Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Improved epiphyseal socket placement with intraoperative 3D fluoroscopy: a consecutive series of pediatric all-epiphyseal anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

  • KNEE
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Purpose

Disturbance of the growth plate during all-epiphyseal anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) socket placement is possible due to the undulation of the distal femoral physis and proximal tibial physis. Therefore, it is important to obtain intraoperative imaging of the guide wire prior to reaming the socket. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of the use of 3D intraoperative fluoroscopy on socket placement in patients undergoing all-epiphyseal ACLR. It was hypothesized that 3D imaging would allow for more accurate intraoperative visualization of the growth plate and hence a lower incidence of growth plate violation compared to 2D imaging.

Methods

Patients under the age of 18 who underwent a primary all-epiphyseal ACL reconstruction by the senior authors and had an available postoperative MRI were retrospectively reviewed. Demographic data, surgical details, and the distances between the femoral socket and distal femoral physis (DFP) and tibial socket and proximal tibial physis (PTP) were recorded. Patients were split into two groups based on type of intraoperative fluoroscopy used: a 2D group and a 3D group. Interrater reliability of radiographic measurements was evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).

Results

Seventy-two patients fit the inclusion criteria and were retrospectively reviewed. 54 patients had 2D imaging and 18 patients had 3D imaging. The mean age at time of surgery was 12.3 ± 1.5 years, 79% of patients were male, and 54% tore their left ACL. The mean time from surgery to postoperative MRI was 2.0 ± 1.1 years. The ICC was 0.92 (95% CI 0.35–0.98), indicating almost perfect interrater reliability. The mean difference in distance between the tibial socket and the PTP was significantly less in the 2D imaging group than the 3D imaging group (1.2 ± 1.7 mm vs 2.5 ± 2.2 mm, p = 0.03). The femoral and tibial sockets touched or extended beyond the DFP or PTP, respectively, significantly less in the 3D group than in the 2D group (11% vs 43%, p < 0.000, 17% vs 65%, p < 0.000).

Conclusion

There was a significantly increased distance from the PTP and decreased incidence of DFP violation with use of 3D intraoperative imaging for all-epiphyseal ACLR socket placement. Surgeons should consider utilizing 3D imaging prior to creating femoral and tibial sockets to potentially decrease the risk of physis violation in these patients.

Level of evidence

III.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anderson AF (2003) Transepiphyseal replacement of the anterior cruciate ligament using quadruple hamstring grafts in skeletally immature patients surgical technique. J Bone Jt Surg Am 85:1255–1263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Anderson AF (2004) Transepiphyseal replacement of the anterior cruciate ligament using quadruple hamstring grafts in skeletally immature patients. J Bone Jt Surg Am 86(1):201–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Beisemann N, Keil H, Swartman B, Schnetzke M, Franke J, Grützner PA, Vetter SY (2019) Intraoperative 3D imaging leads to substantial revision rate in management of tibial plateau fractures in 559 cases. J Orthop Surg Res 14:236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Calvo R, Figueroa D, Gili F, Vaisman A, Mocoçain P, Espinosa M, León A, Arellano S (2015) Transphyseal anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in patients with open physes: 10-year follow-up study. Am J Sports Med 43:289–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cordasco FA, Mayer SW, Green DW (2017) All-inside, all-epiphyseal anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in skeletally immature athletes: return to sport, incidence of second surgery, and 2-year clinical outcomes. Am J Sports Med 45:856–863

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cruz AI, Fabricant PD, McGraw M, Rozell JC, Ganley TJ, Wells L (2017) All-epiphyseal ACL reconstruction in children. J Pediatr Orthop 37:204–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. DeFrancesco CJ, Striano BM, Bram JT, Baldwin KD, Ganley TJ (2020) An in-depth analysis of graft rupture and contralateral anterior cruciate ligament rupture rates after pediatric anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 48:2395–2400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dekker TJ, Godin JA, Dale KM, Garrett WE, Taylor DC, Riboh JC (2017) Return to sport after pediatric anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and its effect on subsequent anterior cruciate ligament injury. J Bone Jt Surg Am 99:897–904

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dimeglio A (2001) Growth in pediatric orthopaedics. J Pediatr Orthop 21:549–555

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Dodwell ER, Lamont LE, Green DW, Pan TJ, Marx RG, Lyman S (2014) 20 years of pediatric anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in New York state. Am J Sports Med 42(3):675–680

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Geerling J, Kendoff D, Citak M, Zech S, Gardner MJ, Hüfner T, Krettek C, Richter M (2009) Intraoperative 3D imaging in calcaneal fracture care—clinical implications and decision making. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 66:768–773

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gupta A, Tejpal T, Shanmugaraj A, Horner NS, Gohal C, Khan M (2020) All-epiphyseal anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction produces good functional outcomes and low complication rates in pediatric patients: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sport Traumatol Arthrosc 28:2444–2452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Guzzanti V, Falciglia F, Gigante A, Fabbriciani C (1994) The effect of intra-articular ACL reconstruction on the growth plates of rabbits. J Bone Jt Surg Br 76:960–963

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ho B, Edmonds EW, Chambers HG, Bastrom TP, Pennock AT (2018) Risk factors for early ACL reconstruction failure in pediatric and adolescent patients. J Pediatr Orthop 38:388–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hüfner T, Stübig T, Citak M, Gösling T, Krettek C, Kendoff D (2009) Utility of intraoperative three-dimensional imaging at the hip and knee joints with and without navigation. J Bone Jt Surg Am 91:33–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kercher J, Xerogeanes J, Tannenbaum A, Al-Hakim R, Black JC, Zhao J (2009) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the skeletally immature. J Pediatr Orthop 29:124–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Koch PP, Fucentese SF, Blatter SC (2016) Complications after epiphyseal reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament in prepubescent children. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 24:2736–2740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kocher MS (2005) Physeal sparing reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament in skeletally immature prepubescent children and adolescents. J Bone Jt Surg Am 87:2371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kocher MS, Heyworth BE, Fabricant PD, Tepolt FA, Micheli LJ (2018) Outcomes of physeal-sparing ACL reconstruction with iliotibial band autograft in skeletally immature prepubescent children. J Bone Jt Surg Am 100:1087–1094

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ladenhauf HN, Jones KJ, Potter HG, Nguyen JT, Green DW (2020) Understanding the undulating pattern of the distal femoral growth plate: implications for surgical procedures involving the pediatric knee: a descriptive MRI study. Knee 27:315–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Larson CM, Heikes CS, Ellingson CI, Wulf CA, Giveans MR, Stone RM, Bedi A (2016) Allograft and autograft transphyseal anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in skeletally immature patients: outcomes and complications. Arthroscopy 32(5):860–867

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lawrence JTR, West RL, Garrett WE (2011) Growth disturbance following ACL reconstruction with use of an epiphyseal femoral tunnel. J Bone Jt Surg Am 93:39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lawrence TJR, Bowers AL, Belding J, Cody SR, Ganley TJ (2010) All-epiphyseal anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in skeletally immature patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468:1971–1977

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Leyes-Vence M, Roca-Sanchez T, Flores-Lozano C, Villarreal-Villareal G (2019) All-inside partial epiphyseal anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction plus an associated modified lemaire procedure sutured to the femoral button. Arthrosc Tech 8:e473–e480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Makela EA, Vainionpaa S, Vihtonen K, Mero M, Rokkanen P (1988) The effect of trauma to the lower femoral epiphyseal plate. An expermimental study in rabbits. J Bone Jt Surg Br 70(2):187–191

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Malham GM, Wells-Quinn T (2019) What should my hospital buy next?—Guidelines for the acquisition and application of imaging, navigation, and robotics for spine surgery. J Spine Surg 5:155–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. McCarthy MM, Graziano J, Green DW, Cordasco FA (2012) All-epiphyseal, all-inside anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction technique for skeletally immature patients. Arthrosc Tech 1:e231–e239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Mencio GA, Swiontkowski MF (2015) Green’s skeletal trauma in children. Green’s skelet trauma child, 5th edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  29. Nathan ST, Lykissas MG, Wall EJ (2013) Growth stimulation following an all-epiphyseal anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in a child. JBJS Case Connect 3:e14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Nawabi DH, Jones KJ, Lurie B, Potter HG, Green DW, Cordasco FA (2014) All-inside, physeal-sparing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction does not significantly compromise the physis in skeletally immature athletes. Am J Sports Med 42:2933–2940

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Nguyen CV, Greene JD, Cooperman DR, Liu RW (2015) A radiographic study of the distal femoral epiphysis. J Child Orthop 9:235–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Patel NM, DeFrancesco CJ, Talathi NS, Bram JT, Ganley TJ (2019) All-epiphyseal anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction does not increase the risk of complications compared with pediatric transphyseal reconstruction. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 27:e752–e757

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Pennock AT, Chambers HG, Turk RD, Parvanta KM, Dennis MM, Edmonds EW (2018) Use of a modified all-epiphyseal technique for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the skeletally immature patient. Orthop J Sport Med 6:232596711878176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Pierce TP, Issa K, Festa A, Scillia AJ, McInerney VK (2017) Pediatric anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review of transphyseal versus physeal-sparing techniques. Am J Sports Med 45:488–494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Roberti di Sarsina T, Macchiarola L, Signorelli C, Grassi A, Raggi F, Marcheggiani Muccioli GM, Zaffagnini S (2019) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with an all-epiphyseal “over-the-top” technique is safe and shows low rate of failure in skeletally immature athletes. Knee Surg Sport Traumatol Arthrosc 27:498–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Schnetzke M, Fuchs J, Vetter SY, Beisemann N, Keil H, Grützner P-A, Franke J (2016) Intraoperative 3D imaging in the treatment of elbow fractures—a retrospective analysis of indications, intraoperative revision rates, and implications in 36 cases. BMC Med Imaging 16:24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Shifflett GD, Green DW, Widmann RF, Marx RG (2016) Growth arrest following ACL reconstruction with hamstring autograft in skeletally immature patients: a review of 4 cases. J Pediatr Orthop 36:355–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Thorolfsson B, Svantesson E, Snaebjornsson T, Sansone M, Karlsson J, Samuelsson K, Senorski EH (2021) Adolescents have twice the revision rate of young adults after ACL reconstruction with hamstring tendon autograft: a study from the Swedish national knee ligament registry. Orthop J Sport Med 9:232596712110388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Wall EJ, Ghattas PJ, Eismann EA, Myer GD, Carr P (2017) Outcomes and complications after all-epiphyseal anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in skeletally immature patients. Orthop J Sport Med 5:232596711769360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Wong SE, Feeley BT, Pandya NK (2019) Comparing outcomes between the over-the-top and all-epiphyseal techniques for physeal-sparing ACL reconstruction: a narrative review. Orthop J Sport Med 7:232596711983368

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

There is no funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY, 10021, USA

    Alexandra H. Aitchison, Sofia Hidalgo Perea & Daniel W. Green

  2. Sports Medicine Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA

    Frank A. Cordasco

Authors
  1. Alexandra H. Aitchison
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sofia Hidalgo Perea
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Frank A. Cordasco
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Daniel W. Green
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel W. Green.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

AHA and SHP have no conflicts of interest to disclose. FAC is a consultant and receives royalties from Arthrex Inc. DWG is a consultant for Arthrex Inc and receives royalties for Arthrex Inc and Pega Medical.

Ethical approval

This study was approved by the HSS IRB (Study # 2015-366).

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aitchison, A.H., Perea, S.H., Cordasco, F.A. et al. Improved epiphyseal socket placement with intraoperative 3D fluoroscopy: a consecutive series of pediatric all-epiphyseal anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 30, 1858–1864 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-021-06809-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-021-06809-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation