Skip to main content
Log in

Absorbable suture anchor and knotless anchor techniques produced similar outcomes in arthroscopic anterior talofibular ligament repair

  • ANKLE
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study is to compare absorbable suture anchor with knotless anchor techniques for arthroscopic anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL) repair.

Method

A multicenter retrospective study was performed with 185 patients, who had undergone an arthroscopic ATFL repair procedure using absorbable suture anchor or knotless anchor between May 2017 and October 2019. The follow-up time was a minimum of 18 months. Karlsson–Peterson score, visual analogue scale (VAS), and Cumberland ankle instability tool (CAIT) were evaluated. The complications were also recorded.

Results

One hundred and seven patients underwent one absorbable suture anchor repair procedure (Group A [A]), and the other seventy-eight patients underwent one knotless anchor repair procedure (Group B [B]). At the final follow-up, both Karlsson–Peterson score (A, pre 61.0 ± 8.0 vs post 93.5 ± 5.3, P < 0.001; B, pre 59.5 ± 8.2 vs post 92.4 ± 6.3, P < 0.001), VAS score (A, pre 5.0 ± 1.3 vs post 0.5 ± 0.7, P < 0.001; B, pre 5.5 ± 1.2 vs post 0.9 ± 1.0, P < 0.001), and CAIT score (A, pre 53.1 ± 12.0 vs post 93.1 ± 6.6, P < 0.001; B, pre 51.6 ± 12.0 vs post 93.1 ± 6.5, P < 0.001) improved significantly in both groups. There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding the Karlsson–Peterson score (A, pre 61.0 ± 8.0 vs B, pre 59.5 ± 8.2, n.s; A, post 93.5 ± 5.3 vs B, post 92.4 ± 6.3, n.s), CAIT score (A, pre 53.1 ± 12.0 vs B, pre 51.6 ± 12.0, n.s; A, post 93.1 ± 6.6 vs B, post 93.1 ± 6.5, n.s) and the change ranges of VAS (A, 4.5 ± 1.0 vs B, 4.6 ± 1.2, n.s). Anchor complications were easier to occur in Group B (0/107 vs 6/78, P = 0.007). Knot irritation slightly increased in Group A (10/107 vs 0/78, P = 0.006). No significant difference was found regarding total complication rates (A, 10/107 vs B, 6/78, n.s).

Conclusion

Absorbable suture anchor and knotless anchor for arthroscopic ATFL repair produced similar clinical outcomes. The ankle stability scores increased significantly in both groups. However, the knotless anchor has a higher risk to loosen, deviated direction or break, while the absorbable suture anchor still has a slim chance of knot irritation.

Level of evidence

III.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Acevedo JI, Mangone P (2015) Arthroscopic Brostrom technique. Foot Ankle Int 36(4):465–473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Acevedo JI, Ortiz C, Golano P, Nery C (2015) ArthroBroström lateral ankle stabilization technique: an anatomic study. Am J Sports Med 43(10):2564–2571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Barber FA, Herbert MA, Crates JM (2013) A comparison of lateral ankle ligament suture anchor strength. Foot Ankle Surg 19(2):108–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Burkhart SS (2000) A stepwise approach to arthroscopic rotator cuff repair based on biomechanical principles. Arthroscopy 16(1):82–90

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen J, Sharma A (2020) Clinical safety and efficacy of a novel ultrasound-assisted bioabsorbable suture anchor in foot and ankle surgeries. Foot Ankle Int 41(9):1073–1078

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Corte-Real NM, Moreira RM (2009) Arthroscopic repair of chronic lateral ankle instability. Foot Ankle Int 30(3):213–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cottom JM, Rigby RB (2013) The “all inside” arthroscopic Broström procedure: a prospective study of 40 consecutive patients. J Foot Ankle Surg 52(5):568–574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Denard PJ, Adams CR, Fischer NC, Piepenbrink M, Wijdicks CA (2018) Knotless fixation is stronger and less variable than knotted constructs in securing a suture loop. Orthop J Sports Med 6(5):2325967118774000

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Feng SM, Maffulli N (2021) All-inside arthroscopic modified Broström-Gould procedure for chronic lateral ankle instability with and without anterior talofibular ligament remnant repair produced similar functional results. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 29(8):2453–2461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Guelfi M, Zamperetti M, Pantalone A, Usuelli FG, Salini V, Oliva XM (2018) Open and arthroscopic lateral ligament repair for treatment of chronic ankle instability: a systematic review. Foot Ankle Surg 24(1):11–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hawkins RB (1987) Arthroscopic stapling repair for chronic lateral instability. Clin Podiatr Med Surg 4(4):875–883

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hess A, Caborn D, Rehak D, Harner CD, Fu FH (1991) Surgical treatment of chronic lateral ankle instability using the Mitek suture anchor system. Pittsburgh Orthop J 2:54–59

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kanzaki N, Chinzei N, Yamashita T, Kumai T, Kuroda R (2020) A Novel technique of arthroscopic ankle lateral ligament repair using a knotless suture anchor. Orthop J Sports Med 8(11):2325967120962079

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kim ES, Lee KT, Park JS, Lee YK (2011) Arthroscopic anterior talofibular ligament repair for chronic ankle instability with a suture anchor technique. Orthopedics. https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20110228-03

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kim SH, Yang SH, Rhee SM, Lee KJ, Kim HS, Oh JH (2019) The formation of perianchor fluid associated with various suture anchors used in rotator cuff repair: all-suture, polyetheretherketone, and biocomposite anchors. Bone Jt J 101(12):1506–1511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Li H, Hua Y, Li H, Ma K, Li S, Chen S (2017) Activity level and function 2 years after anterior talofibular ligament repair: a comparison between arthroscopic repair and open repair procedures. Am J Sports Med 45(9):2044–2051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Li H, Xu H, Hua Y, Chen W, Li H, Chen S (2020) anatomic knot suture anchor versus knotless suture anchor technique for anterior talofibular ligament repair: a biomechanical comparison. Orthop J Sports Med 8(1):2325967119898125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Li H, Zhao Y, Hua Y, Li Q, Li H, Chen S (2020) Knotless anchor repair produced similarly favourable outcomes as knot anchor repair for anterior talofibular ligament repair. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 28(12):3987–3993

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lo IK, Burkhart SS, Chan KC, Athanasiou K (2004) Arthroscopic knots: determining the optimal balance of loop security and knot security. Arthroscopy 20(5):489–502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Maffulli N, Del Buono A, Maffulli GD, Oliva F, Testa V, Capasso G et al (2013) Isolated anterior talofibular ligament Broström repair for chronic lateral ankle instability: 9-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med 41(4):858–864

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Matsui K, Takao M, Miyamoto W, Innami K, Matsushita T (2014) Arthroscopic Broström repair with Gould augmentation via an accessory anterolateral port for lateral instability of the ankle. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 134(10):1461–1467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Mederake M, Hofmann UK, Ipach I (2021) Arthroscopic modified Broström operation versus open reconstruction with local periosteal flap in chronic ankle instability. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-021-03949-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Messer TM, Cummins CA, Ahn J, Kelikian AS (2000) Outcome of the modified Broström procedure for chronic lateral ankle instability using suture anchors. Foot Ankle Int 21(12):996–1003

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Paden MH, Stone PA, McGarry JJ (1994) Modified Brostrom lateral ankle stabilization utilizing an implantable anchoring system. J Foot Ankle Surg 33(6):617–622

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Pellegrini MJ, Sevillano J, Ortiz C, Giza E, Carcuro G (2019) Knotless modified arthroscopic-Broström technique for ankle instability. Foot Ankle Int 40(4):475–483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Pereira H, Vuurberg G, Gomes N, Oliveira JM, Ripoll PL, Reis RL et al (2016) Arthroscopic repair of ankle instability with all-soft knotless anchors. Arthrosc Tech 5(1):e99–e107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Qin J, Fu Q, Zhou Q, Wu H, Zhi X (2021) Fully intra-articular lasso-loop stitch technique for arthroscopic anterior talofibular ligament repair. Foot Ankle Int. https://doi.org/10.1177/10711007211044442

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Rhee YG, Cho NS, Parke CS (2012) Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair using modified Mason-Allen medial row stitch: knotless versus knot-tying suture bridge technique. Am J Sports Med 40(11):2440–2447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Rigby RB, Cottom JM (2019) A comparison of the “All-Inside” arthroscopic Broström procedure with the traditional open modified Broström-Gould technique: a review of 62 patients. Foot Ankle Surg 25(1):31–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Takao M, Matsui K, Stone JW, Glazebrook MA, Kennedy JG, Guillo S et al (2016) Arthroscopic anterior talofibular ligament repair for lateral instability of the ankle. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 24(4):1003–1006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Vaishnav S, Millett PJ (2010) Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: scientific rationale, surgical technique, and early clinical and functional results of a knotless self-reinforcing double-row rotator cuff repair system. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 19(2 Suppl):83–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Vega J, Malagelada F, Dalmau-Pastor M (2020) Arthroscopic all-inside ATFL and CFL repair is feasible and provides excellent results in patients with chronic ankle instability. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 28(1):116–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Vega J, Golanó P, Pellegrino A, Rabat E, Peña F (2013) All-inside arthroscopic lateral collateral ligament repair for ankle instability with a knotless suture anchor technique. Foot Ankle Int 34(12):1701–1709

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Vega J, Allmendinger J, Malagelada F, Guelfi M, Dalmau-Pastor M (2020) Combined arthroscopic all-inside repair of lateral and medial ankle ligaments is an effective treatment for rotational ankle instability. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 28(1):132–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Vega J, Montesinos E, Malagelada F, Baduell A, Guelfi M, Dalmau-Pastor M (2020) Arthroscopic all-inside anterior talo-fibular ligament repair with suture augmentation gives excellent results in case of poor ligament tissue remnant quality. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 28(1):100–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Wang J, Hua Y, Chen S, Li H, Zhang J, Li Y (2014) Arthroscopic repair of lateral ankle ligament complex by suture anchor. Arthroscopy 30(6):766–773

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Yeo ED, Park SB, Lee SW, Cho WJ, Kim HK, Cheon SH et al (2021) Knotless all-inside arthroscopic modified Broström procedure for lateral ankle instability. J Foot Ankle Surg 60(3):541–547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Zeng G, Hu X, Liu W, Qiu X, Yang T, Li C et al (2019) Open Broström-gould repair vs arthroscopic anatomical repair of the anterior talofibular ligament for chronic lateral ankle instability. Foot Ankle Int 41(1):44–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Zhi X, Lv Z, Zhang C, Kong C, Wei S, Xu F (2020) Does arthroscopic repair show superiority over open repair of lateral ankle ligament for chronic lateral ankle instability: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res 15(1):355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Zhou YF, Zhang ZZ, Zhang HZ, Li WP, Shen HY, Song B (2021) All-inside arthroscopic modified Broström technique to repair anterior talofibular ligament provides a similar outcome compared with open Broström-gould procedure. Arthroscopy 37(1):268–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to express gratitude to John Valerius, an English native speaker, for taking the time to revise our paper.

Funding

This research was partially supported by the Yuying Program of General Hospital of PLA Central Theater Command (ZZYFH202109).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

XZ: manuscript preparation and literature research. YZ: Data review and follow-up assessment of the medical Center 2. WL: Data collection and follow-up assessment of the medical Center 3. YW: Data collection and follow-up assessment of the medical Center 2. YZ: Data review and follow-up assessment of the medical Center 3. LL: Data analysis and statistical analysis. CK: Data review and follow-up assessment of the medical Center 1. DX: Data collection and follow-up assessment of the medical Center 1. YZ: Designed study and manuscript review. SW: Designed study and manuscript revise.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yongzhan Zhu or Shijun Wei.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

The study was approved by the institutional ethical committee of General Hospital of PLA Central Theater Command. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Written consent was obtained from all participants.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhi, X., Zhang, Y., Li, W. et al. Absorbable suture anchor and knotless anchor techniques produced similar outcomes in arthroscopic anterior talofibular ligament repair. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 30, 2158–2165 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-021-06855-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-021-06855-7

Keywords

Navigation