Abstract
Purpose
Excessive internal and external rotation of the femoral component has been associated with poor outcome with a measured-resection neutral mechanical alignment TKA. This technique assumes that every tibia is in 3° of varus so the femoral component is placed in 3° of external rotation relative to the posterior condylar axis to enable a balanced flexion gap. This is not the case as there is wide variability in the bony anatomy and soft tissue envelope of the knee so flexion imbalance may occur. A patient-specific alignment navigated balanced TKA technique was performed whereby the tibia is cut anatomically up to 3° of varus, then a ligament tensor is used to determine the optimal femoral component position for a balanced TKA. This results in variable femoral rotation. The hypothesis is that matching the femoral component rotation to the patient’s anatomic tibial cut and soft tissue envelope will not affect clinical outcome
Methods
In a single surgeon series 287 consecutive varus aligned TKA’s were performed using this technique with an Attune cruciate retaining fixed bearing TKA with an anatomic patella resurfacing. The angle between the posterior femoral cuts and the posterior condylar axis was collected using Brainlab software. Functional scores were collected prospectively preoperatively and at two years. The variable femoral component rotation was correlated with and compared with the functional outcome scores.
Results
The femoral rotation varied from 7° of internal rotation to 8°of external rotation relative to the posterior condylar axis. The mean rotation was 1.1° of external rotation. There was no significant difference in the Oxford score, WOMAC score, Forgotten Knee Score, KOOS Joint Replacement score or Patient Satisfaction in respect to the variable femoral rotation relative to the posterior condylar axis.
Conclusion
When a more anatomic-balanced TKA technique is used variable femoral rotation will not affect clinical outcome at two years
Level of evidence
II Prospective Cohort Study.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Akagi M, Matsusue Y, Mata T, Asada Y, Horiguchi M, Iida H et al (1999) Effect of rotational alignment on patellar tracking in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 366:155–163
Almaawi AM, Hutt JRB, Masse V, Lavigne M, Vendittoli PA (2017) The impact of mechanical and restricted kinematic alignment on knee anatomy in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 32:2133–2140
An VVG, Twiggs J, Leie M, Fritsch BA (2019) Kinematic alignment is bone and soft tissue preserving compared to mechanical alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Knee. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2019.01.002
Baldini A, Indelli PF, Del L, Mariani PC, Marcucci M (2013) Rotational alignment of the tibial component in total knee arthroplasty: the anterior tibial cortex is a reliable landmark. Joints 1:155–160
Barrack RL, Schrader T, Bertot AJ, Wolfe MW, Myers L (2001) Component rotation and anterior knee pain after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 392:46–55
Becker R, Baker K, Hommel H, Bernard M, Kopf S (2019) No correlation between rotation of femoral components in the transverse plane and clinical outcome after total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 27:1456–1462
Berger RA, Crossett LS, Jacobs JJ, Rubash HE (1998) Malrotation causing patellofemoral complications after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 356:144–153
Cassard X, Garnault V, Corin B, Claverie D, Murgier J (2018) Outpatient total knee arthroplasty: readmission and complication rates on day 30 in 61 patients. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 104:967–970
Clatworthy M (2019) Patient specific alignment navigated balanced TKA with Brainlab3, Technique guide
Corona K, Cerciello S, Vasso M, Toro G, Braile A, Arnold MP et al (2020) Femoral component malrotation is not correlated with poor clinical outcomes after total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-020-05880-2
Daines BK, Dennis DA (2014) Gap balancing vs. measured resection technique in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Surg 6:1–8
Devitt BM, Murgier J (2018) Managing expectations: the bigger they are, the harder they fall: commentary on an article by Danielle Y. Ponzio, MD, et al.: An analysis of the influence of physical activity level on total knee arthroplasty expectations, satisfaction, and outcomes. Increased revision in active patients at five to ten years. J Bone Joint Surg Am 100:123
Gunaratne R, Pratt DN, Banda J, Fick DP, Khan RJK, Robertson BW (2017) Patient dissatisfaction following total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review of the literature. J Arthroplasty 32:3854–3860
Heesterbeek PJ, Jacobs WC, Wymenga AB (2009) Effects of the balanced gap technique on femoral component rotation in TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467:1015–1022
Hess S, Moser LB, Amsler F, Behrend H, Hirschmann MT (2019) Highly variable coronal tibial and femoral alignment in osteoarthritic knees: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 27:1368–1377
Heyse TJ, El-Zayat BF, De Corte R, Chevalier Y, Fuchs-Winkelmann S, Labey L (2018) Internal femoral component malrotation in TKA significantly alters tibiofemoral kinematics. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 26:1767–1775
Hirschmann MT, Hess S, Behrend H, Amsler F, Leclercq V, Moser LB (2019) Phenotyping of hip-knee-ankle angle in young non-osteoarthritic knees provides better understanding of native alignment variability. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 27:1378–1384
Hirschmann MT, Moser LB, Amsler F, Behrend H, Leclercq V, Hess S (2019) Phenotyping the knee in young non-osteoarthritic knees shows a wide distribution of femoral and tibial coronal alignment. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 27:1385–1393
Hirschmann MT, Moser LB, Amsler F, Behrend H, Leclerq V, Hess S (2019) Functional knee phenotypes: a novel classification for phenotyping the coronal lower limb alignment based on the native alignment in young non-osteoarthritic patients. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 27:1394–1402
Howell SM (2019) Calipered kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty: an accurate technique that improves patient outcomes and implant survival. Orthopedics 42:126–135
Insall J, Ranawat CS, Scott WN, Walker P (1976) Total condylar knee replacement: preliminary report. Clin Orthop Relat Res 120:149–154
Kawahara S, Okazaki K, Matsuda S, Nakahara H, Okamoto S, Iwamoto Y (2014) Internal rotation of femoral component affects functional activities after TKA–survey with the 2011 Knee Society Score. J Arthroplasty 29:2319–2323
Krackow KA, Mihalko WM (1999) The effect of medial release on flexion and extension gaps in cadaveric knees: implications for soft-tissue balancing in total knee arthroplasty. Am J Knee Surg 12:222–228
Lee SY, Lim HC, Jang KM, Bae JH (2017) What factors are associated with femoral component internal rotation in TKA using the gap balancing technique? Clin Orthop Relat Res 475:1999–2010
Manning WA, Ghosh KM, Blain A, Longstaff L, Rushton SP, Deehan DJ (2018) Internal femoral component rotation adversely influences load transfer in total knee arthroplasty: a cadaveric navigated study using the Verasense device. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 26:1577–1585
Moser LB, Hess S, Amsler F, Behrend H, Hirschmann MT (2019) Native non-osteoarthritic knees have a highly variable coronal alignment: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 27:1359–1367
Murgier J, Chantalat E, Li K, Chiron P, Telmon N, Huang W et al (2018) Distal femoral torsion: differences between Caucasians and Asians. A multicentre computed tomography study of 515 distal femurs. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 104:997–1001
Nam D, Nunley RM, Barrack RL (2014) Patient dissatisfaction following total knee replacement: a growing concern? Bone Joint J-B 96:96–100
Nedopil AJ, Howell SM, Hull ML (2016) Does malrotation of the tibial and femoral components compromise function in kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty? Orthop Clin North Am 47:41–50
Oh SM, Bin SI, Kim JY, Lee BS, Kim JM (2019) Impact of preoperative varus deformity on postoperative mechanical alignment and long-term results of “mechanical” aligned total knee arthroplasty. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 105:1061–1066
Riviere C, Dhaif F, Shah H, Ali A, Auvinet E, Aframian A et al (2018) Kinematic alignment of current TKA implants does not restore the native trochlear anatomy. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 104:983–995
Scott CE, Howie CR, MacDonald D, Biant LC (2010) Predicting dissatisfaction following total knee replacement: a prospective study of 1217 patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92:1253–1258
Thielemann FW, Konstantinids L, Herget GW, Knothe D, Helwig P, Sudkamp NP et al (2016) Effect of rotational component alignment on clinical outcome 5 to 7 years after TKA with the Columbus knee system. Orthopedics 39:S50–55
Funding
No funding was received for this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Mark Clatworthy is consultant for Depuy. Jérôme Murgier declares no conflict of interest in relation to this article.
Ethical approval
The study was approved by the New Zealand Ethics Committee.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Murgier, J., Clatworthy, M. Variable rotation of the femur does not affect outcome with patient specific alignment navigated balanced TKA. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 30, 517–526 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-020-06226-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-020-06226-8