Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Maintenance policy optimization—literature review and directions

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Numerous of maintenance policies were developed due to the change in the manufacturing environment and the growing of technologies in the past few decades. Due to fluctuation (oscillation, instability) phenomena of the manufacturing industry, it is difficult to identify an optimal maintenance policy that actually suit for a manufacturing system. Thus, a lot of efforts have been done in order to assist manufacturing industry in finding an optimal maintenance policy. This paper attempts to review past and current research on optimal maintenance policy selection issues associated with methods used as well as the applications. Published literatures were systematically classified based on certainty theory in operation management classification model in term of certainty, uncertainty, and risk. Furthermore, a sub family had been classified based on the approaches used in determining the optimal maintenance policy. The possible gap occurred between academic research and industrial application in maintenance policy optimization is also discussed in detail, and several possible ideas are put forward to reduce the gap. More importantly, the paper is intended to provide a different view on classifying these models and give useful references for personnel working in industrial as well as researchers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Swanson L (2001) Linking maintenance strategies to performance. Int J Prod Econ 709(3):237–244

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Madu CN (2000) Competing through maintenance strategies. Int J Quality Reliab 17(9):937–948

    Google Scholar 

  3. Mobley RK (2002) An introduction to predictive maintenance. Buttherworth-Heinemann, Woburn

    Google Scholar 

  4. Tan MT, Raghavan N (2007) Root cause analysis based maintenance policy. Int J Quality Reliab Manag 24(2):203–228

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lu KY, Sy CC (2009) A real-time decision-making of maintenance using fuzzy agent. Expert Syst Appl 36(2):2691–2698

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gupta S, Maiti J, Kumar R, Kumar U (2009) A control chart guided maintenance policy selection. Int J Min Reclam Environ 23(3):216–226

    Google Scholar 

  7. Xia T, Xi L, Lee J, Zhou X (2011) Optimal CBPM policy considering maintenance effects and environmental condition. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 56:1181–1193

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sharma A, Yadava GS, Deshmukh SG (2011) A literature review and future perspectives on maintenance optimization. J Qual Maint Eng 17(1):5–25

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wang W (2012) A stochastic model for joint spare parts inventory and planned maintenance optimization. Eur J Oper Res 216(1):127–139

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Bevilacqua B, Braglia M (2000) The analytic process applied to maintenance strategy selection. Reliab Eng Syst Safe 70(1):71–83

    Google Scholar 

  11. Khazraei K, Deuse J (2011) A strategic standpoint on maintenance taxonomy. J Facil Manag 9(2):96–113

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mechefske CK, Wang Z (2001) Using fuzzy linguistics to select optimum maintenance and condition monitoring strategies. Mech Syst Signal Process 15(6):1129–1140

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sharma RK, Kumar D, Kumar P (2005) FLM to select suitable maintenance strategy in process industries using MISO model. J Qual Maint Eng 1(11):359–374

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Peng Y, Dong M, Zuo MJ (2010) Current status of machine prognostics in condition-based maintenance—a review. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 34:1181–1193

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wang L, Chu J, Wu J (2007) Selection of optimum maintenance strategies based on a fuzzy analytical hierarchy process. Int J Prod Econ 107(1):151–163

    Google Scholar 

  16. Arunraj NS, Maiti J (2010) Risk-based maintenance policy selection using AHP and goal programming. Saf Sci 48(2):238–247

    Google Scholar 

  17. Mechefske CK, Wang Z (2001) Using fuzzy linguistics to select optimum maintenance and condition monitoring strategies. Mech Syst Signal Process 15(6):1129–1140

    Google Scholar 

  18. Alsyouf I (2007) The role of maintenance in improving companies’ productivity and profitability. Int J Prod Econ 105(1):70–78

    Google Scholar 

  19. Tajiri M, Gotoh F (1992) TPM implementation—a Japanese approach. McGraw Hill Inc, New York

    Google Scholar 

  20. Schuh G, Lorenz B, Winter CP, Gudergan G (2010) The house of maintenance-identifying the potential for improvement in internal maintenance organization by means of a capability maturity model. Springer, London

    Google Scholar 

  21. Zaied RA, Abhary K, Gomaa AH (2010) Intelligent integrated maintenance of manufacturing systems. In: Engineering the future, book chapter 15. DOI: 10.5772/10379

  22. Park K, Moon S (2005) Optimal design of heat exchangers using the progressive quadratic response surface model. Int J Heat Mass Transf 48(11):2126–2139

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Munoz A, Martorell S, Serradell V (1997) Genetic algorithms in optimizing surveillance and maintenance of components. Reliab Eng Syst Safe 57(2):107–120

    Google Scholar 

  24. Chen G, Trung TP (2006) Introduction to fuzzy system. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Florida

    Google Scholar 

  25. Geradas WMJ (1992) The EUT maintenance model. Int J Prod Econ 24(3):209–216

    Google Scholar 

  26. Marais KB, Saleh JH (2009) Beyond its cost, the value of maintenance: an analytical framework for capturing its net present value. Reliab Eng Syst Safe 94(2):644–657

    Google Scholar 

  27. Tersine RJ (1985) Production/operations management: concepts, structure, and analysis. Elsevier Science Publisher, New York

    Google Scholar 

  28. Labib AW. (1998) World-class maintenance using a computerised maintenance management system. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering 4 (1):66–75

  29. Fernandez O, Labib AW, Walmsley R, Petty DJ (2003) A decision support maintenance management system. Int J Qual Reliab Manag 20(8):965–979

    Google Scholar 

  30. Labib AW (2004) A decision analysis model for maintenance policy selection using a CMMS. J Qual Maint Eng 10(3):191–202

    Google Scholar 

  31. Khalil J, Saad SM, Gindy N, MacKechnie K (2005) A maintenance policy selection tool for industrial machine parts. Int Fed Inform Process Emerg Sol Future Manufac 159:431–440

    Google Scholar 

  32. Burhanuddin MA, Ahmad AR, Desa MI (2007) An application of decision making grid to improve maintenance strategies in small and medium industries. IEEE International Industrial Electronics and Application Conference Proceedings, Harbin, pp 455–460

    Google Scholar 

  33. Tahir Z, Burhanuddin MA, Ahmad AR, Halawani SM, Arif F (2009) Improvement of decision making grid model for maintenance management in small and medium industries. Industrial and Information Systems International Conference Proceeding, Sri Lanka, pp 598–603

    Google Scholar 

  34. Labib AW, Yunitaro MN (2009) Maintenance strategies for changeable manufacturing. In changeable and reconfigurable manufacturing systems. Springer: Verlag, London. Book chapter

  35. Almeida AT, Bohoris GA (1995) Decision theory in maintenance decision making. J Qual Maint Eng 1(1):39–45

    Google Scholar 

  36. Lugtigheid D, Banjevic D, Jardine AKS (2004) Modelling repairable system reliability with explanatory variables and repair and maintenance actions. J Manag Math 15:89–110

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  37. Samrout M, Chatelet E, Kouta R, Chebbo N (2009) Optimization of maintenance policy using the proportional hazard model. Reliab Eng Syst Safe 94(1):44–52

    Google Scholar 

  38. Martorell S, Sanchez A, Serradell V (1999) Age-dependent reliability model considering effects of maintenance and working conditions. Reliab Eng Syst Safe 64(1):19–31

    Google Scholar 

  39. El-Gogary A. (2004) Estimations of parameters in a three state reliability semi-Markov model. Applied Mathematics and Computation 154:389–403

  40. Gurler U, Kaya AA (2002) Maintenance policy for a system with multi-state components: an approximate solution. Reliab Eng Syst Safe 76(2):117–127

    Google Scholar 

  41. Amari SV, McLaughlin L, Pham H (2006) Cost-effective condition-based maintenance using Markov decision processes. Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, Newport Beach, pp 464–469

    Google Scholar 

  42. Nourelfath M, Ait-Kadi D (2007) Optimization of series–parallel multi-state systems under maintenance policies. Reliab Eng Syst Safe 92(12):1620–1626

    Google Scholar 

  43. Anders GJ, Sugier J (2006) Risk assessment tool for maintenance selection. Dependability of Computer Systems International Conference Proceedings, Szklarska Poreba, pp 306–313

    Google Scholar 

  44. Ge H, Tomasevicz CL, Asgaspoor S (2007) Optimum maintenance policy with inspection by semi-Markov decision processes. Power American Symposium, Las Cruces, pp 17–19

    Google Scholar 

  45. Kenne JP, Nkeungoue LJ (2008) Simultaneous control of production, preventive and corrective maintenance rates of a failure-prone manufacturing system. Appl Numer Math 58:180–194

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  46. Muller A, Suhner MC, Iung B (2008) Formalisation of a new prognosis model for supporting proactive maintenance implementation on industrial system. Reliab Eng Syst Safe 93(2):234–253

    Google Scholar 

  47. Marais KB, Saleh JH (2009) Beyond its cost, the value of maintenance: an analytical framework for capturing its net present value. Reliab Eng Syst Safe 94(2):744–657

    Google Scholar 

  48. Ponchet A, Fouladirar M, Grall A (2010) Assessment of a maintenance model for a multi-deteriorating mode system. Reliab Eng Syst Safe 95(11):1244–1254

    Google Scholar 

  49. Chelbi A, Ait-Kadi D (1999) An optimal inspection strategy for randomly failing equipment. Reliab Eng Syst Safe 63(2):127–131

    Google Scholar 

  50. Lofsten H (1999) Management of industrial maintenance-economic evaluation of maintenance policies. Int J Opera Prod Manag 19(7):716–737

    Google Scholar 

  51. Cassady CR, Pohl EA, Murduck WP (2001) Selective maintenance modeling for industrial systems. J Qual Maint Eng 7(2):104–117

    Google Scholar 

  52. Goel HD, Grievink J, Weijnen MPC (2003) Integrated optimal reliable design, production and maintenance planning for multipurpose process plants. Comput Chem Eng 27(11):1543–1555

    Google Scholar 

  53. Marquez AC, Gupta JND, Heguedas AS (2003) Maintenance policies for a production system with constrained production rate and buffer capacity. Int J Prod Res 41(9):1909–1926

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  54. Pongpech J, Murthy DNP, Boondiskulchock R (2006) Maintenance strategies for used equipment under lease. J Qual Maint Eng 12(1):52–67

    Google Scholar 

  55. Nielsen JJ, Sorensen JD (2011) On risk-based operation and maintenance of offshore wind turbine components. Reliab Eng Syst Safe 96(1):218–229

    Google Scholar 

  56. Young MJ (2003) Human performance model validation: one size does not fit all. Summer Computer Simulation Conference, 732–735

  57. Bogonovo E, Marseguerra M, Zio E (2000) A Monte Carlo methodological approach to plant availability modelling with maintenance, aging and obsolescence. Reliab Eng Syst Safe 67(1):61–73

    Google Scholar 

  58. Vant J (1997) Maintenance optimisation from a decision theoretical point of view. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 58:119–126

    Google Scholar 

  59. Chen T, Popova E (2002) Maintenance policies with two dimensional warranty. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 77(1):61–69

    Google Scholar 

  60. Barata CJ, Guedes S, Marseguerra M, Zio E (2002) Simulation modelling of repairable multi-component deteriorating systems for on condition maintenance optimisation. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 76(3):255–264

    Google Scholar 

  61. Silva AML, Manso LAF, Anders GJ (2004) Evaluation of generation and transmission maintenance strategies based on reliability worth. Electr Power Syst Res 71:99–107

    Google Scholar 

  62. Hilber P, Miranda V, Matos MA, Bertling L (2007) Multiobjective optimization applied to maintenance policy for electrical networks. IEEE Trans Pow Syst 22(4):1675–1682

    Google Scholar 

  63. Nguyen DQT, Miguel J, Bagajewicz J (2009) On the impact of sensor maintenance policies on stochastic-based accuracy. Comput Chem Eng 33(9):1491–1498

    Google Scholar 

  64. Clavareau J, Laeau PE (2009) Maintenance and replacement policies under technological obsolescence. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 94(2):370–381

    Google Scholar 

  65. Mercier S, Laneau PE (2004) Optimal replacement policy for a series system with obsolescence. Appl Stochastic Model Bus Indust 20:73–91

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  66. Huynh KT, Barros A, Berenguer C (2012) Maintenance decision-making for systems operating under indirect condition monitoring: value of online information and impact of measurement uncertainty. IEEE Trans Reliab 61(2):410–425

    Google Scholar 

  67. Hu J, Zhang L (2014) Risk based opportunistic maintenance model for complex mechanism systems. Expert Syst Appl 41(6):3105–3115

    Google Scholar 

  68. Houten FJAMV, Tomiyama T, Salomons OW (2009) Product modeling for model-based maintenance. Annals of the CIRP 47(1):123–128

    Google Scholar 

  69. Li Z, Liao H (2007) Simulation-based decision making for maintenance policy selection for complex systems. Automation and Logistic International Conference, Jinan, pp 29–30

    Google Scholar 

  70. Boschian V, Rezg N, Chelbi A (2009) Contribution of simulation to the optimization of maintenance strategies for a randomly failing production system. Eur J Oper Res 197:1142–1149

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  71. Kaegi M, Mock R, Kroger W (2009) Analyzing maintenance strategies by agent-based simulations: a feasibility study. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 94(9):1416–1421

    Google Scholar 

  72. Sarker R, Haque A (2000) Optimization of maintenance and spare provisioning policy using simulation. Appl Math Model 24:751–760

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  73. Kabir Z, Olayan SA (1996) Joint optimization of age based preventive replacement and continuous review spare provisioning policy. Eur J Oper Res 90:171–181

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  74. Mattila V, Virtanen K, Raivio T (2003) A simulation model for aircraft maintenance in an uncertain operational environment. European Simulation Multiconference Proceedings, Nottingham, pp 456–461

    Google Scholar 

  75. Takata S, Kimura F, Houten FJAM. Westkamper E. Maintenance: changing role in life cycle management. CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology 53 (2):643–655

  76. Krishnasamy L, Khan F, Haddara M (2005) Development of a risk-based maintenance (RBM) strategy for a power-generating plant. J Loss Prev Process Ind 18:69–81

    Google Scholar 

  77. Dingzhou C, Sun Y, Guo H. (2013) Optimizing maintenance policies based on discrete event simulation and the OCBA mechanism. In: Proceedings of Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, 28–31 Jan 2013, Orlando, Florida, p. 1–6

  78. Marseguerra M, Zio E (2000) Optimizing maintenance and repair policies via a combination of genetic algorithms and Monte Carlo simulation. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 68(1):69–83

    Google Scholar 

  79. Vineyard M, Amoako-Gyampah K, Meredith JR (2000) An evaluation of maintenance policies for flexible manufacturing systems. Int J Opera Prod Manag 20(4):409–426

    Google Scholar 

  80. Savsar M (2005) Performance analysis of an FMS operating under different failure rates and maintenance policies. Int J Flex Manuf Syst 16:229–249

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  81. Savsar M (2006) Effects of maintenance policies on the productivity of flexible manufacturing cells. Int J Manag Sci 34:274–282

    Google Scholar 

  82. Malamura E, Murata T (2012) Simulation based plant maintenance planning with multiple maintenance policy and evaluation of production process dependability. In: Proceedings of the International Multi Conference of Engineers and Computer Scientists. 14–16 March 2012. Hong Kong

  83. Azadeh A, Sheikhalishahi M, Firoozi M, Khalili SM (2013) An integrated multi-criteria Taguchi computer simulation-DEA approach for optimum maintenance policy and planning by incorporating learning effects. Int J Prod Res 51(18):5374–5385

    Google Scholar 

  84. Azadeh A, Sheikhalishahi M, Khalili SM, Firoozi M (2014) An integrated fuzzy simulation-fuzzy data envelopment analysis approach for optimum maintenance planning. Int J Comput Integr Manuf 27(2):181–199

    Google Scholar 

  85. Domshlak C, Hullermeier E, Kaci S, Prade H (2011) Preferences in AI—an overview. Artif Intell 175(7–8):1037–1052

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  86. Kobaccy KAH (2008) Artificial intelligence in maintenance. Springer Verlag, London

    Google Scholar 

  87. Mitchell M (1998) An introduction to genetic algorithm. MIT Press, United States of America

    Google Scholar 

  88. Martorell S, Villanueva JF, Carlos S, Nebot Y, Sanchez A, Pitarch JL, Serradell V (2005) RAMS + C informed decision-making with application to multi-objective optimization of technical specifications and maintenance using genetic algorithms. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 87(1):65–75

    Google Scholar 

  89. Morcous G, Lounis Z (2005) Maintenance optimization on infrastructure networks using genetic algorithms. Autom Constr 14(1):129–142

    Google Scholar 

  90. Ilgin MA, Tunali S (2007) Joint optimization of spare parts inventory and maintenance policies using genetic algorithms. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 34:594–604

    Google Scholar 

  91. Okasha NM, Frangopol DM (2009) Lifetime-oriented multi-objective optimization of structural maintenance considering system reliability, redundancy and life-cycle cost using GA. Struct Saf 31(6):460–474

    Google Scholar 

  92. Chung SH, Lau HCW, Ho GTS, Ip WH (2009) Optimization of system reliability in multi-factory production networks by maintenance approach. Expert Syst Appl 36(6):10188–10196

    Google Scholar 

  93. Heo JH, Park GP, Yoon YT, Park JK, Lee SS (2010) Optimal maintenance strategies for transmission systems using the genetic algorithm. Transmission and Distribution Conference Proceedings, New Orleans, pp 1–6

    Google Scholar 

  94. Martorell S, Villamizar M, Carlos S, Sanchez A (2010) Maintenance modeling and optimization integrating human and material resources. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 95(12):1293–1299

    Google Scholar 

  95. Charongrattanasakul P, Pongpullponsak A (2011) Minimizing the cost of integrated systems approach to process control and maintenance model by EWMA control chart using genetic algorithm. Expert Syst Appl 38:5178–5186

    Google Scholar 

  96. Marseguerra M, Zio E (2000) Optimizing maintenance and repair policies via a combination of genetic algorithms and Monte Carlo simulation. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 68(1):69–83

    Google Scholar 

  97. Villanueva JF, Sanchex AI, Carlos S, Martorell S (2008) Genetic algorithm-based optimization of testing and maintenance under uncertain unavailability and cost estimation: a survey of strategies for harmonizing evolution and accuracy. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 93(12):1830–1841

    Google Scholar 

  98. Mahadevan ML, Paul Robert T, Sridhar V (2010) Optimizing maintenance activities using HGA and Monte Carlo simulation. Int J Comput Appl 1(21):106–110

    Google Scholar 

  99. Waeyenbergh G, Pintelon L (2002) A framework for maintenance concept development. Int J Prod Econ 77(3):299–313

    Google Scholar 

  100. Waeyenbergh G, Pintelon L (2004) Maintenance concept development: a case study. Int J Prod Econ 89(3):398–405

    Google Scholar 

  101. Waeyenbergh G, Pintelon L (2009) CIBOCOF: a framework for industrial maintenance concept development. Int J Prod Econ 121(2):633–640

    Google Scholar 

  102. Carazsa FG, Souza GFM (2000) Risk-based decision making method for maintenance policy selection of thermal power plant equipment. Energy 35:964–975

    Google Scholar 

  103. Ding SH, Goh TT, Tan PS, Wee SC, Kamaruddin S (2012) Implementation of decision tree for maintenance policy decision making—a case study in semiconductor industry. Adv Mater Res 591–593:704–707

    Google Scholar 

  104. Bevilacqua M, Braglia M, Gabbrielli R (2000) Monte Carlo simulation approach for a modified FMECA in a power plant. Qual Reliab Eng Int 16:313–324

    Google Scholar 

  105. Tu PYL, Yam R, Tse P, Sun AOW (2001) An integrated maintenance management system for an advanced manufacturing company. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 17:692–703

    Google Scholar 

  106. Leon Hijes FCG, Cartagena JJR (2006) Maintenance strategy based on a multicriterion classification of equipments. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 91(4):444–451

    Google Scholar 

  107. Rosqvist T, Laakso K, Reunnanen M (2009) Value-driven maintenance planning for a production plant. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 94(1):97–110

    Google Scholar 

  108. Qingfeng W, Wenbin L, Xin Z, Jianfeng Y, Qingbin Y (2011) Development and application of equipment maintenance and safety integrity management system. J Loss Prev Process Ind 24(4):321–332

    Google Scholar 

  109. Li D, Gao J (2010) Study and application of reliability-centered maintenance considering radical maintenance. J Loss Prev Process Ind 23(5):622–629

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  110. Popovic VM, Vasic BM, Rakicevic BB, Vorotovic GS (2011) Optimisation of maintenance concept choice using risk factor-decision factor-a case study. International Journal of System Sciences 1–14

  111. Lv C, Xiong J, Ding Y, Zhou H (2013) A maintenance decision-making model based on risk evaluation. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Quality, Reliability, Risk, Maintenance and Safety Engineering. 15–18 July 2013, Chengdu, China, p. 684–688

  112. Braglia M, Frosolini M, Montanari R (2003) Fuzzy criticality assessment model for failure modes and effects analysis. Int J Qual Reliab Manag 20(4):503–524

    Google Scholar 

  113. Dong YL, Gu YJ, Dong XF (2008) Selection of optimum maintenance strategy for power plant equipment based on evidential reasoning and FMEA. IEEE International Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management Conference Proceedings, Singapore, pp 862–866

    Google Scholar 

  114. Guo L, Gao J, Yang J, Kang J (2009) Criticality evaluation of petrochemical equipment based on fuzzy comprehensive evaluation and a BP neural network. J Loss Prev Process Ind 22(4):469–476

    Google Scholar 

  115. Azedah A, Ebrahimipour V, Bavar P (2010) A fuzzy inference system for pump failure diagnosis to improve maintenance process: the case of a petrochemical industry. Experts Syst Appl 37(1):627–639

    Google Scholar 

  116. Sharma RK, Sharma P (2010) System failure behavior and maintenance decision making using RCA, FMEA and FM. J Qual Maint Eng 16(1):64–88

    Google Scholar 

  117. Braglia M, Frosolini M, Montanari R (2003) Fuzzy criticality assessment model for failure modes and effects analysis. Int J Qual Reliab Manag 20(4):503–524

    Google Scholar 

  118. Vinodh S, Varadharajan AR (2012) Application of fuzzy VIKOR for concept selection in agile environment. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 42:1025–1033

    Google Scholar 

  119. Karaarslan N, Gundogar E (2009) An application for modular capability-based ERP software selection using AHP method. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 42:1025–1033

    Google Scholar 

  120. Pohekar SD, Ramachandran M (2004) Application of multi-criteria decision making to sustainable energy planning—a review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 8(4):365–381

    Google Scholar 

  121. Dey PK (2004) Decision support system for inspection and maintenance: a case study of oil pipelines. IEEE Trans Eng Manag 51(1):47–56

    Google Scholar 

  122. Fazlollahtabar H, Yousefpoor N (2008) Selection of optimum maintenance strategies in a virtual learning environment based on analytic hierarchy process. Virtual Learning International Conference Proceeding, Constanţa, pp 143–152

    Google Scholar 

  123. Gassner S (2010) Deriving maintenance strategies for cooperative alliances-a value chain approach. Managing Operations in Service Economies International Conference Proceeding, Porto

    Google Scholar 

  124. Ratnayake RMC, Markeset T (2010) Technical integrity management: measuring HSE awareness using AHP in selecting a maintenance strategy. J Qual Maint Eng 16(1):44–63

    Google Scholar 

  125. Tan Z, Li J, Wu Z, Zheng J, He W (2011) An evaluation of maintenance strategy using risk based inspection. Saf Sci 49(6):852–860

    Google Scholar 

  126. Shyjith K, Ilangkumaran M, Kumanan S (2008) Multi-criteria decision-making approach to evaluate optimum maintenance strategy in textile industry. J Qual Maint Eng 14(4):375–386

    Google Scholar 

  127. Ding SH, Kamaruddin S, Azid IA (2014) Development of a model for optimal maintenance policy selection. Eur J Indust Eng 8(1):50–68

    Google Scholar 

  128. Ding SH, Kamaruddin S, Azid IA (2014) Maintenance policy selection model—a case study in the palm oil industry. J Manuf Technol Manag 25(3):415–435

    Google Scholar 

  129. Cheng YH, Tsao HL (2010) Rolling stock maintenance strategy selection, spares parts’ estimation and replacement interval calculation. Int J Prod Econ 128(1):404–412

    Google Scholar 

  130. Zaim S, Turkyilmaz A, Acar MF, Al-Turki U, Demirel OF (2012) Maintenance strategy selection using AHP and ANP algorithms: a case study. J Qual Maint Eng 18(1):16–29

    Google Scholar 

  131. Aghaie M, Fazli S (2012) An improved MCDM method for maintenance approach selection: a case study of auto industry. Manag Sci Lett 2(1):137–146

    Google Scholar 

  132. Kumar G, Maiti J (2012) Modeling risk based maintenance using fuzzy analytic network process. Experts Syst Appl 39(11):9946–9954

    Google Scholar 

  133. Rahimi M, Sadinejad S, Khalili-Damghani K (2014) Selecting the most appropriate maintenance strategies using fuzzy analytic network process: a case study of Saipa vehicle industry. Dec Sci Lett 3(2):237–242

    Google Scholar 

  134. Labib AW (2004) A decision analysis model for maintenance policy selection using a CMMS. J Qual Maint Eng 10(3):191–202

    Google Scholar 

  135. Bertolini M, Bevilacqua M (2006) A combined goal programming-AHP approach to maintenance selection problem. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 91(7):839–848

    Google Scholar 

  136. Ghosh D, Roy S (2010) A decision-making framework for process plant maintenance. Euro J Indust Eng 4(1):78–98

    Google Scholar 

  137. Pariazar M, Shahrabi J, Zaeri MS, Parhizi S (2008) A combined approach for maintenance strategy selection. J Appl Sci 8(23):4321–4329

    Google Scholar 

  138. Ilangkumaran M, Kumanan S (2009) Selection of maintenance policy for textile industry using hybrid multi-criteria decision making approach. J Manuf Technol Manag 20(7):1009–1022

    Google Scholar 

  139. Ahmadi A, Gupta S, Karim R, Kumar U (2010) Selection of maintenance strategy for aircraft systems using multi-criteria decision making methodologies. Int J Reliab Qual Saf Eng 17(3):223–243

    Google Scholar 

  140. Chen FL, Chen YC (2010) Evaluating the maintenance performance of the semiconductor factories based on the analytical hierarchy process and grey relational analysis. Am J Appl Sci 7(4):567–574

    Google Scholar 

  141. Fouladgar MM, Yazdani-Chamzini A, Lashgari A, Zavadskas EK, Turkis Z (2012) Maintenance strategy selection using AHP and COPRAS under fuzzy environment. Int J Strateg Prop Manag 16(1):85–104

    Google Scholar 

  142. Chan FTS, Prakash A (2012) Maintenance policy selection in manufacturing firms using the fuzzy MCDM approach. Int J Prod Res 50(23):7044–7056

    Google Scholar 

  143. Al-Najjar B, Alsyouf I (2003) Selecting the most efficient maintenance approach using fuzzy multiple criteria decision making. Int J Prod Econ 84(1):85–100

    Google Scholar 

  144. Jafari A, Jafarian M, Zareei A, Zaerpour F (2008) Using fuzzy Delphi method in maintenance strategy selection problem. J Uncert Syst 2(4):289–298

    Google Scholar 

  145. Li C, Xu M, Guo S (2007) ELECTRE III based on ranking fuzzy numbers for deterministic and fuzzy maintenance strategy decision problems. Automation and Logistic IEEE International Conference Proceedings, Jinan, pp 309–312

    Google Scholar 

  146. Mousavi SS, Nezami FG, Heydar M, Aryanejad MB (2009) A hybrid fuzzy group decision making and factor analysis for selecting maintenance strategy. Computers & Industrial Engineering International Conference Proceedings, Troyes, pp 1204–1209

    Google Scholar 

  147. Bashiri M, Badri H, Hejazi TH (2011) Selecting optimum maintenance strategy by fuzzy interactive linear assignment method. Appl Math Model 35(1):152–164

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  148. Kans M (2009) The advancement of maintenance information technology—a literature review. J Qual Maint Eng 15(1):5–16

    Google Scholar 

  149. Kumar R, Panesar SS, Markeset T (2009) Development of technical integrity management service. J Qual Maint Eng 15(3):271–284

    Google Scholar 

  150. Chung SH, Lau HCW, Ho GTS, Ip WH (2009) Optimization of system reliability in multi-factory production networks by maintenance approach. Expert Syst Appl 36(6):10188–10196

    Google Scholar 

  151. Utne IB (2010) Maintenance strategies for deep-sea offshore wind turbine. J Qual Maint Eng 16(4):367–381

    Google Scholar 

  152. Kenezevic J, Odoom ER (2001) Reliability modeling of repairable systems using Petri nets and fuzzy Lambda-Tau methodology. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 73(1):1–17

    Google Scholar 

  153. Sergaki A, Kalaitzakis K (2002) A fuzzy knowledge based method for maintenance planning in a power system. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 77(1):19–30

    Google Scholar 

  154. Louit DM, Pascual R, Jardine AKS (2009) A practical procedure for the selection of time-to-time models based on the assessment of trends in maintenance data. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 94(10):1618–1628

    Google Scholar 

  155. Spurgin AJ (2002) Impact of systematic data collection on training control room crews. Procedings of Human Factors and Power Plants, Scottsdale, pp 1–5

    Google Scholar 

  156. Loften H (1999) Management of industrial maintenance-economic evaluation of maintenance policies. Int J Opera Prod Manag 19(7):716–737

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shahrul Kamaruddin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ding, SH., Kamaruddin, S. Maintenance policy optimization—literature review and directions. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 76, 1263–1283 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-6341-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-6341-2

Keywords

Navigation