Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Meningeal enhancement depicted by magnetic resonance imaging in tumor patients: neoplastic meningitis or therapy-related enhancement?

  • Diagnostic Neuroradiology
  • Published:
Neuroradiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To assess the prevalence of false-positive meningeal contrast enhancement in patients with solid tumors who were undergoing chemotherapy.

Methods

A total of 2572 magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations of the brain were retrospectively evaluated by two readers for the presence of pathological meningeal contrast enhancement conspicuous for neoplastic meningitis. These patients either had malignant melanoma, breast or lung cancer, or lymphoma. The reference standards were cerebrospinal fluid cytology results and follow-up MRI. In cases with pathological contrast enhancement that decreased upon follow-up and non-malignant cytology, the enhancement pattern was further described as pial or dural, local or diffuse, or supra- or infra-tentorial. Moreover, the underlying therapy regimes were assessed.

Results

The final study cohort included 78 patients (51 females, median age 57 years), of which 11 patients (14.1%) had a repeated non-malignant cytology (‘pseudomeningeosis’). In one case, this finding, a granular pleocytosis, was attributed to previous radiotherapy. Of the remaining patients, seven were receiving multimodal, immunotherapy-based therapy regimens. Patients with unsuspicious cytology had a predominantly supratentorial distribution pattern in comparison to patients with neoplastic meningitis.

Conclusions

The overall prevalence of the presence of false-positive meningeal contrast enhancement is low (< 1%) and not associated with specific imaging patterns. We hypothesize that there is a possible relationship between immunotherapy and ‘pseudomeningeosis’. Therefore, in all cases with suspected neoplastic meningitis, the cerebrospinal fluid should be analyzed to confirm the diagnosis, especially in patients undergoing immunotherapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gleissner B, Chamberlain MC (2006) Neoplastic meningitis. Lancet Neurol 5:443–452

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Mahendru G, Chong V (2009) Meninges in cancer imaging. Cancer Imaging 9:14–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Taphoorn MJ, Heimans JJ, Kaiser MC et al (1989) Imaging of brain metastases. Comparison of computerized tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Neuroradiology 31:391–395

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Prömmel P, Pilgram-Pastor S, Sitter H et al (2013) Neoplastic meningitis: how MRI and CSF cytology are influenced by CSF cell count and tumor type. Sci World J 2013:248072

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Straathof CS, de Bruin HG, Dippel DW et al (1999) The diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging and cerebrospinal fluid cytology in leptomeningeal metastasis. J Neurol 246:810–814

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Smirniotopoulos JG, Murphy FM, Rushing EJ, Rees JH, Schroeder JW (2007) Patterns of contrast enhancement in the brain and meninges. Radiographics 27:525–551

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Parmar H, Sitoh Y-Y, Anand P, Chua V, Hui F (2006) Contrast-enhanced flair imaging in the evaluation of infectious leptomeningeal diseases. Eur J Radiol 58:89–95

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cosar-Alas R, Alas A, Ozen A, Denizli B, Saynak M, Uzunoglu S, Aydogdu N, Karagol H, Uzal C, Kocak Z (2010) Capecitabine-related intracranial hypotension syndrome mimicking dural metastasis in a breast cancer patient: case report and review of the literature. J Cancer Res Ther 6:557–559

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ali S, Lee S-K (2015) Ipilimumab therapy for melanoma: a mimic of leptomeningeal metastases. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 36:E69–E70

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Manousakis G, Koch J, Sommerville RB, el-Dokla A, Harms MB, al-Lozi MT, Schmidt RE, Pestronk A (2013) Multifocal radiculoneuropathy during ipilimumab treatment of melanoma. Muscle Nerve 48:440–444

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Watanabe M, Tanaka R, Takeda N (1993) Correlation of MRI and clinical features in meningeal carcinomatosis. Neuroradiology 35:512–515

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Muscal JA, Jones JY, Paulino AC, Bertuch AA, Su J, Woo SY, Mahoney DH Jr, Chintagumpala M (2009) Changes mimicking new leptomeningeal disease after intensity-modulated radiotherapy for medulloblastoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 73:214–221

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Chamberlain M, Junck L, Brandsma D, Soffietti R, Rudà R, Raizer J, Boogerd W, Taillibert S, Groves MD, le Rhun E, Walker J, van den Bent M, Wen PY, Jaeckle KA (2017) Leptomeningeal metastases: A RANO proposal for response criteria. Neuro-oncology 19:484–492

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Antony J, Hacking C, Jeffree RL (2015) Pachymeningeal enhancement-a comprehensive review of literature. Neurosurg Rev 38:649–659

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Forghani R, Farb RI (2008) Diagnosis and temporal evolution of signs of intracranial hypotension on MRI of the brain. Neuroradiology 50:1025–1034

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Schmid L, Müller M, Treumann T, Arnold W, Möller B, Aeberli D, Villiger PM (2009) Induction of complete and sustained remission of rheumatoid pachymeningitis by rituximab. Arthritis Rheum 60:1632–1634

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Seymour L, Bogaerts J, Perrone A, Ford R, Schwartz LH, Mandrekar S, Lin NU, Litière S, Dancey J, Chen A, Hodi FS, Therasse P, Hoekstra OS, Shankar LK, Wolchok JD, Ballinger M, Caramella C, de Vries EG, RECIST working group (2017) iRECIST: guidelines for response criteria for use in trials testing immunotherapeutics. Lancet Oncol 18:e143–e152

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Byun DJ, Wolchok JD, Rosenberg LM, Girotra M (2017) Cancer immunotherapy - immune checkpoint blockade and associated endocrinopathies. Nat Rev Endocrinol 13:195–207

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. El Majzoub I, Qdaisat A, Thein KZ et al (2018) Adverse effects of immune checkpoint therapy in Cancer patients visiting the emergency Department of a Comprehensive Cancer Center. Ann Emerg Med 73:79–87

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lidar M, Giat E, Garelick D, Horowitz Y, Amital H, Steinberg-Silman Y, Schachter J, Shapira-Frommer R, Markel G (2018) Rheumatic manifestations among cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Autoimmun Rev 17:284–289

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Khoja L, Day D, Wei-Wu Chen T, Siu LL, Hansen AR (2017) Tumour- and class-specific patterns of immune-related adverse events of immune checkpoint inhibitors: a systematic review. Ann Oncol 28:2377–2385

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Beer L, Hochmair M, Prosch H (2018) Pitfalls in the radiological response assessment of immunotherapy. Memo 11:138–143

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Kong BY, Menzies AM, Saunders CAB, Liniker E, Ramanujam S, Guminski A, Kefford RF, Long GV, Carlino MS (2016) Residual FDG-PET metabolic activity in metastatic melanoma patients with prolonged response to anti-PD-1 therapy. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res 29:572–577

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kerklaan JP, Lycklama á Nijeholt GJ, Wiggenraad RGJ, Berghuis B, Postma TJ, Taphoorn MJB (2011) SMART syndrome: a late reversible complication after radiation therapy for brain tumours. J Neurol 258:1098–1104

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Pruitt A, Dalmau J, Detre J, Alavi A, Rosenfeld MR (2006) Episodic neurologic dysfunction with migraine and reversible imaging findings after radiation. Neurology 67:676–678

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kaplan JG, DeSouza TG, Farkash A et al (1990) Leptomeningeal metastases: comparison of clinical features and laboratory data of solid tumors, lymphomas and leukemias. J Neuro-Oncol 9:225–229

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Wasserstrom WR, Glass JP, Posner JB (1982) Diagnosis and treatment of leptomeningeal metastases from solid tumors: experience with 90 patients. Cancer 49:759–772

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding was received for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Georg Bier.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standard. For this type of study formal consent is not required.

Informed consent

Our local ethics committee waived the requirement to obtain informed consent.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bier, G., Klumpp, B., Roder, C. et al. Meningeal enhancement depicted by magnetic resonance imaging in tumor patients: neoplastic meningitis or therapy-related enhancement?. Neuroradiology 61, 775–782 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-019-02215-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-019-02215-y

Keywords

Navigation