.
Rosenkrantz AB, Wang W, Vijayasarathi A, Duszak R, Jr. Factors Influencing List Prices for Radiologists’ Services. J Am Coll Radiol. 2017;14(11):1396-402.
Rosenkrantz AB, Wang W, Hughes DR, Ginocchio LA, Rosman DA, Duszak R, Jr. Academic Radiologist Subspecialty Identification Using a Novel Claims-Based Classification System. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017;208(6):1249-55.
Rosenkrantz AB, Wang W, Bodapati S, Hughes DR, Duszak R, Jr. Private Practice Radiologist Subspecialty Classification Using Medicare Claims. J Am Coll Radiol. 2017;14(11):1419-25.
Rosenkrantz AB, Wang W, Hughes DR, Duszak R, Jr. Generalist versus Subspecialist Characteristics of the U.S. Radiologist Workforce. Radiology. 2018;286(3):929-37.
Rosenkrantz AB, Wang W, Hughes DR, Duszak R, Jr. A County-Level Analysis of the US Radiologist Workforce: Physician Supply and Subspecialty Characteristics. J Am Coll Radiol. 2018;15(4):601-6.
Rosenkrantz AB, Friedberg EB, Prologo JD, Everett C, Duszak R, Jr. Generalist versus Subspecialist Workforce Characteristics of Invasive Procedures Performed by Radiologists. Radiology. 2018;289(1):140-7.
Duszak R, Jr., Muroff LR. Measuring and managing radiologist productivity, part 1: clinical metrics and benchmarks. J Am Coll Radiol. 2010;7(6):452-8.
Duszak R, Jr., Muroff LR. Measuring and managing radiologist productivity, part 2: beyond the clinical numbers. J Am Coll Radiol. 2010;7(7):482-9.
Funding
Authors Rosenkrantz and Duszak are supported by research grants from the Harvey L. Neiman Health Policy Institute.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rosenkrantz, A.B., Shanbhogue, K.P. & Duszak, R. In comparison with other abdominal imaging modalities, which radiologists interpret abdominal MRI?. Abdom Radiol 44, 2656–2662 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-019-02009-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-019-02009-z