Skip to main content
Log in

Novel ultrasound method to reposition kidney stones

  • SYMPOSIUM PAPER
  • Published:
Urological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The success of surgical management of lower pole stones is principally dependent on stone fragmentation and residual stone clearance. Choice of surgical method depends on stone size, yet all methods are subjected to post-surgical complications resulting from residual stone fragments. Here we present a novel method and device to reposition kidney stones using ultrasound radiation force delivered by focused ultrasound and guided by ultrasound imaging. The device couples a commercial imaging array with a focused annular array transducer. Feasibility of repositioning stones was investigated by implanting artificial and human stones into a kidney-mimicking phantom that simulated a lower pole and collecting system. During experiment, stones were located by ultrasound imaging and repositioned by delivering short bursts of focused ultrasound. Stone motion was concurrently monitored by fluoroscopy, ultrasound imaging, and video photography, from which displacement and velocity were estimated. Stones were seen to move immediately after delivering focused ultrasound and successfully repositioned from the lower pole to the collecting system. Estimated velocities were on the order of 1 cm/s. This in vitro study demonstrates a promising modality to facilitate spontaneous clearance of kidney stones and increased clearance of residual stone fragments after surgical management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Albala DM, Assimos DG, Clayman RV (2001) Lower pole I: a prospective randomized trial of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and nephrostolithotomy for lower pole nephrolitiasis—Initial results. J Urol 166:2072–2080

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Pearle MS, Lingeman JE, Leveilee R (2008) Prospective randomized trial comparing shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy for lower pole caliceal calculi 1 cm or less. J Urol 179:S69–S73

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Chen RN, Streem SB (1996) Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for lower pole calculi: long-term radiographic and clinical outcome. J Urol 156:1572–1575

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sampaio FJ, Aragao AH (1994) Limitations of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for lower caliceal stones: anatomic insight. J Endourol 8:241–247

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Chiong E, Hwee ST, Kay LM (2005) Randomized controlled study of mechanical percussion, diuresis, and inversion therapy to assist pas-sage of lower pole renal calculi after shock wave lithotripsy. J Urol 65:1070–1074

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kekre NS, Kumar S (2008) Optimizing the fragmentation and clearance after shock wave lithotripsy. Curr Opin Urol 18:205–209

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Pace KT, Tariq N, Dyer SJ (2001) Mechanical percussion, inversion, and diuresis for residual lower pole fragments after shock wave lithotripsy: a prospective, single blind, randomized controlled trial. J Urol 166:2065–2071

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Torr GR (1984) The acoustic radiation force. J Acoust Soc Am 52(5):402–408

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lafon C, Zderic V, Noble ML, Yuen JC, Kaczkowski PJ, Sapozhnikov OA, Chavrier F, Crum LA, Vaezy S (2005) Gel phantom for use in high intensity focused ultrasound dosimetry. Ultrasound Med Biol 31(10):1383–1389

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. U.S. Food and Drug Administration (2008) Information for Manufacturers Seeking Marketing Clearance for Diagnostic Ultrasound Systems and Transducers

  11. O’Neil HT (1949) Theory of focusing radiators. J Acoust Soc Am 21:516–526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bailey MR, Khokhlova VA, Sapozhnikov OA, Kargl SG, Crum LA (2003) Physical mechanisms of the therapeutic effect of ultrasound (a review). Acoust Phys 49(4):369–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Smith-Bindman R, Lipson J, Marcus R, Kim KP, Mahesh M, Gould R, de Gonzalez AB, Miglioretti DL (2009) Radiation dose associated with common computed tomography examinations and the associated lifetime attributable risk of cancer. Arch Intern Med 169(22):2078–2086

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank our colleagues at the Center for Industrial and Medical Ultrasound and the Consortium for Shock Waves in Medicine for advice, shared resources, and review. This work was supported by a grant from the National Space Biomedical Research Institute NCC9-58, NIH DK43881, and NIH DK086371.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael R. Bailey.

Additional information

Proceedings paper from the 3rd International Urolithiasis Research Symposium, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA, December 3–4, 2009.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shah, A., Owen, N.R., Lu, W. et al. Novel ultrasound method to reposition kidney stones. Urol Res 38, 491–495 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-010-0319-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-010-0319-9

Keywords

Navigation