Skip to main content
Log in

A single-receiver geometry-free approach to stochastic modeling of multi-frequency GNSS observables

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Geodesy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The proper choice of stochastic model is of great importance to global navigation satellite system (GNSS) data processing. Whereas extensive investigations into stochastic modeling are mainly based on the relative (or differential) method employing zero and/or short baselines, this work proposes an absolute method that relies upon a stand-alone receiver and works by applying the least-squares variance component estimation to the geometry-free functional model, thus facilitating the characterization of stochastic properties of multi-frequency GNSS observables at the undifferenced level. In developing the absolute method, special care has been taken of the code multipath effects by introducing ambiguity-like parameters to the code observation equations. By means of both the relative and absolute methods, we characterize the precision, cross and time correlation of the code and phase observables of two newly emerging constellations, namely the Chinese BDS and the European Galileo, collected by a variety of receivers of different types at multiple frequencies. Our first finding is that so far as the precision is concerned, the absolute method yields nearly the same numerical values as those derived by the zero-baseline-based relative method. However, the two methods give contradictory results with regard to the cross correlation, which is found (not) to occur between BDS phase observables when use has been made of the relative (absolute) method. Our explanation to this discrepancy is that the cross correlation found in the relative method originates from the parts (antenna, cable, low noise amplifier) shared by two receivers creating a zero baseline. The time correlation is only of significance when the multipath effects are present, as is the case with the short-baseline-based relative method; this correlation turns out to be largely weaker (or ideally absent) in the absolute (or zero-baseline-based relative) method. Moreover, with the absolute method, the stochastic properties determined for two receivers of the same type but subject to different multipath effects are virtually the same. We take this as a convincing evidence that the absolute method is robust against multipath effects. Hence, the absolute method proposed in the present work represents a promising complement to the relative method and appears to be particularly beneficial to GNSS positioning, navigation and timing technologies based on the undifferenced observables, typically the precise point positioning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability statement

RINEX observation data of MGEX stations and broadcast ephemeris are obtained from the online archives of the Crustal Dynamics Data Information System, ftp://cddis.gsfc.nasa.gov; RINEX observation data collected in the Curtin university are accessed from the website of Curtin GNSS Research Center, http://saegnss2.curtin.edu.au/ldc/; RINEX observation data of Hong Kong CORS is downloaded from the Hong Kong Geodetic Survey Services, https://www.geodetic.gov.hk/en/index.htm. RINEX observation data collected in Wuhan is available at https://pan.baidu.com/s/1CYVPnWGvb0-_S8zS-VGD_A (Extraction code: rgex).

References

  • Amiri-Simkooei A (2007) Least-squares variance component estimation: theory and GPS applications. PhD Thesis, Delft University of Technology

  • Amiri-Simkooei A, Teunissen P, Tiberius C (2009) Application of least-squares variance component estimation to GPS observables. J Surv Eng 135:149–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amiri-Simkooei A, Zangeneh-Nejad F, Asgari J (2013) Least-squares variance component estimation applied to GPS geometry-based observation model. J Surv Eng 139:176–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bona P (2000) Precision, cross correlation, and time correlation of GPS phase and code observations. GPS Solut 4:3–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunini C, Azpilicueta F (2010) GPS slant total electron content accuracy using the single layer model under different geomagnetic regions and ionospheric conditions. J Geodesy 84:293–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cai C, Gao Y (2013) Modeling and assessment of combined GPS/GLONASS precise point positioning. GPS solut 17:223–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cai C, He C, Santerre R, Pan L, Cui X, Zhu J (2016) A comparative analysis of measurement noise and multipath for four constellations: GPS, BeiDou, GLONASS and Galileo. Surv Rev 48:287–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CSNO (2018) Development of the BeiDou Navigation Satellite System (Version 3). http://www.beidou.gov.cn/xt/gfxz/201812/P020190117356387956569.pdf. Accessed 1 July 2019

  • de Bakker PF, van der Marel H, Tiberius CC (2009) Geometry-free undifferenced, single and double differenced analysis of single frequency GPS, EGNOS and GIOVE-A/B measurements. GPS Solut 13:305–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Bakker PF, Tiberius CC, Van Der Marel H, van Bree RJ (2012) Short and zero baseline analysis of GPS L1 C/A, L5Q, GIOVE E1B, and E5aQ signals. GPS Solut 16:53–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El-Mowafy A (2015) Estimation of multi-constellation GNSS observation stochastic properties using single receiver single satellite data validation method. Surv Rev 47:99–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ESA (2018) Galileo fact sheet. http://esamultimedia.esa.int/docs/galileo/Galileo_factsheet_2018.pdf. Accessed 1 July 2019

  • EU (2016) The European GNSS (Galileo) open service signal-in-space interface control document. https://www.gsc-europa.eu/system/files/galileo_documents/Galileo-OS-SIS-ICD.pdf. Accessed 1 July 2019

  • Eueler HJ, Goad CC (1991) On optimal filtering of GPS dual frequency observations without using orbit information. Bulletin Géodésique 65:130–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fritsche M, Dietrich R, Knöfel C, Rülke A, Vey S, Rothacher M, Steigenberger P (2005) Impact of higher order ionospheric terms on GPS estimates. Geophys Res Lett 32:L23311. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL024342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grafarend EW (2000) Mixed integer-real valued adjustment (IRA) problems: GPS initial cycle ambiguity resolution by means of the LLL algorithm. GPS Solut 4:31–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hou P, Zhang B, Yuan Y (2019a) Combined GPS + BDS instantaneous single-and dual-frequency RTK positioning: stochastic modelling and performance assessment. J Spat Sci. https://doi.org/10.1080/14498596.2018.1558117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hou P, Zhang B, Yuan Y, Zhang X, Zha J (2019b) Stochastic modeling of BDS2/3 observations with application to RTD/RTK positioning. Meas Sci Technol. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6501/ab1fad

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kazmierski K, Hadas T, Sośnica K (2018) Weighting of multi-GNSS observations in real-time precise point positioning. Remote Sens 10:84. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10010084

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kedar S, Hajj GA, Wilson BD, Heflin MB (2003) The effect of the second order GPS ionospheric correction on receiver positions. Geophys Res Lett 30:1829. https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GL017639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khodabandeh A, Teunissen PJ (2016) Array-aided multifrequency GNSS ionospheric sensing: estimability and precision analysis. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 54:5895–5913

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khodabandeh A, Teunissen P (2018) On the impact of GNSS ambiguity resolution: geometry, ionosphere, time and biases. J Geodesy 92:637–658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koch K-R (1977) Least squares adjustment and collocation. Bulletin Géodésique 51:127–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koch K-R (1978) Schätzung von varianzkomponenten. Allgemeine Vermessungs Nachrichten 85:264–269

    Google Scholar 

  • Koch K-R (1999) Parameter estimation and hypothesis testing in linear models. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kubik K (1970) The estimation of the weights of measured quantities within the method of least squares. Bulletin Géodésique (1946–1975) 95:21–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laurichesse D, Mercier F, Berthias JP, Broca P, Cerri L (2009) Integer ambiguity resolution on undifferenced GPS phase measurements and its application to PPP and satellite precise orbit determination. Navigation 56:135–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leick A, Rapoport L, Tatarnikov D (2015) GPS satellite surveying. Wiley, Hoboken

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Li B (2016) Stochastic modeling of triple-frequency BeiDou signals: estimation, assessment and impact analysis. J Geodesy 90:593–610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li B, Shen Y, Xu P (2008) Assessment of stochastic models for GPS measurements with different types of receivers. Chin Sci Bull 53:3219–3225

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu X, Yuan Y, Huo X, Li Z, Li W (2010) Model analysis method (MAM) on the effect of the second-order ionospheric delay on GPS positioning solution. Chin Sci Bull 55:1529–1534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu T, Yuan Y, Zhang B, Wang N, Tan B, Chen Y (2017) Multi-GNSS precise point positioning (MGPPP) using raw observations. J Geodesy 91:253–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odijk D, Zhang B, Khodabandeh A, Odolinski R, Teunissen PJ (2016) On the estimability of parameters in undifferenced, uncombined GN network and PPP-RTK user models by means of S-system theory. J Geodesy 90:15–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao CR (1971) Estimation of variance and covariance components—MINQUE theory. J Multivar Anal 1:257–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Satirapod C, Luansang M (2008) Comparing stochastic models used in GPS precise point positioning technique Empire. Surv Rev 40:188–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schönemann E, Becker M, Springer T (2011) A new approach for GNSS analysis in a multi-GNSS and multi-signal environment. J Geod Sci 1:204–214

    Google Scholar 

  • Smyrnaios M, Schön S, Nicolás ML (2013) Multipath propagation, characterization and modeling in GNSS. In: Jin S (ed) Geodetic sciences-observations, modeling and applications. IntechOpen, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Teunissen P (1985) Generalized inverses, adjustment, the datum problem and S-transformations. In: Sanso F, Grafarend EW (eds) Optimization of geodetic networks. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Teunissen P (1988) Towards a least-squares framework for adjusting and testing of both functional and stochastic models. Technical report 26, Geodetic Computing Centre, Delft, Netherlands

  • Teunissen PJG (1995) The least-squares ambiguity decorrelation adjustment: a method for fast GPS integer ambiguity estimation. J Geodesy 70:65–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teunissen P (2000) Adjustment theory: an introduction. VSSD, Delft

    Google Scholar 

  • Teunissen P (2006) Testing theory. VSSD, Delft

    Google Scholar 

  • Teunissen PJ (2018) Distributional theory for the DIA method. J Geodesy 92:59–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teunissen PJG, Amiri-Simkooei AR (2008) Least-squares variance component estimation. J Geodesy 82:65–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teunissen PJ, Kleusberg A (2012) GPS for geodesy. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Teunissen P, De Bakker P (2013) Single-receiver single-channel multi-frequency GNSS integrity: outliers, slips, and ionospheric disturbances. J Geodesy 87:161–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teunissen P, Khodabandeh A (2015) Review and principles of PPP-RTK methods. J Geodesy 89:217–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teunissen PJG, Montenbruck O (2017) Springer handbook of global navigation satellite systems. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tian Y, Sui L, Xiao G, Zhao D, Tian Y (2019) Analysis of Galileo/BDS/GPS signals and RTK performance. GPS Solut. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-019-0831-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiberius C, Kenselaar F (2003) Variance component estimation and precise GPS positioning: case study. J Surv Eng 129:11–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiberius C, Kenselaar F, Tiberius C, Kenselaar F (2000) Variance component estimation for precise GPS positioning. Geodezija ir Kartografija 26:152–159

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu S, Zhao X, Pang C, Zhang L, Wang Y (2019) A new strategy of stochastic modeling aiming at BDS hybrid constellation in precise relative positioning. Adv Space Res 63:2757–2770

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu P, Liu Y, Shen Y, Fukuda Y (2007) Estimability analysis of variance and covariance components. J Geodesy 81:593–602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang Y, Li J, Xu J, Tang J, Guo H, He H (2011) Contribution of the compass satellite navigation system to global PNT users. Chin Sci Bull 56:2813–2819

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaminpardaz S, Teunissen PJ (2017) Analysis of Galileo IOV + FOC signals and E5 RTK performance. GPS Solut 21:1855–1870

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang B, Teunissen PJ, Yuan Y (2017a) On the short-term temporal variations of GNSS receiver differential phase biases. J Geodesy 91:563–572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Z, Li B, Shen Y, Yang L (2017b) A noise analysis method for GNSS signals of a standalone receiver. Acta Geodaetica et Geophysica 52:301–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang B, Chen Y, Yuan Y (2019) PPP-RTK based on undifferenced and uncombined observations: theoretical and practical aspects. J Geodesy 93:1011–1024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-018-1220-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 41774042, 41574015). The first author is supported by the CAS Pioneer Hundred Talents Program. The fourth author acknowledges the LU JIAXI International team program supported by the K.C. Wong Education Foundation and CAS. All this support is gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Baocheng Zhang proposed the method, designed the research and wrote the paper. Pengyu Hou developed the software, analyzed the data and wrote the paper. Teng Liu improved the computational efficiency of the software and revised the manuscript. Yunbin Yuan supervised the experimental analysis and revised the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Baocheng Zhang or Pengyu Hou.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, B., Hou, P., Liu, T. et al. A single-receiver geometry-free approach to stochastic modeling of multi-frequency GNSS observables. J Geod 94, 37 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-020-01366-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-020-01366-8

Keywords

Navigation