Skip to main content
Log in

RGS14 modulates locomotor behavior and ERK signaling induced by environmental novelty and cocaine within discrete limbic structures

  • Original Investigation
  • Published:
Psychopharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rationale

In rodents, exposure to novel environments or psychostimulants promotes locomotion. Indeed, locomotor reactivity to novelty strongly predicts behavioral responses to psychostimulants in animal models of addiction. RGS14 is a plasticity-restricting protein with unique functional domains that enable it to suppress ERK-dependent signaling as well as regulate G protein activity. Although recent studies show that RGS14 is expressed in multiple limbic regions implicated in psychostimulant- and novelty-induced hyperlocomotion, its function has been examined mostly in the context of hippocampal physiology and memory.

Objective

We investigated whether RGS14 modulates novelty- and cocaine-induced locomotion (NIL and CIL, respectively) and neuronal activity.

Methods

We assessed Rgs14 knockout (RGS14 KO) mice and wild-type (WT) littermate controls using NIL and CIL behavioral tests, followed by quantification of c-fos and phosphorylated ERK (pERK) induction in limbic regions that normally express RGS14.

Results

RGS14 KO mice were less active than WT controls in the NIL test, driven by avoidance of the center of the novel environment. By contrast, RGS14 KO mice demonstrated augmented peripheral locomotion in the CIL test conducted in either a familiar or novel environment. RGS14 KO mice exhibited increased thigmotaxis, as well as greater c-fos and pERK induction in the central amygdala and dorsal hippocampus, when cocaine and novelty were paired.

Conclusions

RGS14 KO mice exhibited anti-correlated locomotor responses to novelty and cocaine, but displayed increased thigmotaxis in response to either stimuli which was augmented by their combination. Our findings also suggest RGS14 may reduce neuronal activity in limbic subregions by inhibiting ERK-dependent signaling.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank C. Strauss for helpful editing of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (AG061175, NS102306, DA038453, and DA049257 to DW; 2T32 NS 007480-20 to DL; F31DA044726 to SLF; R01NS037112 and 2R21NS102652 to JH).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John R. Hepler.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Figure S1

Male and female RGS14 KO mice show similar locomotor phenotypes in a novel environment compared to male and female WT mice. a RGS14 KO males (n = 14) were significantly less active in the NIL test compared to WT males (n = 13). b Female RGS14 KO mice (n = 6) showed a trend towards reduced total locomotion compared to female WT mice (n = 6) which did not reach statistical significance. c RGS14 KO males demonstrated significantly reduced locomotor activity in the center of the environment compared to WT males. d RGS14 KO females demonstrated reduced locomotor activity in the center of the environment compared to WT females. e RGS14 KO males demonstrated similar levels of locomotor activity in the periphery compared to WT males. f RGS14 KO females demonstrated similar levels of locomotor activity in the periphery compared to WT females. g When the genotypes were split by sex and analyzed by two-way ANOVA (sex x genotype), there was a strong trend for a main effect of genotype on total ambulations (p = 0.051) and h a significant main effect of genotype on central ambulations. Although the experiment wasn’t powered to detect sex differences, no main effects of sex or interactions were detected for either measures; thus NIL data for both sexes were pooled. ns = not significant, *p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01. (PNG 102 kb)

High resolution image (TIF 11591 kb)

Figure S2

Male and female RGS14 KO mice exhibit similar locomotor behavior in response to 20 mg/kg cocaine in a familiar environment. a RGS14 KO males (n=7) exhibited an increase in total locomotor activity that did not reach statistical significance compared to WT males. b RGS14 KO females (n=7) exhibited a slight but non-significant increase in total locomotion in comparison to WT females. c,d Neither RGS14 KO males or females differed from their same-sex WT counterparts in central ambulations. e RGS14 KO males exhibited an increase in peripheral ambulations compared to WT that did not reach statistical significance. f RGS14 KO females showed significantly more peripheral ambulations than WT. g,h Sex-specific analyses revealed no main effect of sex on total or peripheral ambulations. ns = not significant, *p < 0.05. (PNG 217 kb)

High resolution image (TIF 46636 kb)

Figure S3

RGS14 deficiency does not alter induction of pERK in regions of interest in experimentally naive animals. a RGS14-ir (magenta) was evident only in WT animals with the exposure settings used to acquire epifluorescent micrographs. Overall pERK induction (green) was minimal when RGS14 KO (n = 5) and WT (n = 5) mice were rapidly euthanized compared to the levels observed following exposure to environmental novelty and cocaine, and did not significantly differ by genotype in any region examined (p > 0.05 for all comparisons). Scale bars denote 100 μm. (PNG 1622 kb)

High resolution image (TIF 28477 kb)

Table S1

Summary of statistical comparisons of male and female RGS14 WT and KO mice in NIL test. a There was a strong trend (p = 0.051) for a main effect of genotype on total locomotion, with RGS14 KO mice demonstrating reduced total locomotion compared to WT controls. There was no main effect of sex (p > 0.05) and no interaction effect (p > 0.05). b There was a main effect of genotype (p < 0.01) on central locomotion, with RGS14 KO mice exhibiting fewer center ambulations. There was no main effect of sex (p > 0.05) or interaction (p > 0.05). (PNG 235 kb)

High resolution image (TIF 6827 kb)

Table S2

Summary of statistical comparisons for male and female RGS14 KO and WT mice in response to 20 mg/kg cocaine in a familiar environment. a There was a strong trend (p = 0.056) for a main effect of genotype on total ambulations, where RGS14 KO mice exhibited increased total locomotion compared to WT. There was no main effect of sex (p > 0.05) and no interaction effect (p > 0.05) b Among peripheral ambulations, there was a main effect of genotype (p < 0.05) where RGS14 KO mice exhibited significantly more activity than WT, but there was no effect of sex (p > 0.05) and no interaction (p > 0.05). (PNG 108 kb)

High resolution image (TIF 7201 kb)

Table S3

Summary of statistical comparisons of pERK induction within regions and between genotypes in experimentally naive RGS14 KO (n = 5) and WT (n = 5) mice. Average pERK+ cell counts were compared within regions and between genotypes using multiple t-tests adjusted for multiple comparisons, as described in the Methods section. No regional pERK+ cell counts were significantly different between genotypes in naive mice (p > 0.05 for all comparisons). (PNG 361 kb)

High resolution image (TIF 3232 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Foster, S.L., Lustberg, D.J., Harbin, N.H. et al. RGS14 modulates locomotor behavior and ERK signaling induced by environmental novelty and cocaine within discrete limbic structures. Psychopharmacology 238, 2755–2773 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-021-05892-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-021-05892-x

Keywords

Navigation