Abstract
Composite graft fingertip replacement (CGFR) can maintain digital length and a normal nail complex when microvascular replantation of traumatically amputated fingertips is unfeasible. However, there remains reluctance to perform CGFR in adults owing to perceived poor outcomes compared with children, despite a lack of supporting evidence. We report CGFR outcome in adults and children. A prospectively collated patient information database identified CGFR attempts over five consecutive years. Patient demographics and co-morbidities, injury mechanisms and details (including Ishikawa levels), timing of surgical interventions and outcomes were documented. One hundred thirty-one CGFRs were attempted in 130 patients (106 in children under 16). Ishikawa amputation level or CGFR outcome was not documented in 21 excluded cases. Despite a significant association between adulthood and smoking, complete or partial graft survival was excellent in both adults and children (86% and 89%, respectively). Adults and children were significantly more likely to sustain laceration and crush injuries, respectively. These results challenge the near-universal scepticism held against CGFR in adults. Partial graft survival can appear discouraging when mummified eschar conceals regenerating tissue beneath. We emphasise the importance of patience in the clinical management of fingertip injuries treated by CGFR with two representative cases where the graft was considered ‘completely necrotic’ but ultimately survived to generate normal nail growth with an excellent cosmetic and functional result.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Elsahy NI (1977) Replantation of a completely amputated distal segment of a thumb. Case report. Plast Reconstr Surg 59:579–581
Rose EH et al (1989) The “cap” technique: nonmicrosurgical reattachment of fingertip amputations. J Hand Surg [Am] 14:513–518
Showalter JT (1968) Results of replacement of fingertip tissue. Int Surg 50:306–310
Adani R et al (2003) Treatment of fingertips amputation using the Hirase technique. Hand Surg 8:257–264
Chunprapaph B (1974) Replantation of portions of four fingers in one hand. N Engl J Med 291:460–461
Douglas B (1959) Successful replacement of completely avulsed portions of fingers as composite grafts. Plast Reconstr Surg 23:213–225
Moiemen NS, Elliot D (1997) Composite graft replacement of digital tips. 2. A study in children. J Hand Surg [Br] 22:346–352
Ishikawa K et al (1990) A new classification of the amputated level of the distal part of the finger. J Jpn Soc Reconstr Microsurg 3:54
Chase RA (1973) Atlas of Hand Surgery. Saunders, Philadelphia
Heistein JB, Cook PA (2003) Factors affecting composite graft survival in digital tip amputations. Ann Plast Surg 50:299–303
Uysal A et al (2006) An alternative technique for microsurgical unreplantable fingertip amputations. Ann Plast Surg 57:545–551
Son D et al (2005) Extending the limits of fingertip composite grafting with moist-exposed dressing. Int Wound J 2:315–321
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Urso-Baiarda, F.G., Wallace, C.G. & Baker, R. Post-traumatic composite graft fingertip replantation in both adults and children. Eur J Plast Surg 32, 229–233 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-009-0346-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-009-0346-3