Abstract
Objective
The authors describe magnetic resonance (MR) findings in eight patients with histologically confirmed focal myositis.
Materials and methods
In each patient, axial TSE T1-weighted and fast short-tau inversion recovery (STIR) images were obtained using a 1.5-T MR scanner. Three patients also underwent dynamic contrast-enhanced MR examination using a GE T1-weighted sequence. The following features were evaluated: anatomical distribution, extent of the involvement, signal intensity characteristics, dynamic enhancement pattern and outcome at follow-up examinations.
Results
Seven of eight lesions were located in the lower extremities, one of eight in the arm; four of eight involved part of a muscle, two of eight diffusely involved a muscle and two of eight showed multifocal involvement of two or more muscles. All lesions were hyperintense on fast-STIR images: the hyperintensity was homogeneous in six of eight and inhomogeneous in two of eight. On T1-weighted unenhanced images, all lesions but two appeared isointense or slightly hypointense in comparison to normal muscles; two lesions showed a slight hyperintensity. Dynamic enhancement pattern corresponded to the type usually seen in benign soft tissue lesions. All lesions disappeared.
Conclusion
Focal myositis is an uncommon pseudotumour which should be considered in the differential diagnosis of muscular masses and myopathies.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Heffner RR, Armbrustmacher VW, Earle KM. Focal myositis. Cancer 1977; 40: 301–306.
Flaisler F, Blin D, Asencio G, Lopez F, Combe B. Focal myositis: a localized form of polymyositis? J Rheumatol 1993; 20: 1414–1416.
Toti P, Romano L, Villanova M, Zazzi M, Luzi P. Focal myositis: a polymerase chain reaction analysis for a viral etiology. Hum Pathol 1997; 28: 111–113.
Ho KL, Konno ET, Chason JL. Focal myositis of the neck. Hum Pathol 1979; 10: 353–356.
Shapiro MJ, Applebaum H, Besser AS. Cervical focal myositis in a child. J Pediatr Surg 1986; 21: 375–376.
Bamanikar S, Mathew M. Focal myositis of the tongue—a pseudotumoral lesion. Histopathology 1994; 24: 171–173.
Azuma T, Komori A, Nagayama M. Focal myositis of the tongue. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1987; 45: 953–955.
Ellis GL, Brannon RB. Focal myositis of the perioral musculature. Oral Surg 1979; 48: 337–341.
Maguire JK, Milford LW, Pitcock JA. Focal myositis in the hand. J Hand Surg (Am) 1988; 13: 140–142.
Hansen LB, Baekgaard N, Reske-Nielson E. Focal myositis of the rectus abdominal muscles. Acta Chir Scand 1985; 151: 77–80.
Lim KL, Robson K, Powell RJ. Focal myositis: an unusual case of bilateral upper eyelid swelling. Postgrad Med J 1993; 69: 876–878.
Naughton M, Jessop JD, Williams BD. Idiopathic recurrent non-suppurative focal myositis: a report of two cases. Br J Rheumatol 1993; 32: 1101–1104.
Caldwell CJ, Swash M, van der Walt JD, Geddes JF. Focal myositis: a clinocopathological study. Neuromusc Disord 1995; 5: 317–321.
Smith AG, Urbanits S, Blaivas M, Grisold W, Russell JW. Clinical and pathologic features of focal myositis. Muscle Nerve 2000; 23: 1569–1575.
Llauger J, Bagué S, Palmer J, Matìas-Guiu X, San Roman L, Doncel A. Focal myositis of the thigh: unusual MR pattern. Skelet Radiol 2002; 31: 307–310.
Kransdorf MJ, Temple HT, Sweet DE. Focal myositis. Skelet Radiol 1998; 27: 283–287.
Kisielinski K, Miltner O, Sellhaus B, et al. Recurrent focal myositis of the peroneal muscles. Rheumatology 2002;41:1318–1322
Galloway HR, Dahlstrom JE, Bennett GM. Focal myositis. Australas Radiol 2001; 45: 347–349.
Moreno-Lugris C, Gonzalez-Gay MA, Sanchez-Andrade A. Magnetic resonance imaging: a useful technique in the diagnosis and follow-up of focal myositis [letter]. Ann Rheum Dis 1996; 55: 856.
Rodolico C, Mazzeo A, Toscano A, et al. Specific matrix metalloproteinase expression in focal myositis: an immunopathological study. Acta Neurol Scand 2005; 112: 173–177.
van Rijswijk CSP, Geirnaerdt MJA, Hogendoorn PCW, et al. Soft-tissue tumors: value of static and dynamic gadopentate dimeglumine-enhanced MR imaging in prediction of malignancy. Radiology 2004; 233: 493–502.
Hohlfeld R, Engel AG, Goebles N, et al. Cellular immune mechanism in inflammatory myopathies. Curr Opin Rheumatol 1997; 9: 520–526.
Finger DR, Dennis GJ. Focal myosistis [letter]. J Rheumatol 1995; 22: 183–185.
Garcia J. MRI in inflammatory myopathies. Skelet Radiol 2000; 29: 425–438.
Hernandez RJ, Keim DR, Chenevert TL, et al. Fat-suppressed MR imaging of myositis. Radiology 1992; 182: 217–219.
Johnston RB Jr. Oxigen metabolism and the microbicidal activity of macrophages. Fed Proc 1978; 37: 2759–2764.
Adams DO, Hamilton TA. The cell biology of macrophage activation. Ann Rev Immunol 1984; 2: 283–318.
Haimes AB, Zimmerman RD, Morgello S, et al. MR imaging of brain abscesses. AJR 1989; 152: 1073–1085.
Tohme-Noun C, Le Breton C, Sbotka A, et al. Imaging findings in three cases of the nodular type of muscular sarcoidosis. AJR 2004; 183: 995–999.
Liefeld P, Ferguson A, Fu F. Focal myositis: a benign lesion that mimics malignant disease. J Bone Jt Surg Am 1982; 64: 1371–1373.
Moskovic E, Fisher C, Westbury G, et al. Focal myositis, a benign inflammatory pseudotumor: CT appearance. Br J Radiol 1990; 64: 489–493.
Erlemann R, Reiser M, Peters P, et al. Musculoskeletal neoplasms: static and dynamic Gd-DTPA-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 1989; 171: 767–773.
Verstraete KL, De Deene Y, Roels H, Dierick A, Uyttendaele D, Kunnen M. Benign and malignant muscoloskeletal lesions: dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging—parametric “first pass” images depict tissue vascularization and perfusion. Radiology 1994; 192: 835–843.
Mirowitz SA, Totty GW, Lee JKT. Characterization of musculoskeletal masses using dynamic Gd-DTPA enhanced spin-echo MRI. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1992; 16: 120–125.
Ma LD, Frassica FJ, McCarthy EF, Bluemke DA, Zerhouni EA. Benign and malignant musculoskeletal masses: MR imaging differentiation with rim to center differential enhancement ratios. Radiology 1997; 202: 739–744.
van der Woude HJ, Verstraete KL, Hogendoorn PCW, Taminiau AHM, Hermans J, Bloem JL. Muskuloskeletal tumors: does fast dynamic contrast-enhanced subtraction MR imaging contribute to the characterization? Radiology 1998; 208: 821–828.
Verstraete Kl, van der Woude HJ. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. In: De Schepper AM, editor. Imaging of soft tissue tumors. 2nd ed. Berlin: Springer; 2001. p. 83–104.
De Schepper AM, De Beuckeleer L, Vandevenne J, Somville J. Magnetic resonance imaging of soft tissue tumors. Eur Radiol 2000; 10: 213–223.
Verstraete KL, van der Woude HJ, Hogendoorn PCW, De Deene Y, Kunnen M, Bloem JL. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of musculoskeletal tumors: basic principles and clinical applications. J Magn Reson Imaging 1996; 6: 311–321.
Jelinek JS, Murphey MD, Aboulafia AJ, et al. Muscle infarction in patients with diabetes mellitus: MR imaging findings. Radiology 1999; 211: 241–247.
Pagonidis K, Raissaki M, Gourtsoyiannis N. Proliferative myositis. Value of imaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2005; 29: 108–111.
Ruzek KA, Wenger DE. The multiple faces of lymphoma of the musculoskeletal system. Skelet Radiol 2004; 33: 1–8.
Lee VS, Martinez S, Coleman RE. Primary muscle lymphoma: clinical and imaging findings. Radiology 1997; 203: 237–244.
May DA, Disler DG, Jones EA, Balkissoon AA, Manaster BJ. Abnormal signal intensity in skeletal muscle at MR imaging: patterns, pearls, and pitfalls. Radiographics 2000; 20: S295–S315.
Lu CH, Tsang YM, Yu CW, et al. Rhabdomyolysis: magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography findings. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2007; 31: 368–374.
Akansel G, Akgoz Y, Ciftci E, Arslan A, Demirci A. MRI findings in Behcet disease. Skelet Radiol 2004; 33: 426–428.
Choy YC, Dalakas MC. Expression of matrix metalloproteinases in the muscle of patients with inflammatory myopathies. Neurology 2000; 54: 65–71.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gaeta, M., Mazziotti, S., Minutoli, F. et al. MR imaging findings of focal myositis: a pseudotumour that may mimic muscle neoplasm. Skeletal Radiol 38, 571–578 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-009-0664-3
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-009-0664-3