Skip to main content
Log in

In comparison with other abdominal imaging modalities, which radiologists interpret abdominal MRI?

  • Practice
  • Published:
Abdominal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To assess subspecialty mix and case volumes of general and abdominal subspecialty radiologists interpreting abdominal MRI.

Methods

The 2016 CMS Physician/Supplier Procedure Summary Master File was used to obtain billed counts of radiologist-interpreted abdominal fluoroscopy, US, CT, and MRI examinations. The CMS Physician and Other Supplier Public Use File was used to assess the subspecialty mix and case volume of the radiologists interpreting those examinations.

Results

The fraction of all abdominal imaging examinations interpreted by generalists and abdominal subspecialty radiologists was 70.7% and 16.5% for fluoroscopy; 68.7% and 21.0% for US; 71.4% and 19.2% for CT; and 41.9% and 52.5% for MRI. In 2016, the fraction of general and abdominal radiologists interpreting > 50 fluoroscopy examinations on Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries was 15.1% and 16.2%. For > 50 US examinations, the fraction was 61.5% and 60.5%; for > 50 CT examinations, 91.2% and 79.6%; and for > 50 MRI examinations, 4.0% and 28.5%. The fraction of abdominal imaging examinations interpreted overall by low-volume providers (those interpreting ≤ 50 examinations in 2016) was 59.5% for fluoroscopy, 17.5% for US, 6.3% for CT, and 50.6% for MRI.

Conclusion

Nationally, most abdominal fluoroscopy, US, and CT examinations are interpreted by general radiologists, who have similar annual volumes of these examinations as abdominal subspecialty radiologists. In contrast, most abdominal MRI examinations are interpreted by abdominal subspecialty radiologists, who attain considerably higher volumes. These findings have implications for workforce planning and abdominal imaging fellowship design to ensure their graduates are optimally prepared to contribute to their future practices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rosman DA, Duszak R, Jr., Wang W, Hughes DR, Rosenkrantz AB. Changing Utilization of Noninvasive Diagnostic Imaging Over 2 Decades: An Examination Family-Focused Analysis of Medicare Claims Using the Neiman Imaging Types of Service Categorization System. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018;210(2):364-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Qayyum A. Diffusion-weighted imaging in the abdomen and pelvis: concepts and applications. Radiographics. 2009;29(6):1797-810.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Madhuranthakam AJ, Yuan Q, Pedrosa I. Quantitative Methods in Abdominal MRI: Perfusion Imaging. Top Magn Reson Imaging. 2017;26(6):251-8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Srinivasa Babu A, Wells ML, Teytelboym OM, et al. Elastography in Chronic Liver Disease: Modalities, Techniques, Limitations, and Future Directions. Radiographics. 2016;36(7):1987-2006.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Kloeckner R, Otto G, Biesterfeld S, Oberholzer K, Dueber C, Pitton MB. MDCT versus MRI assessment of tumor response after transarterial chemoembolization for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2010;33(3):532-40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Pedrosa I, Sun MR, Spencer M, et al. MR imaging of renal masses: correlation with findings at surgery and pathologic analysis. Radiographics. 2008;28(4):985-1003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Rahman WT, Hussain HK, Parikh ND, Davenport MS. Reinterpretation of Outside Hospital MRI Abdomen Examinations in Patients With Cirrhosis: Is the OPTN Mandate Necessary? AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016;207(4):782-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Physician/Supplier Procedure Summary File. https://www.cms.gov/Research-Statistics-Data-and-Systems/Statistics-Trends-and-Reports/Physician-Supplier-Procedure-Summary/index.html. Accessed on: December 28, 2018.

  9. Gyftopoulos S, Harkey P, Hemingway J, Hughes DR, Rosenkrantz AB, Duszak R, Jr. Changing Musculoskeletal Extremity Imaging Utilization From 1994 Through 2013: A Medicare Beneficiary Perspective. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017;209(5):1103-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Morris E, Duszak R, Jr., Sista AK, Hemingway J, Hughes DR, Rosenkrantz AB. National Trends in Inferior Vena Cava Filter Placement and Retrieval Procedures in the Medicare Population Over Two Decades. J Am Coll Radiol. 2018;15(8):1080-6.s

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Rosenkrantz AB, Bilal NH, Hughes DR, Duszak R, Jr. National specialty trends in billable diagnostic ultrasound in the ED: analysis of Medicare claims data. Am J Emerg Med. 2014;32(12):1470-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Chokshi FH, Hughes DR, Wang JM, Mullins ME, Hawkins CM, Duszak R, Jr. Diagnostic Radiology Resident and Fellow Workloads: A 12-Year Longitudinal Trend Analysis Using National Medicare Aggregate Claims Data. J Am Coll Radiol. 2015;12(7):664-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Rosenkrantz AB, Hawkins CM, Deitte LA, Hemingway J, Hughes DR, Duszak R, Jr. Invasive Procedural Versus Diagnostic Imaging and Clinical Services Rendered by Radiology Trainees Over Two Decades. J Am Coll Radiol. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2018.11.029.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Medicare Provider Utililzation and Payment Data: Physician and Other Supplier. https://www.cms.gov/research-statistics-data-and-systems/statisti cs-trends-and-reports/medicare-provider-charge-data/physician-and-other-supplier.html. Accessed on: December 28, 2018.

  15. Rosenkrantz AB, Hoque K, Hemingway J, Hughes DR, Duszak R, Jr. Unique Medicare Beneficiaries Served: A Radiologist-Focused Specialty-Level Analysis. J Am Coll Radiol. 2018;15(5):734-9 e2.

  16. Rosenkrantz AB, Nicola GN, Duszak R, Jr. Characteristics of High-Performing Radiologists Within Medicare Quality Programs. J Am Coll Radiol. 2018;15(6):842-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Rosenkrantz AB, Wang W, Vijayasarathi A, Duszak R, Jr. Factors Influencing List Prices for Radiologists’ Services. J Am Coll Radiol. 2017;14(11):1396-402.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Rosenkrantz AB, Wang W, Hughes DR, Ginocchio LA, Rosman DA, Duszak R, Jr. Academic Radiologist Subspecialty Identification Using a Novel Claims-Based Classification System. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017;208(6):1249-55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Rosenkrantz AB, Wang W, Bodapati S, Hughes DR, Duszak R, Jr. Private Practice Radiologist Subspecialty Classification Using Medicare Claims. J Am Coll Radiol. 2017;14(11):1419-25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Rosenkrantz AB, Wang W, Hughes DR, Duszak R, Jr. Generalist versus Subspecialist Characteristics of the U.S. Radiologist Workforce. Radiology. 2018;286(3):929-37.

  21. Rosenkrantz AB, Wang W, Hughes DR, Duszak R, Jr. A County-Level Analysis of the US Radiologist Workforce: Physician Supply and Subspecialty Characteristics. J Am Coll Radiol. 2018;15(4):601-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Rosenkrantz AB, Friedberg EB, Prologo JD, Everett C, Duszak R, Jr. Generalist versus Subspecialist Workforce Characteristics of Invasive Procedures Performed by Radiologists. Radiology. 2018;289(1):140-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Duszak R, Jr., Muroff LR. Measuring and managing radiologist productivity, part 1: clinical metrics and benchmarks. J Am Coll Radiol. 2010;7(6):452-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Duszak R, Jr., Muroff LR. Measuring and managing radiologist productivity, part 2: beyond the clinical numbers. J Am Coll Radiol. 2010;7(7):482-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Authors Rosenkrantz and Duszak are supported by research grants from the Harvey L. Neiman Health Policy Institute.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew B. Rosenkrantz.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rosenkrantz, A.B., Shanbhogue, K.P. & Duszak, R. In comparison with other abdominal imaging modalities, which radiologists interpret abdominal MRI?. Abdom Radiol 44, 2656–2662 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-019-02009-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-019-02009-z

Keywords

Navigation