Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Accuracy and precision of a new portable ultrasound scanner, the Biocon-700, in residual urine volume measurement

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

The aim of this study was to examine the accuracy of a new portable abdominal ultrasound (US) machine (Biocon-700, Mcube Technology, Seoul, Korea) for measuring postvoid residual (PVR) urine.

Method

One-hundred and twenty-five patients with voiding problems underwent PVR measurements, which were compared with the postvoid bladder volume measurements obtained by catheterization within 5 min in the same patients. Accuracy was assessed by comparing the two methods, and correlation coefficients were obtained.

Result

The Pearson’s correlation coefficient between PVR volume as measured by US and by catheterization was 0.872 (R 2 = 0.76). The mean difference was 23.59 ± 37.32 ml (95% confidence interval, 17.5–30.65 ml), and the absolute scan error tended to increase with a greater amount of catheterized residual urine volume (R 2 = 0.49).

Conclusions

Accuracy of the Biocon-700 scanner is as good as catheter assessments of residual volume and is therefore a sufficient alternative to catheterization for determining residual urine volume.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Holmes J. Ultrasonic studies of the bladder. J Urol. 1967;97:654–63.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Coombes GM, Millard RJ. The accuracy of portable ultrasound scanning in the measurement of residual urine volume. J Urol. 1994;152:2083–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Choe JH, Lee JH, Lee KS. Accuracy and precision of a new portable ultrasound scanner, the BME-150A, in residual urine volume measurement: a comparison with the BladderScan BVI 3000. Int Urogynecol J. 2007;18:641–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Park YH, Ku JH, Oh SJ. Accuracy of post-void residual urine volume measurement using a portable ultrasound bladder scanner with real-time pre-scan imaging. Neurourol Urodyn. 2011;30:335–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1:307–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Roehrborn CG, Peters PC. Can transabdominal ultrasound estimation of postvoiding residual (PVR) replace catheterization? Urology. 1988;31:445–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Fuse H, Yokoyama T, Muraishi Y, Katayama T. Measurement of residual urine volume using a portable ultrasound instrument. Int Urol Nephrol. 1996;28(5):633–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ireton RC, Krieger JN, Cardenas DD, Williams-Burden B, Kelly E, Souci T, et al. Bladder volume determination using a dedicated, portable ultrasound scanner. J Urol. 1990;143(5):909–11.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Chan H. Noninvasive bladder volume measurement. J Neurosci Nurs. 1993;25:309–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ghani KR, Pilacher J, Rowland D, et al. Portable ultrasonography and bladder volume accuracy-a comparative study using three-dimensional ultrasonography. Urology. 2008;72:24–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Abdel-Fattah M, Barrington JW. The accuracy of Bardscan: a new tool for the measurement of the bladder volume. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2005;25(2):186–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Alnaif B, Drutz HP. The accuracy of portable abdominal ultrasound equipment in measuring postvoid residual volume. Int Urogynecol J. 1999;10:215–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Goode PS, Locher JL, Bryant RL, et al. Measurement of postvoid residual urine with portable transabdominal bladder ultrasound scanner and urethral catheterization. Int Urogynecol J. 2000;11:296–300.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ghadeer AS, Annick L, Craig EC, Joyce S, Kevin B, Dante P. Accuracy of bladder scanning in the assessment of postvoid residual volume. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2009;31(6):526–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Griffiths CJ, Murray A, Ramsden PD. Accuracy and repeatability of bladder volume measurement using ultrasonic imaging. J Urol. 1986;136:808–12.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Cooperberg MR, Cahmbers SK, Rutherford TJ, et al. Cystic pelvic pathology presenting as falsely elevated post-void residual urine measured by portable ultrasound bladder scanning: report of 3 cases and review of the literature. Urology. 2000;55:590.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Barrington JW, Edwards G, Ashcroft M, et al. Measurement of bladder volume following cesarean section using Bladderscan. Int Urogynecol J. 2001;12:373–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chul Hong Kim.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

None.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cho, M.K., Noh, E.J. & Kim, C.H. Accuracy and precision of a new portable ultrasound scanner, the Biocon-700, in residual urine volume measurement. Int Urogynecol J 28, 1057–1061 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-016-3224-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-016-3224-0

Keyword

Navigation