Abstract
Purpose
To assess the prevalence of false-positive meningeal contrast enhancement in patients with solid tumors who were undergoing chemotherapy.
Methods
A total of 2572 magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations of the brain were retrospectively evaluated by two readers for the presence of pathological meningeal contrast enhancement conspicuous for neoplastic meningitis. These patients either had malignant melanoma, breast or lung cancer, or lymphoma. The reference standards were cerebrospinal fluid cytology results and follow-up MRI. In cases with pathological contrast enhancement that decreased upon follow-up and non-malignant cytology, the enhancement pattern was further described as pial or dural, local or diffuse, or supra- or infra-tentorial. Moreover, the underlying therapy regimes were assessed.
Results
The final study cohort included 78 patients (51 females, median age 57 years), of which 11 patients (14.1%) had a repeated non-malignant cytology (‘pseudomeningeosis’). In one case, this finding, a granular pleocytosis, was attributed to previous radiotherapy. Of the remaining patients, seven were receiving multimodal, immunotherapy-based therapy regimens. Patients with unsuspicious cytology had a predominantly supratentorial distribution pattern in comparison to patients with neoplastic meningitis.
Conclusions
The overall prevalence of the presence of false-positive meningeal contrast enhancement is low (< 1%) and not associated with specific imaging patterns. We hypothesize that there is a possible relationship between immunotherapy and ‘pseudomeningeosis’. Therefore, in all cases with suspected neoplastic meningitis, the cerebrospinal fluid should be analyzed to confirm the diagnosis, especially in patients undergoing immunotherapy.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Gleissner B, Chamberlain MC (2006) Neoplastic meningitis. Lancet Neurol 5:443–452
Mahendru G, Chong V (2009) Meninges in cancer imaging. Cancer Imaging 9:14–21
Taphoorn MJ, Heimans JJ, Kaiser MC et al (1989) Imaging of brain metastases. Comparison of computerized tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Neuroradiology 31:391–395
Prömmel P, Pilgram-Pastor S, Sitter H et al (2013) Neoplastic meningitis: how MRI and CSF cytology are influenced by CSF cell count and tumor type. Sci World J 2013:248072
Straathof CS, de Bruin HG, Dippel DW et al (1999) The diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging and cerebrospinal fluid cytology in leptomeningeal metastasis. J Neurol 246:810–814
Smirniotopoulos JG, Murphy FM, Rushing EJ, Rees JH, Schroeder JW (2007) Patterns of contrast enhancement in the brain and meninges. Radiographics 27:525–551
Parmar H, Sitoh Y-Y, Anand P, Chua V, Hui F (2006) Contrast-enhanced flair imaging in the evaluation of infectious leptomeningeal diseases. Eur J Radiol 58:89–95
Cosar-Alas R, Alas A, Ozen A, Denizli B, Saynak M, Uzunoglu S, Aydogdu N, Karagol H, Uzal C, Kocak Z (2010) Capecitabine-related intracranial hypotension syndrome mimicking dural metastasis in a breast cancer patient: case report and review of the literature. J Cancer Res Ther 6:557–559
Ali S, Lee S-K (2015) Ipilimumab therapy for melanoma: a mimic of leptomeningeal metastases. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 36:E69–E70
Manousakis G, Koch J, Sommerville RB, el-Dokla A, Harms MB, al-Lozi MT, Schmidt RE, Pestronk A (2013) Multifocal radiculoneuropathy during ipilimumab treatment of melanoma. Muscle Nerve 48:440–444
Watanabe M, Tanaka R, Takeda N (1993) Correlation of MRI and clinical features in meningeal carcinomatosis. Neuroradiology 35:512–515
Muscal JA, Jones JY, Paulino AC, Bertuch AA, Su J, Woo SY, Mahoney DH Jr, Chintagumpala M (2009) Changes mimicking new leptomeningeal disease after intensity-modulated radiotherapy for medulloblastoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 73:214–221
Chamberlain M, Junck L, Brandsma D, Soffietti R, Rudà R, Raizer J, Boogerd W, Taillibert S, Groves MD, le Rhun E, Walker J, van den Bent M, Wen PY, Jaeckle KA (2017) Leptomeningeal metastases: A RANO proposal for response criteria. Neuro-oncology 19:484–492
Antony J, Hacking C, Jeffree RL (2015) Pachymeningeal enhancement-a comprehensive review of literature. Neurosurg Rev 38:649–659
Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174
Forghani R, Farb RI (2008) Diagnosis and temporal evolution of signs of intracranial hypotension on MRI of the brain. Neuroradiology 50:1025–1034
Schmid L, Müller M, Treumann T, Arnold W, Möller B, Aeberli D, Villiger PM (2009) Induction of complete and sustained remission of rheumatoid pachymeningitis by rituximab. Arthritis Rheum 60:1632–1634
Seymour L, Bogaerts J, Perrone A, Ford R, Schwartz LH, Mandrekar S, Lin NU, Litière S, Dancey J, Chen A, Hodi FS, Therasse P, Hoekstra OS, Shankar LK, Wolchok JD, Ballinger M, Caramella C, de Vries EG, RECIST working group (2017) iRECIST: guidelines for response criteria for use in trials testing immunotherapeutics. Lancet Oncol 18:e143–e152
Byun DJ, Wolchok JD, Rosenberg LM, Girotra M (2017) Cancer immunotherapy - immune checkpoint blockade and associated endocrinopathies. Nat Rev Endocrinol 13:195–207
El Majzoub I, Qdaisat A, Thein KZ et al (2018) Adverse effects of immune checkpoint therapy in Cancer patients visiting the emergency Department of a Comprehensive Cancer Center. Ann Emerg Med 73:79–87
Lidar M, Giat E, Garelick D, Horowitz Y, Amital H, Steinberg-Silman Y, Schachter J, Shapira-Frommer R, Markel G (2018) Rheumatic manifestations among cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Autoimmun Rev 17:284–289
Khoja L, Day D, Wei-Wu Chen T, Siu LL, Hansen AR (2017) Tumour- and class-specific patterns of immune-related adverse events of immune checkpoint inhibitors: a systematic review. Ann Oncol 28:2377–2385
Beer L, Hochmair M, Prosch H (2018) Pitfalls in the radiological response assessment of immunotherapy. Memo 11:138–143
Kong BY, Menzies AM, Saunders CAB, Liniker E, Ramanujam S, Guminski A, Kefford RF, Long GV, Carlino MS (2016) Residual FDG-PET metabolic activity in metastatic melanoma patients with prolonged response to anti-PD-1 therapy. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res 29:572–577
Kerklaan JP, Lycklama á Nijeholt GJ, Wiggenraad RGJ, Berghuis B, Postma TJ, Taphoorn MJB (2011) SMART syndrome: a late reversible complication after radiation therapy for brain tumours. J Neurol 258:1098–1104
Pruitt A, Dalmau J, Detre J, Alavi A, Rosenfeld MR (2006) Episodic neurologic dysfunction with migraine and reversible imaging findings after radiation. Neurology 67:676–678
Kaplan JG, DeSouza TG, Farkash A et al (1990) Leptomeningeal metastases: comparison of clinical features and laboratory data of solid tumors, lymphomas and leukemias. J Neuro-Oncol 9:225–229
Wasserstrom WR, Glass JP, Posner JB (1982) Diagnosis and treatment of leptomeningeal metastases from solid tumors: experience with 90 patients. Cancer 49:759–772
Funding
No funding was received for this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standard. For this type of study formal consent is not required.
Informed consent
Our local ethics committee waived the requirement to obtain informed consent.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bier, G., Klumpp, B., Roder, C. et al. Meningeal enhancement depicted by magnetic resonance imaging in tumor patients: neoplastic meningitis or therapy-related enhancement?. Neuroradiology 61, 775–782 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-019-02215-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-019-02215-y