Skip to main content
Log in

Medial femoral head border is a reliable and reproducible reference for axis determination for femoral component of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Purpose

The femoral component should be implanted parallel to the mechanical axis in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. It was hypothesised that a line between medial femoral condyle centres and medial border of femoral head will be parallel to the mechanical axis; this study set out to examine this hypothesis.

Methods

One hundred X-rays in fifty patients were included for this study. Long-leg standing X-rays including hip and ankle with patellae facing forwards were obtained. On these films, we measured the angle, α, between mechanical axis and the line between the femoral head centre and knee centre (medial mechanical axis), and the angle, β, between the medial mechanical axis and a line between medial femoral condyle and femoral head centre.

Results

The average value of α was 0.1 ± 0.5° and the average value of β 3.0° ± 0.3°. These data indicate that mechanical axis and medial mechanical axis are virtually parallel to each other.

Conclusion

As medial femoral head border is easily identified fluoroscopically, it is a reliable landmark for orientating the femoral component of medial UKA.

Level of evidence

Case series with no comparison group, Level IV.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  1. Bonner TJ, Eardley WGP, Patterson P, Gregg PJ (2011) The effect of post-operative mechanical axis alignment on the survival of primary total knee replacements after a follow-up of 15 years. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93:1217–1222

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bonutti PM, Dethmers D, Ulrich SD, Seyler TM, Mont MA (2008) Computer navigation assisted versus minimally invasive TKA: benefits and drawbacks. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466:2756–2762

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Carr A, Keyes G, Miller R, O’Connor J, Goodfellow J (1993) Medial unicompartmental arthroplasty. A survival study of the Oxford meniscal knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res 295:205–213

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Choong PF, Dowsey MM, Stoney JD (2009) Does accurate anatomical alignment result in better function and quality of life? A prospective randomized controlled trial comparing conventional and computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 24:560–569

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gulati A, Chau R, Simpson DJ, Dodd CA, Gill HS, Murray DW (2009) Influence of component alignment on outcome for unicompartmental knee replacement. Knee 16:196–199

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Gulati A, Chau R, Pandit HG, Gray H, Price AJ, Dodd CA, Murray DW (2009) The incidence of physiological radiolucency following Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement and its relationship to outcome. J Bone Joint Surg Br 91:896–902

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Jenny JY, Boeri C (2002) Accuracy of implantation of a unicompartmental total knee arthroplasty with 2 different instrumentations: a case-controlled comparative study. J Arthroplasty 17:1016–1020

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kennedy WR, White RP (1987) Unicompartmental arthroplasty of the knee. Postoperative alignment and its influence on overall results. Clin Orthop Relat Res 221:278–285

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kort NP, van Raay JJAM, Thomassen BJW (2007) Alignment of the femoral component in a mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a study in 10 cadaver femora. Int Orthop 31:315–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Longstaff LM, Sloan K, Stamp N, Scaddan M, Beaver R (2009) Good alignment after total knee arthroplasty leads to faster rehabilitation and better function. J Arthroplasty 24:570–578

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Moreland JR, Bassett LW, Hanker GJ (1987) Radiographic analysis of the axial alignment of the lower extremity. J Bone Joint Surg Am 69:745–749

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Sikorski JM (2008) Alignment in total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 90:1121–1127

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Whiteside LA, McCarthy DS (1992) Laboratory evaluation of alignment and kinematics in a unicompartmental knee arthroplasty inserted with intramedullary instrumentation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 274:238–247

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. Hiranaka.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hiranaka, T., Pandit, H., Gill, H.S. et al. Medial femoral head border is a reliable and reproducible reference for axis determination for femoral component of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21, 2442–2446 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-012-2227-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-012-2227-8

Keywords

Navigation