Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

MRI of the fetal eyes: morphologic and biometric assessment for abnormal development with ultrasonographic and clinicopathologic correlation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Currently ocular biometric measurements are defined by US and are measured from the orbital walls. These bony landmarks cannot be seen by MRI, and therefore these measurements cannot be directly applied.

Objective

To define measurements of normal growth of the fetal eyes using MRI.

Materials and methods

Transorbital views were analyzed in 198 fetal MR examinations. The ocular diameter (OD) and interocular and binocular distances (IOD and BOD) were measured and were plotted against gestational age. Fetuses with abnormalities affecting the eyes were evaluated separately.

Results

Of 198 scans, 146 had suitable images, 35 of which were abnormal. Normal growth of BOD, IOD and OD were determined, and compared with the respective already established US data.

Conclusion

Normal growth charts were derived from a cohort of 111 normal fetuses. Because the margins of the vitreous are inside the bony orbit, at the same gestational age measurements of the BOD and OD are always less than the corresponding measurements by US, and those of the IOD are always more. Normal growth charts for MRI can now be used to support suspected diagnoses of orbital and ocular pathologies and the syndromes that give rise to them, and many examples are demonstrated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine (2008) Practice guideline for the performance of obstetric ultrasound examinations. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine, Laurel, MD. http://www.aium.org/publications/clinical/obstetric.pdf. Accessed 20 June 2008

  2. Dilmen G, Köktener A, Turhan NO et al (2002) Growth of the fetal lens and orbit. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 76:267–271

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Goldstein I, Tamir A, Zimmer EZ et al (1998) Growth of the fetal orbit and lens in normal pregnancies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 12:175–179

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Rosati P, Guariglia L (2003) Early transvaginal fetal orbital measurements: a screening tool for aneuploidy? J Ultrasound Med 22:1201–1205

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Trout T, Budorick NE, Pretorius DH et al (1994) Significance of orbital measurements in the fetus. J Ultrasound Med 13:937–943

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Mayden KL, Tortora M, Berkowitz RL et al (1982) Orbital diameters: a new parameter for prenatal diagnosis and dating. Am J Obstet Gynecol 144:289–297

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Babcook C (2000) The fetal face and neck. In: Callen P (ed) Ultrasonography in obstetrics and gynecology. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 307–315

    Google Scholar 

  8. Stroustrup A, Levine D (2005) MR imaging of the fetal skull, face and neck. In: Levine D (ed) Atlas of fetal MRI. Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton, pp 73–90

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sonigo P, Simon I, Mahieu-Caputo D et al (2003) The role of MRI in the investigation of fetal ocular anomalies. Pediatr Radiol 33 [Suppl 2]:S25

    Google Scholar 

  10. Robinson AJ, Blaser S, Toi A et al (2004) MR imaging of the fetal eyes: normal and abnormal development. Pediatr Radiol 34 [Suppl 2]:S136

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bremond-Gignac D, Cussenot O, Deplus S et al (1994) Computation of eyeball growth by magnetic resonance imaging. Surg Radiol Anat 16:113–115

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bremond-Gignac DS, Benali K, Deplus S et al (1997) In utero eyeball development study by magnetic resonance imaging. Surg Radiol Anat 19:319–322

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Jeanty P, Dramaix-Wilmet M, Van Gansbeke D et al (1982) Fetal ocular biometry by ultrasound. Radiology 143:513–516

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Romero R, Pilu G, Jeanty P et al (1988) Prenatal diagnosis of congenital anomalies. Appleton & Lange, Norwalk, p 83

    Google Scholar 

  15. Achiron R, Gottlieb Z, Yaron Y et al (1995) The development of the fetal eye: in utero ultrasonographic measurements of the vitreous and lens. Prenat Diagn 15:155–160

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Robson CD, Barnewolt CE (2004) MR imaging of fetal head and neck anomalies. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 14:273–291

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Berg C, Geipel A, Germer U et al (2001) Prenatal detection of Fraser syndrome without cryptophthalmos: case report and review of the literature. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 18:76–80

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Fryns JP, van Schoubroeck D, Vandenberghe K et al (1997) Diagnostic echographic findings in cryptophthalmos syndrome (Fraser syndrome). Prenat Diagn 17:582–584

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Bardakjian T, Weiss A, Schneider A (2006) Anophthalmia/microphthalmia overview. GeneReviews, NCBI. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/bv.fcgi?rid=gene.chapter.anophthalmia-ov Accessed 20 June 2008

  20. Chitayat D, Sroka H, Keating S et al (2007) The PDAC syndrome (pulmonary hypoplasia/agenesis, diaphragmatic hernia/eventration, anophthalmia/microphthalmia, and cardiac defect) (Spear syndrome, Matthew-Wood syndrome): report of eight cases including a living child and further evidence for autosomal recessive inheritance. Am J Med Genet A 143:1268–1281

    Google Scholar 

  21. Achiron R, Kreiser D, Achiron A (2000) Axial growth of the fetal eye and evaluation of the hyaloid artery: in utero ultrasonographic study. Prenat Diagn 20:894–899

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Birnholz JC, Farrell EE (1988) Fetal hyaloid artery: timing of regression with US. Radiology 166:781–783

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Ramji FG, Slovis TL, Baker JD (1996) Orbital sonography in children. Pediatr Radiol 26:245–258

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Reches A, Yaron Y, Burdon K et al (2007) Prenatal detection of congenital bilateral cataract leading to the diagnosis of Nance-Horan syndrome in the extended family. Prenat Diagn 27:662–664

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Fayol L, Garcia P, Denis D et al (2006) Adams-Oliver syndrome associated with cutis marmorata telangiectatica congenita and congenital cataract: a case report. Am J Perinatol 23:197–200

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Başbuğ M, Serin IS, Ozçelik B et al (2005) Prenatal ultrasonographic diagnosis of rhizomelic chondrodysplasia punctata by detection of rhizomelic shortening and bilateral cataracts. Fetal Diagn Ther 20:171–174

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Terhal P, Sakkers R, Hochstenbach R et al (2004) Cerebellar hypoplasia, zonular cataract, and peripheral neuropathy in trisomy 17 mosaicism. Am J Med Genet A 130:410–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Vutova K, Peicheva Z, Popova A et al (2002) Congenital toxoplasmosis: eye manifestations in infants and children. Ann Trop Paediatr 22:213–218

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Cengiz B, Baxi L (2001) Congenital cataract in triplet pregnancy after IVF with frozen embryos: prenatal diagnosis and management. Fetal Diagn Ther 16:234–236

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Romain M, Awoust J, Dugauquier C et al (1999) Prenatal ultrasound detection of congenital cataract in trisomy 21. Prenat Diagn 19:780–782

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Beinder EJ, Pfeiffer RA, Bornemann A et al (1997) Second-trimester diagnosis of fetal cataract in a fetus with Walker-Warburg syndrome. Fetal Diagn Ther 12:197–199

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Shapiro I, Borochowitz Z, Degani S et al (1992) Neu-Laxova syndrome: prenatal ultrasonographic diagnosis, clinical and pathological studies, and new manifestations. Am J Med Genet 43:602–605

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Brent RL (1984) The effects of ionizing radiation, microwaves, and ultrasound on the developing embryo: clinical interpretations and applications of the data. Curr Probl Pediatr 14:1–87

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Milic A, Blaser S, Robinson A et al (2006) Prenatal detection of microtia by MRI in a fetus with trisomy 22. Pediatr Radiol 36:706–710

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Hosseinzadeh K, Owens E (2005) Optimization of acquisition time for MRI of fetal head: the eyes have it. AJR 185:1060–1062

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Demyer W, Zeman W, Palmer CG (1964) The face predicts the brain: diagnostic significance of median facial anomalies for holoprosencephaly (arrhinencephaly). Pediatrics 34:256–263

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Kusanovic J, Mittal P, Goncalves L et al (2005) 3D ultrasound evaluation of the fetal optic chiasm: a potential parameter for the differential diagnosis of developmental midline brain anomalies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 26:311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Whitby E (2006) In utero magnetic resonance imaging of developmental abnormalities of the fetal CNS. In: Griffiths P, Paley M, Whitby E (eds) Imaging the central nervous system of the fetus and neonate. Taylor and Francis, New York, pp 99–110

    Google Scholar 

  39. Cohen MM Jr, Richieri-Costa A, Guion-Almeida ML et al (1995) Hypertelorism: interorbital growth, measurements, and pathogenetic considerations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 24:387–395

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Slevin J, Blaser S, Chitayat D et al (2005) ‘Intraventricular fused fornices,’ a marker for complex midline anomalies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 26:311

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiology, Children’s Hospital of British Columbia, 4480 Oak St., Vancouver, V6H 3V4, Canada

    Ashley J. Robinson

  2. Department of Diagnostic Imaging, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada

    Ashley J. Robinson & Susan Blaser

  3. Department of Medical Imaging, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Canada

    Ants Toi & Sophie Pantazi

  4. Department of Prenatal Diagnosis & Medical Genetics, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Canada

    David Chitayat

  5. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Canada

    Sarah Keating & Sandra Viero

  6. Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Canada

    Greg Ryan

Authors
  1. Ashley J. Robinson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Susan Blaser
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ants Toi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. David Chitayat
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Sophie Pantazi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Sarah Keating
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Sandra Viero
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Greg Ryan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ashley J. Robinson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Robinson, A.J., Blaser, S., Toi, A. et al. MRI of the fetal eyes: morphologic and biometric assessment for abnormal development with ultrasonographic and clinicopathologic correlation. Pediatr Radiol 38, 971–981 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-008-0929-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-008-0929-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation