Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A capacity approach to territorial resilience: the case of European regions

  • Special Issue Paper
  • Published:
The Annals of Regional Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Regional resilience is a new paradigm to explain the local system ability to cope with a negative event, tolerating the effect produced by the perturbing action. The first objective of the paper is to analyze the complex concept of regional resilience, adopting a systemic and holistic approach. Using a multidimensional methodology, regional resilience is described by outcome and driver variables, with focus on sustainability of local systems, broken down into the three pillars of economy, society and environment, whereby the holistic approach means that each dimension of territorial sustainable development is partly determined by its relations with the other dimensions. The second aim of the paper is then to test the relations between determinants and outcome of regional resilience. This framework is different compared to previous empirical studies, which primarily focus on economic performance in terms of income or employment dynamics. The model is applied to the case of European regions, to get a map of regional resilience in its different dimensions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. “The high resilience allows tests of those novel combinations because the system-wide costs of failure are low. The result is the condition needed for creative experimentation” (Holling 2001).

  2. Regional Studies recently dedicated a themed issue right at the “resilience revisited” (Bailey and Turok 2016), where different authors analyze the resilience processes following this approach in different English, Turkish, Canadian, Australian and European regions.

  3. The World Bank developed a composite indicator of people’s preparation for risk at country level which comprises measures of assets across four components of socio-economic systems: human capital, physical and financial assets, social support, State support (World Bank 2014).

  4. These regions belongs to 21 European countries, that do not include Bulgarian, Cypriot, Croatian, Lithuanian, Latvian, Maltese, Norwegian, Rumanian regions and the French islands, for the presence of too many missing values.

  5. The Cliff and Ord model is described by two equations: \(Y={\lambda }WY+X\beta +u\) and \(u={\rho }Wu+\varepsilon \), where \(\varepsilon \) is assumed to be independent and identically distributed or independent but heteroscedastically distributed, and the heteroscedasticity is of unknown form. In the right member of the first equation among the regressors, a variable of spatial lag is inserted. It is defined pre-multiplying the variable to regress (Y) with the spatial-weighting matrix (W). This endogenous variable (WY) is the weighted average of the dependent variable values observed in other statistical units. By means of the second equation, the model takes into account also that the error terms (u) are generated by a spatial autoregressive process. These two equations estimate simultaneously the values of each statistical unit. Consequently, the values of the dependent variable are not independent from each other. The W matrix is constructed as a matrix of contiguity, considering the geographical proximity of the European regions, and weighing the proximity with the geographical coordinates of the centroid of each region. The parameter \({\lambda }\) measures the intensity of spatial interactions and spillovers effects. The parameter measures the spatial autocorrelation of the error term. The parameter \({\beta }\) takes into account that in the dependent variables the values of each region are determined simultaneously from each other (Drukker et al. 2013).

  6. This estimator is consistent and robust when the error term is heteroscedastically distributed.

  7. The environmental resilience cannot be taken under consideration because of missing data. This causes the reduction in the number of European regions considered.

References

  • Adger NW (2000) Social and ecological resilience: are they related? Prog Hum Geogr 24(3):347–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aiginger K, Bärenthaler-Sieber S, Vogel J (2013) Competitiveness under new perspectives. WWWforEurope working paper, 44

  • Annoni P, Kozovska K (2010) EU regional competitiveness index. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey D, Turok I (2016) Editorial. Resilience revisited. Reg Stud 50:557–560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker S, Mehmooda A (2015) Social innovation and the governance of sustainable places. Local Environ 20(3):321–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benke M, Czimre K, Forray K, Kozma T, Márton S, Teperics K (2016) Learning regions for resilience in Hungary and opportunities. Working paper February 2016. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.2437.4809

  • Blackburn S, Cassidy J (2012) Making cities resilient report 2012 my city is getting ready!. A global snapshot of how local governments reduce disaster risk, United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaikie P, Cannon T, Davis I, Wisner B (2004) At risk: natural hazards, people’s vulnerability and disasters. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Boschma R (2004) Competitiveness of regions from an evolutionary perspective. Reg Stud 38:1001–1014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boschma R (2015) Towards an evolutionary perspective on regional resilience. Reg Stud 49:733–751

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briguglio L, Cordina G, Farrugia N, Vella S (2009) Economic vulnerability and resilience concepts and measurements. Oxf Dev Stud 37(3):229–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camagni R, Capello R (2013) Regional competitiveness and territorial capital: a conceptual approach and empirical evidence from the European Union. Reg Stud 47(9):1383–1402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter S, Walker B, Anderies M, Abel NA (2001) From metaphor to measurement: resilience of what to what? Ecosystems 4:765–781

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapple K, Lester B (2007) Emerging patterns of regional resilience. Working paper 2007–13 for the building resilient regions network. University of California, Berkeley

  • Chatterjee S, Hadi AS (2006) Regression analysis be examples. Wiley, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cliff AD, Ord JK (1973) Spatial autocorrelation. Pion, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Cliff AD, Ord JK (1981) Spatial processes: models and applications. Pion, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Costanza R, Graumlich L, Steffen W, Crumley C, Dearing J, Hibbard K, Leemans R, Redman C, Schimel D (2007) Sustainability or to collapse: what can we learn from integrating the history of humans and the rest of nature? AMBIO J Hum Environ 36(7):522–527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crescenzi R, Luca D, Milio S (2016) The geography of the economic crisis in Europe: national macroeconomic conditions, regional structural factors and short-term economic performance. Camb J Reg Econ Soc 9(1):13–32. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsv031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cuadrado-Roura JR, Maroto A (2016) Unbalanced regional resilience to the economic crisis in Spain: a tale of specialisation and productivity. Camb J Reg Econ Soc 9:153–178. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsv034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cutter SL, Finch C (2007) Temporal and spatial changes in social vulnerability to natural hazards. Proc Nat Acad Sci 105(7):2301–2306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dallara A (2008) Un metodo per la descrizione quantitativa dei sistemi locali. In: Bellini N, Calafati A (eds) Internazionalizzazione e sviluppo regionale. Franco Angeli, Milano, pp 137–169

    Google Scholar 

  • Dallara A, Rizzi P (2012) A geographic map of sustainability in the Italian local systems. Reg Stud 46:321–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta P, Mäler KG (2003) The economics of non-convex ecosystems: introduction. Environ Resour Econ 26(4):499–525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Caro P (2015) Testing and explaining economic resilience with an application to Italian regions. Pap Reg Sci 96(1):93–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dow GK, Juster FT (1985) Goods, time, and well-being: the joint dependence problem. In: Juster FT, Stafford FP (eds) Time goods, and well-being. Institute for Social Research, Ann Arbor, pp 397–413

    Google Scholar 

  • Drukker DM, Prucha IR, Raciborski R (2013) Maximum likelihood and generalized spatial two-stage least-squares estimators for a spatial-autoregressive model with spatial-autoregressive disturbances. Stata J 13(2):221–241

    Google Scholar 

  • Eraydin A, Tasan-Kok T (2013) Resilience thinking in Urban planning. Springer, Netherlands

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ESPON (2014) Territorial dynamics in Europe economic crisis and the resilience of regions. Territorial observation no. 12. Luxembourg

  • Federal Emergency Management Agency (1998) Introduction to mitigation. IS 393, Emmitsburg, Maryland

  • Florida R (2002) The rise of the creative class: and how it’s transforming work, leisure, community and everyday life. NY Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Folke C (2006) Resilience: the emergence of a perspective for social-ecological systems analyses. Glob Environ Change 16(3):253–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folke C, Carpenter S, Walker B, Scheffer M, Elmqvist T, Gunderson L, Holling CS (2004) Regime shifts, resilience, and biodiversity in ecosystem management. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 35:557–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foster KA (2007) A case study approach to understanding regional resilience. Working paper 2007–08, Institute of Urban and Regional Development, Berkeley

  • Foster K (2012) In search of regional resilience. In: Weir M, Wial H, Wolman H (eds) Building regional resilience: urban and regional policy and its effects, vol 4. Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC

  • Giannakis E, Bruggeman A (2015) Economic crisis and regional resilience: evidence from Greece. Pap Reg Sci. https://doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12206

    Google Scholar 

  • Giannakis E, Bruggeman A (2017) Determinants of regional resilience to economic crisis: a European perspective. Eur Plan Stud 25(8):1394–1415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glatron S, Beck E (2008) Evaluation of socio-spatial vulnerability of citydwellers and analysis of risk perception: industrial and seismic risks in Mulhouse. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 8(5):1029–1040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graziano P (2014) Rischio, vulnerabilità e resilienza territoriale: il caso delle province italiane. In: Mazzola F, Musolino D, Provenzano V (eds) Reti, nuovi settori e sostenibilità. Prospettive per l’analisi e le politiche regionali, Franco Angeli, Milano, pp 243–270

    Google Scholar 

  • Graziano P, Rizzi P (2016) Vulnerability and resilience in the local systems: the case of italian provinces. Sci Total Environ 553:211–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunderson LH, Holling CS, Light SS (eds) (1995) Barriers and bridges to the renewal of ecosystems and institutions. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Holling CS (1973) Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 4:1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holling CS (2001) Understanding the complexity of economic, ecological and social systems. Ecosystems 4:390–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hudec O, Reggiani A, Šiserová M (2016) Resilience capacity and vulnerability: the case of Slovakia. http://www-sre.wu.ac.at/ersa/ersaconfs/ersa16/Paper86_MonikaSiserova.pdf

  • Huggins R, Thompson P (2012) Well-being and competitiveness: are the two linked at a place-based level? Camb J Reg Econ Soc 5:45–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2001) Climate change: impacts adaptation and vulnerability. University of Cambridge, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Jakobsen K (2013) Livelihood asset maps: a multidimensional approach to measuring risk-management capacity and adaptation policy targeting–a case study in Bhutan. Reg Environ Change 13(2):219–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jolliffe IT (2002) Principal component analysis. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaly UL, Pratt CR, Mitchell J (2004) The demonstration environmental vulnerability index. South Pacific applied geoscience commission technical

  • Kitson M, Martin R, Tyler P (2004) Regional competitiveness: an elusive yet key concept? Reg Stud 38:991–999

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lagravinese R (2015) Economic crisis and rising gaps North-South: evidence from the Italian regions. Camb J Reg Econ Soc 8:331–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LeSage J (1999) The theory and practice of spatial econometrics. University of Toledo, Toledo, Department of Economics

    Google Scholar 

  • LeSage J, Pace RK (2009) Introduction to spatial econometrics. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Liou FM, Ding CG (2004) Positioning the non-least developed developing countries based on vulnerability-related indicators. J Int Dev 16(6):751–767

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lung T, Lavalle C, Hiederer R, Dosio A, Bouwer LM (2013) A multi-hazard regional level impact assessment for Europe combining indicators of climatic and non-climatic change. Glob Environ Change 23:522–536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malecki EJ (2012) Regional social capital: why it matters. Reg Stud 46(8):1023–1039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin R (2012) Regional economic resilience, hysteresis and recessionary shocks. J Econ Geogr 12(1):1–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin R (2016) How regions reavt to recessions: resilience and the role of economic structure. Reg Stud 50:561–585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin R, Sunley P (2007) Complexity thinking and evolutionary economic geography. J Econ Geogr 7(5):573–601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin R, Sunley P (2015) On the notion of regional economic resilience: conceptualisation and explanation. J Econ Geogr 15(1):1–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masik G (2016) Economic resilience: the case of Poland and certain European regions. Geogr Pol 89(4):457–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan K (2007) The learning region: institutions, innovation and regional renewal. Reg Stud 41:147–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naudé W, McGillivray M, Rossouw S (2009) Measuring the vulnerability of subnational regions in South Africa. Oxf Dev Stud 37(3):249–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odum E (1985) Trends expected in stressed ecosystems. Bioscience 35(7):419–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2016) Resilient cities (preliminary version). OECD Publishing, Paris. http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy/resilient-cities-report-preliminary-version.pdf

  • OECD (2014) OECD regional outlook 2014: regions and cities: where policies and people meet. OECD Publishing, Paris. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264201415-en

  • Paton D (2001) Responding to hazard effects: promoting resilience and adjustment adoption. Aust J Emerg Manag 16(1):47–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Pendall R, Foster KA, Cowell M (2010) Resilience and regions: building understanding of the metaphor. Camb J Reg Econ Soc 3(1):71–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam R, Leonardi R, Nanetti RY (1993) Making democracy work. Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton University Press, Princeton

  • Rajib S (2009) City profile: climate and disaster resilience United Nations University (UNU), Citynet (CITYNET), United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction—Hyogo Liaison Office (UNISDR Hyogo), Asia Regional Task Force on Urban Risk Reduction (RTF-URR)

  • Resilience Alliance (2007) Assessing resilience in social-ecological systems. A workbook for scientists version 1.1, draft for testing and evaluation

  • Rizzi P, Graziano P, Dallara A (2015) The regional competitiveness: an alternative approach. Riv Int Sci Soc 3:307–366

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneiderbauer S, Pedoth L, Zhang D, Zebisch M (2013) Assessing adaptive capacity within regional climate change vulnerability studies–an Alpine example. Nat Hazards 67(3):1059–1073

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sensier M, Bristow G, Healy A (2016) Measuring regional economic resilience across Europe: operationalizing a complex concept. Spat Econ Anal 11(2):128–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simmie J, Martin R (2010) The economic resilience of regions: towards an evolutionary approach. Camb J Reg Econ Soc 3(1):27–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sotarauta M (2005) Tales of resilience from two Finnish cities: self-renewal capacity at the heart of strategic adaptation. In: Duke C, Osborne M, Wilson B (eds) Rebalancing the social and economic learning, partnership and place. Niace, Leicester

    Google Scholar 

  • Tian Y, Jim C, Wang H (2014) Assessing the landscape and ecological quality of urban green spaces in a compact city. Landsc Urban Plan 121:97–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tran L, O’Neill RV, Smith ER (2010) Spatial pattern of environmental vulnerability in the Mid-Atlantic region. USA. Appl Geogr 30(2):191–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turcu C, Karadimitriou N, Chaytor S (2015) The impact of the global financial and economic crisis on European cities. UCL briefing for policy-makers, UCL public policy. www.ucl.ac.uk/public-policy/public-policybriefings/Crisis_briefing

  • Tyrvainen L, Makinen K, Schipperijn J (2007) Tools for mapping social values of urban woodlands and other green areas. Landsc Urban Plan 79:5–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Commission on Sustainable Development (2001) Report of the commission on sustainable development. Supplement no. 19 (A/56/19), United Nations, New York

  • UNDP (2014) Human development report, (2014) Sustaining human progress: reducing vulnerabilities and building resilience. Communications Development Incorporated, Washington, DC

  • UNISDR (2016) The Hyogo framework for action 2005–2015: building the resilience of nations and communities to disasters. European Forum for Disaster Risk Reduction, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • Vazquez-Barquero A (2002) Endogenous development. Routledge, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Vale LJ, Campanella TJ (2005) The resilient city. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker B, Holling CS, Carpenter SR, Kinzig A (2004) Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social-ecological systems. Ecol Soc 9(2):5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2014) World development report 2014: risk and opportunity-managing risk for development. Washington

  • Young O, Berkhout F, Gallopin G, Janssen MA, Ostrom E, van der Leeuw S (2006) The globalization of socio-ecological systems: an agenda for scientific research. Glob Environ Change 16:304–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman MA, Arunkumar R (1994) Resiliency research: implications for schools and policy. Soc Policy Rep 8(4):1–17

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paolo Rizzi.

Appendix

Appendix

See Tables 9 and 10.

Table 9 The selected variables of resilience in European Regions
Table 10 Economic, social, environmental Resilience Drivers Composite Indicator (rank)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rizzi, P., Graziano, P. & Dallara, A. A capacity approach to territorial resilience: the case of European regions. Ann Reg Sci 60, 285–328 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-017-0854-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-017-0854-1

JEL Classification

Navigation