Skip to main content
Log in

The contribution of intraoperative medial compartment stability to post-operative knee flexion angle in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

  • Knee
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Purpose

Given the knee kinematics and soft tissue balance in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA), it was hypothesised that intraoperative medial compartment stability will result in good functional outcome. The purpose of this study was to test the influence of soft tissue balance on post-operative knee flexion in UKA.

Methods

The influence of soft tissue balance on post-operative knee flexion in UKA was first examined retrospectively by using a newly developed tensor device in 30 consecutive patients diagnosed with either isolated medial compartmental osteoarthritis or idiopathic necrosis. The intraoperative component gap of the medial compartment was measured by using the tensor while applying a 20-lb joint distraction force at 0°, 10°, 30°, 45°, 60°, 90°, 120°, and 135° of knee flexion, with calculation of the joint looseness. Correlations between the soft tissue parameters and post-operative knee flexion angles were analysed 1 year after surgery.

Results

The post-operative knee flexion angle was negatively correlated with the component gap at 45°, 60°, and 90° of flexion (R = −0.41, P < 0.05; R = −0.44, P < 0.05; and R = −0.44, P < 0.05, respectively). Furthermore, the post-operative knee flexion angle was negatively correlated with joint looseness at 45°, 60°, and 90° of flexion (R = −0.40, P < 0.05; R = −0.41, P < 0.05; and R = −0.36, P < 0.05, respectively).

Conclusions

The intraoperative medial compartment stability of knee flexion in midrange resulted in increasing post-operative knee flexion angle in UKA. Medial soft tissue release should be minimised, and assessment of soft tissue balance using a tensor can be performed to predict the post-operative knee flexion angle during surgery for UKA.

Level of evidence

III.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Collier MB, Eickmann TH, Sukezaki F, McAuley JP, Engh GA (2006) Patient, implant, and alignment factors associated with revision of medial compartment unicondylar arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 21:108–115

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Dennis DA, Mahfouz MR, Komistek RD, Hoff W (2005) In vivo determination of normal and anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee kinematics. J Biomech 38:241–253

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Emerson RH Jr, Head WC, Peters PC Jr (1992) Soft-tissue balance and alignment in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 74:807–810

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, Lang AG (2009) Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav Res Methods 41:1149–1160

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hernigou P, Deschamps G (2004) Alignment influences wear in the knee after medial unicompartmental arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 423:161–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kanekasu K, Banks SA, Honjo S, Nakata O, Kato H (2004) Fluoroscopic analysis of knee arthroplasty kinematics during deep flexion kneeling. J Arthroplasty 19:998–1003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Matsuda S, Kawahara S, Okazaki K, Tashiro Y, Iwamoto Y (2013) Postoperative alignment and ROM affect patient satisfaction after TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471:127–133

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Matsumoto T, Kuroda R, Kubo S, Muratsu H, Mizuno K, Kurosaka M (2009) The intra-operative joint gap in cruciate-retaining compared with posterior-stabilised total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 91:475–480

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Matsumoto T, Muratsu H, Kubo S, Kuroda R, Kurosaka M (2013) Intra-operative joint gap kinematics in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 28:29–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Matsumoto T, Muratsu H, Tsumura N, Mizuno K, Kuroda R, Yoshiya S, Kurosaka M (2006) Joint gap kinematics in posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty measured by a new tensor with the navigation system. J Biomech Eng 128:867–871

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Matsuzaki T, Matsumoto T, Kubo S, Muratsu H, Matsushita T, Kawakami Y, Ishida K, Oka S, Kuroda R, Kurosaka M (2014) Tibial internal rotation is affected by lateral laxity in cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty: an intraoperative kinematic study using a navigation system and offset-type tensor. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22:615–620

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Mochizuki T, Sato T, Tanifuji O, Kobayashi K, Koga Y, Yamagiwa H, Omori G, Endo N (2013) In vivo pre- and postoperative three-dimensional knee kinematics in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Sci 18:54–60

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Muratsu H, Matsumoto T, Kubo S, Maruo A, Miya H, Kurosaka M, Kuroda R (2010) Femoral component placement changes soft tissue balance in posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 25:926–930

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Nakamura E, Banks SA, Tanaka A, Sei A, Mizuta H (2009) Three-dimensional tibiofemoral kinematics during deep flexion kneeling in a mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 24:1120–1124

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Patil S, Colwell CW Jr, Ezzet KA, D’Lima DD (2005) Can normal knee kinematics be restored with unicompartmental knee replacement? J Bone Joint Surg Am 87:332–338

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Takayama K, Matsumoto T, Muratsu H, Ishida K, Shibanuma N, Araki D, Matsushita T, Kuroda R, Kurosaka M (2014) The tibia first technique with tensor measurement is useful to predict the soft tissue tension after implantation in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop. doi:10.1007/s00264-014-2531-7

    Google Scholar 

  17. Utzschneider S, Goettinger M, Weber P, Horng A, Glaser C, Jansson V, Muller PE (2011) Development and validation of a new method for the radiologic measurement of the tibial slope. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19:1643–1648

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Vince KG, Cyran LT (2004) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: new indications, more complications? J Arthroplasty 19:9–16

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Von Keudell A, Sodha S, Collins J, Minas T, Fitz W, Gomoll AH (2014) Patient satisfaction after primary total and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: an age-dependent analysis. Knee 21:180–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Weber P, Schroder C, Laubender RP, Baur-Melnyk A, von Schulze Pellengahr C, Jansson V, Muller PE (2013) Joint line reconstruction in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: development and validation of a measurement method. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21:2468–2473

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Whiteside LA (2005) Making your next unicompartmental knee arthroplasty last: three keys to success. J Arthroplasty 20:2–3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tomoyuki Matsumoto.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Matsuzaki, T., Matsumoto, T., Muratsu, H. et al. The contribution of intraoperative medial compartment stability to post-operative knee flexion angle in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 25, 272–276 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-014-3493-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-014-3493-4

Keywords

Navigation