Abstract
Purpose
The prescription in International Nonproprietary Names (INN) is a legal obligation for all physicians in France since January 2015. The objective of this study was to analyze the frequency and main factors of INN drug prescribing in general practice.
Methods
Multicenter cross-sectional study conducted with 11 interns acting as observers of 23 GP trainers between November 2015 and January 2016. Two evaluators analyzed all GPs’ drug prescriptions to identify INN or brand name prescriptions.
Results
The database included 4957 drugs prescribed during 1647 visits. Of these, 1462 (29.5% [95% CI 28.2–30.8%]) were prescribed only in INN. According to the multivariate analyses, the factors favoring INN prescribing were as follows: at the drug level, its initial prescribing (OR = 1.4), a nonspecific prescribing objective (OR = 1.6), its listing in the generic drug index with (OR = 7.7) or without (OR = 2.9) efficiency objective included in the payment for public health objectives (PPHO) program, and the oral route of administration (OR from 0.4 for the percutaneous route to 0.2 for the pulmonary route); at the patient level, the male gender (OR = 1.3), the age of 15 years or more (OR = 1.9), and the absence of a long-term condition (OR = 1.3); at the physician level, the reception of a public healthcare insurance representative (OR = 4.1), the nonreception of pharmaceutical sales representatives (OR = 3.0), and the urban practice environment (OR = 2.8).
Conclusions
In 2015, less than one third of drugs were prescribed in INN only in general practice. The use of various incentives and regulatory measures is likely to favor the prescription of INNs by practitioners.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
World Health Organization (2017) Guidance on the use of international nonproprietary names (INNs) for pharmaceutical substances. https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=2ahUKEwjXxPP1ofrdAhUDZVAKHdQKDaQQFjAAegQICRAC&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.who.int%2Fmedicines%2Fservices%2Finn%2FFINAL_WHO_PHARM_S_NOM_1570_web.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3fFsY4eRnn6HwUj1upTolN. Accessed 21 Jun 2018
Aronson JK (2004) Medication errors resulting from the confusion of drug names. Expert Opin Drug Saf 3:167–172. https://doi.org/10.1517/14740338.3.3.167
No author (2006) Think INN, prescribe INN, dispense INN. ISDB Newsletter 20:5–10
Godman B, Bishop I, Finlayson AE, Campbell S, Kwon HY, Bennie M (2013) Reforms and initiatives in Scotland in recent years to encourage the prescribing of generic drugs, their influence and implications for other countries. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 13:469–482. https://doi.org/10.1586/14737167.2013.820956
OECD (2010) Value for money in health spending (table 6.1). OECD health policy studies. https://read.oecd-ilibrary.org/social-issues-migration-health/value-for-money-in-health-spending_9789264088818-en#page176. Accessed 21 Jun 2018
Pontén J, Rönnholm G, Skiöld P (2017) PPRI pharma profile, Sweden 2017 (page 46)7. WHO Collaborating Centre for Pharmaceutical Pricing and Reimbursement Policies. https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwi6ju7QpfrdAhXLJVAKHeVNA6EQFjAAegQICRAC&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwhocc.goeg.at%2FLiteraturliste%2FDokumente%2FCountryInformationReports%2FPPRI_Pharma_Profile_Sweden_2017.pdf&usg=AOvVaw25A53fGDSn7HyUFSq30xZZ. Accessed 21 Jun 2018
Mutualité Française (2011) La Dénomination commune internationale (p7). http://solidarites-sante.gouv.fr/IMG/pdf/La_denomination_commune_internationale_-_Mutualite_francaise.pdf. Accessed 21 Jun 2018
Dunne S, Shannon B, Dunne D, Cullen W (2013) A review of the differences and similarities between generic drugs and their originator counterparts, including economic benefits associated with usage of generic medicines, using Ireland as a case study. BMC Pharmacol Toxicol 14:1. https://doi.org/10.1186/2050-6511-14-1
Décret n° 2014–1359 du 14 novembre 2014 relatif à l’obligation de certification des logiciels d’aide à la prescription médicale et des logiciels d’aide à la dispensation prévue à l’article L. 161–38 du code de la sécurité sociale. JORF 0264:19255. https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/affichTexte.do?cidTexte=JORFTEXT000029761800&categorieLien=id. Accessed 21 Jun 2018
Ministère des affaires sociales de la santé et des droits des femmes (2015) Plan national d’action de promotion des médicaments génériques (p24). http://solidarites-sante.gouv.fr/IMG/pdf/Plan_national_medicaments_generiques_24mars2015.pdf. Accessed 21 Jun 2018
No author (2006) INN use: proposals for improvement. ISDN Newsletter 20:11
HAS (2014) Précisions concernant la certification des Logiciels d’Aide à la Prescription de la HAS. https://www.has-sante.fr/portail/upload/docs/application/pdf/2008-06/precisions_certification_des_lap200608.pdf. Accessed 21 Jun 2018
Simoens S, De Coster S (2006) Sustaining generic medicines markets in Europe. J Generic Med 3:257–268. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jgm.4940128
Bernard L, Gueyffier F, Letrilliart L (2018) Drug prescription goals in primary care: a cross-sectional study (submitted)
WHO (2003) International Classification of Primary Care, Second edition (ICPC-2). http://www.who.int/classifications/icd/adaptations/icpc2/en/. Accessed 21 Jun 2018
Agence nationale de sécurité du médicament et des produits de santé (2016) Répertoire des médicaments génériques. https://ansm.sante.fr/var/ansm_site/storage/original/application/7ef02426c3ced1d9cfbb57e0b10971bc.pdf. Accessed 21 Jun 2018
CNAMTS (2015) Note méthodologique du dispositif de rémunération sur objectifs de santé publique des médecins traitants. Les indicateurs portant sur la qualité de la pratique médicale (Table p14). https://www.ameli.fr/sites/default/files/Documents/5088/document/indicateurs-qualite-medecins_assurance-maladie.pdf. Accessed 21 Jun 2018
Insee (2003) Professions et catégories socioprofessionnelles (PCS). https://www.insee.fr/fr/metadonnees/pcs2003/categorieSocioprofessionnelleAgregee/1?champRecherche=true. Accessed 21 Jun 2018
Prometheus. http://promethe.org/. Accessed 21 Jun 2018
Centre national hospitalier d’information sur le médicament. Banque de donnée sur les médicaments Thériaque. http://www.theriaque.org/apps/contenu/accueil.php. Accessed 21 Jun 2018
World Health Organization (2011) Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification system. https://www.whocc.no/atc/structure_and_principles/. Accessed 21 Jun 2018
The comprehensive R archive network. R software version 3.1.0. https://pbil.univ-lyon1.fr/CRAN/. Accessed 21 Jun 2018
Mutualité Française (2010) Point de repère: Prescription en DCI Eté 2010. http://solidarites-sante.gouv.fr/IMG/pdf/Mutualite_francaise_prescriptions_en_DCI.pdf. Accessed 21 Jun 2018
UFC Que Choisir (2016) Enquête sur la prescription en DCI Un déni caractérisé de l’intérêt des patients. https://www.quechoisir.org/action-ufc-que-choisir-enquete-sur-la-prescription-en-dci-un-deni-caracterise-de-l-interet-des-patients-n11881/. Accessed 21 Jun 2018
Health & Social Care Information Center (2013) Prescriptions dispensed in the community. Statistics for England, 2002-2012 (Table A5, p80). NHS Digit https://files.digital.nhs.uk/publicationimport/pub11xxx/pub11291/pres-disp-com-eng-2002-12-rep.pdf. Accessed 21 Jun 2018
Davis JS, Barrett T, Harris L (2017) Knowledge of proprietary and generic drug names among hospital prescribers: time to mandate generic prescribing? Intern Med J 47:959–962. https://doi.org/10.1111/imj.13506
Boissel A, Fagnoni P, Guignard MH, Lazzarotti A, De Messières S, Sgro C (2014) Evaluation of the good prescribing practices at discharge in a University Hospital: what stakes for non-substitutable chronic treatment? Pharm Hosp Clin 49:95–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phclin.2013.07.017
Montastruc F, Moulis G, Palmaro A, Gardette V, Durrieu G, Montastruc JL (2014) Interactions between medical residents and drug companies: a national survey after the mediator® affair. PLoS One 9:e104828. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0104828
Darroch C, Kay AG (2008) Current and future trends in the use of generic medicines in the UK. Pharm J 281:507
Chhina HK, Bhole VM, Goldsmith C, Hall W, Kaczorowski J, Lacaille D (2013) Effectiveness of academic detailing to optimize medication prescribing behaviour of family physicians. J Pharm Pharm Sci 16:511–529. https://doi.org/10.18433/J3KK6C
Mastura I, Teng CL (2008) Effect of “group detailing” on drug prescribing in primary care. Med J Malaysia 63:315–318 https://doi-org.docelec.univ-lyon1.fr/10.1016/0895-4356(94)00221-B
Reynaud C, Goffe D, Robert-Tissot C (2017) La rémunération sur objectifs de santé publique-Bilan à 5 ans et présentation du nouveau dispositif (Table p18). Assurance maladie. https://www.ameli.fr/fileadmin/user_upload/documents/DP_bilan_ROSP_2016_du_21_avril_def.pdf. Accessed 21 Jun 2018
Fickweiler F, Fickweiler W, Urbach E (2017) Interactions between physicians and the pharmaceutical industry generally and sales representatives specifically and their association with physicians’ attitudes and prescribing habits: a systematic review. BMJ Open 7:e016408. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016408
Yeh JS, Franklin JM, Avorn J, Landon J, Kesselheim AS (2016) Association of industry payments to physicians with the prescribing of brand-name statins in Massachusetts. JAMA Intern Med 176:763–768. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.1709
McCarthy M (2016) Now there’s proof: docs who get company cash tend to prescribe more brand-name meds. ProPublica 352:i1645. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i1645
Van Bever E, Wirtz VJ, Azermai M, De Loof G, Christiaens T, Nicolas L, Van Bortel L, Vander Stichele R (2014) Operational rules for the implementation of INN prescribing. Int J Med Inf 83:47–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2013.09.004
Stenner SP, Chen Q, Johnson KB (2010) Impact of generic substitution decision support on electronic prescribing behavior. JAMIA 17:681–688. https://doi.org/10.1136/jamia.2009.002568
Chong CP, March G, Clark A, Gilbert A, Hassali MA, Bahari MB (2011) A nationwide study on generic medicines substitution practices of Australian community pharmacists and patient acceptance. Health Policy 99:139–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2010.08.002
Qian J, Hansen RA, Surry D, Howard J, Kiptanui Z, Harris I (2017) Disclosure of industry payments to prescribers: industry payments might be a factor impacting generic drug prescribing. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 26:819–826. https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.4224
Kirchhoff AC, Hart G, Campbell EG (2014) Rural and urban primary care physician professional beliefs and quality improvement behaviors. J Rural Health 30:235–243. https://doi.org/10.1111/jrh.12067
Gopalakrishnan S, Ganeshkumar P, Katta A (2013) Assessment of prescribing practices among urban and rural general practitioners in Tamil Nadu. Indian J Pharmacol 45:252–257. https://doi.org/10.4103/0253-7613.111931
Fabiano V, Mameli C, Cattaneo D, Delle Fave A, Preziosa A, Mele G, Clementi E, Zuccotti GV (2012) Perceptions and patterns of use of generic drugs among Italian family pediatricians: first round results of a web survey. Health Policy 104:247–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2011.12.005
El-chaar GM, Mardy G, Wehlou K, Rubin LG (1996) Randomized, double blind comparison of brand and generic antibiotic suspensions: II. A study of taste and compliance in children. Pediatr Infect Dis J 15:18–22. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006454-199601000-00004
Hedenrud T, Hjelmqvist H, Sundell KA (2014) Do people regard generic drugs as good as original brand-named drugs, and are there age or gender differences? Res Soc Adm Pharm 10:e19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2014.07.054
Heikkilä R, Mäntyselkä P, Ahonen R (2011) Do people regard cheaper medicines effective? Population survey on public opinion of generic substitution in Finland. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 20:185–191. https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.2084
Letrilliart L, Rigault-Fossier P, Fossier B, Kellou N, Paumier F, Bois C, Polazzi S, Schott AM, Zerbib Y (2016) Comparison of French training and non-training general practices: a cross-sectional study. BMC Med Educ 16:126. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-016-0649-6
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Louis Bernard who supervised the data collection, and the interns who collected the data: Morgane Aillet, Sofien Amraoui, François Drogou, Florent Debruyne, Aurélie Fleurentin, Laura Laperriere, Thomas Lecocq, Lucile Moracchini, Allison Netboute, Arnaud Ponçon, and Manon Ubéra. We also thank their 23 GP trainers. We are indebted to Philippe Ameline, who developed the server for data entry and storage. We are grateful to Natane Reynaud for the English editing of the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
LL conceived the study, and he designed it along with FB and AP. XD helped to use the Thériaque drug database. FB and AP managed the database, with the support of LL. JG performed the statistical analyses. XD, DD, CC, and FG contributed to the interpretation of the findings. FB, AP, and LL drafted the manuscript. All authors reviewed and approved the final version of the article.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
The Hospices Civils de Lyon ethics committee has approved the OPREM study. A patient information poster was displayed in the offices of participating physicians. Data storage was covered by a statement made to the French Commission on Information Technology and Liberties (CNIL, No. 1549782).
Electronic supplementary material
ESM 1
(PDF 58.5 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
De Bruyne, F., Ponçon, A., Giai, J. et al. INN or brand name drug prescriptions: a multilevel, cross-sectional study in general practice. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 75, 275–283 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-018-2580-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-018-2580-8