Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Plea for a standardized imaging approach to disorders of sex development in neonates: consensus proposal from European Society of Paediatric Radiology task force

  • ESPR
  • Published:
Pediatric Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 21 June 2019

This article has been updated

Abstract

This consensus article elaborated by the European Society for Paediatric Radiology task force on gastrointestinal and genitourinary imaging is intended to standardize the imaging approach in newborns with disorders of sex development. These newborns represent a difficult and stressful situation necessitating a multidisciplinary team approach. Imaging plays an important role in the work-up but needs to be optimized and customized to the patient. Ultrasound plays the central role in assessing the genital anatomy. The examination must be conducted in a detailed and systematic way. It must include transabdominal and transperineal approaches with adapted high-resolution transducers. The pelvic cavity, the genital folds, the inguinal areas and the adrenals must be evaluated as well as the rest of the abdominal cavity. A reporting template is proposed. The indications of magnetic resonance imaging and cysto- and genitography are discussed as well as they may provide additional information. Imaging findings must be reported cautiously using neutral wording as much as possible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 21 June 2019

    The above article was published online with an incorrect author name.

References

  1. Wherret DK (2015) Approach to the infant with suspected disorder of sex development. Pediatr Clin N Am 62:983–999

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hiort O, Birnbaum W, Marshall L et al (2014) Management of disorders of sex development. Nat Rev Endocrinol 10:520–529

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cools M, Nordenstrom A, Robeva R et al (2018) Caring for individuals with DSD: a consensus statement. Nat Rev Endocrinol 14:415–429

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Mendonca BB, Domenico S, Arnhold IJ, Costa EM (2009) 46,XY disorders of sexual development (DSD). Clin Endocrinol 70:173–187

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kousta E, Papathanasiou A, Skordis N (2010) Sex determination and disorders of sex development according to the revised nomenclature and classification in 46XX individuals. Hormones (Athens) 9:218–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lee PA, Houk CP, Ahmed SF, International Consensus Conference on Intersex organized by the Lawson Wilkins pediatric Endocrine Society and the European Society for Paediatric Endocrinology (2006) Consensus management of intersex disorders. Pediatrics 118:e488–e500

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Odeh M, Granin V, Kais M et al (2009) Sonographic fetal sex determination. Obstet Gynecol Surv 64:50–57

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Rotondi M, Valenzano F, Bilancioni E et al (2001) Prenatal measurement of testicular diameter by ultrasonography: development of fetal male gender and evaluation of testicular descent. Prenat Diagn 21:112–115

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Chitty LS, Chatelain P, Wolffenbuttel KP, Aigrain Y (2012) Prenatal diagnosis of disorders of sexual development. J Pediatr Urol 8:576–584

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lynch TA, Ruzzo K, Sack V, Rijhsinghani A (2016) Fetal sex determination using NIPT and ultrasound as a method for diagnosing important fetal sex abnormalities. Prenat Diagn 36:888–890

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Paltiel HJ, Phelps A (2014) US of the pediatric female pelvis. Radiology 270:644–657

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kaplan SL, Edgar JC, Ford EG et al (2016) Size of ovaries, uterus and breast buds by ultrasound in full-term neonates aged 0-3 days. Pediatr Radiol 46:1837–1847

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Son JK, Taylor GA (2014) Transperineal ultrasonography. Pediatr Radiol 44:193–201

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Otero HJ, Rubio E, Blask A (2015) Ovary and testicle and everything in between: lesions and imaging in the newborn. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 36:178–192

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sargar KM, Khanna G, Hulett Bowling R (2017) Imaging of nonmalignant adrenal lesions in children. Radiographics 37:1648–1664

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Moshiri M, Chapman T, Fechner PY et al (2012) Evaluation and management of disorders of sex development: multidisciplinary approach to a complex diagnosis. Radiographics 32:1599–1618

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Chavhan GB, Parra DA, Oudjhane K et al (2008) Imaging of ambiguous genitalia: classification and diagnostic approach. Radiographics 28:1891–1904

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Guerra-Junior G, Andrade KC, Barcelos IHK, Maciel-Guerra AT (2018) Imaging techniques in the diagnostic journey of disorders of sex development. Sex Dev 12:95–99

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Cassart M, Massez A, Donner C et al (2005) Sonographic diagnosis of fetal adrenal hyperplasia: utility for prenatal corticotherapy. Prenat Diagn 25:1060–1061

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kim CJ (2014) Congenital lipoid adrenal hyperplasia. Ann Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 19:179–183

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Karsli T, Sutter J, Shekhawat PS (2016) X-linked adrenal hypoplasia congenita due to NROB1 (DAX1) deficiency presenting as severe respiratory distress in near term infants. Pediatr Neonatol 57:444–445

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Riccabona M, Darge K, Lobo ML et al (2015) ESPR Uroradiology Taskforce – imaging recommendations in paediatric uroradiology, part VIII: retrograde urethrography, imaging disorder of sexual development and imaging childhood testicular torsion. Pediatr Radiol 45:2023–2028

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Kopac M, Riccabona M, Haim M (2009) Contrast-enhanced voiding urosonography and genitography in a baby with ambiguous genitalia and urogenital sinus. Ultraschall Med 30:299–300

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Mansour SM, Hamed ST, Adel L et al (2012) Does MRI add to ultrasound in the assessment of disorders of sex development? Eur J Radiol 81:2403–2410

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fred E. Avni.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

None

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The original version of this article was revised: The above article was published online with an incorrect author name. The correct spelling is Hans-J. Mentzel, presented in the author list above, instead of Hans-J Menzel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Avni, F.E., Lerisson, H., Lobo, ML. et al. Plea for a standardized imaging approach to disorders of sex development in neonates: consensus proposal from European Society of Paediatric Radiology task force. Pediatr Radiol 49, 1240–1247 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-019-04414-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-019-04414-4

Keywords

Navigation