Abstract
Purpose
Dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) has shown the capability of differentiating uric acid (UA) from non-UA stones with 90–100% accuracy. With the invention of dual-source (DS) scanners, both low- and high-energy images are acquired simultaneously. However, DECT can also be performed by sequential acquisition of both images on single-source (SS) scanners. The objective of this study is to investigate the effects of motion artifacts on stone classification using both SS-DECT and DS-DECT.
Methods
114 kidney stones of different types and sizes were imaged on both DS-DECT and SS-DECT scanners with tube voltages of 80 and 140 kVp with and without induced motion. Postprocessing was conducted to create material-specific images from corresponding low- and high-energy images. The dual-energy ratio (DER) and stone material were determined and compared among different scans.
Results
For the motionless scans, all stones were correctly classified with SS-DECT, while two cystine stones were misclassified with DS-DECT. When motion was induced, 94% of the stones were misclassified with SS-DECT versus 11% with DS-DECT (P < 0.0001). Stone size was not a factor in stone misclassification under motion. Stone type was not a factor in stone misclassification under motion with SS-DECT, although with DS-DECT, cystine showed higher number of stone misclassification.
Conclusions
Motion artifacts could result in stone misclassification in DECT. This effect is more pronounced in SS-DECT versus DS-DECT, especially if stones of different types lie in close proximity to each other. Further, possible misinterpretation of the number of stones (i.e., missing one, or thinking that there are two) in DS-DECT could be a potentially significant problem.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Worcester EM, Coe FL (2008) Nephrolithiasis. Prim Care 35(2):369–391, vii
Scales CD Jr, Smith AC, Hanley JM, Saigal CS (2012) Prevalence of kidney stones in the United States. Eur Urol 62(1):160–165
Worcester EM, Coe FL (2010) Clinical practice. Calcium kidney stones. N Engl J Med 363(10):954–963
Saigal CS, Joyce G, Timilsina AR (2005) Direct and indirect costs of nephrolithiasis in an employed population: opportunity for disease management? Kidney Int 68(4):1808–1814
Boulay I, Holtz P, Foley WD, White B, Begun FP (1999) Ureteral calculi: diagnostic efficacy of helical CT and implications for treatment of patients. Am J Roentgenol 172(6):1485–1490
Primak AN, Fletcher JG, Vrtiska TJ, et al. (2007) Noninvasive differentiation of uric acid versus non-uric acid kidney stones using dual-energy CT. Acad Radiol 14(12):1441–1447
Matlaga BR, Kawamoto S, Fishman E (2008) Dual source computed tomography: a novel technique to determine stone composition. Urology 72(5):1164–1168
Boll DT, Patil NA, Paulson EK, et al. (2009) Renal stone assessment with dual-energy multidetector CT and advanced postprocessing techniques: improved characterization of renal stone composition–pilot study. Radiology 250(3):813–820
Leng S, Shiung M, Ai S, et al. (2015) Feasibility of discriminating uric acid from non-uric acid renal stones using consecutive spatially registered low- and high-energy scans obtained on a conventional CT scanner. Am J Roentgenol 204(1):92–97
Ibrahim El SH, Rana FN, Johnson KR, White RD (2012) Assessment of cardiac iron deposition in sickle cell disease using 3.0 Tesla cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Hemoglobin 36(4):343–361
Jepperson MA, Cernigliaro JG, Ibrahim ES et al. (2014) In vivo comparison of radiation exposure of dual-energy CT versus low-dose ct versus standard CT for imaging urinary calculi. J Endourol Endourol Soc
Grosjean R, Sauer B, Guerra RM, et al. (2008) Characterization of human renal stones with MDCT: advantage of dual energy and limitations due to respiratory motion. Am J Roentgenol. 190(3):720–728
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ibrahim, ES.H., Cernigliaro, J.G., Pooley, R.A. et al. Motion artifacts in kidney stone imaging using single-source and dual-source dual-energy CT scanners: a phantom study. Abdom Imaging 40, 3161–3167 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-015-0530-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-015-0530-9