Abstract
Background
Femoral tunneled central line placement in the pediatric population offers an alternative means for intravenous (IV) access, but there is concern for higher complication and infection rates when placed at bedside.
Objective
To describe the complications and infection outcomes of primary femoral tunneled central venous catheter placement in the interventional radiology suite compared to the portable bedside location at a single tertiary pediatric institution.
Materials and methods
We conducted a retrospective review comparing interventional radiology suites vs. bedside primary tunneled common femoral vein central line placement (January 2014 to December 2015). We identified 244 primary femoral placements in pediatric patients, ages 1 day to 18 years, using our electronic medical record and collected into a Research Electronic Data Capture. We compared categorical variables using the Fisher exact test. We compared continuous variables using the Wilcoxon rank test.
Results
In total, 2,375 pediatric patients received peripherally inserted and central lines; 244 of these were primary femoral tunneled central venous catheters (in 140 boys and 104 girls). In 140 children (mean age: 206 days), lines were inserted in the interventional radiology (IR) suite (technical success of 100%), with 14 (10.0%) complications including infection (n=7), malposition (n=2), bleeding (n=0), thrombosis (n=1) and line occlusion (n=4). The infection rate was 2.1 per 1,000 line days. In 104 children (mean age: 231 days), lines were placed at bedside (technical success 100%) with 14 (13.3%) complications including infection (n=3), malposition (n=5), bleeding (n=0), thrombosis (n=2) and line occlusion (n=4). The infection rate was 0.78 per 1,000 line days. The total line days were 7,109, of which 3,258 were in the IR suite and 3,851 in the bedside group. There was no statistical significance for complication rate (P=0.55) or infection rate (P=0.57) between bedside and interventional suite placements.
Conclusion
In a cohort of children receiving primary femoral tunneled central venous catheters, the complication and infection rates in a bedside setting are not significantly increased compared to the lines placed in an IR suite. The perception of increased infection and complications from bedside-placed tunneled central venous catheters appears to be hyperbolized.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Vo JN, Hoffer FA, Shaw DW (2010) Techniques in vascular and interventional radiology: pediatric central venous access. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol 13:250–257
Subramanian S, Moe DC, Vo JN (2013) Ultrasound-guided tunneled lower extremity peripherally inserted central catheter placement in infants. J Vasc Interv Radiol 24:1910–1913
Gaballah M, Krishnamurthy G, Berman JI et al (2015) Lower extremity vascular access in neonates and infants: a single institutional experience. J Vasc Interv Radiol 26:1660–1668
Gaballah M, Krishnamurthy G, Keller MS et al (2014) US-guided placement and tip position confirmation for lower-extremity central venous access in neonates and infants with comparison versus conventional insertion. J Vasc Interv Radiol 25:548–555
Silberzweig JE, Sacks D, Khorsandi AS et al (2003) Reporting standards for central venous access. J Vasc Interv Radiol 14:S443–S452
Nahum E, Levy I, Katz J et al (2002) Efficacy of subcutaneous tunneling for prevention of bacterial colonization of femoral central venous catheters in critically ill children. Pediatr Infect Dis J 21:1000–1004
Lungren MP, Pabon-Ramos WM (2013) Single-incision technique for placing femoral tunneled central venous catheters in infants. J Vasc Interv Radiol 24:755–756
Timsit JF, Bruneel F, Cheval C et al (1999) Use of tunneled femoral catheters to prevent catheter-related infection. A randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med 130:729–735
Dubois J, Garel L, Tapiero B et al (1997) Peripherally inserted central catheters in infants and children. Radiology 204:622–626
Toh LM, Mavili E, Moineddin R et al (2013) Are cuffed peripherally inserted central catheters superior to uncuffed peripherally inserted central catheters? A retrospective review in a tertiary pediatric center. J Vasc Interv Radiol 24:1316–1322
Frey AM (1995) Pediatric peripherally inserted central catheter program report: a summary of 4,536 catheter days. J Intraven Nurs 18:280–291
Acknowledgments
We express our deep appreciation and sincere gratitude to Dr. Wei Zhang, PhD, professor at the Department of Pediatric Radiology and research statistician at Texas Children’s Hospital, for the support and seemingly endless statistical evaluation in the present study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
None
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chau, A., Hernandez, J.A., Pimpalwar, S. et al. Equivalent success and complication rates of tunneled common femoral venous catheter placed in the interventional suite vs. at patient bedside. Pediatr Radiol 48, 889–894 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-018-4090-3
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-018-4090-3